Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis

Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision‐making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2023-01, Vol.37 (1), p.e14845-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kampaktsis, Polydoros N., Siouras, Athanasios, Doulamis, Ilias P., Moustakidis, Serafeim, Emfietzoglou, Maria, Van den Eynde, Jef, Avgerinos, Dimitrios V., Giannakoulas, George, Alvarez, Paulino, Briasoulis, Alexandros
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e14845
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 37
creator Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.
Siouras, Athanasios
Doulamis, Ilias P.
Moustakidis, Serafeim
Emfietzoglou, Maria
Van den Eynde, Jef
Avgerinos, Dimitrios V.
Giannakoulas, George
Alvarez, Paulino
Briasoulis, Alexandros
description Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision‐making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried from 2000 to 2020 for ACHD patients who underwent isolated HT. The study cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) datasets that were used to train and test a CatBoost ML model. Feature selection was performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Recipient, donor, procedural, and post‐transplant characteristics were tested for their ability to predict mortality. We additionally used SHAP for explainability analysis, as well as individualized mortality risk assessment. Results The study cohort included 1033 recipients (median age 34 years, 61% male). At 1 year after HT, there were 205 deaths (19.9%). Out of a total of 49 variables, 10 were selected as highly predictive of 1‐year mortality and were used to train the ML model. Area under the curve (AUC) and predictive accuracy for the 1‐year ML model were .80 and 75.2%, respectively, and .69 and 74.2% for the 3‐year model, respectively. Based on SHAP analysis, hemodialysis of the recipient post‐HT had overall the strongest relative impact on 1‐year mortality after HΤ, followed by recipient‐estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and ischemic time. Conclusions ML models showed satisfactory predictive accuracy of mortality after HT in ACHD and allowed for individualized mortality risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.14845
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2731056478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731056478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2555-71faaa1d6eb86ede8aa3b1ef47ba884b4431fda580ae98d3d58b7ac763bd3f2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EglJYcAHkJSwKcRwnDjtU8ZIKlXiso0k8oUapU2xHqDtOgDgjJ8E0hR3ejDX65hvNT8gBi05YeKeVtycskYnYIAPG83wURSzeJIMoj-LwT_kO2XXuJXRTloptssNTzkQu-YB83EI10wZpg2CNNs9f758lOFR0YVHpyuvW0Lam89Z6aLRfUqg9WjoLuKfegnGLBoyHFagNBdU13tE37We0as0zGh0G17zSDoP8jJ7Tp7vpA1Xg4WcbBQPN0mm3R7ZqaBzur-uQPF1ePI6vR5Pp1c34fDKqYiHEKGM1ADCVYilTVCgBeMmwTrISpEzKJOGsViBkBJhLxZWQZQZVlvJS8TpGPiRHvXdh29cOnS_m2lXYhFOw7VwRZ5xFIk0yGdDjHq1s65zFulhYPQe7LFhU_MRfhPiLVfyBPVxru3KO6o_8zTsApz3wphtc_m8qxo_3vfIbl8aT5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731056478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N. ; Siouras, Athanasios ; Doulamis, Ilias P. ; Moustakidis, Serafeim ; Emfietzoglou, Maria ; Van den Eynde, Jef ; Avgerinos, Dimitrios V. ; Giannakoulas, George ; Alvarez, Paulino ; Briasoulis, Alexandros</creator><creatorcontrib>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N. ; Siouras, Athanasios ; Doulamis, Ilias P. ; Moustakidis, Serafeim ; Emfietzoglou, Maria ; Van den Eynde, Jef ; Avgerinos, Dimitrios V. ; Giannakoulas, George ; Alvarez, Paulino ; Briasoulis, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><description>Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision‐making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried from 2000 to 2020 for ACHD patients who underwent isolated HT. The study cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) datasets that were used to train and test a CatBoost ML model. Feature selection was performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Recipient, donor, procedural, and post‐transplant characteristics were tested for their ability to predict mortality. We additionally used SHAP for explainability analysis, as well as individualized mortality risk assessment. Results The study cohort included 1033 recipients (median age 34 years, 61% male). At 1 year after HT, there were 205 deaths (19.9%). Out of a total of 49 variables, 10 were selected as highly predictive of 1‐year mortality and were used to train the ML model. Area under the curve (AUC) and predictive accuracy for the 1‐year ML model were .80 and 75.2%, respectively, and .69 and 74.2% for the 3‐year model, respectively. Based on SHAP analysis, hemodialysis of the recipient post‐HT had overall the strongest relative impact on 1‐year mortality after HΤ, followed by recipient‐estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and ischemic time. Conclusions ML models showed satisfactory predictive accuracy of mortality after HT in ACHD and allowed for individualized mortality risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14845</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36315983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Adult ; congenital heart disease ; explainability ; Female ; Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery ; Heart Failure ; Heart Transplantation ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Risk Assessment ; UNOS</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2023-01, Vol.37 (1), p.e14845-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2555-71faaa1d6eb86ede8aa3b1ef47ba884b4431fda580ae98d3d58b7ac763bd3f2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2555-71faaa1d6eb86ede8aa3b1ef47ba884b4431fda580ae98d3d58b7ac763bd3f2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siouras, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doulamis, Ilias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustakidis, Serafeim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emfietzoglou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Eynde, Jef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgerinos, Dimitrios V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannakoulas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briasoulis, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision‐making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried from 2000 to 2020 for ACHD patients who underwent isolated HT. The study cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) datasets