Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis
Introduction: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore Singapore, 2022-11, Vol.51 (11), p.686-694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 694 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 686 |
container_title | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Choo, Bryan Peide Goh, George Boon-Bee Chia, Sing Yi Oh, Hong Choon Tan, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn Ang, Tiing Leong Bee, Yong Mong Wong, Yu Jun |
description | Introduction: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to establish a price threshold for NAFLD treatment, when it becomes available.
Method: A Markov model was constructed comparing 4 screening strategies (versus no screening) to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients: fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4 and VCTE (simultaneous), and FIB-4 and VCTE (sequential). Sensitivity analyses and price threshold analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainties in the results.
Results: VCTE was the most cost-effective NAFLD screening strategy (USD24,727/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), followed by FIB-4 (USD36,800/QALY), when compared to no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a higher degree of certainty for VCTE as a cost-effective strategy compared to FIB-4 (90.7% versus 73.2%). The duration of expected screening benefit is the most influential variable based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio tornado analysis. The minimum duration of screening benefit for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective was at least 2.6 years. The annual cost of NAFLD treatment should be less than USD751 for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective.
Conclusion: Both VCTE and FIB-4 are cost-effective NAFLD screening strategies among T2DM patients in Singapore. However, given the lack of access to VCTE at primacy care and potential budget constraints, FIB-4 can also be considered for NAFLD screening among T2DM patients in Singapore.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis, fatty liver, screening, liver fibrosis, population health |
doi_str_mv | 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022284 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2744671740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2744671740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-555a5451d33920b46007885d3381a8c64342720aaed4046424f6dd1371f1ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwD2bHJsV2xknKrqp4SRVsurdce9IaJU7JuEjh67FohVjN62rmzsmyW8FnUAku700IpqXcWOM6dLSdSS6lrOEsm_CCQw4ll-f_8svsiuiDc6i4LCfZ91sfctPafte33rLGxDiy1n_hwJwnNISM7IAYfNgyH1gc98hkmpkNRiTWYdv6eKAHtmC2p5hj06CNaUFAImaCY_vBW2RxNyClIy71TDuSp-vsoknW8eYUp9n66XG9fMlX78-vy8UqtwWomCuljAIlXFHMJd-kH3hV1yqVtTC1LaEAWUluDDrgUIKEpnROFJVoBKIqptndce1-6D8PSFF3nmyybQL2B9KyAigrUQFP0vlRaoeeaMBGJ--dGUYtuP7FrY-49R9ufcJd_ADExXlO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2744671740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Choo, Bryan Peide ; Goh, George Boon-Bee ; Chia, Sing Yi ; Oh, Hong Choon ; Tan, Ngiap Chuan ; Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn ; Ang, Tiing Leong ; Bee, Yong Mong ; Wong, Yu Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Choo, Bryan Peide ; Goh, George Boon-Bee ; Chia, Sing Yi ; Oh, Hong Choon ; Tan, Ngiap Chuan ; Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn ; Ang, Tiing Leong ; Bee, Yong Mong ; Wong, Yu Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to establish a price threshold for NAFLD treatment, when it becomes available.
Method: A Markov model was constructed comparing 4 screening strategies (versus no screening) to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients: fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4 and VCTE (simultaneous), and FIB-4 and VCTE (sequential). Sensitivity analyses and price threshold analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainties in the results.
Results: VCTE was the most cost-effective NAFLD screening strategy (USD24,727/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), followed by FIB-4 (USD36,800/QALY), when compared to no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a higher degree of certainty for VCTE as a cost-effective strategy compared to FIB-4 (90.7% versus 73.2%). The duration of expected screening benefit is the most influential variable based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio tornado analysis. The minimum duration of screening benefit for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective was at least 2.6 years. The annual cost of NAFLD treatment should be less than USD751 for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective.
Conclusion: Both VCTE and FIB-4 are cost-effective NAFLD screening strategies among T2DM patients in Singapore. However, given the lack of access to VCTE at primacy care and potential budget constraints, FIB-4 can also be considered for NAFLD screening among T2DM patients in Singapore.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis, fatty liver, screening, liver fibrosis, population health</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022284</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2022-11, Vol.51 (11), p.686-694</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-555a5451d33920b46007885d3381a8c64342720aaed4046424f6dd1371f1ee53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-555a5451d33920b46007885d3381a8c64342720aaed4046424f6dd1371f1ee53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choo, Bryan Peide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, George Boon-Bee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sing Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Hong Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ngiap Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Tiing Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bee, Yong Mong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yu Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis</title><title>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</title><description>Introduction: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to establish a price threshold for NAFLD treatment, when it becomes available.
Method: A Markov model was constructed comparing 4 screening strategies (versus no screening) to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients: fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4 and VCTE (simultaneous), and FIB-4 and VCTE (sequential). Sensitivity analyses and price threshold analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainties in the results.
