Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)

Among the most important rationales to drill the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole was the necessity to calibrate geophysical methods. Deep and hitherto inaccessible seismic reflectors, high‐conductivity layers, and temperature belong to this group of deep crustal properties wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research 2000-09, Vol.105 (B9), p.21319-21331
Hauptverfasser: Stoll, Johannes B., Haak, Volker, Spitzer, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21331
container_issue B9
container_start_page 21319
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 105
creator Stoll, Johannes B.
Haak, Volker
Spitzer, Klaus
description Among the most important rationales to drill the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole was the necessity to calibrate geophysical methods. Deep and hitherto inaccessible seismic reflectors, high‐conductivity layers, and temperature belong to this group of deep crustal properties which can be predicted from surface measurements, but whose depth and nature are a matter of dispute. One problem is the unknown influence of inhomogeneous superficial layers on the determination and resolution of the model parameters. In the case of electrical resistivity a number of presite experiments had detected a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent at a mean depth of ∼10 km. Distorting superficial layers were expected to cause severe ambiguity in the interpretation of the specific properties of this layer, even feigning its existence at all. The drilling yielded direct evidence of high‐conductivity material within the range of 8 km depth. After completion of the KTB a large‐scale dipole‐dipole experiment was carried out using a vertical electric receiver dipole with one of the electrodes in the main drill hole at 9065 m depth and a second in the earlier drill hole at 4000 m depth. The idea was to find out whether the buried electrode was close to a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent. The surprising result was that the two apparent resistivity curves measured with the transmitter spread perpendicular and parallel to the NNW striking very highly conductive fracture zones are almost overlapping, even though these fracture zones are the cause of a strong structural anisotropy of the apparent resistivity measured with magnetotellurics. Such a strong anisotropy should also show up in the buried electrode experiment except when a high‐conductivity layer close but above the buried electrode at 9000 m depth is introduced in the model, As a result, the interpretation of this experiment suggests a NE dipping electrically conductive fault system soling out into a high‐conductivity horizontal layer at 7–8 km depth. The conductivity is increased due to graphite and high‐salinity fluids, in a depth near the fossil Cretaceous brittle‐ductile transition zone for quartz‐rich rocks.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2000JB900145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27556360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27556360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3756-ffee544fc37afab235b030e13530df3e6ab100165d3ab83a867e95c1640b42ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qlRql3PgBPiBEJRbGn7s5NgFSIECUBiFOlnczS906u4u9EfDvaxRUeurJ8uh5Xs28hOwyOGLAR8ccAC7GIwAm1Qcy4EzpjHPgH8kgjYoMOM8_k50YfyUQpNIS2IDcn3qs-uAq6-mq3ZQes5XrWo8UnzsMbo1NT11D-59IpxjWtqGTtuldk-ZJOUHs6Elw3rvmgc5D-xDsmh5cLsdfv5BPtfURd97eIbk9O11Ovmezm-n55Nssq0SeVqxrRCVlnX62tiUXqgQByIQSsKoFaluydJNWK2HLQthC5zhSFUvrl5JXKIZkf5vbhfZxg7E3axcr9N422G6i4blSWmhI4OEWrEIbY8DadOk-G14MA_Naofm3woTvveXamNqpg20qF98dOQJW5AkTW-zJeXz5b6S5mC7GjAupk5VtLRd7fP5r2fDb6Dz1Yu6up0YVVz_k5Xxh5uIPMcaM6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27556360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stoll, Johannes B. ; Haak, Volker ; Spitzer, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Johannes B. ; Haak, Volker ; Spitzer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Among the most important rationales to drill the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole was the necessity to calibrate geophysical methods. Deep and hitherto inaccessible seismic reflectors, high‐conductivity layers, and temperature belong to this group of deep crustal properties which can be predicted from surface measurements, but whose depth and nature are a matter of dispute. One problem is the unknown influence of inhomogeneous superficial layers on the determination and resolution of the model parameters. In the case of electrical resistivity a number of presite experiments had detected a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent at a mean depth of ∼10 km. Distorting superficial layers were expected to cause severe ambiguity in the interpretation of the specific properties of this layer, even feigning its existence at all. The drilling yielded direct evidence of high‐conductivity material within the range of 8 km depth. After completion of the KTB a large‐scale dipole‐dipole experiment was carried out using a vertical electric receiver dipole with one of the electrodes in the main drill hole at 9065 m depth and a second in the earlier drill hole at 4000 m depth. The idea was to find out whether the buried electrode was close to a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent. The surprising result was that the two apparent resistivity curves measured with the transmitter spread perpendicular and parallel to the NNW striking very highly conductive fracture zones are almost overlapping, even though these fracture zones are the cause of a strong structural anisotropy of the apparent resistivity measured with magnetotellurics. Such a strong anisotropy should also show up in the buried electrode experiment except when a high‐conductivity layer close but above the buried electrode at 9000 m depth is introduced in the model, As a result, the interpretation of this experiment suggests a NE dipping electrically conductive fault system soling out into a high‐conductivity horizontal layer at 7–8 km depth. The conductivity is increased due to graphite and high‐salinity fluids, in a depth near the fossil Cretaceous brittle‐ductile transition zone for quartz‐rich rocks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000JB900145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geophysics: general, magnetic, electric and thermic methods and properties ; Internal geophysics ; Stratigraphy</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000-09, Vol.105 (B9), p.21319-21331</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3756-ffee544fc37afab235b030e13530df3e6ab100165d3ab83a867e95c1640b42ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3756-ffee544fc37afab235b030e13530df3e6ab100165d3ab83a867e95c1640b42ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000JB900145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000JB900145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,1430,11497,27907,27908,45557,45558,46392,46451,46816,46875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1490187$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Johannes B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haak, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Among