Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants

Milk fat depression (MFD) syndrome has been associated with the antilipogenic effects of trans‐10 fatty acids (FA), such as t10, c12‐CLA (CLA) and t10‐18:1 (T10). However, these FA alone cannot completely explain the changes in milk fat in small ruminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to use mult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 2023-07, Vol.107 (4), p.1028-1034
Hauptverfasser: Padilha, Charline G., Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M., Oliveira, Dimas E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1034
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1028
container_title Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition
container_volume 107
creator Padilha, Charline G.
Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M.
Oliveira, Dimas E.
description Milk fat depression (MFD) syndrome has been associated with the antilipogenic effects of trans‐10 fatty acids (FA), such as t10, c12‐CLA (CLA) and t10‐18:1 (T10). However, these FA alone cannot completely explain the changes in milk fat in small ruminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to use multiple regression analysis to evaluate other FA that may be related to shifts in milk fat, as well as to improve model accuracy when different milk FA are used as covariates in the models. Previously published data were used in multiple regression analysis for goats (n = 106) and ewes (n = 68). Body weight (BW), vaccenic acid (t11‐18:1), both trans‐10 FA and the major milk FA were tested as covariates to model four response variables associated with MFD: fat concentration (FC), percentage change in milk fat concentration (CFC; %), fat yield (FY; g/d) and percentage change in milk fat yield (CFY; %). All four multiple regression models were significant for both species. When compared with simple regression models, all multiple regression models improved accuracy when estimating MFD. The improvements in model accuracy (lower RMSE) for FC, CFC, FY and CFY were 60.6%, 43.3%, 35.6% and 44.4% for ewes, and 52.1%, 60.1%, 33.6% and 14.9% for goats respectively. Linolenic acid and t11‐18:1 were covariates in all models for goats, and palmitic acid and CLA were covariates in all ewe models. These FA should be investigated regarding their direct effect on gene expression associated with milk fat metabolism in the mammary gland of small ruminants. Multiple regression analysis is the most robust approach to account for the variation of milk fat and yield in goats and ewes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpn.13792
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2833810860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-fb52e23ba617e1059eb79f76bda10f995f5ce546bf677f787f205638c75de4033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcGO1SAUhonRONfRhS9gSNzoojNQCpSlmTijZhxd6Lqh9OBwpbQC1fRtfNThTq8uTGRDwvn4Ts75EXpOyRkt53w_hzPKpKofoB1tmKoIU-Ih2hHFaFWXhxP0JKU9IVRyIh6jEyYayhUlO_T7o_PfsdU5r1gbNySsEzbTTx2dzpCwC3hcfHazBxzhW4SU3BSwDtqvyZV6-YDj1C8pYz3PcdLmFucJj9MAHudbwAOYCDrBverYrHQIBkKOOm-2Aa8O_HBg0qi9x3EZXdAhp6fokdU-wbPjfYq-Xr79cvGuuv509f7izXVlGGV1ZXteQ816LagESriCXiorRT9oSqxS3HIDvBG9FVJa2UpbEy5YayQfoCGMnaJXm7fM8GOBlLvRJQPe6wDTkrpaMtUwUktS0Jf_oPtpiWUjhWoZaylpxYF6vVEmTilFsN0c3ajj2lHSHWLrSmzdfWyFfXE0Lv0Iw1_yT04FON-AX87D-n9T9-Hzzaa8Az0Jo6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833810860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Padilha, Charline G. ; Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M. ; Oliveira, Dimas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Charline G. ; Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M. ; Oliveira, Dimas E.</creatorcontrib><description>Milk fat depression (MFD) syndrome has been associated with the antilipogenic effects of trans‐10 fatty acids (FA), such as t10, c12‐CLA (CLA) and t10‐18:1 (T10). However, these FA alone cannot completely explain the changes in milk fat in small ruminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to use multiple regression analysis to evaluate other FA that may be related to shifts in milk fat, as well as to improve model accuracy when different milk FA are used as covariates in the models. Previously published data were used in multiple regression analysis for goats (n = 106) and ewes (n = 68). Body weight (BW), vaccenic acid (t11‐18:1), both trans‐10 FA and the major milk FA were tested as covariates to model four response variables associated with MFD: fat concentration (FC), percentage change in milk fat concentration (CFC; %), fat yield (FY; g/d) and percentage change in milk fat yield (CFY; %). All four multiple regression models were significant for both species. When compared with simple regression models, all multiple regression models improved accuracy when estimating MFD. The improvements in model accuracy (lower RMSE) for FC, CFC, FY and CFY were 60.6%, 43.3%, 35.6% and 44.4% for ewes, and 52.1%, 60.1%, 33.6% and 14.9% for goats respectively. Linolenic acid and t11‐18:1 were covariates in all models for goats, and palmitic acid and CLA were covariates in all ewe