Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization

Background: As an alternative to the Latarjet procedure, the arthroscopic free bone block (FBB) procedure combined with dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) has been recently proposed to provide both glenoid augmentation and a tendon sling effect for treating anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2023-01, Vol.51 (1), p.187-197
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Chenliang, Xu, Junjie, Fang, Zhaoyi, Chen, Jiebo, Ye, Zipeng, Wu, Xiulin, Li, Ziyun, Wang, Liren, Kang, Yuhao, Zhao, Song, Xu, Caiqi, Zhao, Jinzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 197
container_issue 1
container_start_page 187
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 51
creator Wu, Chenliang
Xu, Junjie
Fang, Zhaoyi
Chen, Jiebo
Ye, Zipeng
Wu, Xiulin
Li, Ziyun
Wang, Liren
Kang, Yuhao
Zhao, Song
Xu, Caiqi
Zhao, Jinzhong
description Background: As an alternative to the Latarjet procedure, the arthroscopic free bone block (FBB) procedure combined with dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) has been recently proposed to provide both glenoid augmentation and a tendon sling effect for treating anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of FBB-DAS for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic FBB-DAS for ASI with >15% glenoid bone loss between February 2017 and March 2020 were screened and enrolled in this study. Clinical outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, including recurrence, complications, shoulder functional scores, range of motion, and return to sports. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also performed. Results: Of a total of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 46.1 ± 13.1 months, no patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation postoperatively, while 2 had a positive anterior apprehension test (3.1%). Additionally, 2 patients (3.1%) experienced complications of hematoma and shoulder stiffness, respectively. The mean visual analog scale score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score all improved significantly from 3.2 ± 2.4, 75.0 ± 18.9, 43.6 ± 27.3, and 33.8 ± 9.0 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.8, 95.1 ± 8.0, 95.5 ± 7.8, and 14.8 ± 3.5 at final follow-up, respectively (all P < .001). No difference was detected in range of motion except for 8.1° and 7.5° external rotation limitations in adduction and abduction, respectively. There were 62 patients (95.4%) who returned to sports, and 54 patients (83.1%) returned to the preinjury level. The transferred biceps tendon was intact in all 59 patients who completed radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Good bone healing was achieved in 98.3% of patients, and the glenoid bone defect decreased from 18.1% to 4.9%. Osseous and labral glenoids were significantly enlarged in width and depth on the latest magnetic resonance imaging (all P < .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic FBB-DAS provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Despite slight external rotation restrictions, it achieved low recurrence and complication rates, excellent shoulder functional scores, a high return-to-sports rate, and favorable
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03635465221137883
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2747003737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03635465221137883</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2760076829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e61e3c57d31a70b34d6bf907f544d4e24f80b3342bf588a494cbc436d0404e823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoiHwAGyQJTZsptjj3yzTQEulSEX8iOXIY3saF4-d2p5FeDFeD6dTqARCXli697vnXN0DwEuMTjEW4i0inDDKWdtiTISU5BFYYMbahhDOHoPFsd8cgRPwLOcbhBAWXD4FJ4RTLiVjC_Bz411wWnmogoGflHHRx-u7wtVUdBxthi7Aj6o4G0qG31zZwXUoNrmY4OddnLyxCV6GXFTvvCuHO6ELb0N0Bp7FYOE25gzVUGfgOpVdilnHvdPwPFk7E2c-6u9wE8feBWtmk3eHoMZKPZjNDj_qKjE8B08G5bN9cf8vwdfz9182H5rt1cXlZr1tNOGyNJZjSzQThmAlUE-o4f2wQmJglBpqWzrIWiW07QcmpaIrqntNCTeIImplS5bgzay7T_F2srl0o8vaeq-CjVPuWkEFQkTUtwSv_0Jv4pRC3a5SHKF6-nZVKTxTut4hJzt0--RGlQ4dRt0x1e6fVOvMq3vlqR-t-TPxO8YKnM5AVtf2wfb_ir8A2K2rvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760076829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wu, Chenliang ; Xu, Junjie ; Fang, Zhaoyi ; Chen, Jiebo ; Ye, Zipeng ; Wu, Xiulin ; Li, Ziyun ; Wang, Liren ; Kang, Yuhao ; Zhao, Song ; Xu, Caiqi ; Zhao, Jinzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenliang ; Xu, Junjie ; Fang, Zhaoyi ; Chen, Jiebo ; Ye, Zipeng ; Wu, Xiulin ; Li, Ziyun ; Wang, Liren ; Kang, Yuhao ; Zhao, Song ; Xu, Caiqi ; Zhao, Jinzhong</creatorcontrib><description>Background: As an alternative to the Latarjet procedure, the arthroscopic free bone block (FBB) procedure combined with dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) has been recently proposed to provide both glenoid augmentation and a tendon sling effect for treating anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of FBB-DAS for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic FBB-DAS for ASI with &gt;15% glenoid bone loss between February 2017 and March 2020 were screened and enrolled in this study. Clinical outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, including recurrence, complications, shoulder functional scores, range of motion, and return to sports. