Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles
Current standard test methods of ASTM and Underwriter's Laboratories for wind resistance of shingles subject a small test deck of shingles, that have been sealed under heated conditions, to a fan-induced airstream impinging at a continuous velocity of 97 km h (60 mph) for 2 h. (ASTM D3161 and U...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of architectural engineering 1997-12, Vol.3 (4), p.147-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Journal of architectural engineering |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Peterka, J. A Cermak, J. E Cochran, L. S Cochran, B. C Hosoya, N Derickson, R. G Harper, C Jones, J Metz, B |
description | Current standard test methods of ASTM and Underwriter's Laboratories for wind resistance of shingles subject a small test deck of shingles, that have been sealed under heated conditions, to a fan-induced airstream impinging at a continuous velocity of 97 km h (60 mph) for 2 h. (ASTM D3161 and UL 997). Although these standard test methods have served a useful purpose in the past, it is generally accepted today that they are deficient in a number of respects. These deficiencies include the test deck not containing any protrusions or valleys, the shingles being sealed under "ideal" conditions, and turbulence of the impinging air stream not being taken into account. In order to improve shingle performance, a wind uplift prediction model was needed. A research program was initiated by ARMA to understand, quantitatively, the uplift mechanism and to develop a prediction methodology suitable for product development. This paper describes the research leading to a quantitative uplift model and presents the results of that research. The investigation included both wind-tunnel and full-scale tests. Uplift forces were found to be significantly lower than forces derived from cladding pressures specified by building codes and standards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27421811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>308213261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a318t-5d71a883bc43ae0537ba769031f33d4e753f183973a0ffbb95b1d8f426786ae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwD1lA1S4CnowTO4hNVMJLRSxKYWk5iU1TpUmI0wV_j9MHSyzZM4vjO3Ov41wBuQYSws04nk-TCRAWeoQijCGK2ARv6Rgomxw5A4goekEQ8mPbH6hT58yYFSGEhwwHzuizqHJ30ZSF7tzXOlelq-vWjU2zlGXnzpdF9VUqc-6caFkadbGvQ2fxkLxPn7zZ2-PzNJ55EoF3XpAzkJxjmlGUigTIUsnCiCBoxJwqFqAGjhFDSbRO0yhIIeea-iHjoVQBDp3RTrdp6--NMp1YFyZTZSkrVW-M8Bn1gQNY8G4HZm1tTKu0aNpiLdsfAUT06QjRpyN636L3Lfp0BAoqbDr2--V-jjSZLHUrq6wwfxo-4T743GIfO8xSSqzqTVtZ9-IlTp6Te9If3L7UXiu77eGwwH_zfwHAr3po</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27421811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Peterka, J. A ; Cermak, J. E ; Cochran, L. S ; Cochran, B. C ; Hosoya, N ; Derickson, R. G ; Harper, C ; Jones, J ; Metz, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterka, J. A ; Cermak, J. E ; Cochran, L. S ; Cochran, B. C ; Hosoya, N ; Derickson, R. G ; Harper, C ; Jones, J ; Metz, B</creatorcontrib><description>Current standard test methods of ASTM and Underwriter's Laboratories for wind resistance of shingles subject a small test deck of shingles, that have been sealed under heated conditions, to a fan-induced airstream impinging at a continuous velocity of 97 km h (60 mph) for 2 h. (ASTM D3161 and UL 997). Although these standard test methods have served a useful purpose in the past, it is generally accepted today that they are deficient in a number of respects. These deficiencies include the test deck not containing any protrusions or valleys, the shingles being sealed under "ideal" conditions, and turbulence of the impinging air stream not being taken into account. In order to improve shingle performance, a wind uplift prediction model was needed. A research program was initiated by ARMA to understand, quantitatively, the uplift mechanism and to develop a prediction methodology suitable for product development. This paper describes the research leading to a quantitative uplift model and presents the results of that research. The investigation included both wind-tunnel and full-scale tests. Uplift forces were found to be significantly lower than forces derived from cladding pressures specified by building codes and standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAEIED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Asphalts ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings ; Exact sciences and technology ; External envelopes ; Full-scale tests ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Tiles ; Wall covering (rendering, paint, wall paper) ; Wind tunnel test</subject><ispartof>Journal of architectural engineering, 1997-12, Vol.3 (4), p.147-155</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a318t-5d71a883bc43ae0537ba769031f33d4e753f183973a0ffbb95b1d8f426786ae53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a318t-5d71a883bc43ae0537ba769031f33d4e753f183973a0ffbb95b1d8f426786ae53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,75939,75947</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2082128$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterka, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cermak, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, B. