Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PR...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The spine journal 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Valente Aguiar, Pedro Silva, Pedro Santos Vaz, Rui Pereira, Paulo |
description | Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs.
To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease.
Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal
All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created.
The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score.
The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers.
Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years.
Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients.
Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943022010087</els_id><sourcerecordid>2738188707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS1EBZT2DarKSzZJx86PnU3RFYKChNRNu7YcZ9L6yolT20G6vEZfGHMvsGTl0eg7Z-RzCPnCoGTA2m_bMi52Riw5cF4yVgKII3LGpJAFayt-nOeGd0VXV3BKPsa4BQApGD8hp1VbA1RdfUb-bwLS9BdpwLi6FKkf6aKTxTnl1eJDwoH6NRk_IZ1QxzWDVI8JA93fp3nzB8OO2nl0K84m8_0ua412bu8W0C8YsudDho3P-ku6oUHPg5_sY8aNn1PwzuUxBavdJ_Jh1C7i55f3nPy-uf51dVvc__xxd7W5L0zV8lTUTdvItjeig66SqE3DOQL2dWO0rEcpWs7aRjAYNAwgR2x0zXTXY9drkQXVObk4-C7B_1sxJjXZaNA5PaNfo-KZYlIKEBmtD6gJPsaAo1qCnXTYKQbquQ61VYc61HMdijEFe9nXlwtrP-HwJnrNPwPfDwDmfz5YDCoauw_R5gSTGrx9_8IT7wCg-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738188707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs.
To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease.
Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal
All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created.
The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score.
The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers.
Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years.
Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients.
Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36400394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; COMI cervical ; Degenerative spine disease ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; MCID ; Memory bias ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; PROMs ; RCT ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7523-5782 ; 0000-0002-4279-3315 ; 0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943022010087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pedro Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs.
To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease.
Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal
All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created.
The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score.
The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers.
Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years.
Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients.
Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</description><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>COMI cervical</subject><subject>Degenerative spine disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MCID</subject><subject>Memory bias</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>PROMs</subject><subject>RCT</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS1EBZT2DarKSzZJx86PnU3RFYKChNRNu7YcZ9L6yolT20G6vEZfGHMvsGTl0eg7Z-RzCPnCoGTA2m_bMi52Riw5cF4yVgKII3LGpJAFayt-nOeGd0VXV3BKPsa4BQApGD8hp1VbA1RdfUb-bwLS9BdpwLi6FKkf6aKTxTnl1eJDwoH6NRk_IZ1QxzWDVI8JA93fp3nzB8OO2nl0K84m8_0ua412bu8W0C8YsudDho3P-ku6oUHPg5_sY8aNn1PwzuUxBavdJ_Jh1C7i55f3nPy-uf51dVvc__xxd7W5L0zV8lTUTdvItjeig66SqE3DOQL2dWO0rEcpWs7aRjAYNAwgR2x0zXTXY9drkQXVObk4-C7B_1sxJjXZaNA5PaNfo-KZYlIKEBmtD6gJPsaAo1qCnXTYKQbquQ61VYc61HMdijEFe9nXlwtrP-HwJnrNPwPfDwDmfz5YDCoauw_R5gSTGrx9_8IT7wCg-g</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creator><creator>Silva, Pedro Santos</creator><creator>Vaz, Rui</creator><creator>Pereira, Paulo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-5782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-3315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>COMI cervical</topic><topic>Degenerative spine disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MCID</topic><topic>Memory bias</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>PROMs</topic><topic>RCT</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pedro Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</au><au>Silva, Pedro Santos</au><au>Vaz, Rui</au><au>Pereira, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>369-378</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs.
To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease.
Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal
All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created.
The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score.
The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers.
Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years.
Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients.
Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36400394</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-5782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-3315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188707 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Cervical Vertebrae - surgery COMI cervical Degenerative spine disease Female Humans Male MCID Memory bias Middle Aged Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods Patient Reported Outcome Measures PROMs RCT Reproducibility of Results Spinal Diseases - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20results%20of%20patient%20reported%20outcome%20measures%20after%20spine%20surgery%20influenced%20by%20recall%20of%20preoperative%20scores?%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Valente%20Aguiar,%20Pedro&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=369-378&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738188707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738188707&rft_id=info:pmid/36400394&rft_els_id=S1529943022010087&rfr_iscdi=true |