models. These FA should be investigated regarding their direct effect on gene expression associated with milk fat metabolism in the mammary gland of small ruminants. Multiple regression analysis is the most robust approach to account for the variation of milk fat and yield in goats and ewes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36415910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animal fat ; Animals ; Body weight ; Butter ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Supplements - analysis ; ewes ; Fat metabolism ; Fatty acids ; Fatty Acids - metabolism ; Female ; Gene expression ; Goats ; Goats - physiology ; Lactation ; Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology ; Linolenic acid ; lipids ; Mammary gland ; Mammary glands ; mammary metabolism ; Milk ; Milk - chemistry ; milk fat depression ; Model accuracy ; Multiple regression analysis ; Multiple regression models ; Oils &amp; fats ; Palmitic acid ; Regression Analysis ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Sheep</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2023-07, Vol.107 (4), p.1028-1034</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2023 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-fb52e23ba617e1059eb79f76bda10f995f5ce546bf677f787f205638c75de4033</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8676-3225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpn.13792$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpn.13792$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Charline G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dimas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants</title><title>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</title><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><description>Milk fat depression (MFD) syndrome has been associated with the antilipogenic effects of trans‐10 fatty acids (FA), such as t10, c12‐CLA (CLA) and t10‐18:1 (T10). However, these FA alone cannot completely explain the changes in milk fat in small ruminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to use multiple regression analysis to evaluate other FA that may be related to shifts in milk fat, as well as to improve model accuracy when different milk FA are used as covariates in the models. Previously published data were used in multiple regression analysis for goats (n = 106) and ewes (n = 68). Body weight (BW), vaccenic acid (t11‐18:1), both trans‐10 FA and the major milk FA were tested as covariates to model four response variables associated with MFD: fat concentration (FC), percentage change in milk fat concentration (CFC; %), fat yield (FY; g/d) and percentage change in milk fat yield (CFY; %). All four multiple regression models were significant for both species. When compared with simple regression models, all multiple regression models improved accuracy when estimating MFD. The improvements in model accuracy (lower RMSE) for FC, CFC, FY and CFY were 60.6%, 43.3%, 35.6% and 44.4% for ewes, and 52.1%, 60.1%, 33.6% and 14.9% for goats respectively. Linolenic acid and t11‐18:1 were covariates in all models for goats, and palmitic acid and CLA were covariates in all ewe models. These FA should be investigated regarding their direct effect on gene expression associated with milk fat metabolism in the mammary gland of small ruminants. Multiple regression analysis is the most robust approach to account for the variation of milk fat and yield in goats and ewes.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animal fat</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Butter</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - analysis</subject><subject>ewes</subject><subject>Fat metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Goats - physiology</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</subject><subject>Linolenic acid</subject><subject>lipids</subject><subject>Mammary gland</subject><subject>Mammary glands</subject><subject>mammary metabolism</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>milk fat depression</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Multiple regression analysis</subject><subject>Multiple regression models</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Palmitic acid</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><issn>0931-2439</issn><issn>1439-0396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcGO1SAUhonRONfRhS9gSNzoojNQCpSlmTijZhxd6Lqh9OBwpbQC1fRtfNThTq8uTGRDwvn4Ts75EXpOyRkt53w_hzPKpKofoB1tmKoIU-Ih2hHFaFWXhxP0JKU9IVRyIh6jEyYayhUlO_T7o_PfsdU5r1gbNySsEzbTTx2dzpCwC3hcfHazBxzhW4SU3BSwDtqvyZV6-YDj1C8pYz3PcdLmFucJj9MAHudbwAOYCDrBverYrHQIBkKOOm-2Aa8O_HBg0qi9x3EZXdAhp6fokdU-wbPjfYq-Xr79cvGuuv509f7izXVlGGV1ZXteQ816LagESriCXiorRT9oSqxS3HIDvBG9FVJa2UpbEy5YayQfoCGMnaJXm7fM8GOBlLvRJQPe6wDTkrpaMtUwUktS0Jf_oPtpiWUjhWoZaylpxYF6vVEmTilFsN0c3ajj2lHSHWLrSmzdfWyFfXE0Lv0Iw1_yT04FON-AX87D-n9T9-Hzzaa8Az0Jo6A</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Padilha, Charline G.</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M.</creator><creator>Oliveira, Dimas E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-3225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants</title><author>Padilha, Charline G. ; Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M. ; Oliveira, Dimas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-fb52e23ba617e1059eb79f76bda10f995f5ce546bf677f787f205638c75de4033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animal fat</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Butter</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - analysis</topic><topic>ewes</topic><topic>Fat metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Goats - physiology</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology</topic><topic>Linolenic acid</topic><topic>lipids</topic><topic>Mammary gland</topic><topic>Mammary glands</topic><topic>mammary metabolism</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>milk fat depression</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Multiple regression analysis</topic><topic>Multiple regression models</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Palmitic acid</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Charline G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dimas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Padilha, Charline G.</au><au>Ribeiro, Claudio V. D. M.</au><au>Oliveira, Dimas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1028</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1028-1034</pages><issn>0931-2439</issn><eissn>1439-0396</eissn><abstract>Milk fat depression (MFD) syndrome has been associated with the antilipogenic effects of trans‐10 fatty acids (FA), such as t10, c12‐CLA (CLA) and t10‐18:1 (T10). However, these FA alone cannot completely explain the changes in milk fat in small ruminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to use multiple regression analysis to evaluate other FA that may be related to shifts in milk fat, as well as to improve model accuracy when different milk FA are used as covariates in the models. Previously published data were used in multiple regression analysis for goats (n = 106) and ewes (n = 68). Body weight (BW), vaccenic acid (t11‐18:1), both trans‐10 FA and the major milk FA were tested as covariates to model four response variables associated with MFD: fat concentration (FC), percentage change in milk fat concentration (CFC; %), fat yield (FY; g/d) and percentage change in milk fat yield (CFY; %). All four multiple regression models were significant for both species. When compared with simple regression models, all multiple regression models improved accuracy when estimating MFD. The improvements in model accuracy (lower RMSE) for FC, CFC, FY and CFY were 60.6%, 43.3%, 35.6% and 44.4% for ewes, and 52.1%, 60.1%, 33.6% and 14.9% for goats respectively. Linolenic acid and t11‐18:1 were covariates in all models for goats, and palmitic acid and CLA were covariates in all ewe models. These FA should be investigated regarding their direct effect on gene expression associated with milk fat metabolism in the mammary gland of small ruminants. Multiple regression analysis is the most robust approach to account for the variation of milk fat and yield in goats and ewes.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36415910</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpn.13792</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-3225</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-2439
ispartof Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2023-07, Vol.107 (4), p.1028-1034
issn 0931-2439
1439-0396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2739430270
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accuracy
Animal fat
Animals
Body weight
Butter
Diet - veterinary
Dietary Supplements - analysis
ewes
Fat metabolism
Fatty acids
Fatty Acids - metabolism
Female
Gene expression
Goats
Goats - physiology
Lactation
Linoleic Acids, Conjugated - pharmacology
Linolenic acid
lipids
Mammary gland
Mammary glands
mammary metabolism
Milk
Milk - chemistry
milk fat depression
Model accuracy
Multiple regression analysis
Multiple regression models
Oils & fats
Palmitic acid
Regression Analysis
Robustness (mathematics)
Sheep
title Milk fatty acids as covariates in multiple regression analysis is a robust approach to model the decrease in milk fat concentration and yield in small ruminants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A58%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Milk%20fatty%20acids%20as%20covariates%20in%20multiple%20regression%20analysis%20is%20a%20robust%20approach%20to%20model%20the%20decrease%20in%20milk%20fat%20concentration%20and%20yield%20in%20small%20ruminants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20physiology%20and%20animal%20nutrition&rft.au=Padilha,%20Charline%20G.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1028&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1028-1034&rft.issn=0931-2439&rft.eissn=1439-0396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpn.13792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833810860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833810860&rft_id=info:pmid/36415910&rfr_iscdi=true