“We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency
Philadelphia has one of the country's largest populations re‐entering society after incarceration. Reentry services have been critiqued for their ineffectiveness. Scholars note the lack of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in the field, and the challenges of translating them. Through a case study...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of community psychology 2023-04, Vol.51 (3), p.945-961 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 961 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 945 |
| container_title | Journal of community psychology |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Updyke, Alison Ghose, Toorjo |
| description | Philadelphia has one of the country's largest populations re‐entering society after incarceration. Reentry services have been critiqued for their ineffectiveness. Scholars note the lack of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in the field, and the challenges of translating them. Through a case study of one reentry agency implementing an EBP, we examine engagement with the intervention by clients and service providers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clients and staff (n = 35). A grounded theory using sensitizing concepts approach was used to analyze the data. Productive engagement with the intervention was facilitated by: (1) translatability of the core EBP elements so that they addressed client and staff needs, (2) accessibility to the intervention by enhancing subjective ownership and successfully navigating logistical barriers, and (3) collectivity among participants and staff that helped them address societal and structural barriers. Productive engagement with an EBP can resist carceral processes in reentry service‐provision. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcop.22964 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2737464970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2737464970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-5969523cf8f083b1505307177b5ca91bb912c12fa4f90a0284bc55a6f9ef967e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEYhuEgiq2HjRcgAReKMJrDJDNxV0o9ISiouHPIZP5pp0xnajK1dNdL8AL05nolRltduHAVAg8vPx9Ce5ScUELY6dDU4xPGlAzXUJsKRgIpmVpHbUIUCUKuWAttOTck_q94tIlaXPKYSxW30fNi_v4EhxZwMwDcvew83OO6zBbztwHozC3mH2e4V_V1v6j6eFo0AwyvRQaVAU9S7SDDY6tNUxjARYU1tgBVY2dY9z2a7aCNXJcOdlfvNno87z10L4Ob24urbucmMJzKMBBKKsG4yeOcxDylgghOIhpFqTBa0TRVlBnKch3mimjC4jA1QmiZK8iVjIBvo6Nld2zrlwm4JhkVzkBZ6grqiUtYxKNQhioinh78ocN6Yit_nVexYJSFknl1vFTG1s5ZyJOxLUbazhJKkq_Vk6_Vk-_VPd5fJSfpCLJf-jOzB3QJpkUJs39SyXX39m4Z_QSLS44t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785212462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Updyke, Alison ; Ghose, Toorjo</creator><creatorcontrib>Updyke, Alison ; Ghose, Toorjo</creatorcontrib><description>Philadelphia has one of the country's largest populations re‐entering society after incarceration. Reentry services have been critiqued for their ineffectiveness. Scholars note the lack of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in the field, and the challenges of translating them. Through a case study of one reentry agency implementing an EBP, we examine engagement with the intervention by clients and service providers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clients and staff (n = 35). A grounded theory using sensitizing concepts approach was used to analyze the data. Productive engagement with the intervention was facilitated by: (1) translatability of the core EBP elements so that they addressed client and staff needs, (2) accessibility to the intervention by enhancing subjective ownership and successfully navigating logistical barriers, and (3) collectivity among participants and staff that helped them address societal and structural barriers. Productive engagement with an EBP can resist carceral processes in reentry service‐provision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4392</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36383698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Clients ; cognitive behavioral therapy ; diversion ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Grounded Theory ; Humans ; Imprisonment ; Intervention ; justice‐involved community ; mass incarceration ; Ownership ; Philadelphia ; prisoner reentry ; service provision</subject><ispartof>Journal of community psychology, 2023-04, Vol.51 (3), p.945-961</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-5969523cf8f083b1505307177b5ca91bb912c12fa4f90a0284bc55a6f9ef967e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcop.22964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcop.22964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Updyke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghose, Toorjo</creatorcontrib><title>“We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency</title><title>Journal of community psychology</title><addtitle>J Community Psychol</addtitle><description>Philadelphia has one of the country's largest populations re‐entering society after incarceration. Reentry services have been critiqued for their ineffectiveness. Scholars note the lack of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in the field, and the challenges of translating them. Through a case study of one reentry agency implementing an EBP, we examine engagement with the intervention by clients and service providers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clients and staff (n = 35). A grounded theory using sensitizing concepts approach was used to analyze the data. Productive engagement with the intervention was facilitated by: (1) translatability of the core EBP elements so that they addressed client and staff needs, (2) accessibility to the intervention by enhancing subjective ownership and successfully navigating logistical barriers, and (3) collectivity among participants and staff that helped them address societal and structural barriers. Productive engagement with an EBP can resist carceral processes in reentry service‐provision.