Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience

The surgical aspect of kidney transplant can be the surgical technique itself or the use of reconstruction techniques in the case of a complication requiring reoperation. In our study, we examined particularly surgical techniques and reconstruction options for ureteral anastomoses. Data from patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2022-11, Vol.54 (9), p.2578-2583
Hauptverfasser: Illésy, Lóránt, Kovács, Dávid Ágoston, Fedor, Roland, Zádori, Gergely, Kanyári, Zsolt, Asztalos sen, László, Nemes, Balázs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2583
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2578
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 54
creator Illésy, Lóránt
Kovács, Dávid Ágoston
Fedor, Roland
Zádori, Gergely
Kanyári, Zsolt
Asztalos sen, László
Nemes, Balázs
description The surgical aspect of kidney transplant can be the surgical technique itself or the use of reconstruction techniques in the case of a complication requiring reoperation. In our study, we examined particularly surgical techniques and reconstruction options for ureteral anastomoses. Data from patients who underwent kidney transplant from 2010 to 2020 (N = 433) were examined retrospectively at follow-up of at least 1 year. We sought an association between the type of ureteral anastomoses and parameters considered to be risk factors based on literature data. We did not note the complicated cases that solved spontaneously and only selected cases where the ureteral anastomosis complication (UAcomp) needed urologic, radiological, or surgical intervention. In a smaller group, we examined the correlation between BK polyomavirus and ureteral stenosis. A total of 9.2% (n = 40) of patients developed UAcomp, 67.5% (n = 27) of whom required reoperation. In complicated cases, the rate of primary ureteral anastomosis type was 60.0% (n = 24) ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) and 40.0% (n = 16) ureteroureterostomy (UU) (P = .184). After UNS, 7.7% (n = 17) of cases required reoperation, and this rate was 4.7% (n = 10) after UU (P = .164). After treatment of the UAcomp, 95.0% (n = 38) of the patients were discharged with a functioning graft, and 5.0% (n = 2) required graftectomy. Complications of ureteral anastomosis with appropriate interventions results in good graft function. The type of ureteral anastomosis is not significantly associated with UAcomp. It is important that the operating surgeon is well versed in UNS and UU techniques to be able to adapt to any situation, be it primary surgery or reoperation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134522007151</els_id><sourcerecordid>2738188393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b3d0f6942ce9ec95af32668021b3ff04deff1571ca1f7917b9d65d39710e3ad83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOAjEUhhujEURfwTSu3Az2Mld2BFGJJCYK66a0p6ZkmIF2IPL2drgkLl01p_93ek4_hB4o6VNC06dlv3Gy8mtXKwDdZ4SxEPRJnFygLs0zHrGU8UvUJSSmEeVx0kE33i9JqFnMr1GHpzEhSUG6SM4dNOBkiUf1al1aJRtbVx5_wmZrna2-8aQK-Q6q9h4PTSjwu9UV7PHssEUpq2aAh_grwCVEI2h5PP5Zg7NQKbhFV0aWHu5OZw_NX8az0Vs0_XidjIbTSPGcNNGCa2LSImYKClBFIg1naZoTRhfcGBJrMIYmGVWSmqyg2aLQaaJ5kVECXOqc99Dj8d3gZbMF34iV9QrKsB_UWy9YxnOa57zgAR0cUeVq7x0YsXZ2Jd1eUCJaxWIp_ioWreI2C4pD8_1pznaxCtm59ew0AM9HAMJvdxac8OpgQlsHqhG6tv-Z8wtJeJV5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738188393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Illésy, Lóránt ; Kovács, Dávid Ágoston ; Fedor, Roland ; Zádori, Gergely ; Kanyári, Zsolt ; Asztalos sen, László ; Nemes, Balázs</creator><creatorcontrib>Illésy, Lóránt ; Kovács, Dávid Ágoston ; Fedor, Roland ; Zádori, Gergely ; Kanyári, Zsolt ; Asztalos sen, László ; Nemes, Balázs</creatorcontrib><description>The surgical aspect of kidney transplant can be the surgical technique itself or the use of reconstruction techniques in the case of a complication requiring reoperation. In our study, we examined particularly surgical techniques and reconstruction options for ureteral anastomoses. Data from patients who underwent kidney transplant from 2010 to 2020 (N = 433) were examined retrospectively at follow-up of at least 1 year. We sought an association between the type of ureteral anastomoses and parameters considered to be risk factors based on literature data. We did not note the complicated cases that solved spontaneously and only selected cases where the ureteral anastomosis complication (UAcomp) needed urologic, radiological, or surgical intervention. In a smaller group, we examined the correlation between BK polyomavirus and ureteral stenosis. A total of 9.2% (n = 40) of patients developed UAcomp, 67.5% (n = 27) of whom required reoperation. In complicated cases, the rate of primary ureteral anastomosis type was 60.0% (n = 24) ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) and 40.0% (n = 16) ureteroureterostomy (UU) (P = .184). After UNS, 7.7% (n = 17) of cases required reoperation, and this rate was 4.7% (n = 10) after UU (P = .164). After treatment of the UAcomp, 95.0% (n = 38) of the patients were discharged with a functioning graft, and 5.0% (n = 2) required graftectomy. Complications of ureteral anastomosis with appropriate interventions results in good graft function. The type of ureteral anastomosis is not significantly associated with UAcomp. It is important that the operating surgeon is well versed in UNS and UU techniques to be able to adapt to any situation, be it primary surgery or reoperation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36400590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2022-11, Vol.54 (9), p.2578-2583</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b3d0f6942ce9ec95af32668021b3ff04deff1571ca1f7917b9d65d39710e3ad83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b3d0f6942ce9ec95af32668021b3ff04deff1571ca1f7917b9d65d39710e3ad83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Illésy, Lóránt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Dávid Ágoston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedor, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zádori, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanyári, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos sen, László</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemes, Balázs</creatorcontrib><title>Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>The surgical aspect of kidney transplant can be the surgical technique itself or the use of reconstruction techniques in the case of a complication requiring reoperation. In our study, we examined particularly surgical techniques and reconstruction options for ureteral anastomoses. Data from patients who underwent kidney transplant from 2010 to 2020 (N = 433) were examined retrospectively at follow-up of at least 1 year. We sought an association between the type of ureteral anastomoses and parameters considered to be risk factors based on literature data. We did not note the complicated cases that solved spontaneously and only selected cases where the ureteral anastomosis complication (UAcomp) needed urologic, radiological, or surgical intervention. In a smaller group, we examined the correlation between BK polyomavirus and ureteral stenosis. A total of 9.2% (n = 40) of patients developed UAcomp, 67.5% (n = 27) of whom required reoperation. In complicated cases, the rate of primary ureteral anastomosis type was 60.0% (n = 24) ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) and 40.0% (n = 16) ureteroureterostomy (UU) (P = .184). After UNS, 7.7% (n = 17) of cases required reoperation, and this rate was 4.7% (n = 10) after UU (P = .164). After treatment of the UAcomp, 95.0% (n = 38) of the patients were discharged with a functioning graft, and 5.0% (n = 2) required graftectomy. Complications of ureteral anastomosis with appropriate interventions results in good graft function. The type of ureteral anastomosis is not significantly associated with UAcomp. It is important that the operating surgeon is well versed in UNS and UU techniques to be able to adapt to any situation, be it primary surgery or reoperation.