Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment
YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.155-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | McLean, Stewart Cook, Neil Rovira-Wilde, Alexander Patel, Shanon Kanagasingam, Shalini |
description | YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatment on YouTube.
YouTube was searched using a combination of keywords relating to endodontic complications to replicate goal-orientated browsing. Video quality was assessed using a modified DISCERN score and global quality score by 2 authors independently. Manifest quantitative content analysis was used to capture information about the video and extent of interactions. The 10 most viewed videos were further analyzed in terms of the messaging and format of the videos.
The mean overall quality of the videos was relatively low (2.20). Videos produced by regulatory bodies had the highest mean score (3.00) and the shortest mean length (2 minutes 23 seconds) but had the fewest views and interactions. The poorest quality videos (mean 1.5) were produced by nonclinicians and news/media, which tended to be longer (mean 8 minutes 49 seconds) and received more engagement. Across all videos, information related to patient decision making tended to be poorly presented.
The dental community, particularly institutions and organizations, need to strategically create engaging videos to redress patients’ concerns about root canal treatment. This can counterbalance the existing misleading information and improve access to evidence-based content, which will ultimately affect patient decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239922006148</els_id><sourcerecordid>2755576082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8bc06129cf0673c51ed315467a49e02c2a93361ebed0379176bf1824ad6ba8363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpSDbbvEAPQcde7I4kW7Kgl7JskoVAQ7KB5CRkedx6Y1tbyQ707aNl0x57Gmb4_h_mI-Qzg5wBk193-c7jmHPgPAedA4gPZMEqVWWiLIuPZAGgdcaF1mfkPMYdAFNCqFNyJmTJJQO5IE_rV9vPdurGn_TZz9u5RmojtfQu3XCc6GZsfRjS4kf64OfgkKYDnX4hve_iS6S-pffeT3RlR9vTbUA7DSn4iZy0to948T6X5PFqvV3dZLc_rjer77eZKwCmrKodSMa1a0Eq4UqGjWBlIZUtNAJ33GohJMMaGxBKMyXrllW8sI2sbSWkWJIvx9598L9njJMZuuiw7-2Ifo6Gq7IslYSKJ5QfURd8jAFbsw_dYMMfw8AcjJqdORg1B6MGtElGU-jyvX-uB2z-Rf4qTMC3I4Dpy9cOg4kumXPYdAHdZBrf_a__DekHhko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755576082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>McLean, Stewart ; Cook, Neil ; Rovira-Wilde, Alexander ; Patel, Shanon ; Kanagasingam, Shalini</creator><creatorcontrib>McLean, Stewart ; Cook, Neil ; Rovira-Wilde, Alexander ; Patel, Shanon ; Kanagasingam, Shalini</creatorcontrib><description>YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatment on YouTube.
YouTube was searched using a combination of keywords relating to endodontic complications to replicate goal-orientated browsing. Video quality was assessed using a modified DISCERN score and global quality score by 2 authors independently. Manifest quantitative content analysis was used to capture information about the video and extent of interactions. The 10 most viewed videos were further analyzed in terms of the messaging and format of the videos.
The mean overall quality of the videos was relatively low (2.20). Videos produced by regulatory bodies had the highest mean score (3.00) and the shortest mean length (2 minutes 23 seconds) but had the fewest views and interactions. The poorest quality videos (mean 1.5) were produced by nonclinicians and news/media, which tended to be longer (mean 8 minutes 49 seconds) and received more engagement. Across all videos, information related to patient decision making tended to be poorly presented.
The dental community, particularly institutions and organizations, need to strategically create engaging videos to redress patients’ concerns about root canal treatment. This can counterbalance the existing misleading information and improve access to evidence-based content, which will ultimately affect patient decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36526106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity ; Disadvantages ; endodontics ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Information Sources ; patient information ; Reproducibility of Results ; risks ; root canal ; Root Canal Therapy ; Social Media ; YouTube</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.155-161</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8bc06129cf0673c51ed315467a49e02c2a93361ebed0379176bf1824ad6ba8363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8bc06129cf0673c51ed315467a49e02c2a93361ebed0379176bf1824ad6ba8363</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1370-8668 ; 0000-0001-6274-5188</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLean, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovira-Wilde, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Shanon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanagasingam, Shalini</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatment on YouTube.
