Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study

Aim To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were div...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical pharmacology 2022-12, Vol.78 (12), p.1973-1979
Hauptverfasser: Yekedüz, Emre, Özbay, Mehmet Fatih, Çağlayan, Dilek, Yıldırım, Atila, Erol, Cihan, Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı, Tunç, Sezai, Özyurt, Neslihan, Özdemir, Feyyaz, Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit, Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman, Kılıçkap, Saadettin, Ürün, Yüksel, Yalçın, Şuayib, Artaç, Mehmet, Coşkun, Hasan Şenol, Utkan, Güngör
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1979
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1973
container_title European journal of clinical pharmacology
container_volume 78
creator Yekedüz, Emre
Özbay, Mehmet Fatih
Çağlayan, Dilek
Yıldırım, Atila
Erol, Cihan
Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı
Tunç, Sezai
Özyurt, Neslihan
Özdemir, Feyyaz
Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman
Kılıçkap, Saadettin
Ürün, Yüksel
Yalçın, Şuayib
Artaç, Mehmet
Coşkun, Hasan Şenol
Utkan, Güngör
description Aim To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. Results There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6–37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3–8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6–8.8), p  = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7–3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0–4.0), p  = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77–1.28; p  = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77–1.20, p  = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p  = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. Conclusion This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727643628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2727643628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-7427e51447908ceb2f52be071be8e006c3f08e9185be58bc684f3ce65691f52c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVJIDdJXyArQTfZOB392JazC5cmLQS6addCVsaJgi25kkzJY_SNO-kNFLroZiRmvnM04jB2IeBKAPQfC4CUpqHSgNKgGvGO7YRWshGgxRHbASjRdEMPJ-y0lGcA0Q6gduzXfg4xeDfztFWfFiw8TdynSPdQXax8K_jaWnOqKfJ1W1Ye4lMYQ025cBcfeMbHlN2EMYw04qurAWMt_GeoT3zB6kqllifXOWX0lR7zLnrM19zxZZtpRjxmXur28HLOjic3F3z_dp6x77efvu0_N_df777sb-4br1pZm17LHluhdT-A8TjKqZUjQi9GNAjQeTWBwUGYdsTWjL4zelIeu7YbBKFenbHLgy_97MeGpdolFI_z7CKmrVjZy77TqpOG0A__oM9py5G2I0ppQwtBS5Q8UD6nUjJOds1hcfnFCrCvKdlDSpaK_ZOSFSRSB1EhOD5i_mv9H9VvR-mXag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734835205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yekedüz, Emre ; Özbay, Mehmet Fatih ; Çağlayan, Dilek ; Yıldırım, Atila ; Erol, Cihan ; Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı ; Tunç, Sezai ; Özyurt, Neslihan ; Özdemir, Feyyaz ; Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit ; Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman ; Kılıçkap, Saadettin ; Ürün, Yüksel ; Yalçın, Şuayib ; Artaç, Mehmet ; Coşkun, Hasan Şenol ; Utkan, Güngör</creator><creatorcontrib>Yekedüz, Emre ; Özbay, Mehmet Fatih ; Çağlayan, Dilek ; Yıldırım, Atila ; Erol, Cihan ; Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı ; Tunç, Sezai ; Özyurt, Neslihan ; Özdemir, Feyyaz ; Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit ; Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman ; Kılıçkap, Saadettin ; Ürün, Yüksel ; Yalçın, Şuayib ; Artaç, Mehmet ; Coşkun, Hasan Şenol ; Utkan, Güngör</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. Results There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6–37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3–8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6–8.8), p  = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7–3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0–4.0), p  = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77–1.28; p  = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77–1.20, p  = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p  = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. Conclusion This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Inhibitor drugs ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Proton pump inhibitors ; Response rates ; Statistical analysis ; Survival ; Targeted cancer therapy ; User groups</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022-12, Vol.78 (12), p.1973-1979</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-7427e51447908ceb2f52be071be8e006c3f08e9185be58bc684f3ce65691f52c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-7427e51447908ceb2f52be071be8e006c3f08e9185be58bc684f3ce65691f52c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yekedüz, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özbay, Mehmet Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çağlayan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Atila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erol, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Sezai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özyurt, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Feyyaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçkap, Saadettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ürün, Yüksel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalçın, Şuayib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artaç, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Hasan Şenol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utkan, Güngör</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study</title><title>European journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Aim To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. Results There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6–37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3–8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6–8.8), p  = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7–3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0–4.0), p  = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77–1.28; p  = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77–1.20, p  = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p  = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. Conclusion This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Inhibitor drugs</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Proton pump