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clients</subject><subject>cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>diversion</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Grounded Theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>justice‐involved community</subject><subject>mass incarceration</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Philadelphia</subject><subject>prisoner reentry</subject><subject>service provision</subject><issn>0090-4392</issn><issn>1520-6629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEYhuEgiq2HjRcgAReKMJrDJDNxV0o9ISiouHPIZP5pp0xnajK1dNdL8AL05nolRltduHAVAg8vPx9Ce5ScUELY6dDU4xPGlAzXUJsKRgIpmVpHbUIUCUKuWAttOTck_q94tIlaXPKYSxW30fNi_v4EhxZwMwDcvew83OO6zBbztwHozC3mH2e4V_V1v6j6eFo0AwyvRQaVAU9S7SDDY6tNUxjARYU1tgBVY2dY9z2a7aCNXJcOdlfvNno87z10L4Ob24urbucmMJzKMBBKKsG4yeOcxDylgghOIhpFqTBa0TRVlBnKch3mimjC4jA1QmiZK8iVjIBvo6Nld2zrlwm4JhkVzkBZ6grqiUtYxKNQhioinh78ocN6Yit_nVexYJSFknl1vFTG1s5ZyJOxLUbazhJKkq_Vk6_Vk-_VPd5fJSfpCLJf-jOzB3QJpkUJs39SyXX39m4Z_QSLS44t</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Updyke, Alison</creator><creator>Ghose, Toorjo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>“We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency</title><author>Updyke, Alison ; Ghose, Toorjo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-5969523cf8f083b1505307177b5ca91bb912c12fa4f90a0284bc55a6f9ef967e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clients</topic><topic>cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>diversion</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Grounded Theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>justice‐involved community</topic><topic>mass incarceration</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Philadelphia</topic><topic>prisoner reentry</topic><topic>service provision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Updyke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghose, Toorjo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of community psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Updyke, Alison</au><au>Ghose, Toorjo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>945</spage><epage>961</epage><pages>945-961</pages><issn>0090-4392</issn><eissn>1520-6629</eissn><abstract>Philadelphia has one of the country's largest populations re‐entering society after incarceration. Reentry services have been critiqued for their ineffectiveness. Scholars note the lack of evidence‐based practices (EBPs) in the field, and the challenges of translating them. Through a case study of one reentry agency implementing an EBP, we examine engagement with the intervention by clients and service providers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clients and staff (n = 35). A grounded theory using sensitizing concepts approach was used to analyze the data. Productive engagement with the intervention was facilitated by: (1) translatability of the core EBP elements so that they addressed client and staff needs, (2) accessibility to the intervention by enhancing subjective ownership and successfully navigating logistical barriers, and (3) collectivity among participants and staff that helped them address societal and structural barriers. Productive engagement with an EBP can resist carceral processes in reentry service‐provision.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36383698</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcop.22964</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-4392 |
| ispartof | Journal of community psychology, 2023-04, Vol.51 (3), p.945-961 |
| issn | 0090-4392 1520-6629 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2737464970 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Case studies Clients cognitive behavioral therapy diversion Evidence-Based Practice Grounded Theory Humans Imprisonment Intervention justice‐involved community mass incarceration Ownership Philadelphia prisoner reentry service provision |
| title | “We're the CHATS old‐heads”: Engaging with evidence‐based practice in a reentry agency |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWe're%20the%20CHATS%20old%E2%80%90heads%E2%80%9D:%20Engaging%20with%20evidence%E2%80%90based%20practice%20in%20a%20reentry%20agency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20psychology&rft.au=Updyke,%20Alison&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=945&rft.epage=961&rft.pages=945-961&rft.issn=0090-4392&rft.eissn=1520-6629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcop.22964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2737464970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785212462&rft_id=info:pmid/36383698&rfr_iscdi=true |