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOAjEUhhujEURfwTSu3Az2Mld2BFGJJCYK66a0p6ZkmIF2IPL2drgkLl01p_93ek4_hB4o6VNC06dlv3Gy8mtXKwDdZ4SxEPRJnFygLs0zHrGU8UvUJSSmEeVx0kE33i9JqFnMr1GHpzEhSUG6SM4dNOBkiUf1al1aJRtbVx5_wmZrna2-8aQK-Q6q9h4PTSjwu9UV7PHssEUpq2aAh_grwCVEI2h5PP5Zg7NQKbhFV0aWHu5OZw_NX8az0Vs0_XidjIbTSPGcNNGCa2LSImYKClBFIg1naZoTRhfcGBJrMIYmGVWSmqyg2aLQaaJ5kVECXOqc99Dj8d3gZbMF34iV9QrKsB_UWy9YxnOa57zgAR0cUeVq7x0YsXZ2Jd1eUCJaxWIp_ioWreI2C4pD8_1pznaxCtm59ew0AM9HAMJvdxac8OpgQlsHqhG6tv-Z8wtJeJV5</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Illésy, Lóránt</creator><creator>Kovács, Dávid Ágoston</creator><creator>Fedor, Roland</creator><creator>Zádori, Gergely</creator><creator>Kanyári, Zsolt</creator><creator>Asztalos sen, László</creator><creator>Nemes, Balázs</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience</title><author>Illésy, Lóránt ; Kovács, Dávid Ágoston ; Fedor, Roland ; Zádori, Gergely ; Kanyári, Zsolt ; Asztalos sen, László ; Nemes, Balázs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b3d0f6942ce9ec95af32668021b3ff04deff1571ca1f7917b9d65d39710e3ad83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Illésy, Lóránt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Dávid Ágoston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedor, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zádori, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanyári, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos sen, László</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemes, Balázs</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Illésy, Lóránt</au><au>Kovács, Dávid Ágoston</au><au>Fedor, Roland</au><au>Zádori, Gergely</au><au>Kanyári, Zsolt</au><au>Asztalos sen, László</au><au>Nemes, Balázs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2578</spage><epage>2583</epage><pages>2578-2583</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>The surgical aspect of kidney transplant can be the surgical technique itself or the use of reconstruction techniques in the case of a complication requiring reoperation. In our study, we examined particularly surgical techniques and reconstruction options for ureteral anastomoses. Data from patients who underwent kidney transplant from 2010 to 2020 (N = 433) were examined retrospectively at follow-up of at least 1 year. We sought an association between the type of ureteral anastomoses and parameters considered to be risk factors based on literature data. We did not note the complicated cases that solved spontaneously and only selected cases where the ureteral anastomosis complication (UAcomp) needed urologic, radiological, or surgical intervention. In a smaller group, we examined the correlation between BK polyomavirus and ureteral stenosis. A total of 9.2% (n = 40) of patients developed UAcomp, 67.5% (n = 27) of whom required reoperation. In complicated cases, the rate of primary ureteral anastomosis type was 60.0% (n = 24) ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) and 40.0% (n = 16) ureteroureterostomy (UU) (P = .184). After UNS, 7.7% (n = 17) of cases required reoperation, and this rate was 4.7% (n = 10) after UU (P = .164). After treatment of the UAcomp, 95.0% (n = 38) of the patients were discharged with a functioning graft, and 5.0% (n = 2) required graftectomy. Complications of ureteral anastomosis with appropriate interventions results in good graft function. The type of ureteral anastomosis is not significantly associated with UAcomp. It is important that the operating surgeon is well versed in UNS and UU techniques to be able to adapt to any situation, be it primary surgery or reoperation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36400590</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.045</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2022-11, Vol.54 (9), p.2578-2583
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738188393
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Ureteral Complications Requiring Intervention After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ureteral%20Complications%20Requiring%20Intervention%20After%20Kidney%20Transplant:%20A%20Single-Center%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Ill%C3%A9sy,%20L%C3%B3r%C3%A1nt&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2578&rft.epage=2583&rft.pages=2578-2583&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738188393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738188393&rft_id=info:pmid/36400590&rft_els_id=S0041134522007151&rfr_iscdi=true