De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review
Objective: Combination therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is often prescribed as initial treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) despite limited evidence that ICS therapy is beneficial. Prescribing rates exceed the estimated number of candidates diagnosed with COPD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.478-484 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 484 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 478 |
container_title | Journal of Pharmacy Practice |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Schroeder, Michelle N. Sens, Hailee M. Shah, Shaina K. |
description | Objective: Combination therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is often prescribed as initial treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) despite limited evidence that ICS therapy is beneficial. Prescribing rates exceed the estimated number of candidates diagnosed with COPD who are eligible for ICS treatment per guideline-directed therapy. Therefore, some patients would benefit from ICS withdrawal due to potentially inappropriate prescribing. This review aims to highlight evidence evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in COPD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed between June 2021 and March 2022 with assistance from a reference librarian. Sources of literature review include PubMed and Embase. The authors selected randomized controlled trials and articles evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in patients with COPD. Three clinical trials and one post-hoc analysis are discussed in this review. Pertinent safety, efficacy, and statistical and clinical outcomes are summarized. Conclusions: The most appropriate approach to de-prescribe ICS maintenance therapy in COPD without clear indication remains uncertain. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing clinical outcomes by analyzing ICS use in practice and identifying potential candidates for ICS withdrawal. The withdrawal protocols discussed in this review offer options for clinicians to help guide therapy decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/08971900221144127 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746393856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_08971900221144127</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2746393856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dbd77565cb41553ce439b9df613071d1cc112481d360e9d94b2e721705582e5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqXwA1iQR5YUv_6IEzZUPiVEKwRzlNhvqas0LnYC4t-TUmBBYrrhnjvpjpBjYGMArc9YlmvIGeMcQErgeocMQQlIIBd6lww3frIBBuQgxmUPghR8nwxEKlWWST0k5hKTWcBogqtc80LvmkVZo6UTH1pnfGwxeGcjdQ2dLIJvnKHTKrahM617Qzrr6pVvyvBBL13EMuI5vaAPZQjll_2Ibw7fD8nevKwjHn3riDxfXz1NbpP76c3d5OI-MUKyNrGV1VqlylQSlBIGpcir3M5TEEyDBWMAuMzAipRhbnNZcdQcNFMq46hQjMjptncd_GuHsS1WLhqs67JB38WCa5mKXGQq7VHYoib4GAPOi3Vwq35HAazYfFv8-bbPnHzXd9UK7W_i58weGG-BWL5gsfRdaPq5_zR-AsMGgME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2746393856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Schroeder, Michelle N. ; Sens, Hailee M. ; Shah, Shaina K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Michelle N. ; Sens, Hailee M. ; Shah, Shaina K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Combination therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is often prescribed as initial treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) despite limited evidence that ICS therapy is beneficial. Prescribing rates exceed the estimated number of candidates diagnosed with COPD who are eligible for ICS treatment per guideline-directed therapy. Therefore, some patients would benefit from ICS withdrawal due to potentially inappropriate prescribing. This review aims to highlight evidence evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in COPD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed between June 2021 and March 2022 with assistance from a reference librarian. Sources of literature review include PubMed and Embase. The authors selected randomized controlled trials and articles evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in patients with COPD. Three clinical trials and one post-hoc analysis are discussed in this review. Pertinent safety, efficacy, and statistical and clinical outcomes are summarized. Conclusions: The most appropriate approach to de-prescribe ICS maintenance therapy in COPD without clear indication remains uncertain. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing clinical outcomes by analyzing ICS use in practice and identifying potential candidates for ICS withdrawal. The withdrawal protocols discussed in this review offer options for clinicians to help guide therapy decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-1900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-1937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08971900221144127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36458847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.478-484</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dbd77565cb41553ce439b9df613071d1cc112481d360e9d94b2e721705582e5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dbd77565cb41553ce439b9df613071d1cc112481d360e9d94b2e721705582e5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0160-8571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08971900221144127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08971900221144127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36458847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Michelle N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sens, Hailee M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Shaina K.</creatorcontrib><title>De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review</title><title>Journal of Pharmacy Practice</title><addtitle>J Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Objective: Combination therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is often prescribed as initial treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) despite limited evidence that ICS therapy is beneficial. Prescribing rates exceed the estimated number of candidates diagnosed with COPD who are eligible for ICS treatment per guideline-directed therapy. Therefore, some patients would benefit from ICS withdrawal due to potentially inappropriate prescribing. This review aims to highlight evidence evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in COPD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed between June 2021 and March 2022 with assistance from a reference librarian. Sources of literature review include PubMed and Embase. The authors selected randomized controlled trials and articles evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in patients with COPD. Three clinical trials and one post-hoc analysis are discussed in this review. Pertinent safety, efficacy, and statistical and clinical outcomes are summarized. Conclusions: The most appropriate approach to de-prescribe ICS maintenance therapy in COPD without clear indication remains uncertain. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing clinical outcomes by analyzing ICS use in practice and identifying potential candidates for ICS withdrawal. The withdrawal protocols discussed in this review offer options for clinicians to help guide therapy decisions.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inappropriate Prescribing</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy</subject><issn>0897-1900</issn><issn>1531-1937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqXwA1iQR5YUv_6IEzZUPiVEKwRzlNhvqas0LnYC4t-TUmBBYrrhnjvpjpBjYGMArc9YlmvIGeMcQErgeocMQQlIIBd6lww3frIBBuQgxmUPghR8nwxEKlWWST0k5hKTWcBogqtc80LvmkVZo6UTH1pnfGwxeGcjdQ2dLIJvnKHTKrahM617Qzrr6pVvyvBBL13EMuI5vaAPZQjll_2Ibw7fD8nevKwjHn3riDxfXz1NbpP76c3d5OI-MUKyNrGV1VqlylQSlBIGpcir3M5TEEyDBWMAuMzAipRhbnNZcdQcNFMq46hQjMjptncd_GuHsS1WLhqs67JB38WCa5mKXGQq7VHYoib4GAPOi3Vwq35HAazYfFv8-bbPnHzXd9UK7W_i58weGG-BWL5gsfRdaPq5_zR-AsMGgME</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Schroeder, Michelle N.</creator><creator>Sens, Hailee M.</creator><creator>Shah, Shaina K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-8571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review</title><author>Schroeder, Michelle N. ; Sens, Hailee M. ; Shah, Shaina K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dbd77565cb41553ce439b9df613071d1cc112481d360e9d94b2e721705582e5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inappropriate Prescribing</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Michelle N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sens, Hailee M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Shaina K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Pharmacy Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schroeder, Michelle N.</au><au>Sens, Hailee M.</au><au>Shah, Shaina K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Pharmacy Practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>478</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>478-484</pages><issn>0897-1900</issn><eissn>1531-1937</eissn><abstract>Objective: Combination therapy, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), is often prescribed as initial treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) despite limited evidence that ICS therapy is beneficial. Prescribing rates exceed the estimated number of candidates diagnosed with COPD who are eligible for ICS treatment per guideline-directed therapy. Therefore, some patients would benefit from ICS withdrawal due to potentially inappropriate prescribing. This review aims to highlight evidence evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in COPD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed between June 2021 and March 2022 with assistance from a reference librarian. Sources of literature review include PubMed and Embase. The authors selected randomized controlled trials and articles evaluating ICS withdrawal approaches in patients with COPD. Three clinical trials and one post-hoc analysis are discussed in this review. Pertinent safety, efficacy, and statistical and clinical outcomes are summarized. Conclusions: The most appropriate approach to de-prescribe ICS maintenance therapy in COPD without clear indication remains uncertain. Pharmacists can play a role in optimizing clinical outcomes by analyzing ICS use in practice and identifying potential candidates for ICS withdrawal. The withdrawal protocols discussed in this review offer options for clinicians to help guide therapy decisions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36458847</pmid><doi>10.1177/08971900221144127</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-8571</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-1900 |
ispartof | Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.478-484 |
issn | 0897-1900 1531-1937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746393856 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
subjects | Administration, Inhalation Adrenal Cortex Hormones Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use Drug Therapy, Combination Humans Inappropriate Prescribing Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy |
title | De-Prescribing Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De-Prescribing%20Inhaled%20Corticosteroids%20in%20Chronic%20Obstructive%20Pulmonary%20Disease:%20A%20Narrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Pharmacy%20Practice&rft.au=Schroeder,%20Michelle%20N.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=478&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=478-484&rft.issn=0897-1900&rft.eissn=1531-1937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08971900221144127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2746393856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2746393856&rft_id=info:pmid/36458847&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08971900221144127&rfr_iscdi=true |