Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848
Hauptverfasser: Kneeland, Rachel, Montes, Daniel, Endo, Justin, Shields, Bridget, Bartels, Christie M., Garg, Shivani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1848
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1838
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 75
creator Kneeland, Rachel
Montes, Daniel
Endo, Justin
Shields, Bridget
Bartels, Christie M.
Garg, Shivani
description Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab. Results Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year. Conclusion The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.25058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2735894084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2735894084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctK9DAUB_Agioq68AUk4EYXo7lP6q4OfiqMCF7QXUkyp1jtZUxah-6-R_AZfRKjVReCWeQCv_zJyUFom5IDSgg7NM4fMEmkXkLrjEo6Ekrq5Z-9uF9DWyE8kjg405onq2iNKy41YXId9efV3DcvUEHd4qLGk641NTRdwNNuHucT37cPUJm2CfGU5i14fLOIuMd3AE8BNzk-hrKouspYfBvgCKf4ug_tx53C4St4KWCBTT3DF9Cat_-vaW3KPhRhE63kpgyw9bVuoNt_JzeTs9H08vR8kk5HjkuuR0oRN9Y0UVYmUnDtBGjnEqIsMYmlFETOQbCxcuBm1jprVe4cMTOaEAkJ5Rtob8iNdT53ENqsKoKDshzqzNg4_kUiiBaR7v6ij03n43uj0oIxqaKNan9QzjcheMizuS8q4_uMkuyjJVlsSfbZkmh3vhI7W8HsR343IILDASyKEvq_k7J0cjVEvgPHaJad</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842256735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</creator><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab. Results Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year. Conclusion The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.25058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36358025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Cell activation ; Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Lupus ; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis ; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy ; Meta-analysis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pharmacists ; Severity of Illness Index ; Systemic lupus erythematosus ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848</ispartof><rights>2022 American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2023 American College of Rheumatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7272-2692 ; 0000-0002-3955-8357 ; 0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.25058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.25058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab. Results Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year. Conclusion The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</description><subject>Cell activation</subject><subject>Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Systemic lupus erythematosus</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10ctK9DAUB_Agioq68AUk4EYXo7lP6q4OfiqMCF7QXUkyp1jtZUxah-6-R_AZfRKjVReCWeQCv_zJyUFom5IDSgg7NM4fMEmkXkLrjEo6Ekrq5Z-9uF9DWyE8kjg405onq2iNKy41YXId9efV3DcvUEHd4qLGk641NTRdwNNuHucT37cPUJm2CfGU5i14fLOIuMd3AE8BNzk-hrKouspYfBvgCKf4ug_tx53C4St4KWCBTT3DF9Cat_-vaW3KPhRhE63kpgyw9bVuoNt_JzeTs9H08vR8kk5HjkuuR0oRN9Y0UVYmUnDtBGjnEqIsMYmlFETOQbCxcuBm1jprVe4cMTOaEAkJ5Rtob8iNdT53ENqsKoKDshzqzNg4_kUiiBaR7v6ij03n43uj0oIxqaKNan9QzjcheMizuS8q4_uMkuyjJVlsSfbZkmh3vhI7W8HsR343IILDASyKEvq_k7J0cjVEvgPHaJad</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Kneeland, Rachel</creator><creator>Montes, Daniel</creator><creator>Endo, Justin</creator><creator>Shields, Bridget</creator><creator>Bartels, Christie M.</creator><creator>Garg, Shivani</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Kneeland, Rachel ; Montes, Daniel ; Endo, Justin ; Shields, Bridget ; Bartels, Christie M. ; Garg, Shivani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-660c78196b595438c4e8cc906b0a9b11e4f3e4276cecdbbcbb6fcc0ad1905e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cell activation</topic><topic>Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Systemic lupus erythematosus</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kneeland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Shivani</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kneeland, Rachel</au><au>Montes, Daniel</au><au>Endo, Justin</au><au>Shields, Bridget</au><au>Bartels, Christie M.</au><au>Garg, Shivani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1838</spage><epage>1848</epage><pages>1838-1848</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can be debilitating and cause psychological distress. Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B cell activation, is a Federal Drug Administration–approved SLE medication, but less is known on its use in CLE. Moreover, the time to response after starting belimumab in CLE is unknown, which may lead to premature discontinuation in the absence of early perceivable benefits. Thus, the objectives of this meta‐analysis were to examine the efficacy of belimumab, as well as the time to response after starting belimumab in patients with CLE with or without SLE. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to include studies that examined clinical response in patients with CLE with or without SLE receiving belimumab. A clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users versus nonusers was summarized in a random‐effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each consecutive 4‐week observation interval to identify time to a clinical response in CLE with or without SLE after starting belimumab. Results Among 747 screened studies, 14 were included. The pooled odds of clinical response at 52 weeks in belimumab users were 44% higher compared to nonusers (OR 1.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20–1.74], I2 = 0%). A clinical response was first noted after 20 weeks of starting belimumab (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.81], I2 = 0%), with a sustained clinical response through 1 year. Conclusion The findings support belimumab as an effective therapy for CLE with SLE. Likewise, the findings inform patient counseling regarding estimates of 20 weeks to achieve a response.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>36358025</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.25058</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-8357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-0374</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2023-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1838-1848
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2735894084
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Cell activation
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects
Lupus
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - diagnosis
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous - drug therapy
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - diagnosis
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy
Meta-analysis
Monoclonal antibodies
Pharmacists
Severity of Illness Index
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Treatment Outcome
title Improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus After Twenty Weeks of Belimumab Use: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20in%20Cutaneous%20Lupus%20Erythematosus%20After%20Twenty%20Weeks%20of%20Belimumab%20Use:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Kneeland,%20Rachel&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1838&rft.epage=1848&rft.pages=1838-1848&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.25058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2735894084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842256735&rft_id=info:pmid/36358025&rfr_iscdi=true