Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review
Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for wha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1004 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 985 |
container_title | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology |
container_volume | 280 |
creator | Parmar, Adya Prabhu, P. Prashanth |
description | Purpose
Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review.
Methods
A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias.
Results
This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis.
Conclusions
This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734614598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734614598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwCduzYNTtUlYeExAbYWo4zhlR5FE9Clb8nIYUlq5HunLnSHELOGb1ilKprpFTQNKZJElOlEhHvDsicCS5ioRJ5SOZUcxULodSMnCBuKKWp0PyYzLjkKeVSz8nb2vvCWddHjY_ywnsIULeRK4t6iMvIIgJiNWYVWOwC4Eh-9FsI1nVY4E1kI-yxhcq2hYsCfBWwOyVH3pYIZ_u5IK9365fVQ_z0fP-4un2KXaJUG2ds6WzGcqq1V8J7rlUupfTLRGjFrWCQaTlEXDqWLhmzlqsxtx6Y88LyBbmcereh-ewAW1MV6KAsbQ1NhyZRXEgmUr0c0GRCXWgQA3izDUVlQ28YNaNPM_k0g0_z49PshqOLfX-XVZD_nfwKHAA-ATis6ncIZtN0oR5-_q_2G-xDgiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734614598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creator><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review.
Methods
A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias.
Results
This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis.
Conclusions
This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36350369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Surgery ; Hearing ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Hyperacusis - diagnosis ; Hyperacusis - epidemiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Review Article</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review.
Methods
A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias.
Results
This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis.
Conclusions
This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</description><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperacusis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperacusis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwCduzYNTtUlYeExAbYWo4zhlR5FE9Clb8nIYUlq5HunLnSHELOGb1ilKprpFTQNKZJElOlEhHvDsicCS5ioRJ5SOZUcxULodSMnCBuKKWp0PyYzLjkKeVSz8nb2vvCWddHjY_ywnsIULeRK4t6iMvIIgJiNWYVWOwC4Eh-9FsI1nVY4E1kI-yxhcq2hYsCfBWwOyVH3pYIZ_u5IK9365fVQ_z0fP-4un2KXaJUG2ds6WzGcqq1V8J7rlUupfTLRGjFrWCQaTlEXDqWLhmzlqsxtx6Y88LyBbmcereh-ewAW1MV6KAsbQ1NhyZRXEgmUr0c0GRCXWgQA3izDUVlQ28YNaNPM_k0g0_z49PshqOLfX-XVZD_nfwKHAA-ATis6ncIZtN0oR5-_q_2G-xDgiQ</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Parmar, Adya</creator><creator>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><author>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperacusis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperacusis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parmar, Adya</au><au>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>985-1004</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review.
Methods
A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias.
Results
This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis.
Conclusions
This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36350369</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-4477 |
ispartof | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004 |
issn | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734614598 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Head and Neck Surgery Hearing Hearing Tests Humans Hyperacusis - diagnosis Hyperacusis - epidemiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Otorhinolaryngology Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Review Article |
title | Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T02%3A40%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20different%20clinical%20assessment%20measures%20of%20hyperacusis:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Parmar,%20Adya&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=985-1004&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734614598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734614598&rft_id=info:pmid/36350369&rfr_iscdi=true |