Results: VCTE was the most cost-effective NAFLD screening strategy (USD24,727/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), followed by FIB-4 (USD36,800/QALY), when compared to no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a higher degree of certainty for VCTE as a cost-effective strategy compared to FIB-4 (90.7% versus 73.2%). The duration of expected screening benefit is the most influential variable based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio tornado analysis. The minimum duration of screening benefit for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective was at least 2.6 years. The annual cost of NAFLD treatment should be less than USD751 for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective.
Conclusion: Both VCTE and FIB-4 are cost-effective NAFLD screening strategies among T2DM patients in Singapore. However, given the lack of access to VCTE at primacy care and potential budget constraints, FIB-4 can also be considered for NAFLD screening among T2DM patients in Singapore.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis, fatty liver, screening, liver fibrosis, population health</description><issn>0304-4602</issn><issn>0304-4602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwD2bHJsV2xknKrqp4SRVsurdce9IaJU7JuEjh67FohVjN62rmzsmyW8FnUAku700IpqXcWOM6dLSdSS6lrOEsm_CCQw4ll-f_8svsiuiDc6i4LCfZ91sfctPafte33rLGxDiy1n_hwJwnNISM7IAYfNgyH1gc98hkmpkNRiTWYdv6eKAHtmC2p5hj06CNaUFAImaCY_vBW2RxNyClIy71TDuSp-vsoknW8eYUp9n66XG9fMlX78-vy8UqtwWomCuljAIlXFHMJd-kH3hV1yqVtTC1LaEAWUluDDrgUIKEpnROFJVoBKIqptndce1-6D8PSFF3nmyybQL2B9KyAigrUQFP0vlRaoeeaMBGJ--dGUYtuP7FrY-49R9ufcJd_ADExXlO</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Choo, Bryan Peide</creator><creator>Goh, George Boon-Bee</creator><creator>Chia, Sing Yi</creator><creator>Oh, Hong Choon</creator><creator>Tan, Ngiap Chuan</creator><creator>Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn</creator><creator>Ang, Tiing Leong</creator><creator>Bee, Yong Mong</creator><creator>Wong, Yu Jun</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis</title><author>Choo, Bryan Peide ; Goh, George Boon-Bee ; Chia, Sing Yi ; Oh, Hong Choon ; Tan, Ngiap Chuan ; Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn ; Ang, Tiing Leong ; Bee, Yong Mong ; Wong, Yu Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-555a5451d33920b46007885d3381a8c64342720aaed4046424f6dd1371f1ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choo, Bryan Peide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, George Boon-Bee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sing Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Hong Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ngiap Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Tiing Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bee, Yong Mong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yu Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choo, Bryan Peide</au><au>Goh, George Boon-Bee</au><au>Chia, Sing Yi</au><au>Oh, Hong Choon</au><au>Tan, Ngiap Chuan</au><au>Tan, Jessica Yi Lyn</au><au>Ang, Tiing Leong</au><au>Bee, Yong Mong</au><au>Wong, Yu Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>686-694</pages><issn>0304-4602</issn><eissn>0304-4602</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to establish a price threshold for NAFLD treatment, when it becomes available.
Method: A Markov model was constructed comparing 4 screening strategies (versus no screening) to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients: fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4 and VCTE (simultaneous), and FIB-4 and VCTE (sequential). Sensitivity analyses and price threshold analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainties in the results.
Results: VCTE was the most cost-effective NAFLD screening strategy (USD24,727/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), followed by FIB-4 (USD36,800/QALY), when compared to no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a higher degree of certainty for VCTE as a cost-effective strategy compared to FIB-4 (90.7% versus 73.2%). The duration of expected screening benefit is the most influential variable based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio tornado analysis. The minimum duration of screening benefit for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective was at least 2.6 years. The annual cost of NAFLD treatment should be less than USD751 for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective.
Conclusion: Both VCTE and FIB-4 are cost-effective NAFLD screening strategies among T2DM patients in Singapore. However, given the lack of access to VCTE at primacy care and potential budget constraints, FIB-4 can also be considered for NAFLD screening among T2DM patients in Singapore.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis, fatty liver, screening, liver fibrosis, population health</abstract><doi>10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022284</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-4602 |
ispartof | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2022-11, Vol.51 (11), p.686-694 |
issn | 0304-4602 0304-4602 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2744671740 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease screening in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness and price threshold analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-alcoholic%20fatty%20liver%20disease%20screening%20in%20type%202%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20A%20cost-effectiveness%20and%20price%20threshold%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Medicine,%20Singapore&rft.au=Choo,%20Bryan%20Peide&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=686-694&rft.issn=0304-4602&rft.eissn=0304-4602&rft_id=info:doi/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744671740%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2744671740&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |