Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation
Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Farhan, Manaf H. Chin-Hong, Patrick H. Keenan, John D. Shieh, Wen K. |
description | Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<45::AID-JCTB638>3.0.CO;2-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27297162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27297162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e88987a356ee91c059b9000fc0bdc8c94eaf2dd3db0a005779effbcd606c18983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFv0zAUhSMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tqO7bigSSWw0arQiQ14vHKcGxTWJsVOJfbvl6hVX3m6D_c7R0dfklxxmHIAcXl-tygWFxysYZnWcM6tNaAutJ3xD5mazeaLT2xZ3H_UMr-SU5gW6_eCiWfJ5BR5nkxA6JwJZdTL5FWMfwBA50JPkutbCnUXtq71lHZ1Om8dha5sfPqdnO-7ENNqH5r2d3obaV917K4nVz0Ox_WUrncUXN907evkRe02kd4c71ny4_rzffGFrdY3i2K-Yl5q3jPKc5sbJ5UmstyDsqUdptQeysrn3mbkalFVsirBAShjLNV16SsN2vMhKs-Sd4feXej-7in2uG2ip83GtdTtIwojrOFa_BfkGpQEkQ3gzwPoQxdjoBp3odm68IgccPSPOPrHUSaOMvHgH7VFjplCHPzj0T9KBCzWKHBc8Pa4wEXvNnUYFDfx1C60NrnSA8YOWBN7-nd6u_CA2kij8Ne3G1x-1cvciBWu5BOCM5rY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16053024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><description>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-2575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<45::AID-JCTB638>3.0.CO;2-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCTBDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>anaerobic reactor ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; Environment and pollution ; fluidized bed ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; packed-bed ; performance data ; steady-state ; suspended growth</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2667856$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><title>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</description><subject>anaerobic reactor</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>fluidized bed</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>packed-bed</subject><subject>performance data</subject><subject>steady-state</subject><subject>suspended growth</subject><issn>0268-2575</issn><issn>1097-4660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFv0zAUhSMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tqO7bigSSWw0arQiQ14vHKcGxTWJsVOJfbvl6hVX3m6D_c7R0dfklxxmHIAcXl-tygWFxysYZnWcM6tNaAutJ3xD5mazeaLT2xZ3H_UMr-SU5gW6_eCiWfJ5BR5nkxA6JwJZdTL5FWMfwBA50JPkutbCnUXtq71lHZ1Om8dha5sfPqdnO-7ENNqH5r2d3obaV917K4nVz0Ox_WUrncUXN907evkRe02kd4c71ny4_rzffGFrdY3i2K-Yl5q3jPKc5sbJ5UmstyDsqUdptQeysrn3mbkalFVsirBAShjLNV16SsN2vMhKs-Sd4feXej-7in2uG2ip83GtdTtIwojrOFa_BfkGpQEkQ3gzwPoQxdjoBp3odm68IgccPSPOPrHUSaOMvHgH7VFjplCHPzj0T9KBCzWKHBc8Pa4wEXvNnUYFDfx1C60NrnSA8YOWBN7-nd6u_CA2kij8Ne3G1x-1cvciBWu5BOCM5rY</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>Farhan, Manaf H.</creator><creator>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creator><creator>Keenan, John D.</creator><creator>Shieh, Wen K.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</title><author>Farhan, Manaf H. ; Chin-Hong, Patrick H. ; Keenan, John D. ; Shieh, Wen K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e88987a356ee91c059b9000fc0bdc8c94eaf2dd3db0a005779effbcd606c18983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>anaerobic reactor</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>fluidized bed</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>packed-bed</topic><topic>performance data</topic><topic>steady-state</topic><topic>suspended growth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Manaf H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keenan, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Wen K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farhan, Manaf H.</au><au>Chin-Hong, Patrick H.</au><au>Keenan, John D.</au><au>Shieh, Wen K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>45-57</pages><issn>0268-2575</issn><eissn>1097-4660</eissn><coden>JCTBDC</coden><abstract>Four anaerobic reactors were studied for the purposes of this work: two anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBR) using diatomaceous earth and granular activated carbon as immobilization media (R1 and R2, respectively), a packed-bed reactor (R3), and a suspended growth reactor (R4). A nutrient-supplemented wastestream with glucose as the main carbon source was treated. Successful reactor start-up was achieved for all four anaerobic reactors. These reactors were able to handle organic loading rates of more than 12000, 7500, 6000 and 650 mg dm super(-3) day super(-1) for R1-R4, respectively. Anaerobic fluidized bed reactors were less affected by interruptions and adverse operating conditions than were packed-bed and suspended growth reactors. Immobilized cell reactors and, specifically, AFBRs were clearly superior to conventional high-rate digesters. This enhanced performance is primarily due to the very high cell retention ability of such reactors. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiencies were achievable under pseudo-steady state operation. Removal efficiencies above 98% were observed for all reactors. Specific biogas production rates of 1.5-1.7, 1.4-1.7, 1.1-1.5 and 0.9-1.3 dm super(3) of methane per gram of TOC removed for R1-R4, respectively, were attained. A consistent biogas methane content of 52.5-55.9% was observed. Biomass concentrations of 84, 91, 21 and 1.9 g VS dm super(-3) were measured for R1-R4, respectively. Extremely high biomass concentrations in AFBRs were possible due to the high available specific surface area.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<45::AID-JCTB638>3.0.CO;2-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-2575 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 1997-05, Vol.69 (1), p.45-57 |
issn | 0268-2575 1097-4660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27297162 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | anaerobic reactor Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of waters Biotechnology Environment and pollution fluidized bed Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects packed-bed performance data steady-state suspended growth |
title | Performance of Anaerobic Reactors during Pseudo-Steady-State Operation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A08%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20Anaerobic%20Reactors%20during%20Pseudo-Steady-State%20Operation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20technology%20and%20biotechnology%20(1986)&rft.au=Farhan,%20Manaf%20H.&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=45-57&rft.issn=0268-2575&rft.eissn=1097-4660&rft.coden=JCTBDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1%3C45::AID-JCTB638%3E3.0.CO;2-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27297162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16053024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |