Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona

New, productive fluvial marshes may develop along regulated canyon rivers through reduction in flood frequency, thereby increasing diversity, production, and wildlife habitat availability. Few fluvial marshes occurred along the eddy-dominated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon prior to construction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 1995-11, Vol.5 (4), p.1025-1039
Hauptverfasser: Stevens, Lawrence E., Schmidt, John C., Ayers, Tina J., Brown, Bryan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1039
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1025
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 5
creator Stevens, Lawrence E.
Schmidt, John C.
Ayers, Tina J.
Brown, Bryan T.
description New, productive fluvial marshes may develop along regulated canyon rivers through reduction in flood frequency, thereby increasing diversity, production, and wildlife habitat availability. Few fluvial marshes occurred along the eddy-dominated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon prior to construction of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963. Reduction of flooding after 1963 permitted widespread marsh development. Fluvial marshes exhibited low stability but high resilience, quickly redeveloping after scouring by high flows between 1983 and 1986. In 1991, 253 fluvial wet marshes (cattail/reed and horseweed/Bermudagrass) and 850 dry marshes (horsetail/willow) occupied 25.0 ha (1%) of the 363 km mainstream riparian corridor between Lees Ferry and Diamond Creek, Arizona. Fluvial marsh development and composition varied in relation to local and reach-based geomorphology, and microsite gradients in inundation frequency and soil texture. Colorado River marsh density (number/km$^2$) increased with distance downstream, and marshes were larger and more abundant in wide reaches. Wet marsh cattail/reed stands developed on silty loam soils in low velocity depositional environments that were inundated 54% of the days from 1986 to 1991, whereas dry horsetail/willow marshes occupied less frequently inundated sites with sandy soils. Mean marsh standing mass (641 g C/m$^2$) was comparable with values from regulated alluvial river marshes, but litter retention appeared limited by flow variability in both regulated and unregulated fluvial marshes. We discuss implications of flow management on the four marsh assemblages, and the need for consensus on priorities for management of regulated fluvial wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2269352
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27378768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2269352</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2269352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-663166e20da246470b6fae1e3b054d888a04ce906c2a0bb0d40a3e8847db7dec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFPwjAUB_DFaCKi8e6pB6MXpq_t2m5HQgBNSDQq56bbHjAyVmwHBD-9w3FV3-W9w-_9k_eC4JrCA-OgHhmTCRfsJOjQhCehEDE7bWYQNAQl6Xlw4f0SmmKMdQIzKu2OOJxvSlMXtuqROdqVdeuFLe183yOmysmgmZ3JLXkrtujIyji_IDlusbTrFVY1KSpSL5CM3Y821f4Q1HfFl63MZXA2M6XHq2PvBtPR8GPwFE5exs-D_iTMuJIilJJTKZFBblgkIwWpnBmkyFMQUR7HsYEowwRkxgykKeQRGI5xHKk8VTlmvBvctblrZz836Gu9KnyGZWkqtBuvmeIqVjL-F1IFVCQyauB9CzNnvXc402tXNMfvNQV9-LU-_rqRrJW7osT9b0wP-680SYSIKDDRLN22S0tfW_dH9k3LZsZqM3eF19P3RIIUIPg3OYmSQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17015964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Stevens, Lawrence E. ; Schmidt, John C. ; Ayers, Tina J. ; Brown, Bryan T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lawrence E. ; Schmidt, John C. ; Ayers, Tina J. ; Brown, Bryan T.</creatorcontrib><description>New, productive fluvial marshes may develop along regulated canyon rivers through reduction in flood frequency, thereby increasing diversity, production, and wildlife habitat availability. Few fluvial marshes occurred along the eddy-dominated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon prior to construction of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963. Reduction of flooding after 1963 permitted widespread marsh development. Fluvial marshes exhibited low stability but high resilience, quickly redeveloping after scouring by high flows between 1983 and 1986. In 1991, 253 fluvial wet marshes (cattail/reed and horseweed/Bermudagrass) and 850 dry marshes (horsetail/willow) occupied 25.0 ha (1%) of the 363 km mainstream riparian corridor between Lees Ferry and Diamond Creek, Arizona. Fluvial marsh development and composition varied in relation to local and reach-based geomorphology, and microsite gradients in inundation frequency and soil texture. Colorado River marsh density (number/km$^2$) increased with distance downstream, and marshes were larger and more abundant in wide reaches. Wet marsh cattail/reed stands developed on silty loam soils in low velocity depositional environments that were inundated 54% of the days from 1986 to 1991, whereas dry horsetail/willow marshes occupied less frequently inundated sites with sandy soils. Mean marsh standing mass (641 g C/m$^2$) was comparable with values from regulated alluvial river marshes, but litter retention appeared limited by flow variability in both regulated and unregulated fluvial marshes. We