Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement

We have recently demonstrated in a large patient cohort that the prevalence and severity of reflux will improve in most limbs after stenting and that most limbs will not develop new-onset reflux. In the present report, we have focused on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with untreated refl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY) NY), 2023-03, Vol.11 (2), p.294-301.e2
Hauptverfasser: Saleem, Taimur, Lucas, Michael, Thaggard, David, Peeples, Hunter, Luke, Cooper, Raju, Seshadri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301.e2
container_issue 2
container_start_page 294
container_title Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)
container_volume 11
creator Saleem, Taimur
Lucas, Michael
Thaggard, David
Peeples, Hunter
Luke, Cooper
Raju, Seshadri
description We have recently demonstrated in a large patient cohort that the prevalence and severity of reflux will improve in most limbs after stenting and that most limbs will not develop new-onset reflux. In the present report, we have focused on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with untreated reflux in the same patient cohort who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting without correction of residual reflux. The clinical outcomes data from 1379 limbs treated with only iliac vein stenting without correction of superficial or deep reflux from 1997 to 2018 were analyzed (23-year follow-up period). Of the 1379 limbs, 632 (46%) had had preexisting reflux before stenting and 747 (54%) had did not. The reflux data (reflux segmental score, air plethysmography, ambulatory venous pressure) for these patients have been previously reported in detail. The subsets were compared perioperatively with each other using the following variables: grade of swelling, visual analog scale for pain score, venous clinical severity score, venous stasis dermatitis, ulceration, and quality of life measures. Both groups demonstrated improvements in the venous clinical severity score, grade of swelling, visual analog scale score, and quality of life. No differences were found in ulcer healing (5% vs 3% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) and resolution of dermatitis (6% vs 5% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) between the two groups. Of the 632 limbs with preexisting reflux, 218 (34%) had had axial reflux and 414 had had nonaxial reflux (66%). The clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. Using a multisegment reflux score, the limbs with prestent reflux (n = 632) were divided into two groups. A segmental score of ≥3 indicated severe reflux and a score of 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727645206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213333X22004231</els_id><sourcerecordid>2727645206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-20065526ab2ee3efce267a4fb78e786de15c85b7bc8da2da35f469c2621ffa403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMottT-AQ-So5eu2Zfd7C54kaJVKHhR8Bay2RdISXdrki36702p9ui7vDnMDMxHyHXOspzl4m6TbfZhnwEDyFiTMdackSlAzhecF_X5SfOPCZmHsGHpaiHKil2SCReQVFNPyWrpbG-1cjQODr3qNdLB0LGPHlXEjno0bvyiykT01DqrNN2j7WmI2Ee6c0rjNqkrcmGUCzj__TPy_vT4tnxerF9XL8uH9ULzUsQFMCbKEoRqAZGj0QiiUoVpqxqrWnSYl7ou26rVdaegU7w0hWg0CMiNUQXjM3J77N354XPEEOXWBo3OqR6HMUiooBJFCUwkKxyt2g8hpB1y5-1W-W-ZM3lgKDfywFAeGErWyMQwhW5--8d2i90p8kcsGe6PBkwr9xa9DNpiwtZZjzrKbrD_9f8AdtODUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727645206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saleem, Taimur ; Lucas, Michael ; Thaggard, David ; Peeples, Hunter ; Luke, Cooper ; Raju, Seshadri</creator><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Taimur ; Lucas, Michael ; Thaggard, David ; Peeples, Hunter ; Luke, Cooper ; Raju, Seshadri</creatorcontrib><description>We have recently demonstrated in a large patient cohort that the prevalence and severity of reflux will improve in most limbs after stenting and that most limbs will not develop new-onset reflux. In the present report, we have focused on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with untreated reflux in the same patient cohort who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting without correction of residual reflux. The clinical outcomes data from 1379 limbs treated with only iliac vein stenting without correction of superficial or deep reflux from 1997 to 2018 were analyzed (23-year follow-up period). Of the 1379 limbs, 632 (46%) had had preexisting reflux before stenting and 747 (54%) had did not. The reflux data (reflux segmental score, air plethysmography, ambulatory venous pressure) for these patients have been previously reported in detail. The subsets were compared perioperatively with each other using the following variables: grade of swelling, visual analog scale for pain score, venous clinical severity score, venous stasis dermatitis, ulceration, and quality of life measures. Both groups demonstrated improvements in the venous clinical severity score, grade of swelling, visual analog scale score, and quality of life. No differences were found in ulcer healing (5% vs 3% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) and resolution of