Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry

Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and bran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.697-705
Hauptverfasser: Isernia, Giacomo, Simonte, Gioele, Gallitto, Enrico, Bertoglio, Luca, Fargion, Aaron, Melissano, Germano, Chiesa, Roberto, Lenti, Massimo, Pratesi, Carlo, Faggioli, Gianluca, Gargiulo, Mauro, Luigi, Baccani, Luca, Bertoglio, Roberto, Chiesa, Gianluca, Faggioli, Aaron, Fargion, Cecilia, Fenelli, Gianluigi, Fino, Enrico, Gallitto, Mauro, Gargiulo, Giacomo, Isernia, Andrea, Kahlberg, Massimo, Lenti, Antonino, Logiacco, Chiara, Mascoli, Germano, Melissano, Andrea, Melloni, Gianpalolo, Reboldi, Gianbattista, Parlani, Rodolfo, Pini, Carlo, Pratesi, Enrico, Rinaldi, Gioele, Simonte, Sara, Speziali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 705
container_issue 4
container_start_page 697
container_title Journal of endovascular therapy
container_volume 31
creator Isernia, Giacomo
Simonte, Gioele
Gallitto, Enrico
Bertoglio, Luca
Fargion, Aaron
Melissano, Germano
Chiesa, Roberto
Lenti, Massimo
Pratesi, Carlo
Faggioli, Gianluca
Gargiulo, Mauro
Luigi, Baccani
Luca, Bertoglio
Roberto, Chiesa
Gianluca, Faggioli
Aaron, Fargion
Cecilia, Fenelli
Gianluigi, Fino
Enrico, Gallitto
Mauro, Gargiulo
Giacomo, Isernia
Andrea, Kahlberg
Massimo, Lenti
Antonino, Logiacco
Chiara, Mascoli
Germano, Melissano
Andrea, Melloni
Gianpalolo, Reboldi
Gianbattista, Parlani
Rodolfo, Pini
Carlo, Pratesi
Enrico, Rinaldi
Gioele, Simonte
Sara, Speziali
description Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and branched aortic repair candidates and whether these discrepancies could influence endovascular repair outcomes. Methods: Data from all consecutive patients treated during the 2008–2019 period within the Italian Multicenter fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) Registry were included in the present study. Propensity matching was performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for demographic data and comorbidities to obtain comparable male and female samples. The selection model led to a final study population of 176 patients (88 women and 88 men) among the total initial cohort of 596. Study endpoints were technical and clinical success, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reintervention rates evaluated at 30 days and during follow-up. Results: Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) received urgent/emergent repair. In most of the cases (71.6%), women received treatment for extensive thoracoabdominal pathology (Crawford type I, II, or III aneurysm rather than type IV or juxta-pararenal) versus 46.6% of men (p=0.001). Female patients presented with more challenging iliac accesses with at least one side considered hostile in 27.3% of the cases (vs 13.6% in male patients, p=0.039). Finally, women had significantly smaller visceral vessels. Women had significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success rate versus 96.6% in the male population (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of 30-day reinterventions between men and women. The 5-year estimate of freedom from late reintervention, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 85.6% in men versus 81.6% in women (p=ns). No aneurysm-related death was recorded during follow-up (median observational time, 23 months [interquartile range, 7–45 months]). Conclusion: Women presented a significantly higher incidence of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, smaller visceral vessels, and more complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in a significantly lower technical success after F/BEVAR. Further studies assessing sex-related differences are needed to properly determine the impact on outcomes and stratify procedural risks. Clinical Impact Women are generally underrepresented in trials foc
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15266028221137498
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738493716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15266028221137498</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2738493716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c231b0985cdff64cc1312cc3dbffce0551f919be9d41aa89015611cdd77f0413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhq2qVaHQB-il8rGXUI8dOwm3BbEtEgUJuEdee0yDEnuxY8RKPHy9WsoFiZPH0vf_o_kI-QbsCKBpfoLkSjHecg4gmrprP5B9kLWsQEr2cTtzVW2BPfIlpXvGOBTyM9kTqmatUrBPnm_wiZ57N2b0BmnwdIke0xz1jJZqb-lJ1N78LZ8zb8OjTiaPOtJFiPNg6MJjjps00Wtc6yEe06s8mzBhossYJqrppZ6H4PVI_-SxBNDPGAt8N5QVm0Pyyekx4deX94DcLs9uT39XF1e_zk8XF5URrZgrwwWsWNdKY51TtTEggBsj7Mo5g0xKcB10K-xsDVq3HQOpAIy1TeNYDeKA_NjVrmN4yOW4fhqSwXHUHkNOPW9EW3eiAVVQ2KEmhpQiun4dh0nHTQ-s3zrv3zgvme8v9Xk1oX1N_JdcgKMdkPQd9vchxyIkvdP4D16virg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738493716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Isernia, Giacomo ; Simonte, Gioele ; Gallitto, Enrico ; Bertoglio, Luca ; Fargion, Aaron ; Melissano, Germano ; Chiesa, Roberto ; Lenti, Massimo ; Pratesi, Carlo ; Faggioli, Gianluca ; Gargiulo, Mauro ; Luigi, Baccani ; Luca, Bertoglio ; Roberto, Chiesa ; Gianluca, Faggioli ; Aaron, Fargion ; Cecilia, Fenelli ; Gianluigi, Fino ; Enrico, Gallitto ; Mauro, Gargiulo ; Giacomo, Isernia ; Andrea, Kahlberg ; Massimo, Lenti ; Antonino, Logiacco ; Chiara, Mascoli ; Germano, Melissano ; Andrea, Melloni ; Gianpalolo, Reboldi ; Gianbattista, Parlani ; Rodolfo, Pini ; Carlo, Pratesi ; Enrico, Rinaldi ; Gioele, Simonte ; Sara, Speziali</creator><creatorcontrib>Isernia, Giacomo ; Simonte, Gioele ; Gallitto, Enrico ; Bertoglio, Luca ; Fargion, Aaron ; Melissano, Germano ; Chiesa, Roberto ; Lenti, Massimo ; Pratesi, Carlo ; Faggioli, Gianluca ; Gargiulo, Mauro ; Luigi, Baccani ; Luca, Bertoglio ; Roberto, Chiesa ; Gianluca, Faggioli ; Aaron, Fargion ; Cecilia, Fenelli ; Gianluigi, Fino ; Enrico, Gallitto ; Mauro, Gargiulo ; Giacomo, Isernia ; Andrea, Kahlberg ; Massimo, Lenti ; Antonino, Logiacco ; Chiara, Mascoli ; Germano, Melissano ; Andrea, Melloni ; Gianpalolo, Reboldi ; Gianbattista, Parlani ; Rodolfo, Pini ; Carlo, Pratesi ; Enrico, Rinaldi ; Gioele, Simonte ; Sara, Speziali ; Italian Multicenter Fenestrated and Branched Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and branched aortic repair candidates and whether these discrepancies could influence endovascular repair outcomes. Methods: Data from all consecutive patients treated during the 2008–2019 period within the Italian Multicenter fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) Registry were included in the present study. Propensity matching was performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for demographic data and comorbidities to obtain comparable male and female samples. The selection model led to a final study population of 176 patients (88 women and 88 men) among the total initial cohort of 596. Study endpoints were technical and clinical success, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reintervention rates evaluated at 30 days and during follow-up. Results: Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) received urgent/emergent repair. In most of the cases (71.6%), women received treatment for extensive thoracoabdominal pathology (Crawford type I, II, or III aneurysm rather than type IV or juxta-pararenal) versus 46.6% of men (p=0.001). Female patients presented with more challenging iliac accesses with at least one side considered hostile in 27.3% of the cases (vs 13.6% in male patients, p=0.039). Finally, women had significantly smaller visceral vessels. Women had significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success rate versus 96.6% in the male population (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of 30-day reinterventions between men and women. The 5-year estimate of freedom from late reintervention, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 85.6% in men versus 81.6% in women (p=ns). No aneurysm-related death was recorded during follow-up (median observational time, 23 months [interquartile range, 7–45 months]). Conclusion: Women presented a significantly higher incidence of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, smaller visceral vessels, and more complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in a significantly lower technical success after F/BEVAR. Further studies assessing sex-related differences are needed to properly determine the impact on outcomes and stratify procedural risks. Clinical Impact Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysms. Aiming to assess whether sex may affect outcomes after a complex endovascular aortic repair, a propensity score selection was applied to a total population of 596 patients receiving F/BEVAR aortic repair with the Cook platform, matching each treated female patient with a corresponding male patient. Women presented more frequently a thoracoabdominal aneurysm extent, smaller visceral vessels, and complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success versus 96.6% (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of short-term and mid-term reinterventions. According to these results, careful and critical assessment should be posed in case of female patients receiving complex aortic repair, especially regarding preoperative anatomical evaluation and clinical selection with appropriate surgical risk stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15266028221137498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36408661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - mortality ; Female ; Health Status Disparities ; Healthcare Disparities ; Humans ; Italy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Stents ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.697-705</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c231b0985cdff64cc1312cc3dbffce0551f919be9d41aa89015611cdd77f0413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c231b0985cdff64cc1312cc3dbffce0551f919be9d41aa89015611cdd77f0413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0768-245X ; 0000-0002-2269-6833 ; 0000-0002-2268-9166 ; 0000-0001-6871-2176 ; 