Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study
Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC. Methods:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 404 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Journal of cancer research and therapeutics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Uslu, Gonca Rakici, Sema |
description | Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC.
Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied.
Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754049822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A729944677</galeid><sourcerecordid>A729944677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkuL2zAUhUVp6aTT_oBuiqGbbpzqZcvqLoS-YKCbzlrI1nWijCylkkzIvx-lmemLFIEEV985XN0jhF4TvOQEs_e7IeblaVNEtkJR-gQtiJRdzQnrnqIFloLVhHf0Cr1IaYdxIyjtnqMr1jYES8kX6Ha9hSlEbWzIW4h6f6zGECtwBqI7VnudLficqoPN2yrCkLWrBu0HiB-qVZWs3ziorU_Z5jnb4KuUZ3N8iZ6N2iV49XBeo9tPH7-vv9Q33z5_Xa9u6oF30tSs77sWmOaUNSCYoJKI0pcZ21Ix5QrDSDWBsW0l6TveG2ikhFYa3TCsGbtG786--xh-zJCymmwawDntIcxJUdFwzGVHaUHf_oPuwhx96e5EMSka0bHf1EY7UNaPIUc9nEzVqrQnOW-FKFR9gdqALwN0wcNoS_kvfnmBL8vAZIeLAnIWDDGkFGFU-2gnHY-KYHWKXv1M_c_oi-bNwwPnfgLzS_GYdQHWZ-AQXIaY7tx8gKgKe-fD4f_OqgxHPX4Tdg-CdcJe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753975783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</creator><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC.
Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied.
Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36510994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged patients ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects ; Chemoradiotherapy - methods ; Chemotherapy ; Colorectal cancer ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects ; Neoplasm Staging ; Older people ; Patient outcomes ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27457,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><title>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC.
Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied.
Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0973-1482</issn><issn>1998-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkuL2zAUhUVp6aTT_oBuiqGbbpzqZcvqLoS-YKCbzlrI1nWijCylkkzIvx-lmemLFIEEV985XN0jhF4TvOQEs_e7IeblaVNEtkJR-gQtiJRdzQnrnqIFloLVhHf0Cr1IaYdxIyjtnqMr1jYES8kX6Ha9hSlEbWzIW4h6f6zGECtwBqI7VnudLficqoPN2yrCkLWrBu0HiB-qVZWs3ziorU_Z5jnb4KuUZ3N8iZ6N2iV49XBeo9tPH7-vv9Q33z5_Xa9u6oF30tSs77sWmOaUNSCYoJKI0pcZ21Ix5QrDSDWBsW0l6TveG2ikhFYa3TCsGbtG786--xh-zJCymmwawDntIcxJUdFwzGVHaUHf_oPuwhx96e5EMSka0bHf1EY7UNaPIUc9nEzVqrQnOW-FKFR9gdqALwN0wcNoS_kvfnmBL8vAZIeLAnIWDDGkFGFU-2gnHY-KYHWKXv1M_c_oi-bNwwPnfgLzS_GYdQHWZ-AQXIaY7tx8gKgKe-fD4f_OqgxHPX4Tdg-CdcJe</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Uslu, Gonca</creator><creator>Rakici, Sema</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</title><author>Uslu, Gonca ; Rakici, Sema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489d-3bb86e3a4235e7372917109df6423d86e0ef2a1ef6691b84bde599e69da530a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uslu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakici, Sema</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uslu, Gonca</au><au>Rakici, Sema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>397-404</pages><issn>0973-1482</issn><eissn>1998-4138</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The incidence of cancer, particularly rectal cancer (RC), in older adults is gradually increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results, clinicopathological features, and survival factors in older patients with RC.
Methods: We evaluated patients aged ≥65 years with RC treated at a radiation oncology clinic. The demographic, clinical, and histopathological data of the patients were obtained by reviewing their medical records. The toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were applied.
Results: Among 401 patients with RC, 183 (45.6%) were older adults (65-92 years). Furthermore, 122 (66.7%) patients had clinically stage 3 and above RC, and 183 and 91 patients received RT and neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed for 116 (63.4%) patients, 41 (34.4%) and 76 (65.6%) of whom underwent postoperative CRT and preoperative RT, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 22 (18.9%) patients during CRT. RT was performed in 64 patients (35%) at a 1-15-day interval. The mean follow-up duration was 34.7 (range, 1.4-149.0) months. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.4 and 37.4%, respectively, and the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 65.7 and 35.3%, respectively. OS was 49.4 and 34.9 months for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with the advanced geriatric disease (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall and DFS were age, distance from the tumor to the anal canal, and metastasis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that the selection of treatment modalities for older patients with RC should be based on performance status and not age. RT and CRT were safe treatment modalities for older patients with RC, particularly for those who could not undergo surgery.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36510994</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-1482 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2022-12, Vol.18 (9), p.397-404 |
issn | 0973-1482 1998-4138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754049822 |
source | MEDLINE; Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Aged patients Cancer Cancer therapies Care and treatment Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects Chemoradiotherapy - methods Chemotherapy Colorectal cancer Disease-Free Survival Humans Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects Neoplasm Staging Older people Patient outcomes Radiation Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer: A single-institution study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A10%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemoradiotherapy%20for%20elderly%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer:%20A%20single-institution%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Uslu,%20Gonca&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=397-404&rft.issn=0973-1482&rft.eissn=1998-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1967_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA729944677%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753975783&rft_id=info:pmid/36510994&rft_galeid=A729944677&rfr_iscdi=true |