Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA

Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the hill country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 1995-09, Vol.19 (5), p.693-702
Hauptverfasser: Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.), Marsh, N.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 702
container_issue 5
container_start_page 693
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 19
creator Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.)
Marsh, N.L
description Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the hill country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that several important facts were overlooked in the ordinances, including locally high infiltration rates and drainage basins, which function as partial area systems. As a result, development planning is not taking advantage of the natural mitigation potential of the land. Roads cut across infiltration and moisture retention areas on side slopes, enlarging the partial area system feeding streams with stormflows. In addition, most residential planning is not responsive to the stepped microtopography of hill country drainage basins and the critical scale at which local runoff processes operate. Recommendations include adjusting the scale and configuration of development to conform with local runoff processes and features and taking advantage of the water-absorbing capacities of basin side slopes. The lesson for ordinance writers is that standard models of community stormwater ordinances are not appropriate for all terrains, especially complex ones like the Texas hill country.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02471952
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27408771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17088412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-43b308710fa41645a310f50983863230dd042856ad1394e49136731983fb91ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMDJ5YkAN-GwnccZSUYpUiaGtxGa5iVOMEju1U6D_HldFYmS5O7379KT3ELoGcg-E5A-PU0J5DkVKT9AAOKNJlItTNCAs4wmk9O0cXYTwQQhhQqQDtJ3tK-822rXOd--mxKWzwVTaq97ECxuLK_2pG9e12va4a5S1xm6wshUOvfPtl-q1x62yaqMPyAiXcXrV4KX-VgHPTNPgidtFbT_Cq8X4Ep3Vqgn66ncP0Wr6tJzMkvnr88tkPE9KBqRPOFszInIgteKQ8VRFtU5JIZjIGGWkqginIs1UBazgmhfAspxB_NfrAtaKDdHt0bfzbrvToZetCaVuYgLtdkHSnEf_HP4FISdCcKARvDuCpXcheF3LzptW-b0EIg_1y7_6I3xzhGvlpNp4E-RqUWSMQcrZD000fyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17088412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.) ; Marsh, N.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.) ; Marsh, N.L</creatorcontrib><description>Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the hill country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that several important facts were overlooked in the ordinances, including locally high infiltration rates and drainage basins, which function as partial area systems. As a result, development planning is not taking advantage of the natural mitigation potential of the land. Roads cut across infiltration and moisture retention areas on side slopes, enlarging the partial area system feeding streams with stormflows. In addition, most residential planning is not responsive to the stepped microtopography of hill country drainage basins and the critical scale at which local runoff processes operate. Recommendations include adjusting the scale and configuration of development to conform with local runoff processes and features and taking advantage of the water-absorbing capacities of basin side slopes. The lesson for ordinance writers is that standard models of community stormwater ordinances are not appropriate for all terrains, especially complex ones like the Texas hill country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02471952</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>AGUA DE ESCORRENTIA ; AMENAGEMENT DE BASSIN VERSANT ; BUILDING CONTROLS ; EAU DE RUISSELLEMENT ; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION ; Freshwater ; HIGHLANDS ; HILL LAND ; LAND USE ; LEGISLACION ; LEGISLATION ; ORDENACION DE CUENCAS ; PLANIFICACION ; PLANIFICACION REGIONAL ; PLANIFICATION ; PLANIFICATION REGIONALE ; PLANNING ; REGION D'ALTITUDE ; REGIONAL PLANNING ; RUNOFF WATER ; TEXAS ; URBAN AREAS ; UTILISATION DES TERRES ; UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA ; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ; ZONA DE MONTANA ; ZONAS URBANAS ; ZONE URBAINE</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 1995-09, Vol.19 (5), p.693-702</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-43b308710fa41645a310f50983863230dd042856ad1394e49136731983fb91ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-43b308710fa41645a310f50983863230dd042856ad1394e49136731983fb91ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, N.L</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><description>Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the hill country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that several important facts were overlooked in the ordinances, including locally high infiltration rates and drainage basins, which function as partial area systems. As a result, development planning is not taking advantage of the natural mitigation potential of the land. Roads cut across infiltration and moisture retention areas on side slopes, enlarging the partial area system feeding streams with stormflows. In addition, most residential planning is not responsive to the stepped microtopography of hill country drainage basins and the critical scale at which local runoff processes operate. Recommendations include adjusting the scale and configuration of development to conform with local runoff processes and features and taking advantage of the water-absorbing capacities of basin side slopes. The lesson for ordinance writers is that standard models of community stormwater ordinances are not appropriate for all terrains, especially complex ones like the Texas hill country.