discuss implications of flow management on the four marsh assemblages, and the need for consensus on priorities for management of regulated fluvial wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2269352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>ARIZONA ; BARRAGE ; BOTANICAL COMPOSITION ; Canyons ; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY ; COMPOSICION BOTANICA ; COMPOSITION BOTANIQUE ; COURS D'EAU ; CURSOS DE AGUA ; DAMS ; DEBIT ; ECOLOGIA ; ECOLOGIA DE AGUA DULCE ; ECOLOGIA VEGETAL ; ECOLOGIE ; ECOLOGIE D'EAU DOUCE ; ECOLOGY ; FLOODING ; flooding frequency ; FLOW RATE ; fluvial marshes ; Freshwater ; FRESHWATER ECOLOGY ; GASTO ; GEOMORFOLOGIA ; GEOMORPHOLOGIE ; GEOMORPHOLOGY ; INONDATION ; INUNDACION ; MARISMA ; MARSHES ; PHYTOECOLOGIE ; PLANT ECOLOGY ; PRAIRIE MARECAGEUSE ; REPRESAS ; RIVER REGULATION ; RIVERS ; Soil texture ; STREAM FLOW ; Tributaries ; Vegetation ; Wetland ecology ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 1995-11, Vol.5 (4), p.1025-1039</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1995 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-663166e20da246470b6fae1e3b054d888a04ce906c2a0bb0d40a3e8847db7dec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2269352$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2269352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lawrence E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Tina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Bryan T.</creatorcontrib><title>Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>New, productive fluvial marshes may develop along regulated canyon rivers through reduction in flood frequency, thereby increasing diversity, production, and wildlife habitat availability. Few fluvial marshes occurred along the eddy-dominated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon prior to construction of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963. Reduction of flooding after 1963 permitted widespread marsh development. Fluvial marshes exhibited low stability but high resilience, quickly redeveloping after scouring by high flows between 1983 and 1986. In 1991, 253 fluvial wet marshes (cattail/reed and horseweed/Bermudagrass) and 850 dry marshes (horsetail/willow) occupied 25.0 ha (1%) of the 363 km mainstream riparian corridor between Lees Ferry and Diamond Creek, Arizona. Fluvial marsh development and composition varied in relation to local and reach-based geomorphology, and microsite gradients in inundation frequency and soil texture. Colorado River marsh density (number/km$^2$) increased with distance downstream, and marshes were larger and more abundant in wide reaches. Wet marsh cattail/reed stands developed on silty loam soils in low velocity depositional environments that were inundated 54% of the days from 1986 to 1991, whereas dry horsetail/willow marshes occupied less frequently inundated sites with sandy soils. Mean marsh standing mass (641 g C/m$^2$) was comparable with values from regulated alluvial river marshes, but litter retention appeared limited by flow variability in both regulated and unregulated fluvial marshes. We discuss implications of flow management on the four marsh assemblages, and the need for consensus on priorities for management of regulated fluvial wetlands.</description><subject>ARIZONA</subject><subject>BARRAGE</subject><subject>BOTANICAL COMPOSITION</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY</subject><subject>COMPOSICION BOTANICA</subject><subject>COMPOSITION BOTANIQUE</subject><subject>COURS D'EAU</subject><subject>CURSOS DE AGUA</subject><subject>DAMS</subject><subject>DEBIT</subject><subject>ECOLOGIA</subject><subject>ECOLOGIA DE AGUA DULCE</subject><subject>ECOLOGIA VEGETAL</subject><subject>ECOLOGIE</subject><subject>ECOLOGIE D'EAU DOUCE</subject><subject>ECOLOGY</subject><subject>FLOODING</subject><subject>flooding frequency</subject><subject>FLOW RATE</subject><subject>fluvial marshes</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>FRESHWATER ECOLOGY</subject><subject>GASTO</subject><subject>GEOMORFOLOGIA</subject><subject>GEOMORPHOLOGIE</subject><subject>GEOMORPHOLOGY</subject><subject>INONDATION</subject><subject>INUNDACION</subject><subject>MARISMA</subject><subject>MARSHES</subject><subject>PHYTOECOLOGIE</subject><subject>PLANT ECOLOGY</subject><subject>PRAIRIE MARECAGEUSE</subject><subject>REPRESAS</subject><subject>RIVER REGULATION</subject><subject>RIVERS</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>STREAM FLOW</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetland ecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0EFPwjAUB_DFaCKi8e6pB6MXpq_t2m5HQgBNSDQq56bbHjAyVmwHBD-9w3FV3-W9w-_9k_eC4JrCA-OgHhmTCRfsJOjQhCehEDE7bWYQNAQl6Xlw4f0SmmKMdQIzKu2OOJxvSlMXtuqROdqVdeuFLe183yOmysmgmZ3JLXkrtujIyji_IDlusbTrFVY1KSpSL5CM3Y821f4Q1HfFl63MZXA2M6XHq2PvBtPR8GPwFE5exs-D_iTMuJIilJJTKZFBblgkIwWpnBmkyFMQUR7HsYEowwRkxgykKeQRGI5xHKk8VTlmvBvctblrZz836Gu9KnyGZWkqtBuvmeIqVjL-F1IFVCQyauB9CzNnvXc402tXNMfvNQV9-LU-_rqRrJW7osT9b0wP-680SYSIKDDRLN22S0tfW_dH9k3LZsZqM3eF19P3RIIUIPg3OYmSQQ</recordid><startdate>199511</startdate><enddate>199511</enddate><creator>Stevens, Lawrence E.</creator><creator>Schmidt, John C.</creator><creator>Ayers, Tina J.</creator><creator>Brown, Bryan T.