Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS biomaterials science & engineering 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093
Hauptverfasser: Thangavel, Mahendran, Elsen Selvam, Renold
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5093
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5060
container_title ACS biomaterials science & engineering
container_volume 8
creator Thangavel, Mahendran
Elsen Selvam, Renold
description This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2739430853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctO5DAQRS3ECBDTvwBesiDgRxKnl9A8ZiRGtHiso4pT6TZK7MZOQPwCX40z3aARm1n5Wjr3lqouIYecnXAm-CnoUBnXQY_eQBtOhGZMTeUW2RNSyWRaqGL7H71LJiE8Mca4LLI0TXfIrsxTnnEl98j7Hb4YfKWuofPlWzAa2mP6B_US7FqDrem5ca1bjH86W4IHPU4OvdFh9MmLZO6N7fEvqNFDZzS919A0rq0DbZyn584ifTAhDEgv7cJYjAl2Qc9Wqzbm9sbZ8JP8aOI6ONm8--Tx6vJh9iu5ub3-PTu7SUBmqk8QeMMqXikmhcjyvAKRYgFccqV5nRdxw6imHAUKXiilKqxr0CyPt4OqyOU-OVrnrrx7HjD0ZWeCxrYFi24IpVBymkpWZDKiao1q70Lw2JQrbzrwbyVn5dhF-a2LctNFdB5shgxVh_WX7_PyEZBrICaUT27wdrT_L_YDNvyc1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739430853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</creator><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><description>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2373-9878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-9878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36415173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones ; Bone Regeneration ; Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><ispartof>ACS biomaterials science &amp; engineering, 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1234-8974 ; 0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><title>ACS biomaterials science &amp; engineering</title><addtitle>ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</description><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><issn>2373-9878</issn><issn>2373-9878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctO5DAQRS3ECBDTvwBesiDgRxKnl9A8ZiRGtHiso4pT6TZK7MZOQPwCX40z3aARm1n5Wjr3lqouIYecnXAm-CnoUBnXQY_eQBtOhGZMTeUW2RNSyWRaqGL7H71LJiE8Mca4LLI0TXfIrsxTnnEl98j7Hb4YfKWuofPlWzAa2mP6B_US7FqDrem5ca1bjH86W4IHPU4OvdFh9MmLZO6N7fEvqNFDZzS919A0rq0DbZyn584ifTAhDEgv7cJYjAl2Qc9Wqzbm9sbZ8JP8aOI6ONm8--Tx6vJh9iu5ub3-PTu7SUBmqk8QeMMqXikmhcjyvAKRYgFccqV5nRdxw6imHAUKXiilKqxr0CyPt4OqyOU-OVrnrrx7HjD0ZWeCxrYFi24IpVBymkpWZDKiao1q70Lw2JQrbzrwbyVn5dhF-a2LctNFdB5shgxVh_WX7_PyEZBrICaUT27wdrT_L_YDNvyc1g</recordid><startdate>20221212</startdate><enddate>20221212</enddate><creator>Thangavel, Mahendran</creator><creator>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221212</creationdate><title>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</title><author>Thangavel, Mahendran ; Elsen Selvam, Renold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-ea1f0b1b70322566ba24e8a1317c1d6844417c91e2e218777beddac06102ab863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thangavel, Mahendran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsen Selvam, Renold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ACS biomaterials science &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thangavel, Mahendran</au><au>Elsen Selvam, Renold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications</atitle><jtitle>ACS biomaterials science &amp; engineering</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2022-12-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5060</spage><epage>5093</epage><pages>5060-5093</pages><issn>2373-9878</issn><eissn>2373-9878</eissn><abstract>This review focuses on the advancements in additive manufacturing techniques that are utilized for fabricating bioceramic scaffolds and their characterizations leading to bone tissue regeneration. Bioscaffolds are made by mimicking the human bone structure, material composition, and properties. Calcium phosphate apatite materials are the most commonly used scaffold materials as they closely resemble live bone in their inorganic composition. The functionally graded scaffolds are fabricated by utilizing the right choice of the 3D printing method and material combinations to achieve the requirement of the bioscaffold. To tailor the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffold, certain materials are reinforced, doped, or coated to incorporate the functionality. The biomechanical loading conditions that involve flexion, torsion, and tension exerted on the implanted scaffold are discussed. The finite element analysis (FEA) technique is used to investigate the mechanical property of the scaffold before fabrication. This helps in reducing the actual number of samples used for testing. The FEA simulated results and the experimental result are compared. This review also highlights some of the challenges associated while processing the scaffold such as shrinkage, mechanical instability, cytotoxicity, and printability. In the end, the new materials that are evolved for tissue engineering applications are compiled and discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>36415173</pmid><doi>10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-5689</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2373-9878
ispartof ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2022-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5060-5093
issn 2373-9878
2373-9878
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430853
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Bone and Bones
Bone Regeneration
Humans
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Tissue Engineering - methods
Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry
title Review of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Characteristics of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A47%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Physical,%20Mechanical,%20and%20Biological%20Characteristics%20of%203D-Printed%20Bioceramic%20Scaffolds%20for%20Bone%20Tissue%20Engineering%20Applications&rft.jtitle=ACS%20biomaterials%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Thangavel,%20Mahendran&rft.date=2022-12-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5060&rft.epage=5093&rft.pages=5060-5093&rft.issn=2373-9878&rft.eissn=2373-9878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739430853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739430853&rft_id=info:pmid/36415173&rfr_iscdi=true