Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus

Background Prior studies show hospital admission volume to be associated with poor outcomes following elective procedures and inpatient medical hospitalizations. However, it is unknown whether hospital volume impacts Inpatient outcomes for status epilepticus (SE) hospitalizations. In this study, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurocritical care 2023-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-34
Hauptverfasser: Syed, Maryam J., Zutshi, Deepti, Khawaja, Ayaz, Basha, Maysaa M., Marawar, Rohit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Neurocritical care
container_volume 38
creator Syed, Maryam J.
Zutshi, Deepti
Khawaja, Ayaz
Basha, Maysaa M.
Marawar, Rohit
description Background Prior studies show hospital admission volume to be associated with poor outcomes following elective procedures and inpatient medical hospitalizations. However, it is unknown whether hospital volume impacts Inpatient outcomes for status epilepticus (SE) hospitalizations. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of hospital volume on the outcome of patients with SE and related inpatient medical complications. Methods The 2005 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition diagnosis code 345.3 to identify patients undergoing acute hospitalization for SE. The National Inpatient Sample hospital identifier was used as a unique facility identifier to calculate the average volume of patients with SE seen in a year. The study cohort was divided into three groups: low volume (0–7 patients with SE per year), medium volume (8–22 patients with SE per year), and high volume (> 22 patients with SE per year). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether medium or high hospital volume had lower rates of inpatient medical complications compared with low-volume hospitals. Results A total of 137,410 patients with SE were included in the analysis. Most patients ( n  = 50,939; 37%) were treated in a low-volume hospital, 31% ( n  = 42,724) were treated in a medium-volume facility, and 18% ( n  = 25,207) were treated in a high-volume hospital. Patients undergoing treatment at medium-volume hospitals (vs. low-volume hospitals) had higher odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.12–1.25]; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12028-022-01656-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755574677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919735858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ef7536eef2e142e05900d3bf2f01543dde5748702ea7b9efa800225a0741421f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMo7i_gQQJevLRmmXS6jyJuIHhwuYZMd0Vb0kmbBdGnN-O4gAdPVVR99VcVP0J7lBxRQuRxpIywpiKMVYTWoq74CtqkoiSkrenqIp_Rqm4530BbMT4TwmQrxTra4LVgTFCxifK96yHEpF0_uEecngBfOWMzuA6wN_jSx2lI2uIHb_NYSq70J50GcAnf5NT5ESI-99b614XANz-8F6bAxgd8m3TKEZ9Ng4UpDV2OO2jNaBth9ytuo_vzs7vTy-r65uLq9OS66jirUwVGCl4DGAZ0xoCIlpCezw0zpLzG-x6EnDWSMNBy3oLRTXmRCU3krPDU8G10uNSdgn_JEJMah9iBtdqBz1ExKUSRqKUs6MEf9Nnn4Mp1irW0lVw0oikUW1Jd8DEGMGoKw6jDm6JELUxRS1NUuUN9mqJ4Gdr_ks7zEfqfkW8XCsCXQCwt9wjhd_c_sh_JDJho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919735858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus</title><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Syed, Maryam J. ; Zutshi, Deepti ; Khawaja, Ayaz ; Basha, Maysaa M. ; Marawar, Rohit</creator><creatorcontrib>Syed, Maryam J. ; Zutshi, Deepti ; Khawaja, Ayaz ; Basha, Maysaa M. ; Marawar, Rohit</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background Prior studies show hospital admission volume to be associated with poor outcomes following elective procedures and inpatient medical hospitalizations. However, it is unknown whether hospital volume impacts Inpatient outcomes for status epilepticus (SE) hospitalizations. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of hospital volume on the outcome of patients with SE and related inpatient medical complications. Methods The 2005 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition diagnosis code 345.3 to identify patients undergoing acute hospitalization for SE. The National Inpatient Sample hospital identifier was used as a unique facility identifier to calculate the average volume of patients with SE seen in a year. The study cohort was divided into three groups: low volume (0–7 patients with SE per year), medium volume (8–22 patients with SE per year), and high volume (> 22 patients with SE per year). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether medium or high hospital volume had lower rates of inpatient medical complications compared with low-volume hospitals. Results A total of 137,410 patients with SE were included in the analysis. Most patients ( n  = 50,939; 37%) were treated in a low-volume hospital, 31% ( n  = 42,724) were treated in a medium-volume facility, and 18% ( n  = 25,207) were treated in a high-volume hospital. Patients undergoing treatment at medium-volume hospitals (vs. low-volume hospitals) had higher odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.12–1.25]; p  < 0.001), sepsis (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.08–1.43] p  = 0.002), and length of stay (OR 1.13 [95% CI 1.0 –1.19] p  < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had significantly higher odds of urinary tract infections (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.11–1.33] p  < 0.001), pulmonary complications (OR 1.19 [95% CI 1.10–1.28], p  < 0.001), thrombosis (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.44–3.14], p  < 0.001), and renal complications (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.07–1.37], p  = 0.002). In addition, high-volume hospitals had lower odds of metabolic (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72–0.91], p  < 0.001), neurological complications (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69–0.93], p  = 0.004), and disposition to a facility (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82–0.96], p  < 0.001) compared with lower-volume hospitals. Conclusions Our study demonstrates certain associations between hospital volume and outcomes for SE hospitalizations. Further studies using more granular data about the type, severity, and duration of SE and types of treatment are warranted to better understand how hospital volume may impact care and prognosis of patients.