0000-0002-5081-9909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15266028221137498$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15266028221137498$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isernia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonte, Gioele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallitto, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoglio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fargion, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melissano, Germano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenti, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratesi, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggioli, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luigi, Baccani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luca, Bertoglio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Chiesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianluca, Faggioli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaron, Fargion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecilia, Fenelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianluigi, Fino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrico, Gallitto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, Gargiulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomo, Isernia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Kahlberg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massimo, Lenti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonino, Logiacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiara, Mascoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germano, Melissano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Melloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianpalolo, Reboldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianbattista, Parlani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolfo, Pini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlo, Pratesi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrico, Rinaldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioele, Simonte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sara, Speziali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Italian Multicenter Fenestrated and Branched Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and branched aortic repair candidates and whether these discrepancies could influence endovascular repair outcomes. Methods: Data from all consecutive patients treated during the 2008–2019 period within the Italian Multicenter fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) Registry were included in the present study. Propensity matching was performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for demographic data and comorbidities to obtain comparable male and female samples. The selection model led to a final study population of 176 patients (88 women and 88 men) among the total initial cohort of 596. Study endpoints were technical and clinical success, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reintervention rates evaluated at 30 days and during follow-up. Results: Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) received urgent/emergent repair. In most of the cases (71.6%), women received treatment for extensive thoracoabdominal pathology (Crawford type I, II, or III aneurysm rather than type IV or juxta-pararenal) versus 46.6% of men (p=0.001). Female patients presented with more challenging iliac accesses with at least one side considered hostile in 27.3% of the cases (vs 13.6% in male patients, p=0.039). Finally, women had significantly smaller visceral vessels. Women had significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success rate versus 96.6% in the male population (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of 30-day reinterventions between men and women. The 5-year estimate of freedom from late reintervention, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 85.6% in men versus 81.6% in women (p=ns). No aneurysm-related death was recorded during follow-up (median observational time, 23 months [interquartile range, 7–45 months]). Conclusion: Women presented a significantly higher incidence of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, smaller visceral vessels, and more complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in a significantly lower technical success after F/BEVAR. Further studies assessing sex-related differences are needed to properly determine the impact on outcomes and stratify procedural risks. Clinical Impact Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysms. Aiming to assess whether sex may affect outcomes after a complex endovascular aortic repair, a propensity score selection was applied to a total population of 596 patients receiving F/BEVAR aortic repair with the Cook platform, matching each treated female patient with a corresponding male patient. Women presented more frequently a thoracoabdominal aneurysm extent, smaller visceral vessels, and complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success versus 96.6% (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of short-term and mid-term reinterventions. According to these results, careful and critical assessment should be posed in case of female patients receiving complex aortic repair, especially regarding preoperative anatomical evaluation and clinical selection with appropriate surgical risk stratification.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhq2qVaHQB-il8rGXUI8dOwm3BbEtEgUJuEdee0yDEnuxY8RKPHy9WsoFiZPH0vf_o_kI-QbsCKBpfoLkSjHecg4gmrprP5B9kLWsQEr2cTtzVW2BPfIlpXvGOBTyM9kTqmatUrBPnm_wiZ57N2b0BmnwdIke0xz1jJZqb-lJ1N78LZ8zb8OjTiaPOtJFiPNg6MJjjps00Wtc6yEe06s8mzBhossYJqrppZ6H4PVI_-SxBNDPGAt8N5QVm0Pyyekx4deX94DcLs9uT39XF1e_zk8XF5URrZgrwwWsWNdKY51TtTEggBsj7Mo5g0xKcB10K-xsDVq3HQOpAIy1TeNYDeKA_NjVrmN4yOW4fhqSwXHUHkNOPW9EW3eiAVVQ2KEmhpQiun4dh0nHTQ-s3zrv3zgvme8v9Xk1oX1N_JdcgKMdkPQd9vchxyIkvdP4D16virg</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Isernia, Giacomo</creator><creator>Simonte, Gioele</creator><creator>Gallitto, Enrico</creator><creator>Bertoglio, Luca</creator><creator>Fargion, Aaron</creator><creator>Melissano, Germano</creator><creator>Chiesa, Roberto</creator><creator>Lenti, Massimo</creator><creator>Pratesi, Carlo</creator><creator>Faggioli, Gianluca</creator><creator>Gargiulo, Mauro</creator><creator>Luigi, Baccani</creator><creator>Luca, Bertoglio</creator><creator>Roberto, Chiesa</creator><creator>Gianluca, Faggioli</creator><creator>Aaron, Fargion</creator><creator>Cecilia, Fenelli</creator><creator>Gianluigi, Fino</creator><creator>Enrico, Gallitto</creator><creator>Mauro, Gargiulo</creator><creator>Giacomo, Isernia</creator><creator>Andrea, Kahlberg</creator><creator>Massimo, Lenti</creator><creator>Antonino, Logiacco</creator><creator>Chiara, Mascoli</creator><creator>Germano, Melissano</creator><creator>Andrea, Melloni</creator><creator>Gianpalolo, Reboldi</creator><creator>Gianbattista, Parlani</creator><creator>Rodolfo, Pini</creator><creator>Carlo, Pratesi</creator><creator>Enrico, Rinaldi</creator><creator>Gioele, Simonte</creator><creator>Sara, Speziali</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-245X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2269-6833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-9166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-9909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry</title><author>Isernia, Giacomo ; Simonte, Gioele ; Gallitto, Enrico ; Bertoglio, Luca ; Fargion, Aaron ; Melissano, Germano ; Chiesa, Roberto ; Lenti, Massimo ; Pratesi, Carlo ; Faggioli, Gianluca ; Gargiulo, Mauro ; Luigi, Baccani ; Luca, Bertoglio ; Roberto, Chiesa ; Gianluca, Faggioli ; Aaron, Fargion ; Cecilia, Fenelli ; Gianluigi, Fino ; Enrico, Gallitto ; Mauro, Gargiulo ; Giacomo, Isernia ; Andrea, Kahlberg ; Massimo, Lenti ; Antonino, Logiacco ; Chiara, Mascoli ; Germano, Melissano ; Andrea, Melloni ; Gianpalolo, Reboldi ; Gianbattista, Parlani ; Rodolfo, Pini ; Carlo, Pratesi ; Enrico, Rinaldi ; Gioele, Simonte ; Sara, Speziali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c231b0985cdff64cc1312cc3dbffce0551f919be9d41aa89015611cdd77f0413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isernia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonte, Gioele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallitto, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoglio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fargion, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melissano, Germano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenti, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratesi, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faggioli, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luigi, Baccani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luca, Bertoglio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Chiesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianluca, Faggioli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaron, Fargion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecilia, Fenelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianluigi, Fino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrico, Gallitto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauro, Gargiulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomo, Isernia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Kahlberg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massimo, Lenti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonino, Logiacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiara, Mascoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germano, Melissano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Melloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianpalolo, Reboldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianbattista, Parlani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolfo, Pini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlo, Pratesi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enrico, Rinaldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioele, Simonte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sara, Speziali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Italian Multicenter Fenestrated and Branched Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isernia, Giacomo</au><au>Simonte, Gioele</au><au>Gallitto, Enrico</au><au>Bertoglio, Luca</au><au>Fargion, Aaron</au><au>Melissano, Germano</au><au>Chiesa, Roberto</au><au>Lenti, Massimo</au><au>Pratesi, Carlo</au><au>Faggioli, Gianluca</au><au>Gargiulo, Mauro</au><au>Luigi, Baccani</au><au>Luca, Bertoglio</au><au>Roberto, Chiesa</au><au>Gianluca, Faggioli</au><au>Aaron, Fargion</au><au>Cecilia, Fenelli</au><au>Gianluigi, Fino</au><au>Enrico, Gallitto</au><au>Mauro, Gargiulo</au><au>Giacomo, Isernia</au><au>Andrea, Kahlberg</au><au>Massimo, Lenti</au><au>Antonino, Logiacco</au><au>Chiara, Mascoli</au><au>Germano, Melissano</au><au>Andrea, Melloni</au><au>Gianpalolo, Reboldi</au><au>Gianbattista, Parlani</au><au>Rodolfo, Pini</au><au>Carlo, Pratesi</au><au>Enrico, Rinaldi</au><au>Gioele, Simonte</au><au>Sara, Speziali</au><aucorp>Italian Multicenter Fenestrated and Branched Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>697</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>697-705</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and branched aortic repair candidates and whether these discrepancies could influence endovascular repair outcomes. Methods: Data from all consecutive patients treated during the 2008–2019 period within the Italian Multicenter fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) Registry were included in the present study. Propensity matching was performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for demographic data and comorbidities to obtain comparable male and female samples. The selection model led to a final study population of 176 patients (88 women and 88 men) among the total initial cohort of 596. Study endpoints were technical and clinical success, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reintervention rates evaluated at 30 days and during follow-up. Results: Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) received urgent/emergent repair. In most of the cases (71.6%), women received treatment for extensive thoracoabdominal pathology (Crawford type I, II, or III aneurysm rather than type IV or juxta-pararenal) versus 46.6% of men (p=0.001). Female patients presented with more challenging iliac accesses with at least one side considered hostile in 27.3% of the cases (vs 13.6% in male patients, p=0.039). Finally, women had significantly smaller visceral vessels. Women had significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success rate versus 96.6% in the male population (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of 30-day reinterventions between men and women. The 5-year estimate of freedom from late reintervention, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 85.6% in men versus 81.6% in women (p=ns). No aneurysm-related death was recorded during follow-up (median observational time, 23 months [interquartile range, 7–45 months]). Conclusion: Women presented a significantly higher incidence of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, smaller visceral vessels, and more complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in a significantly lower technical success after F/BEVAR. Further studies assessing sex-related differences are needed to properly determine the impact on outcomes and stratify procedural risks. Clinical Impact Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysms. Aiming to assess whether sex may affect outcomes after a complex endovascular aortic repair, a propensity score selection was applied to a total population of 596 patients receiving F/BEVAR aortic repair with the Cook platform, matching each treated female patient with a corresponding male patient. Women presented more frequently a thoracoabdominal aneurysm extent, smaller visceral vessels, and complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success versus 96.6% (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of short-term and mid-term reinterventions. According to these results, careful and critical assessment should be posed in case of female patients receiving complex aortic repair, especially regarding preoperative anatomical evaluation and clinical selection with appropriate surgical risk stratification.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36408661</pmid><doi>10.1177/15266028221137498</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-245X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2269-6833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-9166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5081-9909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-6028
ispartof Journal of endovascular therapy, 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.697-705
issn 1526-6028
1545-1550
1545-1550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738493716
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - mortality
Female
Health Status Disparities
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
Stents
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Sex Influence on Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A04%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Influence%20on%20Fenestrated%20and%20Branched%20Endovascular%20Aortic%20Aneurysm%20Repair:%20Outcomes%20From%20a%20National%20Multicenter%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Isernia,%20Giacomo&rft.aucorp=Italian%20Multicenter%20Fenestrated%20and%20Branched%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=697-705&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15266028221137498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738493716%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738493716&rft_id=info:pmid/36408661&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15266028221137498&rfr_iscdi=true