YouTube was searched using a combination of keywords relating to endodontic complications to replicate goal-orientated browsing. Video quality was assessed using a modified DISCERN score and global quality score by 2 authors independently. Manifest quantitative content analysis was used to capture information about the video and extent of interactions. The 10 most viewed videos were further analyzed in terms of the messaging and format of the videos.
The mean overall quality of the videos was relatively low (2.20). Videos produced by regulatory bodies had the highest mean score (3.00) and the shortest mean length (2 minutes 23 seconds) but had the fewest views and interactions. The poorest quality videos (mean 1.5) were produced by nonclinicians and news/media, which tended to be longer (mean 8 minutes 49 seconds) and received more engagement. Across all videos, information related to patient decision making tended to be poorly presented.
The dental community, particularly institutions and organizations, need to strategically create engaging videos to redress patients’ concerns about root canal treatment. This can counterbalance the existing misleading information and improve access to evidence-based content, which will ultimately affect patient decision making.</description><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity</subject><subject>Disadvantages</subject><subject>endodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>patient information</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>risks</subject><subject>root canal</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>YouTube</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpSDbbvEAPQcde7I4kW7Kgl7JskoVAQ7KB5CRkedx6Y1tbyQ707aNl0x57Gmb4_h_mI-Qzg5wBk193-c7jmHPgPAedA4gPZMEqVWWiLIuPZAGgdcaF1mfkPMYdAFNCqFNyJmTJJQO5IE_rV9vPdurGn_TZz9u5RmojtfQu3XCc6GZsfRjS4kf64OfgkKYDnX4hve_iS6S-pffeT3RlR9vTbUA7DSn4iZy0to948T6X5PFqvV3dZLc_rjer77eZKwCmrKodSMa1a0Eq4UqGjWBlIZUtNAJ33GohJMMaGxBKMyXrllW8sI2sbSWkWJIvx9598L9njJMZuuiw7-2Ifo6Gq7IslYSKJ5QfURd8jAFbsw_dYMMfw8AcjJqdORg1B6MGtElGU-jyvX-uB2z-Rf4qTMC3I4Dpy9cOg4kumXPYdAHdZBrf_a__DekHhko</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>McLean, Stewart</creator><creator>Cook, Neil</creator><creator>Rovira-Wilde, Alexander</creator><creator>Patel, Shanon</creator><creator>Kanagasingam, Shalini</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-5188</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment</title><author>McLean, Stewart ; Cook, Neil ; Rovira-Wilde, Alexander ; Patel, Shanon ; Kanagasingam, Shalini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8bc06129cf0673c51ed315467a49e02c2a93361ebed0379176bf1824ad6ba8363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity</topic><topic>Disadvantages</topic><topic>endodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>patient information</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>risks</topic><topic>root canal</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>YouTube</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLean, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovira-Wilde, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Shanon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanagasingam, Shalini</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLean, Stewart</au><au>Cook, Neil</au><au>Rovira-Wilde, Alexander</au><au>Patel, Shanon</au><au>Kanagasingam, Shalini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>155-161</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatment on YouTube.
YouTube was searched using a combination of keywords relating to endodontic complications to replicate goal-orientated browsing. Video quality was assessed using a modified DISCERN score and global quality score by 2 authors independently. Manifest quantitative content analysis was used to capture information about the video and extent of interactions. The 10 most viewed videos were further analyzed in terms of the messaging and format of the videos.
The mean overall quality of the videos was relatively low (2.20). Videos produced by regulatory bodies had the highest mean score (3.00) and the shortest mean length (2 minutes 23 seconds) but had the fewest views and interactions. The poorest quality videos (mean 1.5) were produced by nonclinicians and news/media, which tended to be longer (mean 8 minutes 49 seconds) and received more engagement. Across all videos, information related to patient decision making tended to be poorly presented.
The dental community, particularly institutions and organizations, need to strategically create engaging videos to redress patients’ concerns about root canal treatment. This can counterbalance the existing misleading information and improve access to evidence-based content, which will ultimately affect patient decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36526106</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-5188</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2023-02, Vol.49 (2), p.155-161 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576082 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Dental Pulp Cavity Disadvantages endodontics Humans Information Dissemination Information Sources patient information Reproducibility of Results risks root canal Root Canal Therapy Social Media YouTube |
title | Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A16%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20YouTube%20as%20a%20Patient%20Information%20Source%20for%20the%20Risks%20of%20Root%20Canal%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=McLean,%20Stewart&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=155-161&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2755576082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755576082&rft_id=info:pmid/36526106&rft_els_id=S0099239922006148&rfr_iscdi=true |