Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACS biomaterials science & engineering 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5093 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5060 |
container_title | ACS biomaterials science & engineering |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Thangavel, Mahendran Elsen Selvam, Renold |
description | This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2739430853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctO5DAQRS3ECBDTvwBesiDgRxKnl9A8ZiRGtHiso4pT6TZK7MZOQPwCX40z3aARm1n5Wjr3lqouIYecnXAm-CnoUBnXQY_eQBtOhGZMTeUW2RNSyWRaqGL7H71LJiE8Mca4LLI0TXfIrsxTnnEl98j7Hb4YfKWuofPlWzAa2mP6B_US7FqDrem5ca1bjH86W4IHPU4OvdFh9MmLZO6N7fEvqNFDZzS919A0rq0DbZyn584ifTAhDEgv7cJYjAl2Qc9Wqzbm9sbZ8JP8aOI6ONm8--Tx6vJh9iu5ub3-PTu7SUBmqk8QeMMqXikmhcjyvAKRYgFccqV5nRdxw6imHAUKXiilKqxr0CyPt4OqyOU-OVrnrrx7HjD0ZWeCxrYFi24IpVBymkpWZDKiao1q70Lw2JQrbzrwbyVn5dhF-a2LctNFdB5shgxVh_WX7_PyEZBrICaUT27wdrT_L_YDNvyc1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739430853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</creator><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><description>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2373-9878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-9878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36415173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones ; Bone Regeneration ; Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><ispartof>ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1234-8974 ; 0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><title>ACS biomaterials science & engineering</title><addtitle>ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</description><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><issn>2373-9878</issn><issn>2373-9878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctO5DAQRS3ECBDTvwBesiDgRxKnl9A8ZiRGtHiso4pT6TZK7MZOQPwCX40z3aARm1n5Wjr3lqouIYecnXAm-CnoUBnXQY_eQBtOhGZMTeUW2RNSyWRaqGL7H71LJiE8Mca4LLI0TXfIrsxTnnEl98j7Hb4YfKWuofPlWzAa2mP6B_US7FqDrem5ca1bjH86W4IHPU4OvdFh9MmLZO6N7fEvqNFDZzS919A0rq0DbZyn584ifTAhDEgv7cJYjAl2Qc9Wqzbm9sbZ8JP8aOI6ONm8--Tx6vJh9iu5ub3-PTu7SUBmqk8QeMMqXikmhcjyvAKRYgFccqV5nRdxw6imHAUKXiilKqxr0CyPt4OqyOU-OVrnrrx7HjD0ZWeCxrYFi24IpVBymkpWZDKiao1q70Lw2JQrbzrwbyVn5dhF-a2LctNFdB5shgxVh_WX7_PyEZBrICaUT27wdrT_L_YDNvyc1g</recordid><startdate>20221212</startdate><enddate>20221212</enddate><creator>Thangavel, Mahendran</creator><creator>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221212</creationdate><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><author>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ACS biomaterials science & engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thangavel, Mahendran</au><au>Elsen Selvam, Renold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</atitle><jtitle>ACS biomaterials science & engineering</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2022-12-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5060</spage><epage>5093</epage><pages>5060-5093</pages><issn>2373-9878</issn><eissn>2373-9878</eissn><abstract>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>36415173</pmid><doi>10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2373-9878 |
ispartof | ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093 |
issn | 2373-9878 2373-9878 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430853 |
source | ACS Publications; MEDLINE |
subjects | Bone and Bones Bone Regeneration Humans Printing, Three-Dimensional Tissue Engineering - methods Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry |
title | Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A47%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Physical,%20Mechanical,%20and%20Biological%20Characteristics%20of%203D-Printed%20Bioceramic%20Scaffolds%20for%20Bone%20Tissue%20Engineering%20Applications&rft.jtitle=ACS%20biomaterials%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Thangavel,%20Mahendran&rft.date=2022-12-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5060&rft.epage=5093&rft.pages=5060-5093&rft.issn=2373-9878&rft.eissn=2373-9878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739430853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739430853&rft_id=info:pmid/36415173&rfr_iscdi=true |