Inequalities in Access to Mental Health Treatment by Australian Youths During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective:The authors aimed to evaluate changes in use of government-subsidized primary mental health services, through the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), by young people during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and whether changes were associated with age, sex, socioeconomic s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2023-06, Vol.74 (6), p.581-588
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Caroline X., McDonald, Lachlan P., Hamilton, Matthew P., Simons, Koen, Menssink, Jana M., Filia, Kate, Rickwood, Debra, Rice, Simon, Hickie, Ian, McGorry, Patrick D., Cotton, Sue M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective:The authors aimed to evaluate changes in use of government-subsidized primary mental health services, through the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), by young people during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and whether changes were associated with age, sex, socioeconomic status, and residence in particular geographical areas.Methods:Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted by using quarterly mental health MBS service data (all young people ages 12–25 years, 2015–2020) for individual Statistical Area Level 3 areas across Australia. The data captured >22.4 million service records. Meta-analysis and meta-regression models estimated the pandemic interruption effect at the national level and delineated factors influencing these estimates.Results:Compared with expected prepandemic trends, a 6.2% (95% CI=5.3%–7.2%) increase was noted for all young people in use of MBS mental health services in 2020. Substantial differences were found between age and sex subgroups, with a higher increase among females and young people ages 18–25. A decreasing trend was observed for males ages 18–25 (3.5% reduction, 95% CI=2.5%–4.5%). The interruption effect was strongly associated with socioeconomic status. Service uptake increased in areas of high socioeconomic status, with smaller or limited uptake in areas of low socioeconomic status.Conclusions:During 2020, young people’s use of primary mental health services increased overall. However, increases were inequitably distributed and relatively low, compared with increases in population-level mental health burden. Policy makers should address barriers to primary care access for young people, particularly for young males and those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.
ISSN:1075-2730
1557-9700
DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20220345