Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness

•This paper introduced a new disease termed “post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)”.•MR imaging provides a key role for differentiating the PIEH from the post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD).•Most patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement.•Most patients with PISD showed unilateral affl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2022-11, Vol.176, p.222-227
Hauptverfasser: Tien, Chung-Tang, Chen, Chun-Nan, Young, Yi-Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 227
container_issue
container_start_page 222
container_title Radiotherapy and oncology
container_volume 176
creator Tien, Chung-Tang
Chen, Chun-Nan
Young, Yi-Ho
description •This paper introduced a new disease termed “post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)”.•MR imaging provides a key role for differentiating the PIEH from the post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD).•Most patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement.•Most patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction.•The interval from the onset of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to acute hearing loss did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). Increasing numbers of acute sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are recently experienced in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors. This study adopted MR imaging to differentiate between post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD) and post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH) in long-term NPC survivors with acute SNHL. From 2012 to 2021, consecutive 10 irradiated NPC survivors with acute SNHL were enrolled. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery and MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique. Six patients (11 ears) with positive cochlear hydrops on MR images were diagnosed as PIEH, while another 4 patients (4 ears) without cochlear hydrops on MR images were referred to PISD. The interval from the onset of NPC to acute SNHL did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). No significant difference was found between the two disorders from any of the symptomatic, radiotherapeutic, audiological, or vestibular perspective. Interestingly, most (5/6) patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement, while all (4/4) patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction. A significantly declining sequence of abnormality rates in the inner ear test battery was noted in the PIEH patients, running from the audiometry (100%), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test (100%), ocular VEMP test (73%), to the caloric test (36%). However, such declining trend was not observed in patients with PISD. When facing an NPC survivor who had acute SNHL over a prolonged period after irradiation, MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique should be performed to differentiate the PIEH from the PISD, since both disorders have various treatment modalities and hearing outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727645031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167814022045042</els_id><sourcerecordid>2727645031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c9bf750b1e33e1ccfb4b950e028f10c1051b573683896ef2f3ddf9a8b237cd863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgevew6Sbqb7EWQ4hcW9KDnsJtMaEq7WZNtof_elKoHD56GGZ6ZN3kIuaRQUKDVzbIIjfGdLhgwlkYFUDgiYypFnYOU4piMEyZySacwImcxLgGAARenZMQrVpWV5GPy8ubjkLuQbrlmcL7LsDN-tVv3i9TqbLEzwfcx28Yi6_-icWMMdpnBxnYY4zk5sc0q4sV3nZCPh_v32VM-f318nt3Nc51yh1zXrRUltBQ5R6q1badtXQICk5aCplDSthQ8PU_WFVpmuTG2bmTLuNBGVnxCrg93--A_NxgHtXZR42rVdOg3UTHBRDUtgdOETg-oDj7GgFb1wa2bsFMU1F6jWqqDRrXXuJ8mjWnt6jth067R_C79eEvA7QHA9M-tw6CidthpNC6gHpTx7v-EL36qhkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727645031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tien, Chung-Tang ; Chen, Chun-Nan ; Young, Yi-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Tien, Chung-Tang ; Chen, Chun-Nan ; Young, Yi-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>•This paper introduced a new disease termed “post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)”.•MR imaging provides a key role for differentiating the PIEH from the post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD).•Most patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement.•Most patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction.•The interval from the onset of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to acute hearing loss did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). Increasing numbers of acute sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are recently experienced in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors. This study adopted MR imaging to differentiate between post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD) and post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH) in long-term NPC survivors with acute SNHL. From 2012 to 2021, consecutive 10 irradiated NPC survivors with acute SNHL were enrolled. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery and MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique. Six patients (11 ears) with positive cochlear hydrops on MR images were diagnosed as PIEH, while another 4 patients (4 ears) without cochlear hydrops on MR images were referred to PISD. The interval from the onset of NPC to acute SNHL did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). No significant difference was found between the two disorders from any of the symptomatic, radiotherapeutic, audiological, or vestibular perspective. Interestingly, most (5/6) patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement, while all (4/4) patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction. A significantly declining sequence of abnormality rates in the inner ear test battery was noted in the PIEH patients, running from the audiometry (100%), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test (100%), ocular VEMP test (73%), to the caloric test (36%). However, such declining trend was not observed in patients with PISD. When facing an NPC survivor who had acute SNHL over a prolonged period after irradiation, MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique should be performed to differentiate the PIEH from the PISD, since both disorders have various treatment modalities and hearing outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36265683</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acute sensorineural hearing loss ; Caloric Tests ; Edema ; Endolymphatic Hydrops - diagnostic imaging ; Endolymphatic Hydrops - etiology ; Endolymphatic Hydrops - radiotherapy ; Hearing Loss, Sudden - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss, Sudden - etiology ; Humans ; HYDROPS-Mi2 technique ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; MR imaging ; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH) ; Post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD)</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2022-11, Vol.176, p.222-227</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c9bf750b1e33e1ccfb4b950e028f10c1051b573683896ef2f3ddf9a8b237cd863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c9bf750b1e33e1ccfb4b950e028f10c1051b573683896ef2f3ddf9a8b237cd863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3194-5811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814022045042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tien, Chung-Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Yi-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>•This paper introduced a new disease termed “post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)”.•MR imaging provides a key role for differentiating the PIEH from the post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD).•Most patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement.•Most patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction.•The interval from the onset of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to acute hearing loss did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). Increasing numbers of acute sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are recently experienced in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors. This study adopted MR imaging to differentiate between post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD) and post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH) in long-term NPC survivors with acute SNHL. From 2012 to 2021, consecutive 10 irradiated NPC survivors with acute SNHL were enrolled. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery and MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique. Six patients (11 ears) with positive cochlear hydrops on MR images were diagnosed as PIEH, while another 4 patients (4 ears) without cochlear hydrops on MR images were referred to PISD. The interval from the onset of NPC to acute SNHL did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). No significant difference was found between the two disorders from any of the symptomatic, radiotherapeutic, audiological, or vestibular perspective. Interestingly, most (5/6) patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement, while all (4/4) patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction. A significantly declining sequence of abnormality rates in the inner ear test battery was noted in the PIEH patients, running from the audiometry (100%), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test (100%), ocular VEMP test (73%), to the caloric test (36%). However, such declining trend was not observed in patients with PISD. When facing an NPC survivor who had acute SNHL over a prolonged period after irradiation, MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique should be performed to differentiate the PIEH from the PISD, since both disorders have various treatment modalities and hearing outcome.</description><subject>Acute sensorineural hearing loss</subject><subject>Caloric Tests</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Endolymphatic Hydrops - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endolymphatic Hydrops - etiology</subject><subject>Endolymphatic Hydrops - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sudden - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sudden - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>HYDROPS-Mi2 technique</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>MR imaging</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms</subject><subject>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)</subject><subject>Post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD)</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gcgevew6Sbqb7EWQ4hcW9KDnsJtMaEq7WZNtof_elKoHD56GGZ6ZN3kIuaRQUKDVzbIIjfGdLhgwlkYFUDgiYypFnYOU4piMEyZySacwImcxLgGAARenZMQrVpWV5GPy8ubjkLuQbrlmcL7LsDN-tVv3i9TqbLEzwfcx28Yi6_-icWMMdpnBxnYY4zk5sc0q4sV3nZCPh_v32VM-f318nt3Nc51yh1zXrRUltBQ5R6q1badtXQICk5aCplDSthQ8PU_WFVpmuTG2bmTLuNBGVnxCrg93--A_NxgHtXZR42rVdOg3UTHBRDUtgdOETg-oDj7GgFb1wa2bsFMU1F6jWqqDRrXXuJ8mjWnt6jth067R_C79eEvA7QHA9M-tw6CidthpNC6gHpTx7v-EL36qhkQ</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Tien, Chung-Tang</creator><creator>Chen, Chun-Nan</creator><creator>Young, Yi-Ho</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-5811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness</title><author>Tien, Chung-Tang ; Chen, Chun-Nan ; Young, Yi-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c9bf750b1e33e1ccfb4b950e028f10c1051b573683896ef2f3ddf9a8b237cd863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute sensorineural hearing loss</topic><topic>Caloric Tests</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Endolymphatic Hydrops - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endolymphatic Hydrops - etiology</topic><topic>Endolymphatic Hydrops - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sudden - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sudden - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>HYDROPS-Mi2 technique</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>MR imaging</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms</topic><topic>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)</topic><topic>Post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tien, Chung-Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Yi-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tien, Chung-Tang</au><au>Chen, Chun-Nan</au><au>Young, Yi-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>176</volume><spage>222</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>222-227</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>•This paper introduced a new disease termed “post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)”.•MR imaging provides a key role for differentiating the PIEH from the post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD).•Most patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement.•Most patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction.•The interval from the onset of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to acute hearing loss did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). Increasing numbers of acute sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are recently experienced in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors. This study adopted MR imaging to differentiate between post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD) and post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH) in long-term NPC survivors with acute SNHL. From 2012 to 2021, consecutive 10 irradiated NPC survivors with acute SNHL were enrolled. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery and MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique. Six patients (11 ears) with positive cochlear hydrops on MR images were diagnosed as PIEH, while another 4 patients (4 ears) without cochlear hydrops on MR images were referred to PISD. The interval from the onset of NPC to acute SNHL did not significantly differ between the PIEH (10 ± 6 years) and PISD (8 ± 2 years). No significant difference was found between the two disorders from any of the symptomatic, radiotherapeutic, audiological, or vestibular perspective. Interestingly, most (5/6) patients with PIEH had bilateral involvement, while all (4/4) patients with PISD showed unilateral affliction. A significantly declining sequence of abnormality rates in the inner ear test battery was noted in the PIEH patients, running from the audiometry (100%), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test (100%), ocular VEMP test (73%), to the caloric test (36%). However, such declining trend was not observed in patients with PISD. When facing an NPC survivor who had acute SNHL over a prolonged period after irradiation, MR imaging using HYDROPS-Mi2 technique should be performed to differentiate the PIEH from the PISD, since both disorders have various treatment modalities and hearing outcome.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36265683</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-5811</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8140
ispartof Radiotherapy and oncology, 2022-11, Vol.176, p.222-227
issn 0167-8140
1879-0887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727645031
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acute sensorineural hearing loss
Caloric Tests
Edema
Endolymphatic Hydrops - diagnostic imaging
Endolymphatic Hydrops - etiology
Endolymphatic Hydrops - radiotherapy
Hearing Loss, Sudden - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Sudden - etiology
Humans
HYDROPS-Mi2 technique
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MR imaging
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops (PIEH)
Post-irradiation sudden deafness (PISD)
title Post-irradiation endolymphatic hydrops vs. post-irradiation sudden deafness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-irradiation%20endolymphatic%20hydrops%20vs.%20post-irradiation%20sudden%20deafness&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Tien,%20Chung-Tang&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=176&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=222-227&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727645031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727645031&rft_id=info:pmid/36265683&rft_els_id=S0167814022045042&rfr_iscdi=true