A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity
The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in retinal and eye research 2022-11, Vol.91, p.101079-101079, Article 101079 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101079 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101079 |
container_title | Progress in retinal and eye research |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Muni, Rajeev H. Lee, Wei Wei Bansal, Aditya Ramachandran, Arun Hillier, Roxane J. |
description | The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel ways of visualizing and studying the retinal macro and microstructural anatomy following retinal detachment repair.
Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that functional and patient-reported outcomes of retinal reattachment differ with surgical technique, accompanied by differences in anatomic biomarkers of retinal recovery or ‘integrity’. We discuss recent insights into the physiology of retinal reattachment gleaned from multimodal imaging, which shed light on the pathophysiology of various post-operative anatomic abnormalities. The ideal scenario is to achieve retinal reattachment as soon as possible, without retinal displacement, outer retinal folds or discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone, with an intact foveal bulge. To this end, we present an in-depth contemporary account of current concepts and mechanisms involved during retinal reattachment surgery, supported by clinical data and mathematical modelling, awareness of which can help the vitreoretinal surgeon achieve better post-operative outcomes.
In this review we substantiate the case for a paradigm shift in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair; beyond the emphasis on single-operation reattachment rates, and instead striving to maximize functional outcomes using minimally invasive techniques. This can only be achieved if vitreoretinal surgeons embrace all of the available techniques, with individualized selection of surgical approach and the resolute goal of optimizing the ‘integrity’ of retinal reattachment.
•Functional outcomes vary with surgical technique for retinal detachment repair.•Advances in imaging have enabled assessment of the integrity of retinal reattachment.•Structural recovery of photoreceptors differs with variations in surgical technique.•Risk of retinal displacement and outer retinal folds vary with surgical technique.•Retinal pigment epithelium pump based procedures offer the best outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725654687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350946222000398</els_id><sourcerecordid>2725654687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b9a945bd56dc2832bd7330fe135eca924253597c7311f628a18dfe02671ebae43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujEUT_gunRy2I_tt1db2gUTUi84LnptrNQwn7YFhP-vSWgHj3NZPLO-848CGFKppRQeb-ZDh4i7MFDmDLC2GFMiuoMjWlZ8IxKLs5TzwXJqlyyEboKYUMIkaQSl2jEJROcUTlG8xketNfWrVoc1q6J2HU4ebtOb7GFqM26hS6m0aCdf8DLNWDTdwaGiPsmiSOsvIv7a3TR6G2Am1OdoI-X5-XTa7Z4n789zRaZ4UUes7rSVS5qK6Q1rOSstgXnpIF0KRhdsTzdJarCFJzSRrJS09I2QJgsKNQacj5Bd0ffwfefOwhRtS4Y2G51B_0uKFYwIUUuE4UJKo9S4_sQPDRq8K7Vfq8oUQeMaqP-MKoDRnXEmFZvTym7ugX7u_jDLQkejwJIv3458CoYBwmLdR5MVLZ3_6d8A6X2iFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725654687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Muni, Rajeev H. ; Lee, Wei Wei ; Bansal, Aditya ; Ramachandran, Arun ; Hillier, Roxane J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muni, Rajeev H. ; Lee, Wei Wei ; Bansal, Aditya ; Ramachandran, Arun ; Hillier, Roxane J.</creatorcontrib><description>The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel ways of visualizing and studying the retinal macro and microstructural anatomy following retinal detachment repair.
Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that functional and patient-reported outcomes of retinal reattachment differ with surgical technique, accompanied by differences in anatomic biomarkers of retinal recovery or ‘integrity’. We discuss recent insights into the physiology of retinal reattachment gleaned from multimodal imaging, which shed light on the pathophysiology of various post-operative anatomic abnormalities. The ideal scenario is to achieve retinal reattachment as soon as possible, without retinal displacement, outer retinal folds or discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone, with an intact foveal bulge. To this end, we present an in-depth contemporary account of current concepts and mechanisms involved during retinal reattachment surgery, supported by clinical data and mathematical modelling, awareness of which can help the vitreoretinal surgeon achieve better post-operative outcomes.
In this review we substantiate the case for a paradigm shift in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair; beyond the emphasis on single-operation reattachment rates, and instead striving to maximize functional outcomes using minimally invasive techniques. This can only be achieved if vitreoretinal surgeons embrace all of the available techniques, with individualized selection of surgical approach and the resolute goal of optimizing the ‘integrity’ of retinal reattachment.
•Functional outcomes vary with surgical technique for retinal detachment repair.•Advances in imaging have enabled assessment of the integrity of retinal reattachment.•Structural recovery of photoreceptors differs with variations in surgical technique.•Risk of retinal displacement and outer retinal folds vary with surgical technique.•Retinal pigment epithelium pump based procedures offer the best outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-9462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1635</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36253216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Integrity ; Outer retinal folds ; Pneumatic retinopexy ; Retinal detachment ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Retinal displacement ; Scleral buckle ; Scleral Buckling - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy ; Vitrectomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Progress in retinal and eye research, 2022-11, Vol.91, p.101079-101079, Article 101079</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b9a945bd56dc2832bd7330fe135eca924253597c7311f628a18dfe02671ebae43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b9a945bd56dc2832bd7330fe135eca924253597c7311f628a18dfe02671ebae43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muni, Rajeev H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillier, Roxane J.</creatorcontrib><title>A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity</title><title>Progress in retinal and eye research</title><addtitle>Prog Retin Eye Res</addtitle><description>The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel ways of visualizing and studying the retinal macro and microstructural anatomy following retinal detachment repair.
Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that functional and patient-reported outcomes of retinal reattachment differ with surgical technique, accompanied by differences in anatomic biomarkers of retinal recovery or ‘integrity’. We discuss recent insights into the physiology of retinal reattachment gleaned from multimodal imaging, which shed light on the pathophysiology of various post-operative anatomic abnormalities. The ideal scenario is to achieve retinal reattachment as soon as possible, without retinal displacement, outer retinal folds or discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone, with an intact foveal bulge. To this end, we present an in-depth contemporary account of current concepts and mechanisms involved during retinal reattachment surgery, supported by clinical data and mathematical modelling, awareness of which can help the vitreoretinal surgeon achieve better post-operative outcomes.
In this review we substantiate the case for a paradigm shift in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair; beyond the emphasis on single-operation reattachment rates, and instead striving to maximize functional outcomes using minimally invasive techniques. This can only be achieved if vitreoretinal surgeons embrace all of the available techniques, with individualized selection of surgical approach and the resolute goal of optimizing the ‘integrity’ of retinal reattachment.
•Functional outcomes vary with surgical technique for retinal detachment repair.•Advances in imaging have enabled assessment of the integrity of retinal reattachment.•Structural recovery of photoreceptors differs with variations in surgical technique.•Risk of retinal displacement and outer retinal folds vary with surgical technique.•Retinal pigment epithelium pump based procedures offer the best outcomes.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Outer retinal folds</subject><subject>Pneumatic retinopexy</subject><subject>Retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Retinal displacement</subject><subject>Scleral buckle</subject><subject>Scleral Buckling - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Vitrectomy</subject><subject>Vitrectomy - methods</subject><issn>1350-9462</issn><issn>1873-1635</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujEUT_gunRy2I_tt1db2gUTUi84LnptrNQwn7YFhP-vSWgHj3NZPLO-848CGFKppRQeb-ZDh4i7MFDmDLC2GFMiuoMjWlZ8IxKLs5TzwXJqlyyEboKYUMIkaQSl2jEJROcUTlG8xketNfWrVoc1q6J2HU4ebtOb7GFqM26hS6m0aCdf8DLNWDTdwaGiPsmiSOsvIv7a3TR6G2Am1OdoI-X5-XTa7Z4n789zRaZ4UUes7rSVS5qK6Q1rOSstgXnpIF0KRhdsTzdJarCFJzSRrJS09I2QJgsKNQacj5Bd0ffwfefOwhRtS4Y2G51B_0uKFYwIUUuE4UJKo9S4_sQPDRq8K7Vfq8oUQeMaqP-MKoDRnXEmFZvTym7ugX7u_jDLQkejwJIv3458CoYBwmLdR5MVLZ3_6d8A6X2iFw</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Muni, Rajeev H.