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01656-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36522515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Critical Care Medicine ; Databases, Factual ; Demographics ; Diabetes ; Emergency medical care ; Family income ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Intensive ; Internal Medicine ; Length of Stay ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Original Work ; Patients ; Regression analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Status Epilepticus - epidemiology ; Status Epilepticus - therapy ; Thrombosis</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2023-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-34</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ef7536eef2e142e05900d3bf2f01543dde5748702ea7b9efa800225a0741421f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12028-022-01656-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919735858?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,21389,27924,27925,33530,33531,33744,33745,41488,42557,43659,43805,51319,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36522515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Syed, Maryam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zutshi, Deepti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khawaja, Ayaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basha, Maysaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marawar, Rohit</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background Prior studies show hospital admission volume to be associated with poor outcomes following elective procedures and inpatient medical hospitalizations. However, it is unknown whether hospital volume impacts Inpatient outcomes for status epilepticus (SE) hospitalizations. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of hospital volume on the outcome of patients with SE and related inpatient medical complications. Methods The 2005 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition diagnosis code 345.3 to identify patients undergoing acute hospitalization for SE. The National Inpatient Sample hospital identifier was used as a unique facility identifier to calculate the average volume of patients with SE seen in a year. The study cohort was divided into three groups: low volume (0–7 patients with SE per year), medium volume (8–22 patients with SE per year), and high volume (> 22 patients with SE per year). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether medium or high hospital volume had lower rates of inpatient medical complications compared with low-volume hospitals. Results A total of 137,410 patients with SE were included in the analysis. Most patients ( n  = 50,939; 37%) were treated in a low-volume hospital, 31% ( n  = 42,724) were treated in a medium-volume facility, and 18% ( n  = 25,207) were treated in a high-volume hospital. Patients undergoing treatment at medium-volume hospitals (vs. low-volume hospitals) had higher odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.12–1.25]; p  < 0.001), sepsis (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.08–1.43] p  = 0.002), and length of stay (OR 1.13 [95% CI 1.0 –1.19] p  < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had significantly higher odds of urinary tract infections (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.11–1.33] p  < 0.001), pulmonary complications (OR 1.19 [95% CI 1.10–1.28], p  < 0.001), thrombosis (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.44–3.14], p  < 0.001), and renal complications (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.07–1.37], p  = 0.002). In addition, high-volume hospitals had lower odds of metabolic (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72–0.91], p  < 0.001), neurological complications (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69–0.93], p  = 0.004), and disposition to a facility (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82–0.96], p  < 0.001) compared with lower-volume hospitals. Conclusions Our study demonstrates certain associations between hospital volume and outcomes for SE hospitalizations. Further studies using more granular data about the type, severity, and duration of SE and types of treatment are warranted to better understand how hospital volume may impact care and prognosis of patients.]]></description><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Work</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Status Epilepticus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Status Epilepticus - therapy</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMo7i_gQQJevLRmmXS6jyJuIHhwuYZMd0Vb0kmbBdGnN-O4gAdPVVR99VcVP0J7lBxRQuRxpIywpiKMVYTWoq74CtqkoiSkrenqIp_Rqm4530BbMT4TwmQrxTra4LVgTFCxifK96yHEpF0_uEecngBfOWMzuA6wN_jSx2lI2uIHb_NYSq70J50GcAnf5NT5ESI-99b614XANz-8F6bAxgd8m3TKEZ9Ng4UpDV2OO2jNaBth9ytuo_vzs7vTy-r65uLq9OS66jirUwVGCl4DGAZ0xoCIlpCezw0zpLzG-x6EnDWSMNBy3oLRTXmRCU3krPDU8G10uNSdgn_JEJMah9iBtdqBz1ExKUSRqKUs6MEf9Nnn4Mp1irW0lVw0oikUW1Jd8DEGMGoKw6jDm6JELUxRS1NUuUN9mqJ4Gdr_ks7zEfqfkW8XCsCXQCwt9wjhd_c_sh_JDJho</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Syed, Maryam J.</creator><creator>Zutshi, Deepti</creator><creator>Khawaja, Ayaz</creator><creator>Basha, Maysaa M.</creator><creator>Marawar, Rohit</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus</title><author>Syed, Maryam J. ; Zutshi, Deepti ; Khawaja, Ayaz ; Basha, Maysaa M. ; Marawar, Rohit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ef7536eef2e142e05900d3bf2f01543dde5748702ea7b9efa800225a0741421f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Work</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Status Epilepticus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Status Epilepticus - therapy</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Syed, Maryam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zutshi, Deepti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khawaja, Ayaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basha, Maysaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marawar, Rohit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Syed, Maryam J.</au><au>Zutshi, Deepti</au><au>Khawaja, Ayaz</au><au>Basha, Maysaa M.</au><au>Marawar, Rohit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>26-34</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background Prior studies show hospital admission volume to be associated with poor outcomes following elective procedures and inpatient medical hospitalizations. However, it is unknown whether hospital volume impacts Inpatient outcomes for status epilepticus (SE) hospitalizations. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of hospital volume on the outcome of patients with SE and related inpatient medical complications. Methods The 2005 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition diagnosis code 345.3 to identify patients undergoing acute hospitalization for SE. The National Inpatient Sample hospital identifier was used as a unique facility identifier to calculate the average volume of patients with SE seen in a year. The study cohort was divided into three groups: low volume (0–7 patients with SE per year), medium volume (8–22 patients with SE per year), and high volume (> 22 patients with SE per year). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether medium or high hospital volume had lower rates of inpatient medical complications compared with low-volume hospitals. Results A total of 137,410 patients with SE were included in the analysis. Most patients ( n  = 50,939; 37%) were treated in a low-volume hospital, 31% ( n  = 42,724) were treated in a medium-volume facility, and 18% ( n  = 25,207) were treated in a high-volume hospital. Patients undergoing treatment at medium-volume hospitals (vs. low-volume hospitals) had higher odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.12–1.25]; p  < 0.001), sepsis (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.08–1.43] p  = 0.002), and length of stay (OR 1.13 [95% CI 1.0 –1.19] p  < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had significantly higher odds of urinary tract infections (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.11–1.33] p  < 0.001), pulmonary complications (OR 1.19 [95% CI 1.10–1.28], p  < 0.001), thrombosis (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.44–3.14], p  < 0.001), and renal complications (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.07–1.37], p  = 0.002). In addition, high-volume hospitals had lower odds of metabolic (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72–0.91], p  < 0.001), neurological complications (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69–0.93], p  = 0.004), and disposition to a facility (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82–0.96], p  < 0.001) compared with lower-volume hospitals. Conclusions Our study demonstrates certain associations between hospital volume and outcomes for SE hospitalizations. Further studies using more granular data about the type, severity, and duration of SE and types of treatment are warranted to better understand how hospital volume may impact care and prognosis of patients.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36522515</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-022-01656-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-6933
ispartof Neurocritical care, 2023-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-34
issn 1541-6933
1556-0961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755574677
source AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central (Alumni); ProQuest Central
subjects Critical Care Medicine
Databases, Factual
Demographics
Diabetes
Emergency medical care
Family income
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Hospitals, High-Volume
Humans
Inpatients
Intensive
Internal Medicine
Length of Stay
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Original Work
Patients
Regression analysis
Statistical analysis
Status Epilepticus - epidemiology
Status Epilepticus - therapy
Thrombosis
title Understanding the Influence of Hospital Volume on Inpatient Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Status Epilepticus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20Influence%20of%20Hospital%20Volume%20on%20Inpatient%20Outcomes%20Following%20Hospitalization%20for%20Status%20Epilepticus&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Syed,%20Maryam%20J.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=26-34&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-022-01656-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919735858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919735858&rft_id=info:pmid/36522515&rfr_iscdi=true