Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant

After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the las...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of otolaryngology 2023-01, Vol.44 (1), p.103679-103679, Article 103679
Hauptverfasser: Bozsoy, Merve İkiz, Batuk, Merve Özbal, Çınar, Betül Çicek, Yaralı, Mehmet, Sennaroğlu, Gonca, Sennaroğlu, Levent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103679
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103679
container_title American journal of otolaryngology
container_volume 44
creator Bozsoy, Merve İkiz
Batuk, Merve Özbal
Çınar, Betül Çicek
Yaralı, Mehmet
Sennaroğlu, Gonca
Sennaroğlu, Levent
description After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103679
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2732535004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070922003064</els_id><sourcerecordid>2743489316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-5efb39c7c6cb11a5461a2b8fe5b64cc82c991d58004907cfc5caed29e8746a613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcFN2465tGkzUYQ8QWCG0V3IU1vmZRpMibpiP_eSMWFC-HChct3DucehE4JXhFMxMWw0uPgk19RTGk-MVHLPbQgnNGyIc3bPlpgIkWJaywP0VGMA8aYVYwv0OvNTm8mnax3he-LtIbCeVfqqbPJh88iQNx6FyEW1uXp7M52k97E4sOmdfGLtUFbFxOMhR23G-3SMTroMwYnP3uJXm5vnq_vy8enu4frq8fSUFmnkkPfMmlqI0xLiOaVIJq2TQ-8FZUxDTVSko43GFcS16Y33GjoqISmroQWhC3R-ey7Df59gpjUaKOBTc4AfoqK1oxyxrM-o2d_0MFPweV0mapY1UhGRKaqmTLBxxigV9tgRx0-FcHqu201qLlt9d22mtvOsstZBvnZnYWgorHgDHQ2gEmq8_Z_gy84dotx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743489316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz ; Batuk, Merve Özbal ; Çınar, Betül Çicek ; Yaralı, Mehmet ; Sennaroğlu, Gonca ; Sennaroğlu, Levent</creator><creatorcontrib>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz ; Batuk, Merve Özbal ; Çınar, Betül Çicek ; Yaralı, Mehmet ; Sennaroğlu, Gonca ; Sennaroğlu, Levent</creatorcontrib><description>After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland Heights: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Auditory brainstem implantation ; Auditory perception ; Brain stem ; Cranial nerves ; Deactivation ; Electrode placement ; Electrodes ; Facial nerve ; Hearing ; Nerves ; Non-auditory response ; Non-auditory stimulation ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Stimulation ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2023-01, Vol.44 (1), p.103679-103679, Article 103679</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-5efb39c7c6cb11a5461a2b8fe5b64cc82c991d58004907cfc5caed29e8746a613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-5efb39c7c6cb11a5461a2b8fe5b64cc82c991d58004907cfc5caed29e8746a613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070922003064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batuk, Merve Özbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çınar, Betül Çicek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaralı, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sennaroğlu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sennaroğlu, Levent</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><description>After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.</description><subject>Auditory brainstem implantation</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Brain stem</subject><subject>Cranial nerves</subject><subject>Deactivation</subject><subject>Electrode placement</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Facial nerve</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Nerves</subject><subject>Non-auditory response</subject><subject>Non-auditory stimulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcFN2465tGkzUYQ8QWCG0V3IU1vmZRpMibpiP_eSMWFC-HChct3DucehE4JXhFMxMWw0uPgk19RTGk-MVHLPbQgnNGyIc3bPlpgIkWJaywP0VGMA8aYVYwv0OvNTm8mnax3he-LtIbCeVfqqbPJh88iQNx6FyEW1uXp7M52k97E4sOmdfGLtUFbFxOMhR23G-3SMTroMwYnP3uJXm5vnq_vy8enu4frq8fSUFmnkkPfMmlqI0xLiOaVIJq2TQ-8FZUxDTVSko43GFcS16Y33GjoqISmroQWhC3R-ey7Df59gpjUaKOBTc4AfoqK1oxyxrM-o2d_0MFPweV0mapY1UhGRKaqmTLBxxigV9tgRx0-FcHqu201qLlt9d22mtvOsstZBvnZnYWgorHgDHQ2gEmq8_Z_gy84dotx</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz</creator><creator>Batuk, Merve Özbal</creator><creator>Çınar, Betül Çicek</creator><creator>Yaralı, Mehmet</creator><creator>Sennaroğlu, Gonca</creator><creator>Sennaroğlu, Levent</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant</title><author>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz ; Batuk, Merve Özbal ; Çınar, Betül Çicek ; Yaralı, Mehmet ; Sennaroğlu, Gonca ; Sennaroğlu, Levent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-5efb39c7c6cb11a5461a2b8fe5b64cc82c991d58004907cfc5caed29e8746a613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Auditory brainstem implantation</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Brain stem</topic><topic>Cranial nerves</topic><topic>Deactivation</topic><topic>Electrode placement</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Facial nerve</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Nerves</topic><topic>Non-auditory response</topic><topic>Non-auditory stimulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batuk, Merve Özbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çınar, Betül Çicek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaralı, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sennaroğlu, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sennaroğlu, Levent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bozsoy, Merve İkiz</au><au>Batuk, Merve Özbal</au><au>Çınar, Betül Çicek</au><au>Yaralı, Mehmet</au><au>Sennaroğlu, Gonca</au><au>Sennaroğlu, Levent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103679</spage><epage>103679</epage><pages>103679-103679</pages><artnum>103679</artnum><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><abstract>After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.</abstract><cop>Maryland Heights</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103679</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0709
ispartof American journal of otolaryngology, 2023-01, Vol.44 (1), p.103679-103679, Article 103679
issn 0196-0709
1532-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2732535004
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Auditory brainstem implantation
Auditory perception
Brain stem
Cranial nerves
Deactivation
Electrode placement
Electrodes
Facial nerve
Hearing
Nerves
Non-auditory response
Non-auditory stimulation
Software
Statistical analysis
Stimulation
Surgery
title Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T03%3A38%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20non-auditory%20responses%20in%20individuals%20with%20auditory%20brainstem%20implant&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Bozsoy,%20Merve%20%C4%B0kiz&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103679&rft.epage=103679&rft.pages=103679-103679&rft.artnum=103679&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2743489316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743489316&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196070922003064&rfr_iscdi=true