Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?

Rationale Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2023-09, Vol.29 (6), p.893-902
Hauptverfasser: Hofmann, Bjørn, Haug, Erik Skaaheim, Andersen, Eivind Richter, Kjelle, Elin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 902
container_issue 6
container_start_page 893
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 29
creator Hofmann, Bjørn
Haug, Erik Skaaheim
Andersen, Eivind Richter
Kjelle, Elin
description Rationale Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aims and Objective To study the change in the use of prostate MRI in the Norwegian health care system from 2013 to 2021 and to investigate some reasons for and potential implications of this change. Method Data from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO), The Cancer Registry of Norway and Cause‐of‐death registry at the Norwegian Institute of public health and the health registry of Vestfold Hospital Trust were used for descriptive statistical analysis. Results The number of MRIs of the prostate increased threefold from 2013 to 2021, representing an extra cost of 2 million USD in 2020. The incidence of prostate cancer was stable at about 5000 cases per year, corresponding to 178 per 100,000 men, indicating no increased overdiagnosis. However, the clinical staging has changed substantially during this period, indicating stage and grade migration. The number of negative biopsies was reduced, and there are three MRIs per reduced negative biopsy. The number of persons on active surveillance increased during the period. However, these changes are partly independent of the increase in the number of MRIs. Conclusion There was a substantial increase in the number of prostate MRIs and thus an increase in costs. This appears to have contributed to the reduction of negative biopsies, improved staging and increased active surveillance. However, as these effects are partly independent of the increase in MRIs, we need to document the outcomes for patients from prostate MRIs as their opportunity costs are substantial.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.13791
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2736303620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2853976906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-aa950eb9d65ff7779a6c73dd1daa0f21a64b65d4f52505696abb7f89b98383373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhiMEEqUw8AaWWGBIa8e1HU8IoQJFlWAAMTBYjnNpU6VOsR2hbjwET8iT4BImJG650913p__-JDkleERijFewGREqJNlLBoRylmaC0f1dzXhKMjk5TI68X2FMKGZikLzOrHGgPZRorRcWQm2QA99abQ2gOvZqu0C1RRvX-qADILObuEhbvYA12PD18fmy1AFpBygsAbVdMO0a_OVxclDpxsPJbx4mzzfTp-u7dP5wO7u-mqeGZoykWkuGoZAlZ1UlhJCaG0HLkpRa4yojmk8KzspJxTKGGZdcF4WoclnInOaUCjpMzvu7UeNbBz6ode0NNI220HZeZYJyiinPcETP_qCrtnM2qlNZzqgUXGIeqYueMvFp76BSGxetcFtFsNrZrKLN6sfmyI579r1uYPs_qO6nj_3GN-RKf2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2853976906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hofmann, Bjørn ; Haug, Erik Skaaheim ; Andersen, Eivind Richter ; Kjelle, Elin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn ; Haug, Erik Skaaheim ; Andersen, Eivind Richter ; Kjelle, Elin</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aims and Objective To study the change in the use of prostate MRI in the Norwegian health care system from 2013 to 2021 and to investigate some reasons for and potential implications of this change. Method Data from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO), The Cancer Registry of Norway and Cause‐of‐death registry at the Norwegian Institute of public health and the health registry of Vestfold Hospital Trust were used for descriptive statistical analysis. Results The number of MRIs of the prostate increased threefold from 2013 to 2021, representing an extra cost of 2 million USD in 2020. The incidence of prostate cancer was stable at about 5000 cases per year, corresponding to 178 per 100,000 men, indicating no increased overdiagnosis. However, the clinical staging has changed substantially during this period, indicating stage and grade migration. The number of negative biopsies was reduced, and there are three MRIs per reduced negative biopsy. The number of persons on active surveillance increased during the period. However, these changes are partly independent of the increase in the number of MRIs. Conclusion There was a substantial increase in the number of prostate MRIs and thus an increase in costs. This appears to have contributed to the reduction of negative biopsies, improved staging and increased active surveillance. However, as these effects are partly independent of the increase in MRIs, we need to document the outcomes for patients from prostate MRIs as their opportunity costs are substantial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.13791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Disease management ; evaluation ; health services research ; Health surveillance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; practical reasoning ; Prostate cancer</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2023-09, Vol.29 (6), p.893-902</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-aa950eb9d65ff7779a6c73dd1daa0f21a64b65d4f52505696abb7f89b98383373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.13791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.13791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Erik Skaaheim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Eivind Richter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjelle, Elin</creatorcontrib><title>Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><description>Rationale Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aims and Objective To study the change in the use of prostate MRI in the Norwegian