Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on it...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthritis care & research (2010) 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1848 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1838 |
container_title | Arthritis care & research (2010) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Kneeland, Rachel Montes, Daniel Endo, Justin Shields, Bridget Bartels, Christie M. Garg, Shivani |
description | Objective
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab.
Results
Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year.
Conclusion
The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acr.25058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2735894084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2735894084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctK9DAUB_Agioq68AUk4EYXo7lP6q4OfiqMCF7QXUkyp1jtZUxah-6-R_AZfRKjVReCWeQCv_zJyUFom5IDSgg7NM4fMEmkXkLrjEo6Ekrq5Z-9uF9DWyE8kjg405onq2iNKy41YXId9efV3DcvUEHd4qLGk641NTRdwNNuHucT37cPUJm2CfGU5i14fLOIuMd3AE8BNzk-hrKouspYfBvgCKf4ug_tx53C4St4KWCBTT3DF9Cat_-vaW3KPhRhE63kpgyw9bVuoNt_JzeTs9H08vR8kk5HjkuuR0oRN9Y0UVYmUnDtBGjnEqIsMYmlFETOQbCxcuBm1jprVe4cMTOaEAkJ5Rtob8iNdT53ENqsKoKDshzqzNg4_kUiiBaR7v6ij03n43uj0oIxqaKNan9QzjcheMizuS8q4_uMkuyjJVlsSfbZkmh3vhI7W8HsR343IILDASyKEvq_k7J0cjVEvgPHaJad</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842256735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</creator><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab.
Results
Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year.
Conclusion
The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.25058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36358025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Cell activation ; Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Lupus ; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis ; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy ; Meta-analysis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pharmacists ; Severity of Illness Index ; Systemic lupus erythematosus ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care & research (2010), 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848</ispartof><rights>2022 American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2023 American College of Rheumatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7272-2692 ; 0000-0002-3955-8357 ; 0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.25058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.25058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Arthritis care & research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab.
Results
Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year.
Conclusion
The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</description><subject>Cell activation</subject><subject>Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Systemic lupus erythematosus</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10ctK9DAUB_Agioq68AUk4EYXo7lP6q4OfiqMCF7QXUkyp1jtZUxah-6-R_AZfRKjVReCWeQCv_zJyUFom5IDSgg7NM4fMEmkXkLrjEo6Ekrq5Z-9uF9DWyE8kjg405onq2iNKy41YXId9efV3DcvUEHd4qLGk641NTRdwNNuHucT37cPUJm2CfGU5i14fLOIuMd3AE8BNzk-hrKouspYfBvgCKf4ug_tx53C4St4KWCBTT3DF9Cat_-vaW3KPhRhE63kpgyw9bVuoNt_JzeTs9H08vR8kk5HjkuuR0oRN9Y0UVYmUnDtBGjnEqIsMYmlFETOQbCxcuBm1jprVe4cMTOaEAkJ5Rtob8iNdT53ENqsKoKDshzqzNg4_kUiiBaR7v6ij03n43uj0oIxqaKNan9QzjcheMizuS8q4_uMkuyjJVlsSfbZkmh3vhI7W8HsR343IILDASyKEvq_k7J0cjVEvgPHaJad</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Kneeland, Rachel</creator><creator>Montes, Daniel</creator><creator>Endo, Justin</creator><creator>Shields, Bridget</creator><creator>Bartels, Christie M.</creator><creator>Garg, Shivani</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cell activation</topic><topic>Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Systemic lupus erythematosus</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kneeland, Rachel</au><au>Montes, Daniel</au><au>Endo, Justin</au><au>Shields, Bridget</au><au>Bartels, Christie M.</au><au>Garg, Shivani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1838</spage><epage>1848</epage><pages>1838-1848</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab.
Results
Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year.
Conclusion
The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>36358025</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.25058</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2151-464X |
ispartof | Arthritis care & research (2010), 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848 |
issn | 2151-464X 2151-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2735894084 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Cell activation Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects Lupus Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy Meta-analysis Monoclonal antibodies Pharmacists Severity of Illness Index Systemic lupus erythematosus Treatment Outcome |
title | Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20in%20Cutaneous%20Lupus%20Erythematosus%20After%20Twenty%20Weeks%20of%20Belimumab%20Use:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Kneeland,%20Rachel&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1838&rft.epage=1848&rft.pages=1838-1848&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.25058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2735894084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842256735&rft_id=info:pmid/36358025&rfr_iscdi=true |