that were used to train and test a CatBoost ML model. Feature selection was performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Recipient, donor, procedural, and post‐transplant characteristics were tested for their ability to predict mortality. We additionally used SHAP for explainability analysis, as well as individualized mortality risk assessment. Results The study cohort included 1033 recipients (median age 34 years, 61% male). At 1 year after HT, there were 205 deaths (19.9%). Out of a total of 49 variables, 10 were selected as highly predictive of 1‐year mortality and were used to train the ML model. Area under the curve (AUC) and predictive accuracy for the 1‐year ML model were .80 and 75.2%, respectively, and .69 and 74.2% for the 3‐year model, respectively. Based on SHAP analysis, hemodialysis of the recipient post‐HT had overall the strongest relative impact on 1‐year mortality after HΤ, followed by recipient‐estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and ischemic time. Conclusions ML models showed satisfactory predictive accuracy of mortality after HT in ACHD and allowed for individualized mortality risk assessment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>congenital heart disease</subject><subject>explainability</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Failure</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>UNOS</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EglJYcAHkJSwKcRwnDjtU8ZIKlXiso0k8oUapU2xHqDtOgDgjJ8E0hR3ejDX65hvNT8gBi05YeKeVtycskYnYIAPG83wURSzeJIMoj-LwT_kO2XXuJXRTloptssNTzkQu-YB83EI10wZpg2CNNs9f758lOFR0YVHpyuvW0Lam89Z6aLRfUqg9WjoLuKfegnGLBoyHFagNBdU13tE37We0as0zGh0G17zSDoP8jJ7Tp7vpA1Xg4WcbBQPN0mm3R7ZqaBzur-uQPF1ePI6vR5Pp1c34fDKqYiHEKGM1ADCVYilTVCgBeMmwTrISpEzKJOGsViBkBJhLxZWQZQZVlvJS8TpGPiRHvXdh29cOnS_m2lXYhFOw7VwRZ5xFIk0yGdDjHq1s65zFulhYPQe7LFhU_MRfhPiLVfyBPVxru3KO6o_8zTsApz3wphtc_m8qxo_3vfIbl8aT5Q</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.</creator><creator>Siouras, Athanasios</creator><creator>Doulamis, Ilias P.</creator><creator>Moustakidis, Serafeim</creator><creator>Emfietzoglou, Maria</creator><creator>Van den Eynde, Jef</creator><creator>Avgerinos, Dimitrios V.</creator><creator>Giannakoulas, George</creator><creator>Alvarez, Paulino</creator><creator>Briasoulis, Alexandros</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis</title><author>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N. ; Siouras, Athanasios ; Doulamis, Ilias P. ; Moustakidis, Serafeim ; Emfietzoglou, Maria ; Van den Eynde, Jef ; Avgerinos, Dimitrios V. ; Giannakoulas, George ; Alvarez, Paulino ; Briasoulis, Alexandros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2555-71faaa1d6eb86ede8aa3b1ef47ba884b4431fda580ae98d3d58b7ac763bd3f2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>congenital heart disease</topic><topic>explainability</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Failure</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>UNOS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siouras, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doulamis, Ilias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustakidis, Serafeim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emfietzoglou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Eynde, Jef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgerinos, Dimitrios V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannakoulas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Paulino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briasoulis, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kampaktsis, Polydoros N.</au><au>Siouras, Athanasios</au><au>Doulamis, Ilias P.</au><au>Moustakidis, Serafeim</au><au>Emfietzoglou, Maria</au><au>Van den Eynde, Jef</au><au>Avgerinos, Dimitrios V.</au><au>Giannakoulas, George</au><au>Alvarez, Paulino</au><au>Briasoulis, Alexandros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14845</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14845-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision‐making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried from 2000 to 2020 for ACHD patients who underwent isolated HT. The study cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) datasets that were used to train and test a CatBoost ML model. Feature selection was performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Recipient, donor, procedural, and post‐transplant characteristics were tested for their ability to predict mortality. We additionally used SHAP for explainability analysis, as well as individualized mortality risk assessment. Results The study cohort included 1033 recipients (median age 34 years, 61% male). At 1 year after HT, there were 205 deaths (19.9%). Out of a total of 49 variables, 10 were selected as highly predictive of 1‐year mortality and were used to train the ML model. Area under the curve (AUC) and predictive accuracy for the 1‐year ML model were .80 and 75.2%, respectively, and .69 and 74.2% for the 3‐year model, respectively. Based on SHAP analysis, hemodialysis of the recipient post‐HT had overall the strongest relative impact on 1‐year mortality after HΤ, followed by recipient‐estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and ischemic time. Conclusions ML models showed satisfactory predictive accuracy of mortality after HT in ACHD and allowed for individualized mortality risk assessment.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>36315983</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14845</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2023-01, Vol.37 (1), p.e14845-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2731056478
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
congenital heart disease
explainability
Female
Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery
Heart Failure
Heart Transplantation
Humans
Machine Learning
Male
Risk Assessment
UNOS
title Machine learning‐based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A11%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%E2%80%90based%20prediction%20of%20mortality%20after%20heart%20transplantation%20in%20adults%20with%20congenital%20heart%20disease:%20A%20UNOS%20database%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Kampaktsis,%20Polydoros%20N.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14845&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14845-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731056478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731056478&rft_id=info:pmid/36315983&rfr_iscdi=true