health care system from 2013 to 2021 and to investigate some reasons for and potential implications of this change. Method Data from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO), The Cancer Registry of Norway and Cause‐of‐death registry at the Norwegian Institute of public health and the health registry of Vestfold Hospital Trust were used for descriptive statistical analysis. Results The number of MRIs of the prostate increased threefold from 2013 to 2021, representing an extra cost of 2 million USD in 2020. The incidence of prostate cancer was stable at about 5000 cases per year, corresponding to 178 per 100,000 men, indicating no increased overdiagnosis. However, the clinical staging has changed substantially during this period, indicating stage and grade migration. The number of negative biopsies was reduced, and there are three MRIs per reduced negative biopsy. The number of persons on active surveillance increased during the period. However, these changes are partly independent of the increase in the number of MRIs. Conclusion There was a substantial increase in the number of prostate MRIs and thus an increase in costs. This appears to have contributed to the reduction of negative biopsies, improved staging and increased active surveillance. However, as these effects are partly independent of the increase in MRIs, we need to document the outcomes for patients from prostate MRIs as their opportunity costs are substantial.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>health services research</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>practical reasoning</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhiMEEqUw8AaWWGBIa8e1HU8IoQJFlWAAMTBYjnNpU6VOsR2hbjwET8iT4BImJG650913p__-JDkleERijFewGREqJNlLBoRylmaC0f1dzXhKMjk5TI68X2FMKGZikLzOrHGgPZRorRcWQm2QA99abQ2gOvZqu0C1RRvX-qADILObuEhbvYA12PD18fmy1AFpBygsAbVdMO0a_OVxclDpxsPJbx4mzzfTp-u7dP5wO7u-mqeGZoykWkuGoZAlZ1UlhJCaG0HLkpRa4yojmk8KzspJxTKGGZdcF4WoclnInOaUCjpMzvu7UeNbBz6ode0NNI220HZeZYJyiinPcETP_qCrtnM2qlNZzqgUXGIeqYueMvFp76BSGxetcFtFsNrZrKLN6sfmyI579r1uYPs_qO6nj_3GN-RKf2s</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Hofmann, Bjørn</creator><creator>Haug, Erik Skaaheim</creator><creator>Andersen, Eivind Richter</creator><creator>Kjelle, Elin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?</title><author>Hofmann, Bjørn ; Haug, Erik Skaaheim ; Andersen, Eivind Richter ; Kjelle, Elin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-aa950eb9d65ff7779a6c73dd1daa0f21a64b65d4f52505696abb7f89b98383373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>health services research</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>practical reasoning</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Erik Skaaheim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Eivind Richter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjelle, Elin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hofmann, Bjørn</au><au>Haug, Erik Skaaheim</au><au>Andersen, Eivind Richter</au><au>Kjelle, Elin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>893</spage><epage>902</epage><pages>893-902</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aims and Objective To study the change in the use of prostate MRI in the Norwegian health care system from 2013 to 2021 and to investigate some reasons for and potential implications of this change. Method Data from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO), The Cancer Registry of Norway and Cause‐of‐death registry at the Norwegian Institute of public health and the health registry of Vestfold Hospital Trust were used for descriptive statistical analysis. Results The number of MRIs of the prostate increased threefold from 2013 to 2021, representing an extra cost of 2 million USD in 2020. The incidence of prostate cancer was stable at about 5000 cases per year, corresponding to 178 per 100,000 men, indicating no increased overdiagnosis. However, the clinical staging has changed substantially during this period, indicating stage and grade migration. The number of negative biopsies was reduced, and there are three MRIs per reduced negative biopsy. The number of persons on active surveillance increased during the period. However, these changes are partly independent of the increase in the number of MRIs. Conclusion There was a substantial increase in the number of prostate MRIs and thus an increase in costs. This appears to have contributed to the reduction of negative biopsies, improved staging and increased active surveillance. However, as these effects are partly independent of the increase in MRIs, we need to document the outcomes for patients from prostate MRIs as their opportunity costs are substantial.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jep.13791</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2023-09, Vol.29 (6), p.893-902
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2736303620
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Clinical outcomes
Disease management
evaluation
health services research
Health surveillance
Magnetic resonance imaging
practical reasoning
Prostate cancer
title Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management—What are the outcomes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T03%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20prostate%20cancer%20management%E2%80%94What%20are%20the%20outcomes?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Hofmann,%20Bj%C3%B8rn&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=893&rft.epage=902&rft.pages=893-902&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.13791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2853976906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2853976906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true