Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel
An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering 2000-11, Vol.122 (4), p.642-649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 649 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 642 |
container_title | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Thiele, Jeffrey D Melkote, Shreyes N Peascoe, Roberta A Watkins, Thomas R |
description | An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representative types of edge geometry including “up-sharp” edges, edge hones, and chamfers were used as the cutting tools in this study. This study shows that tool edge geometry is highly influential with respect to surface residual stresses, which were measured using x-ray diffraction. In general, compressive surface residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions were generated by large edge hone tools in longitudinal turning operations. Residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools. Microstructural analysis shows that thermally-induced phase transformation effects are present at all feeds and workpiece hardness values with the large edge hone tools, and only at high feeds and hardness values with the small edge hone tools. In general, continuous white layers on the workpiece surface correlate with compressive residual stresses, while over-tempered regions correlate with tensile or compressive residual stresses depending on the workpiece hardness. [S1087-1357(00)00304-X] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.1286369 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27513853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27513853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-68bd15f92fb030db51b65e0e8dbf8f40e08814c43e283bd6b1d4337ab62e1be03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLxDAQhYsoqKsHz14CguChmkmaNnuUZdUFQXAVjyFpJhrtpmvSHrz4243u4mmGmW_eY15RnAC9BABxBZfAZM3r6U5xAILJUk652M09lU0JXDT7xWFK75QCyIofFN9z57AdSO_IbBwGH17LuX1Fcov9Cof4RXSw5KWPH2uPLZI7HW3AlEgfyHKMTufZIyZvR92R5RDzChPxgdz44NPbH0-exhiy8K_H9WK5IIIBpZlG7I6KPae7hMfbOimeb-ZPs7vy_uF2Mbu-LzVv2FDW0lgQbsqcoZxaI8DUAilKa5x0FUUqJVRtxZFJbmxtwFacN9rUDMEg5ZPifKO7jv3niGlQK59a7DodsB-TYo0ALgXP4MUGbGOfUkSn1tGvdPxSQNVvwgrUNuHMnm1FdWp156IOrU__B5LRmrNMnW4onVao3vscRv5UVRUDxvgPBOqCEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27513853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Thiele, Jeffrey D ; Melkote, Shreyes N ; Peascoe, Roberta A ; Watkins, Thomas R</creator><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Jeffrey D ; Melkote, Shreyes N ; Peascoe, Roberta A ; Watkins, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representative types of edge geometry including “up-sharp” edges, edge hones, and chamfers were used as the cutting tools in this study. This study shows that tool edge geometry is highly influential with respect to surface residual stresses, which were measured using x-ray diffraction. In general, compressive surface residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions were generated by large edge hone tools in longitudinal turning operations. Residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools. Microstructural analysis shows that thermally-induced phase transformation effects are present at all feeds and workpiece hardness values with the large edge hone tools, and only at high feeds and hardness values with the small edge hone tools. In general, continuous white layers on the workpiece surface correlate with compressive residual stresses, while over-tempered regions correlate with tensile or compressive residual stresses depending on the workpiece hardness. [S1087-1357(00)00304-X]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-1357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.1286369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Blanking. Shearing ; Cutting ; Exact sciences and technology ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Production techniques</subject><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2000-11, Vol.122 (4), p.642-649</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-68bd15f92fb030db51b65e0e8dbf8f40e08814c43e283bd6b1d4337ab62e1be03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-68bd15f92fb030db51b65e0e8dbf8f40e08814c43e283bd6b1d4337ab62e1be03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=820632$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Jeffrey D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkote, Shreyes N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peascoe, Roberta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel</title><title>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</title><addtitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representative types of edge geometry including “up-sharp” edges, edge hones, and chamfers were used as the cutting tools in this study. This study shows that tool edge geometry is highly influential with respect to surface residual stresses, which were measured using x-ray diffraction. In