Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthroscopy 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3069 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3068 |
container_title | Arthroscopy |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Strickland, Sabrina |
description | Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734166042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734166042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvCGyDkIwcS_LWOw227agFpKypYzpZjT6hXib3YDlCehkclYQun0Uj_D838EHpBSU0JlW8OtUnlLsWaEcZqImvC6CO0omsmK844fYxWpBFtpYjkZ-g85wMhhHPFn6IzLrkQRLIV-n3lfInJmwFv4zhCKCbdv8X7HxFf-5-m-BjwbfShZLxJgC-hFEi4jwnfgFtct6bAMMQexpjmdee_miUFfwIbQy5psktGtY_4xgc_-l-wFB0Hb_-G59f4MgbA-ykEGDL-fBenwc09ePM9egfuGXrSmyHD84d5gb5cX-2376vdx3cftptdZaloaCVacI2ynWmdhN6pzvZiTRRVfUeoMs42nTGSrYVRxACnQrVNa9iacqtI3xJ-gV6dco8pfpsgFz36bOfTTIA4Zc0aLqiURLBZKk5Sm2LOCXp9TH6c_6Yp0QsbfdAnNnpho4nUM5vZ9vKhYepGcP9N_2DwP36Yj3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734166042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Strickland, Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36344062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Fractures, Bone ; Humans ; Joint Instability - prevention & control ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Ligaments, Articular - surgery ; Patella - surgery ; Patellar Dislocation - surgery ; Patellofemoral Joint - surgery ; Suture Anchors</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</description><subject>Fractures, Bone</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - prevention & control</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Patella - surgery</subject><subject>Patellar Dislocation - surgery</subject><subject>Patellofemoral Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvCGyDkIwcS_LWOw227agFpKypYzpZjT6hXib3YDlCehkclYQun0Uj_D838EHpBSU0JlW8OtUnlLsWaEcZqImvC6CO0omsmK844fYxWpBFtpYjkZ-g85wMhhHPFn6IzLrkQRLIV-n3lfInJmwFv4zhCKCbdv8X7HxFf-5-m-BjwbfShZLxJgC-hFEi4jwnfgFtct6bAMMQexpjmdee_miUFfwIbQy5psktGtY_4xgc_-l-wFB0Hb_-G59f4MgbA-ykEGDL-fBenwc09ePM9egfuGXrSmyHD84d5gb5cX-2376vdx3cftptdZaloaCVacI2ynWmdhN6pzvZiTRRVfUeoMs42nTGSrYVRxACnQrVNa9iacqtI3xJ-gV6dco8pfpsgFz36bOfTTIA4Zc0aLqiURLBZKk5Sm2LOCXp9TH6c_6Yp0QsbfdAnNnpho4nUM5vZ9vKhYepGcP9N_2DwP36Yj3s</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Strickland, Sabrina</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</title><author>Strickland, Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1471-49ed78cba9d6efd8bcf450818fb018adc7baa6254a80ae3148979a2513c80f903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fractures, Bone</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - prevention & control</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Patella - surgery</topic><topic>Patellar Dislocation - surgery</topic><topic>Patellofemoral Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strickland, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3068</spage><epage>3069</epage><pages>3068-3069</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36344062</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2007</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-8063 |
ispartof | Arthroscopy, 2022-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3068-3069 |
issn | 0749-8063 1526-3231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734166042 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Fractures, Bone Humans Joint Instability - prevention & control Joint Instability - surgery Ligaments, Articular - surgery Patella - surgery Patellar Dislocation - surgery Patellofemoral Joint - surgery Suture Anchors |
title | Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A25%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial%20Commentary:%20Two%20Fixation%20Points%20Are%20Better%20for%20Medial%20Patellofemoral%20Ligament%20Reconstruction-To%20Minimize%20Complications,%20Bone%20Tunnels%20Should%20Be%20Avoided&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Strickland,%20Sabrina&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3068&rft.epage=3069&rft.pages=3068-3069&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734166042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734166042&rft_id=info:pmid/36344062&rfr_iscdi=true |