</creator><creator>Lee, Wei Wei</creator><creator>Bansal, Aditya</creator><creator>Ramachandran, Arun</creator><creator>Hillier, Roxane J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity</title><author>Muni, Rajeev H. ; Lee, Wei Wei ; Bansal, Aditya ; Ramachandran, Arun ; Hillier, Roxane J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-b9a945bd56dc2832bd7330fe135eca924253597c7311f628a18dfe02671ebae43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Outer retinal folds</topic><topic>Pneumatic retinopexy</topic><topic>Retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Retinal displacement</topic><topic>Scleral buckle</topic><topic>Scleral Buckling - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Vitrectomy</topic><topic>Vitrectomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muni, Rajeev H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillier, Roxane J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in retinal and eye research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muni, Rajeev H.</au><au>Lee, Wei Wei</au><au>Bansal, Aditya</au><au>Ramachandran, Arun</au><au>Hillier, Roxane J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity</atitle><jtitle>Progress in retinal and eye research</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Retin Eye Res</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>101079</spage><epage>101079</epage><pages>101079-101079</pages><artnum>101079</artnum><issn>1350-9462</issn><eissn>1873-1635</eissn><abstract>The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel ways of visualizing and studying the retinal macro and microstructural anatomy following retinal detachment repair.
Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that functional and patient-reported outcomes of retinal reattachment differ with surgical technique, accompanied by differences in anatomic biomarkers of retinal recovery or ‘integrity’. We discuss recent insights into the physiology of retinal reattachment gleaned from multimodal imaging, which shed light on the pathophysiology of various post-operative anatomic abnormalities. The ideal scenario is to achieve retinal reattachment as soon as possible, without retinal displacement, outer retinal folds or discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone, with an intact foveal bulge. To this end, we present an in-depth contemporary account of current concepts and mechanisms involved during retinal reattachment surgery, supported by clinical data and mathematical modelling, awareness of which can help the vitreoretinal surgeon achieve better post-operative outcomes.
In this review we substantiate the case for a paradigm shift in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair; beyond the emphasis on single-operation reattachment rates, and instead striving to maximize functional outcomes using minimally invasive techniques. This can only be achieved if vitreoretinal surgeons embrace all of the available techniques, with individualized selection of surgical approach and the resolute goal of optimizing the ‘integrity’ of retinal reattachment.
•Functional outcomes vary with surgical technique for retinal detachment repair.•Advances in imaging have enabled assessment of the integrity of retinal reattachment.•Structural recovery of photoreceptors differs with variations in surgical technique.•Risk of retinal displacement and outer retinal folds vary with surgical technique.•Retinal pigment epithelium pump based procedures offer the best outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36253216</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101079</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-9462 |
ispartof | Progress in retinal and eye research, 2022-11, Vol.91, p.101079-101079, Article 101079 |
issn | 1350-9462 1873-1635 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725654687 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Humans Integrity Outer retinal folds Pneumatic retinopexy Retinal detachment Retinal Detachment - surgery Retinal displacement Scleral buckle Scleral Buckling - methods Treatment Outcome Visual Acuity Vitrectomy Vitrectomy - methods |
title | A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20paradigm%20shift%20in%20retinal%20detachment%20repair:%20The%20concept%20of%20integrity&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20retinal%20and%20eye%20research&rft.au=Muni,%20Rajeev%20H.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=101079&rft.epage=101079&rft.pages=101079-101079&rft.artnum=101079&rft.issn=1350-9462&rft.eissn=1873-1635&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725654687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725654687&rft_id=info:pmid/36253216&rft_els_id=S1350946222000398&rfr_iscdi=true |