general, compressive surface residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions were generated by large edge hone tools in longitudinal turning operations. Residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools. Microstructural analysis shows that thermally-induced phase transformation effects are present at all feeds and workpiece hardness values with the large edge hone tools, and only at high feeds and hardness values with the small edge hone tools. In general, continuous white layers on the workpiece surface correlate with compressive residual stresses, while over-tempered regions correlate with tensile or compressive residual stresses depending on the workpiece hardness. [S1087-1357(00)00304-X]</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Blanking. Shearing</subject><subject>Cutting</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Production techniques</subject><issn>1087-1357</issn><issn>1528-8935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFLxDAQhYsoqKsHz14CguChmkmaNnuUZdUFQXAVjyFpJhrtpmvSHrz4243u4mmGmW_eY15RnAC9BABxBZfAZM3r6U5xAILJUk652M09lU0JXDT7xWFK75QCyIofFN9z57AdSO_IbBwGH17LuX1Fcov9Cof4RXSw5KWPH2uPLZI7HW3AlEgfyHKMTufZIyZvR92R5RDzChPxgdz44NPbH0-exhiy8K_H9WK5IIIBpZlG7I6KPae7hMfbOimeb-ZPs7vy_uF2Mbu-LzVv2FDW0lgQbsqcoZxaI8DUAilKa5x0FUUqJVRtxZFJbmxtwFacN9rUDMEg5ZPifKO7jv3niGlQK59a7DodsB-TYo0ALgXP4MUGbGOfUkSn1tGvdPxSQNVvwgrUNuHMnm1FdWp156IOrU__B5LRmrNMnW4onVao3vscRv5UVRUDxvgPBOqCEQ</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Thiele, Jeffrey D</creator><creator>Melkote, Shreyes N</creator><creator>Peascoe, Roberta A</creator><creator>Watkins, Thomas R</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel</title><author>Thiele, Jeffrey D ; Melkote, Shreyes N ; Peascoe, Roberta A ; Watkins, Thomas R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-68bd15f92fb030db51b65e0e8dbf8f40e08814c43e283bd6b1d4337ab62e1be03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Blanking. Shearing</topic><topic>Cutting</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Production techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Jeffrey D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkote, Shreyes N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peascoe, Roberta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thiele, Jeffrey D</au><au>Melkote, Shreyes N</au><au>Peascoe, Roberta A</au><au>Watkins, Thomas R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</stitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>642-649</pages><issn>1087-1357</issn><eissn>1528-8935</eissn><abstract>An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effects of tool cutting-edge geometry (edge preparation) and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses for finish hard turning of through-hardened AISI 52100 steel. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) inserts with representative types of edge geometry including “up-sharp” edges, edge hones, and chamfers were used as the cutting tools in this study. This study shows that tool edge geometry is highly influential with respect to surface residual stresses, which were measured using x-ray diffraction. In general, compressive surface residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions were generated by large edge hone tools in longitudinal turning operations. Residual stresses in the axial and circumferential directions generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools. Microstructural analysis shows that thermally-induced phase transformation effects are present at all feeds and workpiece hardness values with the large edge hone tools, and only at high feeds and hardness values with the small edge hone tools. In general, continuous white layers on the workpiece surface correlate with compressive residual stresses, while over-tempered regions correlate with tensile or compressive residual stresses depending on the workpiece hardness. [S1087-1357(00)00304-X]</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.1286369</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1087-1357 |
ispartof | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2000-11, Vol.122 (4), p.642-649 |
issn | 1087-1357 1528-8935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27513853 |
source | ASME Transactions Journals (Current) |
subjects | Applied sciences Blanking. Shearing Cutting Exact sciences and technology Metals. Metallurgy Production techniques |
title | Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Cutting-Edge%20Geometry%20and%20Workpiece%20Hardness%20on%20Surface%20Residual%20Stresses%20in%20Finish%20Hard%20Turning%20of%20AISI%2052100%20Steel&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Thiele,%20Jeffrey%20D&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=642-649&rft.issn=1087-1357&rft.eissn=1528-8935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.1286369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27513853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27513853&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |