Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069
1. Verfasser: Strickland, Sabrina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3069
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3068
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 38
creator Strickland, Sabrina
description Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734166042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734166042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvCGyDkIwcS_LWOw227agFpKypYzpZjT6hXib3YDlCehkclYQun0Uj_D838EHpBSU0JlW8OtUnlLsWaEcZqImvC6CO0omsmK844fYxWpBFtpYjkZ-g85wMhhHPFn6IzLrkQRLIV-n3lfInJmwFv4zhCKCbdv8X7HxFf-5-m-BjwbfShZLxJgC-hFEi4jwnfgFtct6bAMMQexpjmdee_miUFfwIbQy5psktGtY_4xgc_-l-wFB0Hb_-G59f4MgbA-ykEGDL-fBenwc09ePM9egfuGXrSmyHD84d5gb5cX-2376vdx3cftptdZaloaCVacI2ynWmdhN6pzvZiTRRVfUeoMs42nTGSrYVRxACnQrVNa9iacqtI3xJ-gV6dco8pfpsgFz36bOfTTIA4Zc0aLqiURLBZKk5Sm2LOCXp9TH6c_6Yp0QsbfdAnNnpho4nUM5vZ9vKhYepGcP9N_2DwP36Yj3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734166042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Strickland, Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36344062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Fractures, Bone ; Humans ; Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Ligaments, Articular - surgery ; Patella - surgery ; Patellar Dislocation - surgery ; Patellofemoral Joint - surgery ; Suture Anchors</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</description><subject>Fractures, Bone</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Patella - surgery</subject><subject>Patellar Dislocation - surgery</subject><subject>Patellofemoral Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvCGyDkIwcS_LWOw227agFpKypYzpZjT6hXib3YDlCehkclYQun0Uj_D838EHpBSU0JlW8OtUnlLsWaEcZqImvC6CO0omsmK844fYxWpBFtpYjkZ-g85wMhhHPFn6IzLrkQRLIV-n3lfInJmwFv4zhCKCbdv8X7HxFf-5-m-BjwbfShZLxJgC-hFEi4jwnfgFtct6bAMMQexpjmdee_miUFfwIbQy5psktGtY_4xgc_-l-wFB0Hb_-G59f4MgbA-ykEGDL-fBenwc09ePM9egfuGXrSmyHD84d5gb5cX-2376vdx3cftptdZaloaCVacI2ynWmdhN6pzvZiTRRVfUeoMs42nTGSrYVRxACnQrVNa9iacqtI3xJ-gV6dco8pfpsgFz36bOfTTIA4Zc0aLqiURLBZKk5Sm2LOCXp9TH6c_6Yp0QsbfdAnNnpho4nUM5vZ9vKhYepGcP9N_2DwP36Yj3s</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Strickland, Sabrina</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><author>Strickland, Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fractures, Bone</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Patella - surgery</topic><topic>Patellar Dislocation - surgery</topic><topic>Patellofemoral Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strickland, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3068</spage><epage>3069</epage><pages>3068-3069</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36344062</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734166042
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Fractures, Bone
Humans
Joint Instability - prevention & control
Joint Instability - surgery
Ligaments, Articular - surgery
Patella - surgery
Patellar Dislocation - surgery
Patellofemoral Joint - surgery
Suture Anchors
title Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A25%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial%20Commentary:%20Two%20Fixation%20Points%20Are%20Better%20for%20Medial%20Patellofemoral%20Ligament%20Reconstruction-To%20Minimize%20Complications,%20Bone%20Tunnels%20Should%20Be%20Avoided&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Strickland,%20Sabrina&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3068&rft.epage=3069&rft.pages=3068-3069&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734166042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734166042&rft_id=info:pmid/36344062&rfr_iscdi=true