Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study

Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404
Hauptverfasser: Uslu, Gonca, Rakici, Sema
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 404
container_issue 9
container_start_page 397
container_title Journal of cancer research and therapeutics
container_volume 18
creator Uslu, Gonca
Rakici, Sema
description Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied. Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754049822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A729944677</galeid><sourcerecordid>A729944677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkuL2zAUhUVp6aTT_oBuiqGbbpzqZcvqLoS-YKCbzlrI1nWijCylkkzIvx-lmemLFIEEV985XN0jhF4TvOQEs_e7IeblaVNEtkJR-gQtiJRdzQnrnqIFloLVhHf0Cr1IaYdxIyjtnqMr1jYES8kX6Ha9hSlEbWzIW4h6f6zGECtwBqI7VnudLficqoPN2yrCkLWrBu0HiB-qVZWs3ziorU_Z5jnb4KuUZ3N8iZ6N2iV49XBeo9tPH7-vv9Q33z5_Xa9u6oF30tSs77sWmOaUNSCYoJKI0pcZ21Ix5QrDSDWBsW0l6TveG2ikhFYa3TCsGbtG786--xh-zJCymmwawDntIcxJUdFwzGVHaUHf_oPuwhx96e5EMSka0bHf1EY7UNaPIUc9nEzVqrQnOW-FKFR9gdqALwN0wcNoS_kvfnmBL8vAZIeLAnIWDDGkFGFU-2gnHY-KYHWKXv1M_c_oi-bNwwPnfgLzS_GYdQHWZ-AQXIaY7tx8gKgKe-fD4f_OqgxHPX4Tdg-CdcJe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753975783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</creator><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied. Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36510994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged patients ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects ; Chemoradiotherapy - methods ; Chemotherapy ; Colorectal cancer ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects ; Neoplasm Staging ; Older people ; Patient outcomes ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27457,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><title>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied. Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0973-1482</issn><issn>1998-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkuL2zAUhUVp6aTT_oBuiqGbbpzqZcvqLoS-YKCbzlrI1nWijCylkkzIvx-lmemLFIEEV985XN0jhF4TvOQEs_e7IeblaVNEtkJR-gQtiJRdzQnrnqIFloLVhHf0Cr1IaYdxIyjtnqMr1jYES8kX6Ha9hSlEbWzIW4h6f6zGECtwBqI7VnudLficqoPN2yrCkLWrBu0HiB-qVZWs3ziorU_Z5jnb4KuUZ3N8iZ6N2iV49XBeo9tPH7-vv9Q33z5_Xa9u6oF30tSs77sWmOaUNSCYoJKI0pcZ21Ix5QrDSDWBsW0l6TveG2ikhFYa3TCsGbtG786--xh-zJCymmwawDntIcxJUdFwzGVHaUHf_oPuwhx96e5EMSka0bHf1EY7UNaPIUc9nEzVqrQnOW-FKFR9gdqALwN0wcNoS_kvfnmBL8vAZIeLAnIWDDGkFGFU-2gnHY-KYHWKXv1M_c_oi-bNwwPnfgLzS_GYdQHWZ-AQXIaY7tx8gKgKe-fD4f_OqgxHPX4Tdg-CdcJe</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Uslu, Gonca</creator><creator>Rakici, Sema</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><author>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uslu, Gonca</au><au>Rakici, Sema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>397-404</pages><issn>0973-1482</issn><eissn>1998-4138</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied. Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36510994</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-1482
ispartof Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404
issn 0973-1482
1998-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754049822
source MEDLINE; Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged patients
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy - methods
Chemotherapy
Colorectal cancer
Disease-Free Survival
Humans
Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects
Neoplasm Staging
Older people
Patient outcomes
Radiation
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A10%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemoradiotherapy%20for%20elderly%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer:%20A%20single-institution%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Uslu,%20Gonca&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=397-404&rft.issn=0973-1482&rft.eissn=1998-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA729944677%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753975783&rft_id=info:pmid/36510994&rft_galeid=A729944677&rfr_iscdi=true