inhibitors</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>User groups</subject><issn>0031-6970</issn><issn>1432-1041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVJIDdJXyArQTfZOB392JazC5cmLQS6addCVsaJgi25kkzJY_SNO-kNFLroZiRmvnM04jB2IeBKAPQfC4CUpqHSgNKgGvGO7YRWshGgxRHbASjRdEMPJ-y0lGcA0Q6gduzXfg4xeDfztFWfFiw8TdynSPdQXax8K_jaWnOqKfJ1W1Ye4lMYQ025cBcfeMbHlN2EMYw04qurAWMt_GeoT3zB6kqllifXOWX0lR7zLnrM19zxZZtpRjxmXur28HLOjic3F3z_dp6x77efvu0_N_df777sb-4br1pZm17LHluhdT-A8TjKqZUjQi9GNAjQeTWBwUGYdsTWjL4zelIeu7YbBKFenbHLgy_97MeGpdolFI_z7CKmrVjZy77TqpOG0A__oM9py5G2I0ppQwtBS5Q8UD6nUjJOds1hcfnFCrCvKdlDSpaK_ZOSFSRSB1EhOD5i_mv9H9VvR-mXag</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Yekedüz, Emre</creator><creator>Özbay, Mehmet Fatih</creator><creator>Çağlayan, Dilek</creator><creator>Yıldırım, Atila</creator><creator>Erol, Cihan</creator><creator>Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı</creator><creator>Tunç, Sezai</creator><creator>Özyurt, Neslihan</creator><creator>Özdemir, Feyyaz</creator><creator>Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit</creator><creator>Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman</creator><creator>Kılıçkap, Saadettin</creator><creator>Ürün, Yüksel</creator><creator>Yalçın, Şuayib</creator><creator>Artaç, Mehmet</creator><creator>Coşkun, Hasan Şenol</creator><creator>Utkan, Güngör</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study</title><author>Yekedüz, Emre ; Özbay, Mehmet Fatih ; Çağlayan, Dilek ; Yıldırım, Atila ; Erol, Cihan ; Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı ; Tunç, Sezai ; Özyurt, Neslihan ; Özdemir, Feyyaz ; Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit ; Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman ; Kılıçkap, Saadettin ; Ürün, Yüksel ; Yalçın, Şuayib ; Artaç, Mehmet ; Coşkun, Hasan Şenol ; Utkan, Güngör</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-7427e51447908ceb2f52be071be8e006c3f08e9185be58bc684f3ce65691f52c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Inhibitor drugs</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Proton pump inhibitors</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>User groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yekedüz, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özbay, Mehmet Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çağlayan, Dilek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Atila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erol, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Sezai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özyurt, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Feyyaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçkap, Saadettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ürün, Yüksel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalçın, Şuayib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artaç, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Hasan Şenol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utkan, Güngör</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yekedüz, Emre</au><au>Özbay, Mehmet Fatih</au><au>Çağlayan, Dilek</au><au>Yıldırım, Atila</au><au>Erol, Cihan</au><au>Yıldırım, Hasan Çağrı</au><au>Tunç, Sezai</au><au>Özyurt, Neslihan</au><au>Özdemir, Feyyaz</au><au>Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit</au><au>Işıkdoğan, Abdurrahman</au><au>Kılıçkap, Saadettin</au><au>Ürün, Yüksel</au><au>Yalçın, Şuayib</au><au>Artaç, Mehmet</au><au>Coşkun, Hasan Şenol</au><au>Utkan, Güngör</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1973</spage><epage>1979</epage><pages>1973-1979</pages><issn>0031-6970</issn><eissn>1432-1041</eissn><abstract>Aim To compare survival outcomes, response rates, and adverse events (AEs) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) user and non-user patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods We included 272 patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), response rates, and safety. To exclude immortal time bias in survival analyses, we compared PPI non-user patients and all patients. Results There were 141 and 131 patients in the PPI non-user and user groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group. Pantoprazole was the most used PPI. At the median 35.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6–37.9) months follow-up, the median OS was similar in PPI non-user and all patients (6.9 months (95% CI: 5.3–8.5) and 7.7 months (95% CI:6.6–8.8), p  = 0.913). TTF was also similar in PPI non-user and all patients (3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7–3.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0–4.0), p  = 0.661). In multivariable analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between PPI user and non-user groups in OS and TTF (hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77–1.28; p  = 0.963 for OS; HR, 0.93; 0.77–1.20, p  = 0.598 for TTF). The objective response rates (ORR) were similar in the PPI non-user and user groups (19.8% and 16.8%, p  = 0.455). The rates of any grade AEs were also similar in each group. Conclusion This study found no worse outcome in the combined use of PPI and regorafenib among patients with mCRC.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-6970
ispartof European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022-12, Vol.78 (12), p.1973-1979
issn 0031-6970
1432-1041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2727643628
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Clinical outcomes
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Inhibitor drugs
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Proton pump inhibitors
Response rates
Statistical analysis
Survival
Targeted cancer therapy
User groups
title Clinical outcomes of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20concomitant%20use%20of%20proton%20pump%20inhibitors%20and%20regorafenib%20in%20patients%20with%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer:%20a%20multicenter%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Yeked%C3%BCz,%20Emre&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1973&rft.epage=1979&rft.pages=1973-1979&rft.issn=0031-6970&rft.eissn=1432-1041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00228-022-03403-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727643628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734835205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true