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199511</creationdate><title>Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona</title><author>Stevens, Lawrence E. ; Schmidt, John C. ; Ayers, Tina J. ; Brown, Bryan T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-663166e20da246470b6fae1e3b054d888a04ce906c2a0bb0d40a3e8847db7dec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>ARIZONA</topic><topic>BARRAGE</topic><topic>BOTANICAL COMPOSITION</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY</topic><topic>COMPOSICION BOTANICA</topic><topic>COMPOSITION BOTANIQUE</topic><topic>COURS D'EAU</topic><topic>CURSOS DE AGUA</topic><topic>DAMS</topic><topic>DEBIT</topic><topic>ECOLOGIA</topic><topic>ECOLOGIA DE AGUA DULCE</topic><topic>ECOLOGIA VEGETAL</topic><topic>ECOLOGIE</topic><topic>ECOLOGIE D'EAU DOUCE</topic><topic>ECOLOGY</topic><topic>FLOODING</topic><topic>flooding frequency</topic><topic>FLOW RATE</topic><topic>fluvial marshes</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>FRESHWATER ECOLOGY</topic><topic>GASTO</topic><topic>GEOMORFOLOGIA</topic><topic>GEOMORPHOLOGIE</topic><topic>GEOMORPHOLOGY</topic><topic>INONDATION</topic><topic>INUNDACION</topic><topic>MARISMA</topic><topic>MARSHES</topic><topic>PHYTOECOLOGIE</topic><topic>PLANT ECOLOGY</topic><topic>PRAIRIE MARECAGEUSE</topic><topic>REPRESAS</topic><topic>RIVER REGULATION</topic><topic>RIVERS</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>STREAM FLOW</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetland ecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lawrence E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Tina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Bryan T.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Lawrence E.</au><au>Schmidt, John C.</au><au>Ayers, Tina J.</au><au>Brown, Bryan T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>1995-11</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1025</spage><epage>1039</epage><pages>1025-1039</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>New, productive fluvial marshes may develop along regulated canyon rivers through reduction in flood frequency, thereby increasing diversity, production, and wildlife habitat availability. Few fluvial marshes occurred along the eddy-dominated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon prior to construction of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963. Reduction of flooding after 1963 permitted widespread marsh development. Fluvial marshes exhibited low stability but high resilience, quickly redeveloping after scouring by high flows between 1983 and 1986. In 1991, 253 fluvial wet marshes (cattail/reed and horseweed/Bermudagrass) and 850 dry marshes (horsetail/willow) occupied 25.0 ha (1%) of the 363 km mainstream riparian corridor between Lees Ferry and Diamond Creek, Arizona. Fluvial marsh development and composition varied in relation to local and reach-based geomorphology, and microsite gradients in inundation frequency and soil texture. Colorado River marsh density (number/km$^2$) increased with distance downstream, and marshes were larger and more abundant in wide reaches. Wet marsh cattail/reed stands developed on silty loam soils in low velocity depositional environments that were inundated 54% of the days from 1986 to 1991, whereas dry horsetail/willow marshes occupied less frequently inundated sites with sandy soils. Mean marsh standing mass (641 g C/m$^2$) was comparable with values from regulated alluvial river marshes, but litter retention appeared limited by flow variability in both regulated and unregulated fluvial marshes. We discuss implications of flow management on the four marsh assemblages, and the need for consensus on priorities for management of regulated fluvial wetlands.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/2269352</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 1995-11, Vol.5 (4), p.1025-1039
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27378768
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects ARIZONA
BARRAGE
BOTANICAL COMPOSITION
Canyons
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
COMPOSICION BOTANICA
COMPOSITION BOTANIQUE
COURS D'EAU
CURSOS DE AGUA
DAMS
DEBIT
ECOLOGIA
ECOLOGIA DE AGUA DULCE
ECOLOGIA VEGETAL
ECOLOGIE
ECOLOGIE D'EAU DOUCE
ECOLOGY
FLOODING
flooding frequency
FLOW RATE
fluvial marshes
Freshwater
FRESHWATER ECOLOGY
GASTO
GEOMORFOLOGIA
GEOMORPHOLOGIE
GEOMORPHOLOGY
INONDATION
INUNDACION
MARISMA
MARSHES
PHYTOECOLOGIE
PLANT ECOLOGY
PRAIRIE MARECAGEUSE
REPRESAS
RIVER REGULATION
RIVERS
Soil texture
STREAM FLOW
Tributaries
Vegetation
Wetland ecology
Wetlands
title Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A18%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flow%20regulation,%20geomorphology,%20and%20Colorado%20River%20marsh%20development%20in%20the%20Grand%20Canyon,%20Arizona&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Stevens,%20Lawrence%20E.&rft.date=1995-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1025&rft.epage=1039&rft.pages=1025-1039&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2269352&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2269352%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17015964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2269352&rfr_iscdi=true