Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review

Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for wha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004
Hauptverfasser: Parmar, Adya, Prabhu, P. Prashanth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1004
container_issue 3
container_start_page 985
container_title European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
container_volume 280
creator Parmar, Adya
Prabhu, P. Prashanth
description Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review. Methods A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. Results This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis. Conclusions This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734614598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734614598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwCduzYNTtUlYeExAbYWo4zhlR5FE9Clb8nIYUlq5HunLnSHELOGb1ilKprpFTQNKZJElOlEhHvDsicCS5ioRJ5SOZUcxULodSMnCBuKKWp0PyYzLjkKeVSz8nb2vvCWddHjY_ywnsIULeRK4t6iMvIIgJiNWYVWOwC4Eh-9FsI1nVY4E1kI-yxhcq2hYsCfBWwOyVH3pYIZ_u5IK9365fVQ_z0fP-4un2KXaJUG2ds6WzGcqq1V8J7rlUupfTLRGjFrWCQaTlEXDqWLhmzlqsxtx6Y88LyBbmcereh-ewAW1MV6KAsbQ1NhyZRXEgmUr0c0GRCXWgQA3izDUVlQ28YNaNPM_k0g0_z49PshqOLfX-XVZD_nfwKHAA-ATis6ncIZtN0oR5-_q_2G-xDgiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734614598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creator><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review. Methods A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. Results This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis. Conclusions This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36350369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Surgery ; Hearing ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Hyperacusis - diagnosis ; Hyperacusis - epidemiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Review Article</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review. Methods A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. Results This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis. Conclusions This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</description><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperacusis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperacusis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwCduzYNTtUlYeExAbYWo4zhlR5FE9Clb8nIYUlq5HunLnSHELOGb1ilKprpFTQNKZJElOlEhHvDsicCS5ioRJ5SOZUcxULodSMnCBuKKWp0PyYzLjkKeVSz8nb2vvCWddHjY_ywnsIULeRK4t6iMvIIgJiNWYVWOwC4Eh-9FsI1nVY4E1kI-yxhcq2hYsCfBWwOyVH3pYIZ_u5IK9365fVQ_z0fP-4un2KXaJUG2ds6WzGcqq1V8J7rlUupfTLRGjFrWCQaTlEXDqWLhmzlqsxtx6Y88LyBbmcereh-ewAW1MV6KAsbQ1NhyZRXEgmUr0c0GRCXWgQA3izDUVlQ28YNaNPM_k0g0_z49PshqOLfX-XVZD_nfwKHAA-ATis6ncIZtN0oR5-_q_2G-xDgiQ</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Parmar, Adya</creator><creator>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</title><author>Parmar, Adya ; Prabhu, P. Prashanth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-b18cab1d099f74ff397d666f824973a41eb967d636c15811aa3773a4afe1cf4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperacusis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperacusis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Adya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parmar, Adya</au><au>Prabhu, P. Prashanth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>985-1004</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose Hyperacusis is the hypersensitivity to auditory stimuli that would typically not affect those with hearing sensitivity within normal limits. The prevalence of hyperacusis in the general population has been estimated to range from 9% to 15%. There is no universally accepted definition for what defines hyperacusis among kindred illnesses of poor sound tolerance. As a result, hyperacusis prevalence varies more, which has an impact on both assessment and treatment. This study aims to determine the efficacy of the different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis in assessing hyperacusis through a systematic review. Methods A review and reference of literature were done on hyperacusis, and assessment measures were used. A review of 23 articles was conducted to highlight these measures used. Most selected studies included retrospective, prospective, survey, and experimental designs. Study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. Results This review reports the summary and the current evidence of clinical assessment measures used for diagnosing hyperacusis. Conclusions This review highlights a protocol that may be used in the clinical diagnosis of hyperacusis. It also shows the necessity to standardize and validate assessment measures for the younger population.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36350369</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-2518</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-4477
ispartof European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-03, Vol.280 (3), p.985-1004
issn 0937-4477
1434-4726
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734614598
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Head and Neck Surgery
Hearing
Hearing Tests
Humans
Hyperacusis - diagnosis
Hyperacusis - epidemiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Otorhinolaryngology
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Review Article
title Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T02%3A40%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20different%20clinical%20assessment%20measures%20of%20hyperacusis:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Parmar,%20Adya&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=985-1004&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734614598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734614598&rft_id=info:pmid/36350369&rfr_iscdi=true