Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation

Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57
Hauptverfasser: Farhan, Manaf H., Chin-Hong, Patrick H., Keenan, John D., Shieh, Wen K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)
container_volume 69
creator Farhan, Manaf H.
Chin-Hong, Patrick H.
Keenan, John D.
Shieh, Wen K.
description Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<45::AID-JCTB638>3.0.CO;2-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27297162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27297162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e88987a356ee91c059b9000fc0bdc8c94eaf2dd3db0a005779effbcd606c18983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFv0zAUhSMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tqO7bigSSWw0arQiQ14vHKcGxTWJsVOJfbvl6hVX3m6D_c7R0dfklxxmHIAcXl-tygWFxysYZnWcM6tNaAutJ3xD5mazeaLT2xZ3H_UMr-SU5gW6_eCiWfJ5BR5nkxA6JwJZdTL5FWMfwBA50JPkutbCnUXtq71lHZ1Om8dha5sfPqdnO-7ENNqH5r2d3obaV917K4nVz0Ox_WUrncUXN907evkRe02kd4c71ny4_rzffGFrdY3i2K-Yl5q3jPKc5sbJ5UmstyDsqUdptQeysrn3mbkalFVsirBAShjLNV16SsN2vMhKs-Sd4feXej-7in2uG2ip83GtdTtIwojrOFa_BfkGpQEkQ3gzwPoQxdjoBp3odm68IgccPSPOPrHUSaOMvHgH7VFjplCHPzj0T9KBCzWKHBc8Pa4wEXvNnUYFDfx1C60NrnSA8YOWBN7-nd6u_CA2kij8Ne3G1x-1cvciBWu5BOCM5rY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16053024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><description>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-2575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1&lt;45::AID-JCTB638&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCTBDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>anaerobic reactor ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; Environment and pollution ; fluidized bed ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; packed-bed ; performance data ; steady-state ; suspended growth</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2667856$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><title>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</description><subject>anaerobic reactor</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>fluidized bed</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>packed-bed</subject><subject>performance data</subject><subject>steady-state</subject><subject>suspended growth</subject><issn>0268-2575</issn><issn>1097-4660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFv0zAUhSMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tqO7bigSSWw0arQiQ14vHKcGxTWJsVOJfbvl6hVX3m6D_c7R0dfklxxmHIAcXl-tygWFxysYZnWcM6tNaAutJ3xD5mazeaLT2xZ3H_UMr-SU5gW6_eCiWfJ5BR5nkxA6JwJZdTL5FWMfwBA50JPkutbCnUXtq71lHZ1Om8dha5sfPqdnO-7ENNqH5r2d3obaV917K4nVz0Ox_WUrncUXN907evkRe02kd4c71ny4_rzffGFrdY3i2K-Yl5q3jPKc5sbJ5UmstyDsqUdptQeysrn3mbkalFVsirBAShjLNV16SsN2vMhKs-Sd4feXej-7in2uG2ip83GtdTtIwojrOFa_BfkGpQEkQ3gzwPoQxdjoBp3odm68IgccPSPOPrHUSaOMvHgH7VFjplCHPzj0T9KBCzWKHBc8Pa4wEXvNnUYFDfx1C60NrnSA8YOWBN7-nd6u_CA2kij8Ne3G1x-1cvciBWu5BOCM5rY</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>Farhan, Manaf H.</creator><creator>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creator><creator>Keenan, John D.</creator><creator>Shieh, Wen K.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><author>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e88987a356ee91c059b9000fc0bdc8c94eaf2dd3db0a005779effbcd606c18983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>anaerobic reactor</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>fluidized bed</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>packed-bed</topic><topic>performance data</topic><topic>steady-state</topic><topic>suspended growth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farhan, Manaf H.</au><au>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</au><au>Keenan, John D.</au><au>Shieh, Wen K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>45-57</pages><issn>0268-2575</issn><eissn>1097-4660</eissn><coden>JCTBDC</coden><abstract>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1&lt;45::AID-JCTB638&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-2575
ispartof Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57
issn 0268-2575
1097-4660
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27297162
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects anaerobic reactor
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Biotechnology
Environment and pollution
fluidized bed
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
packed-bed
performance data
steady-state
suspended growth
title Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A08%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20Anaerobic%20Reactors%20during%20Pseudo-Steady-State%20Operation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20technology%20and%20biotechnology%20(1986)&rft.au=Farhan,%20Manaf%20H.&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=45-57&rft.issn=0268-2575&rft.eissn=1097-4660&rft.coden=JCTBDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1%3C45::AID-JCTB638%3E3.0.CO;2-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27297162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16053024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true