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosoya, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derickson, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, B</creatorcontrib><title>Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles</title><title>Journal of architectural engineering</title><description>Current standard test methods of ASTM and Underwriter's Laboratories for wind resistance of shingles subject a small test deck of shingles, that have been sealed under heated conditions, to a fan-induced airstream impinging at a continuous velocity of 97 km h (60 mph) for 2 h. (ASTM D3161 and UL 997). Although these standard test methods have served a useful purpose in the past, it is generally accepted today that they are deficient in a number of respects. These deficiencies include the test deck not containing any protrusions or valleys, the shingles being sealed under "ideal" conditions, and turbulence of the impinging air stream not being taken into account. In order to improve shingle performance, a wind uplift prediction model was needed. A research program was initiated by ARMA to understand, quantitatively, the uplift mechanism and to develop a prediction methodology suitable for product development. This paper describes the research leading to a quantitative uplift model and presents the results of that research. The investigation included both wind-tunnel and full-scale tests. Uplift forces were found to be significantly lower than forces derived from cladding pressures specified by building codes and standards.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Asphalts</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External envelopes</subject><subject>Full-scale tests</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Tiles</subject><subject>Wall covering (rendering, paint, wall paper)</subject><subject>Wind tunnel test</subject><issn>1076-0431</issn><issn>1943-5568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwD1lA1S4CnowTO4hNVMJLRSxKYWk5iU1TpUmI0wV_j9MHSyzZM4vjO3Ov41wBuQYSws04nk-TCRAWeoQijCGK2ARv6Rgomxw5A4goekEQ8mPbH6hT58yYFSGEhwwHzuizqHJ30ZSF7tzXOlelq-vWjU2zlGXnzpdF9VUqc-6caFkadbGvQ2fxkLxPn7zZ2-PzNJ55EoF3XpAzkJxjmlGUigTIUsnCiCBoxJwqFqAGjhFDSbRO0yhIIeea-iHjoVQBDp3RTrdp6--NMp1YFyZTZSkrVW-M8Bn1gQNY8G4HZm1tTKu0aNpiLdsfAUT06QjRpyN636L3Lfp0BAoqbDr2--V-jjSZLHUrq6wwfxo-4T743GIfO8xSSqzqTVtZ9-IlTp6Te9If3L7UXiu77eGwwH_zfwHAr3po</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Peterka, J. A</creator><creator>Cermak, J. E</creator><creator>Cochran, L. S</creator><creator>Cochran, B. C</creator><creator>Hosoya, N</creator><creator>Derickson, R. G</creator><creator>Harper, C</creator><creator>Jones, J</creator><creator>Metz, B</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles</title><author>Peterka, J. A ; Cermak, J. E ; Cochran, L. S ; Cochran, B. C ; Hosoya, N ; Derickson, R. G ; Harper, C ; Jones, J ; Metz, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a318t-5d71a883bc43ae0537ba769031f33d4e753f183973a0ffbb95b1d8f426786ae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Asphalts</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External envelopes</topic><topic>Full-scale tests</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Tiles</topic><topic>Wall covering (rendering, paint, wall paper)</topic><topic>Wind tunnel test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterka, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cermak, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, B. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosoya, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derickson, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterka, J. A</au><au>Cermak, J. E</au><au>Cochran, L. S</au><au>Cochran, B. C</au><au>Hosoya, N</au><au>Derickson, R. G</au><au>Harper, C</au><au>Jones, J</au><au>Metz, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>147-155</pages><issn>1076-0431</issn><eissn>1943-5568</eissn><coden>JAEIED</coden><abstract>Current standard test methods of ASTM and Underwriter's Laboratories for wind resistance of shingles subject a small test deck of shingles, that have been sealed under heated conditions, to a fan-induced airstream impinging at a continuous velocity of 97 km h (60 mph) for 2 h. (ASTM D3161 and UL 997). Although these standard test methods have served a useful purpose in the past, it is generally accepted today that they are deficient in a number of respects. These deficiencies include the test deck not containing any protrusions or valleys, the shingles being sealed under "ideal" conditions, and turbulence of the impinging air stream not being taken into account. In order to improve shingle performance, a wind uplift prediction model was needed. A research program was initiated by ARMA to understand, quantitatively, the uplift mechanism and to develop a prediction methodology suitable for product development. This paper describes the research leading to a quantitative uplift model and presents the results of that research. The investigation included both wind-tunnel and full-scale tests. Uplift forces were found to be significantly lower than forces derived from cladding pressures specified by building codes and standards.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147)</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-0431 |
ispartof | Journal of architectural engineering, 1997-12, Vol.3 (4), p.147-155 |
issn | 1076-0431 1943-5568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27421811 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Applied sciences Asphalts Buildings Buildings. Public works Climatology and bioclimatics for buildings Exact sciences and technology External envelopes Full-scale tests TECHNICAL PAPERS Tiles Wall covering (rendering, paint, wall paper) Wind tunnel test |
title | Wind Uplift Model for Asphalt Shingles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A35%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wind%20Uplift%20Model%20for%20Asphalt%20Shingles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20architectural%20engineering&rft.au=Peterka,%20J.%20A&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=147-155&rft.issn=1076-0431&rft.eissn=1943-5568&rft.coden=JAEIED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1997)3:4(147)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E308213261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27421811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |