Even simple framing effects are rational

Bermúdez persuasively argues that framing effects are not as irrational as commonly supposed. In focusing on the reasoning of individual decision-makers in complex situations, however, he neglects the crucial role of the social-communicative context for eliciting certain framing effects. We contend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2022-01, Vol.45, p.e228-e228, Article e228
Hauptverfasser: Flusberg, Stephen J., Thibodeau, Paul H., Holmes, Kevin J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e228
container_issue
container_start_page e228
container_title The Behavioral and brain sciences
container_volume 45
creator Flusberg, Stephen J.
Thibodeau, Paul H.
Holmes, Kevin J.
description Bermúdez persuasively argues that framing effects are not as irrational as commonly supposed. In focusing on the reasoning of individual decision-makers in complex situations, however, he neglects the crucial role of the social-communicative context for eliciting certain framing effects. We contend that many framing effects are best explained in terms of basic, rational principles of discourse processing and pragmatic reasoning.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0140525X22000942
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2728467966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X22000942</cupid><sourcerecordid>2728025131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-aaa1aad9047771a0a28cce6adaac170d03f6540ac5d60667302d98bfadbe50e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAm26idybzSJZSahUKLlRwF25n7pSUPOpMIvjvTWlBUFzdxfm-w-Uwds3hlgM3dy_AJSih3oUAgEKKEzbhUhcpz4U6ZZN9nO7zc3YR43ZklFTFhM0Wn9QmsWp2NSU-YFO1m4S8J9vHBAMlAfuqa7G-ZGce60hXxztlbw-L1_ljunpePs3vV6kVOfQpInJEV4A0xnAEFLm1pNEhWm7AQea1koBWOQ1amwyEK_K1R7cmBSSyKZsdeneh-xgo9mVTRUt1jS11QyyFEbnUptB6RG9-odtuCOOvBwqE4hkfKX6gbOhiDOTLXagaDF8lh3K_Xflnu9HJjg4261C5Df1U_299Ax04bwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728025131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Even simple framing effects are rational</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Flusberg, Stephen J. ; Thibodeau, Paul H. ; Holmes, Kevin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flusberg, Stephen J. ; Thibodeau, Paul H. ; Holmes, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Bermúdez persuasively argues that framing effects are not as irrational as commonly supposed. In focusing on the reasoning of individual decision-makers in complex situations, however, he neglects the crucial role of the social-communicative context for eliciting certain framing effects. We contend that many framing effects are best explained in terms of basic, rational principles of discourse processing and pragmatic reasoning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22000942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Language ; Linguistics ; Metaphor ; Open Peer Commentary ; Sex crimes</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2022-01, Vol.45, p.e228-e228, Article e228</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-aaa1aad9047771a0a28cce6adaac170d03f6540ac5d60667302d98bfadbe50e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-aaa1aad9047771a0a28cce6adaac170d03f6540ac5d60667302d98bfadbe50e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1348-613X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X22000942/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flusberg, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibodeau, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Even simple framing effects are rational</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Bermúdez persuasively argues that framing effects are not as irrational as commonly supposed. In focusing on the reasoning of individual decision-makers in complex situations, however, he neglects the crucial role of the social-communicative context for eliciting certain framing effects. We contend that many framing effects are best explained in terms of basic, rational principles of discourse processing and pragmatic reasoning.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAm26idybzSJZSahUKLlRwF25n7pSUPOpMIvjvTWlBUFzdxfm-w-Uwds3hlgM3dy_AJSih3oUAgEKKEzbhUhcpz4U6ZZN9nO7zc3YR43ZklFTFhM0Wn9QmsWp2NSU-YFO1m4S8J9vHBAMlAfuqa7G-ZGce60hXxztlbw-L1_ljunpePs3vV6kVOfQpInJEV4A0xnAEFLm1pNEhWm7AQea1koBWOQ1amwyEK_K1R7cmBSSyKZsdeneh-xgo9mVTRUt1jS11QyyFEbnUptB6RG9-odtuCOOvBwqE4hkfKX6gbOhiDOTLXagaDF8lh3K_Xflnu9HJjg4261C5Df1U_299Ax04bwg</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Flusberg, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Thibodeau, Paul H.</creator><creator>Holmes, Kevin J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-613X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Even simple framing effects are rational</title><author>Flusberg, Stephen J. ; Thibodeau, Paul H. ; Holmes, Kevin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-aaa1aad9047771a0a28cce6adaac170d03f6540ac5d60667302d98bfadbe50e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flusberg, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thibodeau, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flusberg, Stephen J.</au><au>Thibodeau, Paul H.</au><au>Holmes, Kevin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Even simple framing effects are rational</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>e228</spage><epage>e228</epage><pages>e228-e228</pages><artnum>e228</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>Bermúdez persuasively argues that framing effects are not as irrational as commonly supposed. In focusing on the reasoning of individual decision-makers in complex situations, however, he neglects the crucial role of the social-communicative context for eliciting certain framing effects. We contend that many framing effects are best explained in terms of basic, rational principles of discourse processing and pragmatic reasoning.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0140525X22000942</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-613X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-525X
ispartof The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2022-01, Vol.45, p.e228-e228, Article e228
issn 0140-525X
1469-1825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2728467966
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Decision making
Language
Linguistics
Metaphor
Open Peer Commentary
Sex crimes
title Even simple framing effects are rational
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A10%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Even%20simple%20framing%20effects%20are%20rational&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Flusberg,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=e228&rft.epage=e228&rft.pages=e228-e228&rft.artnum=e228&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X22000942&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728025131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728025131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X22000942&rfr_iscdi=true