Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses
This article evaluated the effect of substrates rigidities on the post-fatigue fracture resistance of adhesively cemented simplified restorations in lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Precrystalized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic blocks were processed into disc-shaped spe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of dentistry 2023-10, Vol.17 (4), p.1020-1028 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1028 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1020 |
container_title | European journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Pucci, César Rogério Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Kleverlaan, Cornelis J Tribst, João Paulo Mendes |
description | This article evaluated the effect of substrates rigidities on the post-fatigue fracture resistance of adhesively cemented simplified restorations in lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Precrystalized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic blocks were processed into disc-shaped specimens (
= 10,
= 10 mm), mimicking a simplified restoration at two thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Thereafter, the discs were cemented onto different base substrates (dentin analogue [control], dentin analogue with a central core build-up of resin composite [RC], or glass ionomer cement [GIC]). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling in a chewing simulator (100 N, 1 × 10
cycles, 4 Hz) and then subjected to thermocycling aging (10,000 cycles, 5/37/55°C, 30 seconds). After the fatigue protocol, the specimens were loaded until failure (N) in a universal testing machine. Finite element analysis calculated the first principal stress at the center of the adhesive interface.
The results showed that "restoration thickness," "type of substrate," and their interaction were statistically significant (one-way analysis of variance;
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0042-1757910 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754503534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2754503534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e053738b99c08b992947a675e570025c9de2ec2e1bab6334118aacea11e451c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujEUSvHk2PXham23ZLj2TBr2BMEM9Nt8xqFXZx2z3w710Ccpl3Ds-8mTyE3DIYMpByFBIAkSZMSaUZnJE-4yATJTJxftpl1iNXIXwDZDzT-pL0eCYZ5wL65OW9LUJsbES68J9-5eOOzsoSXaR1RfPJdJRPXukCQ6w7yNdVoDbSqe-QBqtIl1_e_VQYAoZrclHadcCbYw7Ix8NsmT8l87fH53wyTxxXPCYIsstxobWD_Uy1UDZTEqUCSKXTK0zRpcgKW2Tdk4yNrXVoGUMhmQM-IPeH3m1T_7bdZ2bjg8P12lZYt8GkSgoJXHLRocMD6po6hAZLs238xjY7w8Ds_Zlg9v7M0V93cHfsbosNrk74vzD-B9mgaVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754503534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Pucci, César Rogério ; Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho ; Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creator><creatorcontrib>Pucci, César Rogério ; Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho ; Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creatorcontrib><description>This article evaluated the effect of substrates rigidities on the post-fatigue fracture resistance of adhesively cemented simplified restorations in lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Precrystalized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic blocks were processed into disc-shaped specimens (
= 10,
= 10 mm), mimicking a simplified restoration at two thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Thereafter, the discs were cemented onto different base substrates (dentin analogue [control], dentin analogue with a central core build-up of resin composite [RC], or glass ionomer cement [GIC]). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling in a chewing simulator (100 N, 1 × 10
cycles, 4 Hz) and then subjected to thermocycling aging (10,000 cycles, 5/37/55°C, 30 seconds). After the fatigue protocol, the specimens were loaded until failure (N) in a universal testing machine. Finite element analysis calculated the first principal stress at the center of the adhesive interface.
The results showed that "restoration thickness," "type of substrate," and their interaction were statistically significant (one-way analysis of variance;
< 0.001). Regardless the restoration thickness a higher fracture load was observed for specimens cemented to dentin analogue. Among the base materials, RC build-up presented the highest fracture load and lower stress magnitude for both restoration thicknesses in comparison with GIC build-up. The 0.5-mm restoration showed higher stress peak and lower fracture load when submitted to the compressive test.
More flexible base material reduces the fracture load and increases the stress magnitude of adhesively cemented lithium disilicate restorations regardless the ceramic thickness. Therefore, more rigid substrates are suggested to be used to prevent restoration mechanical failures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757910</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36513340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2023-10, Vol.17 (4), p.1020-1028</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e053738b99c08b992947a675e570025c9de2ec2e1bab6334118aacea11e451c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e053738b99c08b992947a675e570025c9de2ec2e1bab6334118aacea11e451c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3844-2053 ; 0000-0002-5707-7565 ; 0000-0002-5412-3546 ; 0000-0001-8123-2177 ; 0000-0002-3218-8031 ; 0000-0003-4830-0400 ; 0000-0002-5697-2947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pucci, César Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creatorcontrib><title>Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>This article evaluated the effect of substrates rigidities on the post-fatigue fracture resistance of adhesively cemented simplified restorations in lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Precrystalized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic blocks were processed into disc-shaped specimens (
= 10,
= 10 mm), mimicking a simplified restoration at two thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Thereafter, the discs were cemented onto different base substrates (dentin analogue [control], dentin analogue with a central core build-up of resin composite [RC], or glass ionomer cement [GIC]). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling in a chewing simulator (100 N, 1 × 10
cycles, 4 Hz) and then subjected to thermocycling aging (10,000 cycles, 5/37/55°C, 30 seconds). After the fatigue protocol, the specimens were loaded until failure (N) in a universal testing machine. Finite element analysis calculated the first principal stress at the center of the adhesive interface.
The results showed that "restoration thickness," "type of substrate," and their interaction were statistically significant (one-way analysis of variance;
< 0.001). Regardless the restoration thickness a higher fracture load was observed for specimens cemented to dentin analogue. Among the base materials, RC build-up presented the highest fracture load and lower stress magnitude for both restoration thicknesses in comparison with GIC build-up. The 0.5-mm restoration showed higher stress peak and lower fracture load when submitted to the compressive test.
More flexible base material reduces the fracture load and increases the stress magnitude of adhesively cemented lithium disilicate restorations regardless the ceramic thickness. Therefore, more rigid substrates are suggested to be used to prevent restoration mechanical failures.</description><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujEUSvHk2PXham23ZLj2TBr2BMEM9Nt8xqFXZx2z3w710Ccpl3Ds-8mTyE3DIYMpByFBIAkSZMSaUZnJE-4yATJTJxftpl1iNXIXwDZDzT-pL0eCYZ5wL65OW9LUJsbES68J9-5eOOzsoSXaR1RfPJdJRPXukCQ6w7yNdVoDbSqe-QBqtIl1_e_VQYAoZrclHadcCbYw7Ix8NsmT8l87fH53wyTxxXPCYIsstxobWD_Uy1UDZTEqUCSKXTK0zRpcgKW2Tdk4yNrXVoGUMhmQM-IPeH3m1T_7bdZ2bjg8P12lZYt8GkSgoJXHLRocMD6po6hAZLs238xjY7w8Ds_Zlg9v7M0V93cHfsbosNrk74vzD-B9mgaVE</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Pucci, César Rogério</creator><creator>Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho</creator><creator>Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto</creator><creator>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creator><creator>Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira</creator><creator>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J</creator><creator>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-7565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5412-3546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-2177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-8031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-2947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses</title><author>Pucci, César Rogério ; Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho ; Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J ; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-e053738b99c08b992947a675e570025c9de2ec2e1bab6334118aacea11e451c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pucci, César Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pucci, César Rogério</au><au>Mafetano, Ana Paula Valente Pinho</au><au>Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto</au><au>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</au><au>Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira</au><au>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J</au><au>Tribst, João Paulo Mendes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1028</epage><pages>1020-1028</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>This article evaluated the effect of substrates rigidities on the post-fatigue fracture resistance of adhesively cemented simplified restorations in lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Precrystalized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic blocks were processed into disc-shaped specimens (
= 10,
= 10 mm), mimicking a simplified restoration at two thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm). Thereafter, the discs were cemented onto different base substrates (dentin analogue [control], dentin analogue with a central core build-up of resin composite [RC], or glass ionomer cement [GIC]). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling in a chewing simulator (100 N, 1 × 10
cycles, 4 Hz) and then subjected to thermocycling aging (10,000 cycles, 5/37/55°C, 30 seconds). After the fatigue protocol, the specimens were loaded until failure (N) in a universal testing machine. Finite element analysis calculated the first principal stress at the center of the adhesive interface.
The results showed that "restoration thickness," "type of substrate," and their interaction were statistically significant (one-way analysis of variance;
< 0.001). Regardless the restoration thickness a higher fracture load was observed for specimens cemented to dentin analogue. Among the base materials, RC build-up presented the highest fracture load and lower stress magnitude for both restoration thicknesses in comparison with GIC build-up. The 0.5-mm restoration showed higher stress peak and lower fracture load when submitted to the compressive test.
More flexible base material reduces the fracture load and increases the stress magnitude of adhesively cemented lithium disilicate restorations regardless the ceramic thickness. Therefore, more rigid substrates are suggested to be used to prevent restoration mechanical failures.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>36513340</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0042-1757910</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-7565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5412-3546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-2177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-8031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-2947</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1305-7456 |
ispartof | European journal of dentistry, 2023-10, Vol.17 (4), p.1020-1028 |
issn | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754503534 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access |
title | Substrate Rigidity Effect on CAD/CAM Restorations at Different Thicknesses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A34%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substrate%20Rigidity%20Effect%20on%20CAD/CAM%20Restorations%20at%20Different%20Thicknesses&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Pucci,%20C%C3%A9sar%20Rog%C3%A9rio&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1028&rft.pages=1020-1028&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0042-1757910&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2754503534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754503534&rft_id=info:pmid/36513340&rfr_iscdi=true |