the most important rationales to drill the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole was the necessity to calibrate geophysical methods. Deep and hitherto inaccessible seismic reflectors, high‐conductivity layers, and temperature belong to this group of deep crustal properties which can be predicted from surface measurements, but whose depth and nature are a matter of dispute. One problem is the unknown influence of inhomogeneous superficial layers on the determination and resolution of the model parameters. In the case of electrical resistivity a number of presite experiments had detected a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent at a mean depth of ∼10 km. Distorting superficial layers were expected to cause severe ambiguity in the interpretation of the specific properties of this layer, even feigning its existence at all. The drilling yielded direct evidence of high‐conductivity material within the range of 8 km depth. After completion of the KTB a large‐scale dipole‐dipole experiment was carried out using a vertical electric receiver dipole with one of the electrodes in the main drill hole at 9065 m depth and a second in the earlier drill hole at 4000 m depth. The idea was to find out whether the buried electrode was close to a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent. The surprising result was that the two apparent resistivity curves measured with the transmitter spread perpendicular and parallel to the NNW striking very highly conductive fracture zones are almost overlapping, even though these fracture zones are the cause of a strong structural anisotropy of the apparent resistivity measured with magnetotellurics. Such a strong anisotropy should also show up in the buried electrode experiment except when a high‐conductivity layer close but above the buried electrode at 9000 m depth is introduced in the model, As a result, the interpretation of this experiment suggests a NE dipping electrically conductive fault system soling out into a high‐conductivity horizontal layer at 7–8 km depth. The conductivity is increased due to graphite and high‐salinity fluids, in a depth near the fossil Cretaceous brittle‐ductile transition zone for quartz‐rich rocks.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geophysics: general, magnetic, electric and thermic methods and properties</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qlRql3PgBPiBEJRbGn7s5NgFSIECUBiFOlnczS906u4u9EfDvaxRUeurJ8uh5Xs28hOwyOGLAR8ccAC7GIwAm1Qcy4EzpjHPgH8kgjYoMOM8_k50YfyUQpNIS2IDcn3qs-uAq6-mq3ZQes5XrWo8UnzsMbo1NT11D-59IpxjWtqGTtuldk-ZJOUHs6Elw3rvmgc5D-xDsmh5cLsdfv5BPtfURd97eIbk9O11Ovmezm-n55Nssq0SeVqxrRCVlnX62tiUXqgQByIQSsKoFaluydJNWK2HLQthC5zhSFUvrl5JXKIZkf5vbhfZxg7E3axcr9N422G6i4blSWmhI4OEWrEIbY8DadOk-G14MA_Naofm3woTvveXamNqpg20qF98dOQJW5AkTW-zJeXz5b6S5mC7GjAupk5VtLRd7fP5r2fDb6Dz1Yu6up0YVVz_k5Xxh5uIPMcaM6Q</recordid><startdate>20000910</startdate><enddate>20000910</enddate><creator>Stoll, Johannes B.</creator><creator>Haak, Volker</creator><creator>Spitzer, Klaus</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000910</creationdate><title>Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)</title><author>Stoll, Johannes B. ; Haak, Volker ; Spitzer, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3756-ffee544fc37afab235b030e13530df3e6ab100165d3ab83a867e95c1640b42ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geophysics: general, magnetic, electric and thermic methods and properties</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Johannes B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haak, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoll, Johannes B.</au><au>Haak, Volker</au><au>Spitzer, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2000-09-10</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>B9</issue><spage>21319</spage><epage>21331</epage><pages>21319-21331</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Among the most important rationales to drill the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole was the necessity to calibrate geophysical methods. Deep and hitherto inaccessible seismic reflectors, high‐conductivity layers, and temperature belong to this group of deep crustal properties which can be predicted from surface measurements, but whose depth and nature are a matter of dispute. One problem is the unknown influence of inhomogeneous superficial layers on the determination and resolution of the model parameters. In the case of electrical resistivity a number of presite experiments had detected a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent at a mean depth of ∼10 km. Distorting superficial layers were expected to cause severe ambiguity in the interpretation of the specific properties of this layer, even feigning its existence at all. The drilling yielded direct evidence of high‐conductivity material within the range of 8 km depth. After completion of the KTB a large‐scale dipole‐dipole experiment was carried out using a vertical electric receiver dipole with one of the electrodes in the main drill hole at 9065 m depth and a second in the earlier drill hole at 4000 m depth. The idea was to find out whether the buried electrode was close to a high‐conductivity layer of regional extent. The surprising result was that the two apparent resistivity curves measured with the transmitter spread perpendicular and parallel to the NNW striking very highly conductive fracture zones are almost overlapping, even though these fracture zones are the cause of a strong structural anisotropy of the apparent resistivity measured with magnetotellurics. Such a strong anisotropy should also show up in the buried electrode experiment except when a high‐conductivity layer close but above the buried electrode at 9000 m depth is introduced in the model, As a result, the interpretation of this experiment suggests a NE dipping electrically conductive fault system soling out into a high‐conductivity horizontal layer at 7–8 km depth. The conductivity is increased due to graphite and high‐salinity fluids, in a depth near the fossil Cretaceous brittle‐ductile transition zone for quartz‐rich rocks.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000JB900145</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000-09, Vol.105 (B9), p.21319-21331
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27556360
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Geophysics: general, magnetic, electric and thermic methods and properties
Internal geophysics
Stratigraphy
title Electrical double-dipole experiment in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A23%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrical%20double-dipole%20experiment%20in%20the%20German%20Continental%20Deep%20Drilling%20Program%20(KTB)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.au=Stoll,%20Johannes%20B.&rft.date=2000-09-10&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=B9&rft.spage=21319&rft.epage=21331&rft.pages=21319-21331&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000JB900145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27556360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27556360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true