Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?

Mosenia et al report on the use of telehealth services across 11 surgical and nonsurgical specialties, including ophthalmology, at the University of California San Francisco before, during, and after shelter-in-place orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite creative implementation of a hybri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of ophthalmology (1960) 2023-01, Vol.141 (1), p.61-62
1. Verfasser: Glasser, David B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Archives of ophthalmology (1960)
container_volume 141
creator Glasser, David B
description Mosenia et al report on the use of telehealth services across 11 surgical and nonsurgical specialties, including ophthalmology, at the University of California San Francisco before, during, and after shelter-in-place orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite creative implementation of a hybrid care delivery system using a combination of asynchronous data from in-person testing followed by remote visits, the authors found that the surge in use of telehealth services by ophthalmologists lagged that of all other specialties when the shelter-in-place order was implemented. Unique among the specialties studied, the percentage of remotely delivered ophthalmic visits dropped dramatically within 6 months while shelter-in-place orders were still in effect. After the orders were lifted, ophthalmic use of telemedicine (1.1%) returned almost entirely to prepandemic levels, while other specialties continued to provide a considerable percentage of visits remotely (14.9% to 65.9%).
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2744668550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2799234</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2744668550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-4aa5a05097ea5d4dcde2864b95ff61455c8cf96091e4f3580fa033e7989a69603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4Mobsz9Ax6k4MVLZ369NDmJDKeDwS7zXLI2sRvtMpP2sP_elM2C5pLHy-e9b_gglBA8IxiT571utDtWbaXrxtUziimdAWH4Co0pETIVJGPXQy1ghKYh7HE8EmPO4BaNmODAIRNjRJch2VTGm0Qni67tYmGdTzamNpXRdVslu0OyHtLc1-nlDt1YXQczvdwT9Ll428w_0tX6fTl_XaWaUtqmXGvQGLDKjIaSl0VpqBR8q8BaQThAIQurBFbEcMtAYqsxYyZTUmkR-2yCns57j959dya0ebMLhalrfTCuCznNOBdCAvTo4z907zp_iL-LlJA0U6AgUvJMFd6F4I3Nj37XaH_KCc57tflftXmvNu_VxtGHS0C3bUw5DP6KjMD9GYgbhteYqyjj7Acpmn7b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768279595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Glasser, David B</creator><creatorcontrib>Glasser, David B</creatorcontrib><description>Mosenia et al report on the use of telehealth services across 11 surgical and nonsurgical specialties, including ophthalmology, at the University of California San Francisco before, during, and after shelter-in-place orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite creative implementation of a hybrid care delivery system using a combination of asynchronous data from in-person testing followed by remote visits, the authors found that the surge in use of telehealth services by ophthalmologists lagged that of all other specialties when the shelter-in-place order was implemented. Unique among the specialties studied, the percentage of remotely delivered ophthalmic visits dropped dramatically within 6 months while shelter-in-place orders were still in effect. After the orders were lifted, ophthalmic use of telemedicine (1.1%) returned almost entirely to prepandemic levels, while other specialties continued to provide a considerable percentage of visits remotely (14.9% to 65.9%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36454576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Humans ; Ophthalmology ; Shelters ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2023-01, Vol.141 (1), p.61-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jan 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-4aa5a05097ea5d4dcde2864b95ff61455c8cf96091e4f3580fa033e7989a69603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,315,781,785,3341,27926,27927,76491,76494</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glasser, David B</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?</title><title>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Mosenia et al report on the use of telehealth services across 11 surgical and nonsurgical specialties, including ophthalmology, at the University of California San Francisco before, during, and after shelter-in-place orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite creative implementation of a hybrid care delivery system using a combination of asynchronous data from in-person testing followed by remote visits, the authors found that the surge in use of telehealth services by ophthalmologists lagged that of all other specialties when the shelter-in-place order was implemented. Unique among the specialties studied, the percentage of remotely delivered ophthalmic visits dropped dramatically within 6 months while shelter-in-place orders were still in effect. After the orders were lifted, ophthalmic use of telemedicine (1.1%) returned almost entirely to prepandemic levels, while other specialties continued to provide a considerable percentage of visits remotely (14.9% to 65.9%).</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4Mobsz9Ax6k4MVLZ369NDmJDKeDwS7zXLI2sRvtMpP2sP_elM2C5pLHy-e9b_gglBA8IxiT571utDtWbaXrxtUziimdAWH4Co0pETIVJGPXQy1ghKYh7HE8EmPO4BaNmODAIRNjRJch2VTGm0Qni67tYmGdTzamNpXRdVslu0OyHtLc1-nlDt1YXQczvdwT9Ll428w_0tX6fTl_XaWaUtqmXGvQGLDKjIaSl0VpqBR8q8BaQThAIQurBFbEcMtAYqsxYyZTUmkR-2yCns57j959dya0ebMLhalrfTCuCznNOBdCAvTo4z907zp_iL-LlJA0U6AgUvJMFd6F4I3Nj37XaH_KCc57tflftXmvNu_VxtGHS0C3bUw5DP6KjMD9GYgbhteYqyjj7Acpmn7b</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Glasser, David B</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?</title><author>Glasser, David B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-4aa5a05097ea5d4dcde2864b95ff61455c8cf96091e4f3580fa033e7989a69603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glasser, David B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glasser, David B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>61-62</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>Mosenia et al report on the use of telehealth services across 11 surgical and nonsurgical specialties, including ophthalmology, at the University of California San Francisco before, during, and after shelter-in-place orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite creative implementation of a hybrid care delivery system using a combination of asynchronous data from in-person testing followed by remote visits, the authors found that the surge in use of telehealth services by ophthalmologists lagged that of all other specialties when the shelter-in-place order was implemented. Unique among the specialties studied, the percentage of remotely delivered ophthalmic visits dropped dramatically within 6 months while shelter-in-place orders were still in effect. After the orders were lifted, ophthalmic use of telemedicine (1.1%) returned almost entirely to prepandemic levels, while other specialties continued to provide a considerable percentage of visits remotely (14.9% to 65.9%).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>36454576</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6165
ispartof Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2023-01, Vol.141 (1), p.61-62
issn 2168-6165
2168-6173
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2744668550
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects COVID-19
Humans
Ophthalmology
Shelters
Telemedicine
title Is There a Future for Telehealth in Ophthalmology?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T05%3A34%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Future%20for%20Telehealth%20in%20Ophthalmology?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20ophthalmology%20(1960)&rft.au=Glasser,%20David%20B&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=61-62&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744668550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768279595&rft_id=info:pmid/36454576&rft_ama_id=2799234&rfr_iscdi=true