Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up
Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n =...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2023-04, Vol.91 (4), p.221-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 221 |
container_title | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Tremblay, Joël Dufour, Magali Bertrand, Karine Saint-Jacques, Marianne Ferland, Francine Blanchette-Martin, Nadine Savard, Annie-Claude Côté, Mélissa Berbiche, Djamal Beaulieu, Myriam |
description | Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n = 36, Mage = 39.9 SD [13.0], n male gamblers = 31) with follow-ups at 4- and 10-months postadmission regarding the severity of gambling, the individual and couple's well-being. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models for repeated measures were applied to take into account the dependency of observations. Protocol was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02240485). Results: Participants in both treatments generally improved over time with reductions on gambling expanses from an initial $4,000-$600 in a 90-day period following treatment, without difference across treatment conditions in money spent on gambling or frequency of gambling. However, on different indices of gambling severity, the participants in ICT-PG showed more improvement at follow-ups, with better control capacity (OR = 2.57, p < .0129) and greater reduction in gambling craving (OR = 5.83, p < .0001) and erroneous cognitions (OR = 2.63, p < .0063). The couple treatment was associated with a better individual well-being (e.g., less depression for partners, OR = 5.53; p < .0351, and gamblers, OR = 2.37; p < .0334) and couple well-being (e.g., better dyadic satisfaction for partners, OR = 2.02; p < .0057, and gamblers, OR = 3.07; p < .0212). Conclusions: The results underline the necessity to provide a greater diversity of treatment for gamblers and their partner. Further research should focus on identifying active components of ICT-PG and widen its provision to gamblers with concurrent addiction disorders.
What is the public health significance of this article?
This study highlights the importance of directly including the partner in the treatment when helping adults with a gambling disorder. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/ccp0000765 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755574141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2755574141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-a913076fd042fea6e91dda4c30e7b442ed2d5c451a389f759fe4683c35222a3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9rFDEYBvAgil2rFz-ABLxUy2j-TjbeZGm3CxWLbMFbeDeTbKdkJtNkRllPfnSzbLXQg7m8gffHQ8KD0GtKPlDC1UdrB1KOquUTNKOa64pRqp6iGSGMVYTU34_Qi5xvi6E1kc_REa9lIZzO0O8z71sLdoejx4C_Qd_Erv3lGryI_ZhiCOW6Ti2EPVj1o9smGNsfruynIbiyczB2rh-xjwlfwXgTQ9yWyICX0G1C22_xyWqxrq6W7z5hSqovJfcGn5fk-LO6Hl6iZx5Cdq_u5zG6Pj9bLy6qy6_L1eLzZQVc6bECTXn5oW-IYN5B7TRtGhCWE6c2QjDXsEZaISnwufZKau9EPeeWS8YYlHmMTg65Q4p3k8uj6dpsXQjQuzhlw5SUUgkqaKFvH9HbOKW-vM6wOWVKcSnq_yolhaypFqSo9wdlU8w5OW-G1HaQdoYSs2_PPLRX8Jv7yGnTueYf_VtXAacHAAOYIe8spLG1wWU7pVQ62IcZTY0wjFH-B50NoeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754561940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tremblay, Joël ; Dufour, Magali ; Bertrand, Karine ; Saint-Jacques, Marianne ; Ferland, Francine ; Blanchette-Martin, Nadine ; Savard, Annie-Claude ; Côté, Mélissa ; Berbiche, Djamal ; Beaulieu, Myriam</creator><contributor>Cuijpers, Pim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Joël ; Dufour, Magali ; Bertrand, Karine ; Saint-Jacques, Marianne ; Ferland, Francine ; Blanchette-Martin, Nadine ; Savard, Annie-Claude ; Côté, Mélissa ; Berbiche, Djamal ; Beaulieu, Myriam ; Cuijpers, Pim</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n = 36, Mage = 39.9 SD [13.0], n male gamblers = 31) with follow-ups at 4- and 10-months postadmission regarding the severity of gambling, the individual and couple's well-being. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models for repeated measures were applied to take into account the dependency of observations. Protocol was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02240485). Results: Participants in both treatments generally improved over time with reductions on gambling expanses from an initial $4,000-$600 in a 90-day period following treatment, without difference across treatment conditions in money spent on gambling or frequency of gambling. However, on different indices of gambling severity, the participants in ICT-PG showed more improvement at follow-ups, with better control capacity (OR = 2.57, p < .0129) and greater reduction in gambling craving (OR = 5.83, p < .0001) and erroneous cognitions (OR = 2.63, p < .0063). The couple treatment was associated with a better individual well-being (e.g., less depression for partners, OR = 5.53; p < .0351, and gamblers, OR = 2.37; p < .0334) and couple well-being (e.g., better dyadic satisfaction for partners, OR = 2.02; p < .0057, and gamblers, OR = 3.07; p < .0212). Conclusions: The results underline the necessity to provide a greater diversity of treatment for gamblers and their partner. Further research should focus on identifying active components of ICT-PG and widen its provision to gamblers with concurrent addiction disorders.
What is the public health significance of this article?
This study highlights the importance of directly including the partner in the treatment when helping adults with a gambling disorder.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000765</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36521131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Adult ; Clinical trials ; Communications technology ; Couples ; Couples Therapy ; Craving ; Dependency ; Efficacy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gamblers ; Gambling ; Gambling - therapy ; Gambling Disorder ; Human ; Humans ; Information technology ; Integrated Services ; Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach ; Male ; Money ; Pathological gambling ; Pathology ; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2023-04, Vol.91 (4), p.221-233</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-a913076fd042fea6e91dda4c30e7b442ed2d5c451a389f759fe4683c35222a3c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7858-6502 ; 0000-0002-9646-260X ; 0000-0001-9347-6996 ; 0000-0002-9994-4997 ; 0000-0001-7288-937X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36521131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cuijpers, Pim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Jacques, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferland, Francine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchette-Martin, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Annie-Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Mélissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbiche, Djamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaulieu, Myriam</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n = 36, Mage = 39.9 SD [13.0], n male gamblers = 31) with follow-ups at 4- and 10-months postadmission regarding the severity of gambling, the individual and couple's well-being. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models for repeated measures were applied to take into account the dependency of observations. Protocol was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02240485). Results: Participants in both treatments generally improved over time with reductions on gambling expanses from an initial $4,000-$600 in a 90-day period following treatment, without difference across treatment conditions in money spent on gambling or frequency of gambling. However, on different indices of gambling severity, the participants in ICT-PG showed more improvement at follow-ups, with better control capacity (OR = 2.57, p < .0129) and greater reduction in gambling craving (OR = 5.83, p < .0001) and erroneous cognitions (OR = 2.63, p < .0063). The couple treatment was associated with a better individual well-being (e.g., less depression for partners, OR = 5.53; p < .0351, and gamblers, OR = 2.37; p < .0334) and couple well-being (e.g., better dyadic satisfaction for partners, OR = 2.02; p < .0057, and gamblers, OR = 3.07; p < .0212). Conclusions: The results underline the necessity to provide a greater diversity of treatment for gamblers and their partner. Further research should focus on identifying active components of ICT-PG and widen its provision to gamblers with concurrent addiction disorders.
What is the public health significance of this article?
