Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock

This work provides a theoretical explanation for the mechanisms that can drive collective turnover in response to a unit-level shock by applying event systems theory to collective turnover. Specifically, we recognize the importance of modeling a disruption phase following a shock, the social mechani...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of applied psychology 2023-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1001-1026
Hauptverfasser:	Pieper, Jenna R., Maltarich, Mark A., Nyberg, Anthony J., Reilly, Greg, Ray, Caitlin
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Disruption Human Human Capital Humans Management Personnel Motivation Personnel Turnover Retailing Shock Simulation Social Influences Social mechanisms Systems Theory
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	1026
container_issue	6
container_start_page	1001
container_title	Journal of applied psychology
container_volume	108
creator	Pieper, Jenna R. Maltarich, Mark A. Nyberg, Anthony J. Reilly, Greg Ray, Caitlin
description	This work provides a theoretical explanation for the mechanisms that can drive collective turnover in response to a unit-level shock by applying event systems theory to collective turnover. Specifically, we recognize the importance of modeling a disruption phase following a shock, the social mechanisms that influence the collective turnover response, and boundary conditions on the impact of the shock on the collective turnover response. We examine collective turnover following 239 general manager departures in a large U.S. retailer from 2012 to 2014 to observe how a unit-relevant shock affects the collective turnover response across time. In doing so, we identify and explain a potential delay before the disruption phase and the cumulative abnormal voluntary turnover that occurs in the disruption phase following a unit-level shock.
doi_str_mv	10.1037/apl0001052
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746392712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2746392712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f4c89390a2125d11b149329d9f9bae952dde055d77775a6a2df53779c5b27cc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AFS8EaEaj6apgFvZPgFg4Fu1yFNT7Gza2rSDvbvTdlU8MJcnHA4Dw_nvAidE3xDMBO3uq0xxgRzeoDGRDIZk4wnh2iMMSWxDJMROvF-FZiESXyMRixNOA_dGN1NbV2D6aoNRIveNXYDLnoF39rGQzQfukW1hqizkY6WTdXFM9hAHb29W_Nxio5KXXs42_8TtHx8WEyf49n86WV6P4s1y0gXl4nJwlZYU0J5QUhOEsmoLGQpcw2S06IAzHkhwuM61bQoORNCGp5TYUzKJuhq522d_ezBd2pdeQN1rRuwvVdUJCmTVBAa0Ms_6MqGs8J2imaUyFQklP1LBRfnjKeD63pHGWe9d1Cq1lVr7baKYDUkr36TD_DFXtnnayh-0O-oAxDvAN1q1fqt0a6rTA3e9M5B0w2yYM1UGiom7AvOgopo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2746553562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Pieper, Jenna R. ; Maltarich, Mark A. ; Nyberg, Anthony J. ; Reilly, Greg ; Ray, Caitlin</creator><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Jenna R. ; Maltarich, Mark A. ; Nyberg, Anthony J. ; Reilly, Greg ; Ray, Caitlin ; Eby, Lillian T</creatorcontrib><description>This work provides a theoretical explanation for the mechanisms that can drive collective turnover in response to a unit-level shock by applying event systems theory to collective turnover. Specifically, we recognize the importance of modeling a disruption phase following a shock, the social mechanisms that influence the collective turnover response, and boundary conditions on the impact of the shock on the collective turnover response. We examine collective turnover following 239 general manager departures in a large U.S. retailer from 2012 to 2014 to observe how a unit-relevant shock affects the collective turnover response across time. In doing so, we identify and explain a potential delay before the disruption phase and the cumulative abnormal voluntary turnover that occurs in the disruption phase following a unit-level shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0001052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36455014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Disruption ; Human ; Human Capital ; Humans ; Management Personnel ; Motivation ; Personnel Turnover ; Retailing ; Shock ; Simulation ; Social Influences ; Social mechanisms ; Systems Theory</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2023-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1001-1026</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f4c89390a2125d11b149329d9f9bae952dde055d77775a6a2df53779c5b27cc63</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5194-9740 ; 0000-0002-6653-5126 ; 0000-0003-4089-3010 ; 0000-0002-5545-3301 ; 0000-0002-3045-2396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36455014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Jenna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltarich, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyberg, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><title>Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>This work provides a theoretical explanation for the mechanisms that can drive collective turnover in response to a unit-level shock by applying event systems theory to collective turnover. Specifically, we recognize the importance of modeling a disruption phase following a shock, the social mechanisms that influence the collective turnover response, and boundary conditions on the impact of the shock on the collective turnover response. We examine collective turnover following 239 general manager departures in a large U.S. retailer from 2012 to 2014 to observe how a unit-relevant shock affects the collective turnover response across time. In doing so, we identify and explain a potential delay before the disruption phase and the cumulative abnormal voluntary turnover that occurs in the disruption phase following a unit-level shock.