dermatitis (6% vs 5% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) between the two groups. Of the 632 limbs with preexisting reflux, 218 (34%) had had axial reflux and 414 had had nonaxial reflux (66%). The clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. Using a multisegment reflux score, the limbs with prestent reflux (n = 632) were divided into two groups. A segmental score of ≥3 indicated severe reflux and a score of &lt;3 indicated moderate reflux. Of these 632 limbs, 161 (25%) had severe reflux and 471 (75%) had moderate reflux. The two groups demonstrated similar outcomes for most clinical parameters. The post-thrombotic limbs and nonthrombotic limbs also showed similar outcomes. The long-term follow-up of patients after iliac vein stenting showed that uncorrected reflux is well tolerated by most patients across most clinical measures. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-333X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-3348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36265798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Axial ; Chronic Disease ; Dermatitis ; Dermatitis - complications ; Humans ; Iliac Vein - surgery ; Iliac vein stenting ; Quality of Life ; Reflux ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulcer ; Varicose Veins - complications ; Venous Insufficiency - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2023-03, Vol.11 (2), p.294-301.e2</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-20065526ab2ee3efce267a4fb78e786de15c85b7bc8da2da35f469c2621ffa403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-20065526ab2ee3efce267a4fb78e786de15c85b7bc8da2da35f469c2621ffa403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4467-3090</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Taimur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaggard, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeples, Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Cooper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, Seshadri</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><description>We have recently demonstrated in a large patient cohort that the prevalence and severity of reflux will improve in most limbs after stenting and that most limbs will not develop new-onset reflux. In the present report, we have focused on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with untreated reflux in the same patient cohort who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting without correction of residual reflux. The clinical outcomes data from 1379 limbs treated with only iliac vein stenting without correction of superficial or deep reflux from 1997 to 2018 were analyzed (23-year follow-up period). Of the 1379 limbs, 632 (46%) had had preexisting reflux before stenting and 747 (54%) had did not. The reflux data (reflux segmental score, air plethysmography, ambulatory venous pressure) for these patients have been previously reported in detail. The subsets were compared perioperatively with each other using the following variables: grade of swelling, visual analog scale for pain score, venous clinical severity score, venous stasis dermatitis, ulceration, and quality of life measures. Both groups demonstrated improvements in the venous clinical severity score, grade of swelling, visual analog scale score, and quality of life. No differences were found in ulcer healing (5% vs 3% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) and resolution of dermatitis (6% vs 5% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) between the two groups. Of the 632 limbs with preexisting reflux, 218 (34%) had had axial reflux and 414 had had nonaxial reflux (66%). The clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. Using a multisegment reflux score, the limbs with prestent reflux (n = 632) were divided into two groups. A segmental score of ≥3 indicated severe reflux and a score of &lt;3 indicated moderate reflux. Of these 632 limbs, 161 (25%) had severe reflux and 471 (75%) had moderate reflux. The two groups demonstrated similar outcomes for most clinical parameters. The post-thrombotic limbs and nonthrombotic limbs also showed similar outcomes. The long-term follow-up of patients after iliac vein stenting showed that uncorrected reflux is well tolerated by most patients across most clinical measures. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Axial</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Iliac vein stenting</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reflux</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ulcer</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - complications</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - therapy</subject><issn>2213-333X</issn><issn>2213-3348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMottT-AQ-So5eu2Zfd7C54kaJVKHhR8Bay2RdISXdrki36702p9ui7vDnMDMxHyHXOspzl4m6TbfZhnwEDyFiTMdackSlAzhecF_X5SfOPCZmHsGHpaiHKil2SCReQVFNPyWrpbG-1cjQODr3qNdLB0LGPHlXEjno0bvyiykT01DqrNN2j7WmI2Ee6c0rjNqkrcmGUCzj__TPy_vT4tnxerF9XL8uH9ULzUsQFMCbKEoRqAZGj0QiiUoVpqxqrWnSYl7ou26rVdaegU7w0hWg0CMiNUQXjM3J77N354XPEEOXWBo3OqR6HMUiooBJFCUwkKxyt2g8hpB1y5-1W-W-ZM3lgKDfywFAeGErWyMQwhW5--8d2i90p8kcsGe6PBkwr9xa9DNpiwtZZjzrKbrD_9f8AdtODUg</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Saleem, Taimur</creator><creator>Lucas, Michael</creator><creator>Thaggard, David</creator><creator>Peeples, Hunter</creator><creator>Luke, Cooper</creator><creator>Raju, Seshadri</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4467-3090</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement</title><author>Saleem, Taimur ; Lucas, Michael ; Thaggard, David ; Peeples, Hunter ; Luke, Cooper ; Raju, Seshadri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-20065526ab2ee3efce267a4fb78e786de15c85b7bc8da2da35f469c2621ffa403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Axial</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Iliac vein stenting</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reflux</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ulcer</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - complications</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Taimur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaggard, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeples, Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Cooper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, Seshadri</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saleem, Taimur</au><au>Lucas, Michael</au><au>Thaggard, David</au><au>Peeples, Hunter</au><au>Luke, Cooper</au><au>Raju, Seshadri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>294</spage><epage>301.e2</epage><pages>294-301.e2</pages><issn>2213-333X</issn><eissn>2213-3348</eissn><abstract>We have recently demonstrated in a large patient cohort that the prevalence and severity of reflux will improve in most limbs after stenting and that most limbs will not develop new-onset reflux. In the present report, we have focused on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with untreated reflux in the same patient cohort who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting without correction of residual reflux. The clinical outcomes data from 1379 limbs treated with only iliac vein stenting without correction of superficial or deep reflux from 1997 to 2018 were analyzed (23-year follow-up period). Of the 1379 limbs, 632 (46%) had had preexisting reflux before stenting and 747 (54%) had did not. The reflux data (reflux segmental score, air plethysmography, ambulatory venous pressure) for these patients have been previously reported in detail. The subsets were compared perioperatively with each other using the following variables: grade of swelling, visual analog scale for pain score, venous clinical severity score, venous stasis dermatitis, ulceration, and quality of life measures. Both groups demonstrated improvements in the venous clinical severity score, grade of swelling, visual analog scale score, and quality of life. No differences were found in ulcer healing (5% vs 3% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) and resolution of dermatitis (6% vs 5% for limbs with and without prestent reflux, respectively) between the two groups. Of the 632 limbs with preexisting reflux, 218 (34%) had had axial reflux and 414 had had nonaxial reflux (66%). The clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. Using a multisegment reflux score, the limbs with prestent reflux (n = 632) were divided into two groups. A segmental score of ≥3 indicated severe reflux and a score of &lt;3 indicated moderate reflux. Of these 632 limbs, 161 (25%) had severe reflux and 471 (75%) had moderate reflux. The two groups demonstrated similar outcomes for most clinical parameters. The post-thrombotic limbs and nonthrombotic limbs also showed similar outcomes. The long-term follow-up of patients after iliac vein stenting showed that uncorrected reflux is well tolerated by most patients across most clinical measures. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36265798</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.009</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4467-3090</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2213-333X
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2023-03, Vol.11 (2), p.294-301.e2
issn 2213-333X
2213-3348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727645206
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Axial
Chronic Disease
Dermatitis
Dermatitis - complications
Humans
Iliac Vein - surgery
Iliac vein stenting
Quality of Life
Reflux
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Ulcer
Varicose Veins - complications
Venous Insufficiency - therapy
title Clinical tolerance of untreated reflux after iliac vein stent placement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20tolerance%20of%20untreated%20reflux%20after%20iliac%20vein%20stent%20placement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery.%20Venous%20and%20lymphatic%20disorders%20(New%20York,%20NY)&rft.au=Saleem,%20Taimur&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=301.e2&rft.pages=294-301.e2&rft.issn=2213-333X&rft.eissn=2213-3348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727645206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727645206&rft_id=info:pmid/36265798&rft_els_id=S2213333X22004231&rfr_iscdi=true