Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems

Analysis of examples of accidents that have occurred in factory automation (FA) systems in the past has clearly shown that many types of accidents cannot be expressed by probability. These include accidents caused by interlocking failures as designed due to the dead angles of obstacle sensors and th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronics & communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science Fundamental electronic science, 1997-03, Vol.80 (3), p.21-36
Hauptverfasser: Mineo, Yoshiyuki, Suzuki, Yoshihisa, Niinomi, Tatsuya, Iwatani, Katsumi, Sekiguchi, Hisao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 3
container_start_page 21
container_title Electronics & communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science
container_volume 80
creator Mineo, Yoshiyuki
Suzuki, Yoshihisa
Niinomi, Tatsuya
Iwatani, Katsumi
Sekiguchi, Hisao
description Analysis of examples of accidents that have occurred in factory automation (FA) systems in the past has clearly shown that many types of accidents cannot be expressed by probability. These include accidents caused by interlocking failures as designed due to the dead angles of obstacle sensors and those accidents caused when workers or maintenance personnel switch off the safety device or disregard the instructions and cross the safety guardrail. As reliable assessment of these accidents is difficult, an integrated method to assess system safety is required. A method is proposed here to assess the safety of FA systems for people by using a matrix of circumstances potentially encountered in the application of safety measures in order to remove hazards, render them harmless, or localize them, as well as circumstances potentially encountered when the system is handled by people. Also proposed is a method to assess each component of the matrix by integrated ranks consisting of the following six ranks: economically realizable and should be realized, 0; should be generally realized in actual conditions, +1; the other ranks, ‐2, ‐1, +2, and +3, using the above ranks as criteria. By applying this assessment method to 16 cases of accidents: nine cases during normal operation, five cases during maintenance, and two accidents involving outsiders, practical use has been confirmed. © 1997 Scripta Technica, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 80(3): 21–36, 1997
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6440(199703)80:3<21::AID-ECJC3>3.0.CO;2-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27338913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27338913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-a44419e394b96d531effb8c9e46d95f8c5d580fe552077cfd17be057f8351fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkfehI9dJ10miZZRVjq14q6gorgZci2CVa3W2266P57s1b2oniad5LJw-QJgiMGPQYQH-zdDbPhPuMxRGmSwB5TSgDuS-jjUcz6_cHwJDrNLjM8xh70stFhHMmVYGP5YNVnSOIIVCrWg03nXgB85rgRiDttTTsPtXPGucpM27Ay7XNduLC2odV5Wzf-dtbWlW7Lehq6uWtN5baDNasnzuz81K3g4ez0PruIrkbnw2xwFeUICiOdJAlTBlUyVmnBkRlrxzJXJkkLxa3MecElWMP9qkLktmBibIALK5Ezq8e4Fex23Lemfp8Z11JVutxMJnpq6pmjWCBKxdAP3neDeVM71xhLb01Z6WZODGhhkWhhkRZSaCGFOoskgZBiRuQt0rdF3wNlI4pJ4vJfH-XEzH8x_0f-RewOPDfquKXX-bnk6uaVUoGC0-PNOZ1cPOH1rWDE8AtTMZNn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27338913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Mineo, Yoshiyuki ; Suzuki, Yoshihisa ; Niinomi, Tatsuya ; Iwatani, Katsumi ; Sekiguchi, Hisao</creator><creatorcontrib>Mineo, Yoshiyuki ; Suzuki, Yoshihisa ; Niinomi, Tatsuya ; Iwatani, Katsumi ; Sekiguchi, Hisao</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of examples of accidents that have occurred in factory automation (FA) systems in the past has clearly shown that many types of accidents cannot be expressed by probability. These include accidents caused by interlocking failures as designed due to the dead angles of obstacle sensors and those accidents caused when workers or maintenance personnel switch off the safety device or disregard the instructions and cross the safety guardrail. As reliable assessment of these accidents is difficult, an integrated method to assess system safety is required. A method is proposed here to assess the safety of FA systems for people by using a matrix of circumstances potentially encountered in the application of safety measures in order to remove hazards, render them harmless, or localize them, as well as circumstances potentially encountered when the system is handled by people. Also proposed is a method to assess each component of the matrix by integrated ranks consisting of the following six ranks: economically realizable and should be realized, 0; should be generally realized in actual conditions, +1; the other ranks, ‐2, ‐1, +2, and +3, using the above ranks as criteria. By applying this assessment method to 16 cases of accidents: nine cases during normal operation, five cases during maintenance, and two accidents involving outsiders, practical use has been confirmed. © 1997 Scripta Technica, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 80(3): 21–36, 1997</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-0967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6440(199703)80:3&lt;21::AID-ECJC3&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>FA systems ; hazards ; reliability ; safety ; safety assessment ; safety index</subject><ispartof>Electronics &amp; communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science, 1997-03, Vol.80 (3), p.21-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 Scripta Technica, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291520-6440%28199703%2980%3A3%3C21%3A%3AAID-ECJC3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291520-6440%28199703%2980%3A3%3C21%3A%3AAID-ECJC3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mineo, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinomi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Hisao</creatorcontrib><title>Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems</title><title>Electronics &amp; communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science</title><addtitle>Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. III</addtitle><description>Analysis of examples of accidents that have occurred in factory automation (FA) systems in the past has clearly shown that many types of accidents cannot be expressed by probability. These include accidents caused by interlocking failures as designed due to the dead angles of obstacle sensors and those accidents caused when workers or maintenance personnel switch off the safety device or disregard the instructions and cross the safety guardrail. As reliable assessment of these accidents is difficult, an integrated method to assess system safety is required. A method is proposed here to assess the safety of FA systems for people by using a matrix of circumstances potentially encountered in the application of safety measures in order to remove hazards, render them harmless, or localize them, as well as circumstances potentially encountered when the system is handled by people. Also proposed is a method to assess each component of the matrix by integrated ranks consisting of the following six ranks: economically realizable and should be realized, 0; should be generally realized in actual conditions, +1; the other ranks, ‐2, ‐1, +2, and +3, using the above ranks as criteria. By applying this assessment method to 16 cases of accidents: nine cases during normal operation, five cases during maintenance, and two accidents involving outsiders, practical use has been confirmed. © 1997 Scripta Technica, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 80(3): 21–36, 1997</description><subject>FA systems</subject><subject>hazards</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>safety assessment</subject><subject>safety index</subject><issn>1042-0967</issn><issn>1520-6440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkfehI9dJ10miZZRVjq14q6gorgZci2CVa3W2266P57s1b2oniad5LJw-QJgiMGPQYQH-zdDbPhPuMxRGmSwB5TSgDuS-jjUcz6_cHwJDrNLjM8xh70stFhHMmVYGP5YNVnSOIIVCrWg03nXgB85rgRiDttTTsPtXPGucpM27Ay7XNduLC2odV5Wzf-dtbWlW7Lehq6uWtN5baDNasnzuz81K3g4ez0PruIrkbnw2xwFeUICiOdJAlTBlUyVmnBkRlrxzJXJkkLxa3MecElWMP9qkLktmBibIALK5Ezq8e4Fex23Lemfp8Z11JVutxMJnpq6pmjWCBKxdAP3neDeVM71xhLb01Z6WZODGhhkWhhkRZSaCGFOoskgZBiRuQt0rdF3wNlI4pJ4vJfH-XEzH8x_0f-RewOPDfquKXX-bnk6uaVUoGC0-PNOZ1cPOH1rWDE8AtTMZNn</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>Mineo, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Yoshihisa</creator><creator>Niinomi, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Iwatani, Katsumi</creator><creator>Sekiguchi, Hisao</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems</title><author>Mineo, Yoshiyuki ; Suzuki, Yoshihisa ; Niinomi, Tatsuya ; Iwatani, Katsumi ; Sekiguchi, Hisao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3093-a44419e394b96d531effb8c9e46d95f8c5d580fe552077cfd17be057f8351fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>FA systems</topic><topic>hazards</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>safety assessment</topic><topic>safety index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mineo, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinomi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwatani, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Hisao</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Electronics &amp; communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mineo, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Suzuki, Yoshihisa</au><au>Niinomi, Tatsuya</au><au>Iwatani, Katsumi</au><au>Sekiguchi, Hisao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems</atitle><jtitle>Electronics &amp; communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science</jtitle><addtitle>Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. III</addtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>21-36</pages><issn>1042-0967</issn><eissn>1520-6440</eissn><abstract>Analysis of examples of accidents that have occurred in factory automation (FA) systems in the past has clearly shown that many types of accidents cannot be expressed by probability. These include accidents caused by interlocking failures as designed due to the dead angles of obstacle sensors and those accidents caused when workers or maintenance personnel switch off the safety device or disregard the instructions and cross the safety guardrail. As reliable assessment of these accidents is difficult, an integrated method to assess system safety is required. A method is proposed here to assess the safety of FA systems for people by using a matrix of circumstances potentially encountered in the application of safety measures in order to remove hazards, render them harmless, or localize them, as well as circumstances potentially encountered when the system is handled by people. Also proposed is a method to assess each component of the matrix by integrated ranks consisting of the following six ranks: economically realizable and should be realized, 0; should be generally realized in actual conditions, +1; the other ranks, ‐2, ‐1, +2, and +3, using the above ranks as criteria. By applying this assessment method to 16 cases of accidents: nine cases during normal operation, five cases during maintenance, and two accidents involving outsiders, practical use has been confirmed. © 1997 Scripta Technica, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 80(3): 21–36, 1997</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1520-6440(199703)80:3&lt;21::AID-ECJC3&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-0967
ispartof Electronics & communications in Japan. Part 3, Fundamental electronic science, 1997-03, Vol.80 (3), p.21-36
issn 1042-0967
1520-6440
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27338913
source Wiley Journals
subjects FA systems
hazards
reliability
safety
safety assessment
safety index
title Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A57%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20assessment%20methods%20of%20factory%20automation%20systems&rft.jtitle=Electronics%20&%20communications%20in%20Japan.%20Part%203,%20Fundamental%20electronic%20science&rft.au=Mineo,%20Yoshiyuki&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=21-36&rft.issn=1042-0967&rft.eissn=1520-6440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6440(199703)80:3%3C21::AID-ECJC3%3E3.0.CO;2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27338913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27338913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true