</description><subject>AGUA DE ESCORRENTIA</subject><subject>AMENAGEMENT DE BASSIN VERSANT</subject><subject>BUILDING CONTROLS</subject><subject>EAU DE RUISSELLEMENT</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>HIGHLANDS</subject><subject>HILL LAND</subject><subject>LAND USE</subject><subject>LEGISLACION</subject><subject>LEGISLATION</subject><subject>ORDENACION DE CUENCAS</subject><subject>PLANIFICACION</subject><subject>PLANIFICACION REGIONAL</subject><subject>PLANIFICATION</subject><subject>PLANIFICATION REGIONALE</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>REGION D'ALTITUDE</subject><subject>REGIONAL PLANNING</subject><subject>RUNOFF WATER</subject><subject>TEXAS</subject><subject>URBAN AREAS</subject><subject>UTILISATION DES TERRES</subject><subject>UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA</subject><subject>WATERSHED MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>ZONA DE MONTANA</subject><subject>ZONAS URBANAS</subject><subject>ZONE URBAINE</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMDJ5YkAN-GwnccZSUYpUiaGtxGa5iVOMEju1U6D_HldFYmS5O7379KT3ELoGcg-E5A-PU0J5DkVKT9AAOKNJlItTNCAs4wmk9O0cXYTwQQhhQqQDtJ3tK-822rXOd--mxKWzwVTaq97ECxuLK_2pG9e12va4a5S1xm6wshUOvfPtl-q1x62yaqMPyAiXcXrV4KX-VgHPTNPgidtFbT_Cq8X4Ep3Vqgn66ncP0Wr6tJzMkvnr88tkPE9KBqRPOFszInIgteKQ8VRFtU5JIZjIGGWkqginIs1UBazgmhfAspxB_NfrAtaKDdHt0bfzbrvToZetCaVuYgLtdkHSnEf_HP4FISdCcKARvDuCpXcheF3LzptW-b0EIg_1y7_6I3xzhGvlpNp4E-RqUWSMQcrZD000fyY</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.)</creator><creator>Marsh, N.L</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA</title><author>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.) ; Marsh, N.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-43b308710fa41645a310f50983863230dd042856ad1394e49136731983fb91ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>AGUA DE ESCORRENTIA</topic><topic>AMENAGEMENT DE BASSIN VERSANT</topic><topic>BUILDING CONTROLS</topic><topic>EAU DE RUISSELLEMENT</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>HIGHLANDS</topic><topic>HILL LAND</topic><topic>LAND USE</topic><topic>LEGISLACION</topic><topic>LEGISLATION</topic><topic>ORDENACION DE CUENCAS</topic><topic>PLANIFICACION</topic><topic>PLANIFICACION REGIONAL</topic><topic>PLANIFICATION</topic><topic>PLANIFICATION REGIONALE</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>REGION D'ALTITUDE</topic><topic>REGIONAL PLANNING</topic><topic>RUNOFF WATER</topic><topic>TEXAS</topic><topic>URBAN AREAS</topic><topic>UTILISATION DES TERRES</topic><topic>UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA</topic><topic>WATERSHED MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>ZONA DE MONTANA</topic><topic>ZONAS URBANAS</topic><topic>ZONE URBAINE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, N.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marsh, W.M. (University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI.)</au><au>Marsh, N.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>693-702</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the hill country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that several important facts were overlooked in the ordinances, including locally high infiltration rates and drainage basins, which function as partial area systems. As a result, development planning is not taking advantage of the natural mitigation potential of the land. Roads cut across infiltration and moisture retention areas on side slopes, enlarging the partial area system feeding streams with stormflows. In addition, most residential planning is not responsive to the stepped microtopography of hill country drainage basins and the critical scale at which local runoff processes operate. Recommendations include adjusting the scale and configuration of development to conform with local runoff processes and features and taking advantage of the water-absorbing capacities of basin side slopes. The lesson for ordinance writers is that standard models of community stormwater ordinances are not appropriate for all terrains, especially complex ones like the Texas hill country.</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF02471952</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 1995-09, Vol.19 (5), p.693-702
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27408771
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects AGUA DE ESCORRENTIA
AMENAGEMENT DE BASSIN VERSANT
BUILDING CONTROLS
EAU DE RUISSELLEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
Freshwater
HIGHLANDS
HILL LAND
LAND USE
LEGISLACION
LEGISLATION
ORDENACION DE CUENCAS
PLANIFICACION
PLANIFICACION REGIONAL
PLANIFICATION
PLANIFICATION REGIONALE
PLANNING
REGION D'ALTITUDE
REGIONAL PLANNING
RUNOFF WATER
TEXAS
URBAN AREAS
UTILISATION DES TERRES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
ZONA DE MONTANA
ZONAS URBANAS
ZONE URBAINE
title Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A11%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrogeomorphic%20considerations%20in%20development%20planning%20and%20stormwater%20management,%20central%20Texas%20Hill%20Country,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Marsh,%20W.M.%20(University%20of%20Michigan-Flint,%20Flint,%20MI.)&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=693-702&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02471952&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17088412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17088412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true