Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial
Objective To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1). Material and methods Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial rest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2023-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1781-1792 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1792 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1781 |
container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine Silveira, Camila Augusto Martinho, Frederico Canato de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio De Marco, Andrea Carvalho Augusto, Marina Gullo de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt Roulet, Jean-François Bresciani, Eduardo |
description | Objective
To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1).
Material and methods
Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial restoration and periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage. The CDs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive system; NP + UA (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and universal adhesive system; MH + TE (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive; MH + UA (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and universal adhesive. Restorations were assessed using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 24 months. Survival rate, periodontal parameters, dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and aesthetics were also evaluated.
Results
After 24 months, only the MH + TE group did not lose any restoration, with no significant differences between groups. For surface roughness parameter, MH presented 83.3% of the restorations scoring Bravo, whereas NP presented 48.5% of the restorations scoring Bravo. All groups presented restorations with marginal discoloration. All periodontal parameters behaved similarly, regardless of the restorative material. All groups presented significant reductions of dentin hypersensitivity and improved aesthetic perceptions (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746394098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800390580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97ae7f4edec8563bf50778e3c7445b4a11fc5bae4f5211622183549d1220466a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vVCEYhYnR2Fr9Ay4MiRs3KF8XuO5MUz-SJt20a8Jw3zvSMDACd5r6a_pTZTr1Iy66AQLPew4nB6HXjL5nlOoPtS9GEso5odJQRdgTdMykUERozZ7-cz5CL2q9ppRJpcVzdCSUVJwKc4zuznYuLq6FnHCescMp7yDiArXl0q93gLclt-xzxC3jVsC1ziTiXQl5qdhD2QXvIo5Q9yKu1uyDazDhm9C-43VI69A9uqSHukc-dhdObsEVPOcY8w1Ztri4NOVN-NnHfAzpXrGV4OJL9Gx2scKrh_0EXX0-uzz9Ss4vvnw7_XROvNBDI6N2oGcJE3gzKLGaB6q1AeG1lMNKOsZmP6wcyHngjCnOmRGDHCfGOZVKOXGC3h10e9wfS49vN6F6iNEl6Dkt11KJUdLRdPTtf-h1Xkrqv7PcUCpGOhjaKX6gfMm1FpjttoSNK7eWUbvvzx76s70_e9-fZX3ozYP0strA9Gfkd2EdEAeg9qe0hvLX-xHZXx7HqBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2800390580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes ; Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine ; Silveira, Camila Augusto ; Martinho, Frederico Canato ; de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio ; De Marco, Andrea Carvalho ; Augusto, Marina Gullo ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Roulet, Jean-François ; Bresciani, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes ; Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine ; Silveira, Camila Augusto ; Martinho, Frederico Canato ; de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio ; De Marco, Andrea Carvalho ; Augusto, Marina Gullo ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Roulet, Jean-François ; Bresciani, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1).
Material and methods
Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial restoration and periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage. The CDs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive system; NP + UA (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and universal adhesive system; MH + TE (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive; MH + UA (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and universal adhesive. Restorations were assessed using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 24 months. Survival rate, periodontal parameters, dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and aesthetics were also evaluated.
Results
After 24 months, only the MH + TE group did not lose any restoration, with no significant differences between groups. For surface roughness parameter, MH presented 83.3% of the restorations scoring Bravo, whereas NP presented 48.5% of the restorations scoring Bravo. All groups presented restorations with marginal discoloration. All periodontal parameters behaved similarly, regardless of the restorative material. All groups presented significant reductions of dentin hypersensitivity and improved aesthetic perceptions (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusion
Both resin composites and adhesives tested can be combined for partial restorations to treat CDs.
Clinical relevance
This new restorative-surgical protocol to treat CDs presents satisfactory outcomes. The partial restorations can be successfully executed with both combinations of adhesives and resin composites evaluated in this investigation.
TRN
ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03215615; registration date July 12, 2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36462038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Aesthetics ; Clinical Protocols ; Clinical trials ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental Cements ; Dental Marginal Adaptation ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dentin ; Dentin Sensitivity - therapy ; Dentistry ; Esthetics, Dental ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gingival Recession - surgery ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Medicine ; Public health ; Resin Cements ; Tooth Cervix - pathology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2023-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1781-1792</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97ae7f4edec8563bf50778e3c7445b4a11fc5bae4f5211622183549d1220466a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97ae7f4edec8563bf50778e3c7445b4a11fc5bae4f5211622183549d1220466a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36462038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Camila Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinho, Frederico Canato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marco, Andrea Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto, Marina Gullo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulet, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1).
Material and methods
Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial restoration and periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage. The CDs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive system; NP + UA (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and universal adhesive system; MH + TE (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive; MH + UA (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and universal adhesive. Restorations were assessed using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 24 months. Survival rate, periodontal parameters, dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and aesthetics were also evaluated.
Results
After 24 months, only the MH + TE group did not lose any restoration, with no significant differences between groups. For surface roughness parameter, MH presented 83.3% of the restorations scoring Bravo, whereas NP presented 48.5% of the restorations scoring Bravo. All groups presented restorations with marginal discoloration. All periodontal parameters behaved similarly, regardless of the restorative material. All groups presented significant reductions of dentin hypersensitivity and improved aesthetic perceptions (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusion
Both resin composites and adhesives tested can be combined for partial restorations to treat CDs.
Clinical relevance
This new restorative-surgical protocol to treat CDs presents satisfactory outcomes. The partial restorations can be successfully executed with both combinations of adhesives and resin composites evaluated in this investigation.
TRN
ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03215615; registration date July 12, 2017.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Marginal Adaptation</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin Sensitivity - therapy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Tooth Cervix - pathology</subject><issn>1436-3771</issn><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vVCEYhYnR2Fr9Ay4MiRs3KF8XuO5MUz-SJt20a8Jw3zvSMDACd5r6a_pTZTr1Iy66AQLPew4nB6HXjL5nlOoPtS9GEso5odJQRdgTdMykUERozZ7-cz5CL2q9ppRJpcVzdCSUVJwKc4zuznYuLq6FnHCescMp7yDiArXl0q93gLclt-xzxC3jVsC1ziTiXQl5qdhD2QXvIo5Q9yKu1uyDazDhm9C-43VI69A9uqSHukc-dhdObsEVPOcY8w1Ztri4NOVN-NnHfAzpXrGV4OJL9Gx2scKrh_0EXX0-uzz9Ss4vvnw7_XROvNBDI6N2oGcJE3gzKLGaB6q1AeG1lMNKOsZmP6wcyHngjCnOmRGDHCfGOZVKOXGC3h10e9wfS49vN6F6iNEl6Dkt11KJUdLRdPTtf-h1Xkrqv7PcUCpGOhjaKX6gfMm1FpjttoSNK7eWUbvvzx76s70_e9-fZX3ozYP0strA9Gfkd2EdEAeg9qe0hvLX-xHZXx7HqBo</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes</creator><creator>Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine</creator><creator>Silveira, Camila Augusto</creator><creator>Martinho, Frederico Canato</creator><creator>de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio</creator><creator>De Marco, Andrea Carvalho</creator><creator>Augusto, Marina Gullo</creator><creator>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creator><creator>Roulet, Jean-François</creator><creator>Bresciani, Eduardo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial</title><author>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes ; Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine ; Silveira, Camila Augusto ; Martinho, Frederico Canato ; de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio ; De Marco, Andrea Carvalho ; Augusto, Marina Gullo ; de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt ; Roulet, Jean-François ; Bresciani, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97ae7f4edec8563bf50778e3c7445b4a11fc5bae4f5211622183549d1220466a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Marginal Adaptation</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin Sensitivity - therapy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Tooth Cervix - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Camila Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinho, Frederico Canato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marco, Andrea Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto, Marina Gullo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulet, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes</au><au>Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine</au><au>Silveira, Camila Augusto</au><au>Martinho, Frederico Canato</au><au>de Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio</au><au>De Marco, Andrea Carvalho</au><au>Augusto, Marina Gullo</au><au>de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt</au><au>Roulet, Jean-François</au><au>Bresciani, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1781</spage><epage>1792</epage><pages>1781-1792</pages><issn>1436-3771</issn><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1).
Material and methods
Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial restoration and periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage. The CDs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive system; NP + UA (
n
= 20), nanofilled composite and universal adhesive system; MH + TE (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive; MH + UA (
n
= 20), microhybrid composite and universal adhesive. Restorations were assessed using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 24 months. Survival rate, periodontal parameters, dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and aesthetics were also evaluated.
Results
After 24 months, only the MH + TE group did not lose any restoration, with no significant differences between groups. For surface roughness parameter, MH presented 83.3% of the restorations scoring Bravo, whereas NP presented 48.5% of the restorations scoring Bravo. All groups presented restorations with marginal discoloration. All periodontal parameters behaved similarly, regardless of the restorative material. All groups presented significant reductions of dentin hypersensitivity and improved aesthetic perceptions (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusion
Both resin composites and adhesives tested can be combined for partial restorations to treat CDs.
Clinical relevance
This new restorative-surgical protocol to treat CDs presents satisfactory outcomes. The partial restorations can be successfully executed with both combinations of adhesives and resin composites evaluated in this investigation.
TRN
ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03215615; registration date July 12, 2017.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36462038</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-3771 |
ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2023-04, Vol.27 (4), p.1781-1792 |
issn | 1436-3771 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746394098 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adhesives Aesthetics Clinical Protocols Clinical trials Composite materials Composite Resins Dental Cements Dental Marginal Adaptation Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dentin Dentin Sensitivity - therapy Dentistry Esthetics, Dental Follow-Up Studies Gingival Recession - surgery Humans Hypersensitivity Medicine Public health Resin Cements Tooth Cervix - pathology |
title | Evaluation of a novel restorative protocol to treat non-carious cervical lesion associated with gingival recession: a 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T12%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20novel%20restorative%20protocol%20to%20treat%20non-carious%20cervical%20lesion%20associated%20with%20gingival%20recession:%20a%202-year%20follow-up%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Mathias-Santamaria,%20Ingrid%20Fernandes&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1781&rft.epage=1792&rft.pages=1781-1792&rft.issn=1436-3771&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-022-04806-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2800390580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2800390580&rft_id=info:pmid/36462038&rfr_iscdi=true |