</description><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Capital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management Personnel</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personnel Turnover</subject><subject>Retailing</subject><subject>Shock</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social mechanisms</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AFS8EaEaj6apgFvZPgFg4Fu1yFNT7Gza2rSDvbvTdlU8MJcnHA4Dw_nvAidE3xDMBO3uq0xxgRzeoDGRDIZk4wnh2iMMSWxDJMROvF-FZiESXyMRixNOA_dGN1NbV2D6aoNRIveNXYDLnoF39rGQzQfukW1hqizkY6WTdXFM9hAHb29W_Nxio5KXXs42_8TtHx8WEyf49n86WV6P4s1y0gXl4nJwlZYU0J5QUhOEsmoLGQpcw2S06IAzHkhwuM61bQoORNCGp5TYUzKJuhq522d_ezBd2pdeQN1rRuwvVdUJCmTVBAa0Ms_6MqGs8J2imaUyFQklP1LBRfnjKeD63pHGWe9d1Cq1lVr7baKYDUkr36TD_DFXtnnayh-0O-oAxDvAN1q1fqt0a6rTA3e9M5B0w2yYM1UGiom7AvOgopo</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Pieper, Jenna R.</creator><creator>Maltarich, Mark A.</creator><creator>Nyberg, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Reilly, Greg</creator><creator>Ray, Caitlin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-5126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-3010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-3301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3045-2396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock</title><author>Pieper, Jenna R. ; Maltarich, Mark A. ; Nyberg, Anthony J. ; Reilly, Greg ; Ray, Caitlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f4c89390a2125d11b149329d9f9bae952dde055d77775a6a2df53779c5b27cc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Capital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management Personnel</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personnel Turnover</topic><topic>Retailing</topic><topic>Shock</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social mechanisms</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Jenna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltarich, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyberg, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pieper, Jenna R.</au><au>Maltarich, Mark A.</au><au>Nyberg, Anthony J.</au><au>Reilly, Greg</au><au>Ray, Caitlin</au><au>Eby, Lillian T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1026</epage><pages>1001-1026</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>This work provides a theoretical explanation for the mechanisms that can drive collective turnover in response to a unit-level shock by applying event systems theory to collective turnover. Specifically, we recognize the importance of modeling a disruption phase following a shock, the social mechanisms that influence the collective turnover response, and boundary conditions on the impact of the shock on the collective turnover response. We examine collective turnover following 239 general manager departures in a large U.S. retailer from 2012 to 2014 to observe how a unit-relevant shock affects the collective turnover response across time. In doing so, we identify and explain a potential delay before the disruption phase and the cumulative abnormal voluntary turnover that occurs in the disruption phase following a unit-level shock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>36455014</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0001052</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-5126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-3010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-3301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3045-2396</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof	Journal of applied psychology, 2023-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1001-1026
issn	0021-9010 1939-1854
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2746392712
source	MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects	Disruption Human Human Capital Humans Management Personnel Motivation Personnel Turnover Retailing Shock Simulation Social Influences Social mechanisms Systems Theory
title	Collective Turnover Response Over Time to a Unit-Level Shock
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collective%20Turnover%20Response%20Over%20Time%20to%20a%20Unit-Level%20Shock&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Pieper,%20Jenna%20R.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1026&rft.pages=1001-1026&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0001052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2746392712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2746553562&rft_id=info:pmid/36455014&rfr_iscdi=true