Systematic review for deep inspiration breath hold in proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma: A PTCOG Lymphoma Subcommittee report and recommendations
•A systemic review of mediastinal lymphoma studies with dosimetric comparisons involving proton therapy was conducted, with 139 patients.•Proton therapy (FB or DIBH) may improve heart dose, with possibly lower lung, breast, and integral dose as compared to IMRT-DIBH.•Optimal choice of radiation tech...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2022-12, Vol.177, p.21-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A systemic review of mediastinal lymphoma studies with dosimetric comparisons involving proton therapy was conducted, with 139 patients.•Proton therapy (FB or DIBH) may improve heart dose, with possibly lower lung, breast, and integral dose as compared to IMRT-DIBH.•Optimal choice of radiation technique depends on mediastinal distribution of disease and clinic access to advanced technologies.
To systematically review all dosimetric studies investigating the impact of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) compared with free breathing (FB) in mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy as compared to IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy)-DIBH.
We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline using the PubMed database to identify studies of mediastinal lymphoma patients with dosimetric comparisons of proton-FB and/or proton-DIBH with IMRT-DIBH. Parameters included mean heart (MHD), lung (MLD), and breast (MBD) doses, among other parameters. Case reports were excluded. Absolute differences in mean doses > 1 Gy between comparators were considered to be clinically meaningful.
As of April 2021, eight studies fit these criteria (n = 8), with the following comparisons: proton-FB vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 5), proton-DIBH vs proton-FB (n = 5), and proton-DIBH vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 8). When comparing proton-FB with IMRT-DIBH in 5 studies, MHD was reduced with proton-FB in 2 studies, was similar ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.003 |