This study highlights the importance of directly including the partner in the treatment when helping adults with a gambling disorder.]]></description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Couples Therapy</subject><subject>Craving</subject><subject>Dependency</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gamblers</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Gambling - therapy</subject><subject>Gambling Disorder</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Integrated Services</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Pathological gambling</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U9rFDEYBvAgil2rFz-ABLxUy2j-TjbeZGm3CxWLbMFbeDeTbKdkJtNkRllPfnSzbLXQg7m8gffHQ8KD0GtKPlDC1UdrB1KOquUTNKOa64pRqp6iGSGMVYTU34_Qi5xvi6E1kc_REa9lIZzO0O8z71sLdoejx4C_Qd_Erv3lGryI_ZhiCOW6Ti2EPVj1o9smGNsfruynIbiyczB2rh-xjwlfwXgTQ9yWyICX0G1C22_xyWqxrq6W7z5hSqovJfcGn5fk-LO6Hl6iZx5Cdq_u5zG6Pj9bLy6qy6_L1eLzZQVc6bECTXn5oW-IYN5B7TRtGhCWE6c2QjDXsEZaISnwufZKau9EPeeWS8YYlHmMTg65Q4p3k8uj6dpsXQjQuzhlw5SUUgkqaKFvH9HbOKW-vM6wOWVKcSnq_yolhaypFqSo9wdlU8w5OW-G1HaQdoYSs2_PPLRX8Jv7yGnTueYf_VtXAacHAAOYIe8spLG1wWU7pVQ62IcZTY0wjFH-B50NoeA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Tremblay, Joël</creator><creator>Dufour, Magali</creator><creator>Bertrand, Karine</creator><creator>Saint-Jacques, Marianne</creator><creator>Ferland, Francine</creator><creator>Blanchette-Martin, Nadine</creator><creator>Savard, Annie-Claude</creator><creator>Côté, Mélissa</creator><creator>Berbiche, Djamal</creator><creator>Beaulieu, Myriam</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-6502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-6996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-4997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-937X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up</title><author>Tremblay, Joël ; Dufour, Magali ; Bertrand, Karine ; Saint-Jacques, Marianne ; Ferland, Francine ; Blanchette-Martin, Nadine ; Savard, Annie-Claude ; Côté, Mélissa ; Berbiche, Djamal ; Beaulieu, Myriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-a913076fd042fea6e91dda4c30e7b442ed2d5c451a389f759fe4683c35222a3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Couples Therapy</topic><topic>Craving</topic><topic>Dependency</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gamblers</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Gambling - therapy</topic><topic>Gambling Disorder</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Integrated Services</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Pathological gambling</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Jacques, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferland, Francine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchette-Martin, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Annie-Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Mélissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbiche, Djamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaulieu, Myriam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tremblay, Joël</au><au>Dufour, Magali</au><au>Bertrand, Karine</au><au>Saint-Jacques, Marianne</au><au>Ferland, Francine</au><au>Blanchette-Martin, Nadine</au><au>Savard, Annie-Claude</au><au>Côté, Mélissa</au><au>Berbiche, Djamal</au><au>Beaulieu, Myriam</au><au>Cuijpers, Pim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>221-233</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n = 36, Mage = 39.9 SD [13.0], n male gamblers = 31) with follow-ups at 4- and 10-months postadmission regarding the severity of gambling, the individual and couple's well-being. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models for repeated measures were applied to take into account the dependency of observations. Protocol was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02240485). Results: Participants in both treatments generally improved over time with reductions on gambling expanses from an initial $4,000-$600 in a 90-day period following treatment, without difference across treatment conditions in money spent on gambling or frequency of gambling. However, on different indices of gambling severity, the participants in ICT-PG showed more improvement at follow-ups, with better control capacity (OR = 2.57, p < .0129) and greater reduction in gambling craving (OR = 5.83, p < .0001) and erroneous cognitions (OR = 2.63, p < .0063). The couple treatment was associated with a better individual well-being (e.g., less depression for partners, OR = 5.53; p < .0351, and gamblers, OR = 2.37; p < .0334) and couple well-being (e.g., better dyadic satisfaction for partners, OR = 2.02; p < .0057, and gamblers, OR = 3.07; p < .0212). Conclusions: The results underline the necessity to provide a greater diversity of treatment for gamblers and their partner. Further research should focus on identifying active components of ICT-PG and widen its provision to gamblers with concurrent addiction disorders.
What is the public health significance of this article?
This study highlights the importance of directly including the partner in the treatment when helping adults with a gambling disorder.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>36521131</pmid><doi>10.1037/ccp0000765</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7858-6502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-6996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-4997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-937X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-006X |
ispartof | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2023-04, Vol.91 (4), p.221-233 |
issn | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755574141 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
subjects | Addictions Adult Clinical trials Communications technology Couples Couples Therapy Craving Dependency Efficacy Female Follow-Up Studies Gamblers Gambling Gambling - therapy Gambling Disorder Human Humans Information technology Integrated Services Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach Male Money Pathological gambling Pathology Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation Well being |
title | Efficacy of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling (ICT-PG): 10-Month Follow-Up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A21%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial%20of%20Integrative%20Couple%20Treatment%20for%20Pathological%20Gambling%20(ICT-PG):%2010-Month%20Follow-Up&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Tremblay,%20Jo%C3%ABl&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=221-233&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/ccp0000765&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2755574141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754561940&rft_id=info:pmid/36521131&rfr_iscdi=true |