Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378
Hauptverfasser: Valente Aguiar, Pedro, Silva, Pedro Santos, Vaz, Rui, Pereira, Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 378
container_issue 3
container_start_page 369
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 23
creator Valente Aguiar, Pedro
Silva, Pedro Santos
Vaz, Rui
Pereira, Paulo
description Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease. Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created. The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score. The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers. Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years. Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients. Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943022010087</els_id><sourcerecordid>2738188707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS1EBZT2DarKSzZJx86PnU3RFYKChNRNu7YcZ9L6yolT20G6vEZfGHMvsGTl0eg7Z-RzCPnCoGTA2m_bMi52Riw5cF4yVgKII3LGpJAFayt-nOeGd0VXV3BKPsa4BQApGD8hp1VbA1RdfUb-bwLS9BdpwLi6FKkf6aKTxTnl1eJDwoH6NRk_IZ1QxzWDVI8JA93fp3nzB8OO2nl0K84m8_0ua412bu8W0C8YsudDho3P-ku6oUHPg5_sY8aNn1PwzuUxBavdJ_Jh1C7i55f3nPy-uf51dVvc__xxd7W5L0zV8lTUTdvItjeig66SqE3DOQL2dWO0rEcpWs7aRjAYNAwgR2x0zXTXY9drkQXVObk4-C7B_1sxJjXZaNA5PaNfo-KZYlIKEBmtD6gJPsaAo1qCnXTYKQbquQ61VYc61HMdijEFe9nXlwtrP-HwJnrNPwPfDwDmfz5YDCoauw_R5gSTGrx9_8IT7wCg-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738188707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease. Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created. The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score. The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers. Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years. Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients. Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36400394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; COMI cervical ; Degenerative spine disease ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; MCID ; Memory bias ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; PROMs ; RCT ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7523-5782 ; 0000-0002-4279-3315 ; 0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943022010087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pedro Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease. Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created. The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score. The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers. Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years. Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients. Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</description><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>COMI cervical</subject><subject>Degenerative spine disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MCID</subject><subject>Memory bias</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>PROMs</subject><subject>RCT</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS1EBZT2DarKSzZJx86PnU3RFYKChNRNu7YcZ9L6yolT20G6vEZfGHMvsGTl0eg7Z-RzCPnCoGTA2m_bMi52Riw5cF4yVgKII3LGpJAFayt-nOeGd0VXV3BKPsa4BQApGD8hp1VbA1RdfUb-bwLS9BdpwLi6FKkf6aKTxTnl1eJDwoH6NRk_IZ1QxzWDVI8JA93fp3nzB8OO2nl0K84m8_0ua412bu8W0C8YsudDho3P-ku6oUHPg5_sY8aNn1PwzuUxBavdJ_Jh1C7i55f3nPy-uf51dVvc__xxd7W5L0zV8lTUTdvItjeig66SqE3DOQL2dWO0rEcpWs7aRjAYNAwgR2x0zXTXY9drkQXVObk4-C7B_1sxJjXZaNA5PaNfo-KZYlIKEBmtD6gJPsaAo1qCnXTYKQbquQ61VYc61HMdijEFe9nXlwtrP-HwJnrNPwPfDwDmfz5YDCoauw_R5gSTGrx9_8IT7wCg-g</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creator><creator>Silva, Pedro Santos</creator><creator>Vaz, Rui</creator><creator>Pereira, Paulo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-5782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-3315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Valente Aguiar, Pedro ; Silva, Pedro Santos ; Vaz, Rui ; Pereira, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-456586bc790938eac522e0eb45ca84f8762165710da0d08fe5a41a9be9ba738e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>COMI cervical</topic><topic>Degenerative spine disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MCID</topic><topic>Memory bias</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>PROMs</topic><topic>RCT</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pedro Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valente Aguiar, Pedro</au><au>Silva, Pedro Santos</au><au>Vaz, Rui</au><au>Pereira, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>369-378</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are of utmost importance to clinical practice as they permit a patient-focused evaluation of surgical outcomes. However, recall bias can limit an adequate interpretation of PROMs. To assess the impact of recall bias of preoperative status on postoperative PROMs of patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine disease. Randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care neurosurgical unit in Portugal All patients submitted to surgery at our institution from January 2019 to April 2020 due to degenerative lumbar or cervical spine disease with valid PROMs questionnaires were enrolled, and 2 computer generated randomized groups were created. The study´s primary endpoint was the median postoperative Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) score. The intervention group was sent postoperative questionnaires including preoperative answers, while patients in the control group were sent the same PROMs without the preoperative answers. Randomization was applied to 236 patients (118 for each group) and valid results were obtained for 147 patients (81 lumbar, 44 from the intervention group; and 66 cervical, 29 from the intervention group), from which 88 (60%) were females, with a median age of 58 years. Both groups shared similar baseline clinical characteristics and preoperative scores. Median postoperative COMI scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) were 4.20 (IQR: 2.30–6.00) and 5.45 (IQR: 3.75–7.40) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (Wilcoxon, p=.02). This difference was reached mainly due to cervical spine patients as median postoperative COMI score was 3.95 (IQR: 2.20–5.32) in the intervention group and 5.1 (IQR: 4.0–8.4) in the control group (Wilcoxon, p=.01). No significant difference was reached for lumbar patients. Better PROMs scores were obtained for degenerative cervical spine patients to whom the preoperative results were provided. Therefore, providing preoperative scores to patients upon postoperative PROMs fulfilment might influence postoperative results. Further research is necessary to increase the reliability of PROMs in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36400394</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-5782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-3315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-9213</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2023-03, Vol.23 (3), p.369-378
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188707
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
COMI cervical
Degenerative spine disease
Female
Humans
Male
MCID
Memory bias
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PROMs
RCT
Reproducibility of Results
Spinal Diseases - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Are the results of patient reported outcome measures after spine surgery influenced by recall of preoperative scores? A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20results%20of%20patient%20reported%20outcome%20measures%20after%20spine%20surgery%20influenced%20by%20recall%20of%20preoperative%20scores?%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Valente%20Aguiar,%20Pedro&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=369-378&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738188707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738188707&rft_id=info:pmid/36400394&rft_els_id=S1529943022010087&rfr_iscdi=true