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also performed. Results: Of a total of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 46.1 ± 13.1 months, no patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation postoperatively, while 2 had a positive anterior apprehension test (3.1%). Additionally, 2 patients (3.1%) experienced complications of hematoma and shoulder stiffness, respectively. The mean visual analog scale score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score all improved significantly from 3.2 ± 2.4, 75.0 ± 18.9, 43.6 ± 27.3, and 33.8 ± 9.0 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.8, 95.1 ± 8.0, 95.5 ± 7.8, and 14.8 ± 3.5 at final follow-up, respectively (all P &lt; .001). No difference was detected in range of motion except for 8.1° and 7.5° external rotation limitations in adduction and abduction, respectively. There were 62 patients (95.4%) who returned to sports, and 54 patients (83.1%) returned to the preinjury level. The transferred biceps tendon was intact in all 59 patients who completed radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Good bone healing was achieved in 98.3% of patients, and the glenoid bone defect decreased from 18.1% to 4.9%. Osseous and labral glenoids were significantly enlarged in width and depth on the latest magnetic resonance imaging (all P &lt; .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic FBB-DAS provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Despite slight external rotation restrictions, it achieved low recurrence and complication rates, excellent shoulder functional scores, a high return-to-sports rate, and favorable graft healing and remodeling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03635465221137883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36468855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Arthroscopy - adverse effects ; Arthroscopy - methods ; Humans ; Joint Dislocations ; Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Range of motion ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Dislocation - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Dislocation - surgery ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2023-01, Vol.51 (1), p.187-197</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e61e3c57d31a70b34d6bf907f544d4e24f80b3342bf588a494cbc436d0404e823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e61e3c57d31a70b34d6bf907f544d4e24f80b3342bf588a494cbc436d0404e823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6002-5232 ; 0000-0003-2778-4418 ; 0000-0002-6960-4887 ; 0000-0003-2265-1878 ; 0000-0001-9353-0331</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03635465221137883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03635465221137883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhaoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiebo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Zipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ziyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Yuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Caiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: As an alternative to the Latarjet procedure, the arthroscopic free bone block (FBB) procedure combined with dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) has been recently proposed to provide both glenoid augmentation and a tendon sling effect for treating anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of FBB-DAS for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic FBB-DAS for ASI with &gt;15% glenoid bone loss between February 2017 and March 2020 were screened and enrolled in this study. Clinical outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, including recurrence, complications, shoulder functional scores, range of motion, and return to sports. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also performed. Results: Of a total of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 46.1 ± 13.1 months, no patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation postoperatively, while 2 had a positive anterior apprehension test (3.1%). Additionally, 2 patients (3.1%) experienced complications of hematoma and shoulder stiffness, respectively. The mean visual analog scale score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score all improved significantly from 3.2 ± 2.4, 75.0 ± 18.9, 43.6 ± 27.3, and 33.8 ± 9.0 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.8, 95.1 ± 8.0, 95.5 ± 7.8, and 14.8 ± 3.5 at final follow-up, respectively (all P &lt; .001). No difference was detected in range of motion except for 8.1° and 7.5° external rotation limitations in adduction and abduction, respectively. There were 62 patients (95.4%) who returned to sports, and 54 patients (83.1%) returned to the preinjury level. The transferred biceps tendon was intact in all 59 patients who completed radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Good bone healing was achieved in 98.3% of patients, and the glenoid bone defect decreased from 18.1% to 4.9%. Osseous and labral glenoids were significantly enlarged in width and depth on the latest magnetic resonance imaging (all P &lt; .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic FBB-DAS provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Despite slight external rotation restrictions, it achieved low recurrence and complication rates, excellent shoulder functional scores, a high return-to-sports rate, and favorable graft healing and remodeling.</description><subject>Arthroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Dislocations</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Dislocation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Dislocation - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoiHwAGyQJTZsptjj3yzTQEulSEX8iOXIY3saF4-d2p5FeDFeD6dTqARCXli697vnXN0DwEuMTjEW4i0inDDKWdtiTISU5BFYYMbahhDOHoPFsd8cgRPwLOcbhBAWXD4FJ4RTLiVjC_Bz411wWnmogoGflHHRx-u7wtVUdBxthi7Aj6o4G0qG31zZwXUoNrmY4OddnLyxCV6GXFTvvCuHO6ELb0N0Bp7FYOE25gzVUGfgOpVdilnHvdPwPFk7E2c-6u9wE8feBWtmk3eHoMZKPZjNDj_qKjE8B08G5bN9cf8vwdfz9182H5rt1cXlZr1tNOGyNJZjSzQThmAlUE-o4f2wQmJglBpqWzrIWiW07QcmpaIrqntNCTeIImplS5bgzay7T_F2srl0o8vaeq-CjVPuWkEFQkTUtwSv_0Jv4pRC3a5SHKF6-nZVKTxTut4hJzt0--RGlQ4dRt0x1e6fVOvMq3vlqR-t-TPxO8YKnM5AVtf2wfb_ir8A2K2rvA</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Wu, Chenliang</creator><creator>Xu, Junjie</creator><creator>Fang, Zhaoyi</creator><creator>Chen, Jiebo</creator><creator>Ye, Zipeng</creator><creator>Wu, Xiulin</creator><creator>Li, Ziyun</creator><creator>Wang, Liren</creator><creator>Kang, Yuhao</creator><creator>Zhao, Song</creator><creator>Xu, Caiqi</creator><creator>Zhao, Jinzhong</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-5232</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-4418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-4887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-1878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-0331</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization</title><author>Wu, Chenliang ; Xu, Junjie ; Fang, Zhaoyi ; Chen, Jiebo ; Ye, Zipeng ; Wu, Xiulin ; Li, Ziyun ; Wang, Liren ; Kang, Yuhao ; Zhao, Song ; Xu, Caiqi ; Zhao, Jinzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e61e3c57d31a70b34d6bf907f544d4e24f80b3342bf588a494cbc436d0404e823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Arthroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Dislocations</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Dislocation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Dislocation - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhaoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiebo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Zipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ziyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Yuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Caiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chenliang</au><au>Xu, Junjie</au><au>Fang, Zhaoyi</au><au>Chen, Jiebo</au><au>Ye, Zipeng</au><au>Wu, Xiulin</au><au>Li, Ziyun</au><au>Wang, Liren</au><au>Kang, Yuhao</au><au>Zhao, Song</au><au>Xu, Caiqi</au><au>Zhao, Jinzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>187-197</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background: As an alternative to the Latarjet procedure, the arthroscopic free bone block (FBB) procedure combined with dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) has been recently proposed to provide both glenoid augmentation and a tendon sling effect for treating anterior shoulder instability (ASI) with glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of FBB-DAS for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic FBB-DAS for ASI with &gt;15% glenoid bone loss between February 2017 and March 2020 were screened and enrolled in this study. Clinical outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up, including recurrence, complications, shoulder functional scores, range of motion, and return to sports. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also performed. Results: Of a total of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 46.1 ± 13.1 months, no patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation postoperatively, while 2 had a positive anterior apprehension test (3.1%). Additionally, 2 patients (3.1%) experienced complications of hematoma and shoulder stiffness, respectively. The mean visual analog scale score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score all improved significantly from 3.2 ± 2.4, 75.0 ± 18.9, 43.6 ± 27.3, and 33.8 ± 9.0 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.8, 95.1 ± 8.0, 95.5 ± 7.8, and 14.8 ± 3.5 at final follow-up, respectively (all P &lt; .001). No difference was detected in range of motion except for 8.1° and 7.5° external rotation limitations in adduction and abduction, respectively. There were 62 patients (95.4%) who returned to sports, and 54 patients (83.1%) returned to the preinjury level. The transferred biceps tendon was intact in all 59 patients who completed radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Good bone healing was achieved in 98.3% of patients, and the glenoid bone defect decreased from 18.1% to 4.9%. Osseous and labral glenoids were significantly enlarged in width and depth on the latest magnetic resonance imaging (all P &lt; .001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic FBB-DAS provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes for ASI with glenoid bone loss. Despite slight external rotation restrictions, it achieved low recurrence and complication rates, excellent shoulder functional scores, a high return-to-sports rate, and favorable graft healing and remodeling.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36468855</pmid><doi>10.1177/03635465221137883</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-5232</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-4418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-4887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-1878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-0331</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2023-01, Vol.51 (1), p.187-197
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2747003737
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroscopy - adverse effects
Arthroscopy - methods
Humans
Joint Dislocations
Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging
Joint Instability - surgery
Magnetic resonance imaging
Range of motion
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Shoulder
Shoulder Dislocation - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Dislocation - surgery
Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Sports medicine
title Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss after Arthroscopic Free Bone Block Combined With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20Radiological%20Outcomes%20in%20Patients%20With%20Anterior%20Shoulder%20Instability%20and%20Glenoid%20Bone%20Loss%20after%20Arthroscopic%20Free%20Bone%20Block%20Combined%20With%20Dynamic%20Anterior%20Stabilization&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Wu,%20Chenliang&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=187-197&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03635465221137883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760076829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760076829&rft_id=info:pmid/36468855&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03635465221137883&rfr_iscdi=true