Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data

A common explanation for processing limitations in dual-tasking is the existence of a bottleneck during response selection, meaning that the selection of responses can only occur serially for different tasks. However, a large body of data shows that features of a (secondary) Task 2 can already influ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2023-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2068-2083
Hauptverfasser: Schonard, Carolin, Ulrich, Rolf, Janczyk, Markus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2083
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2068
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 76
creator Schonard, Carolin
Ulrich, Rolf
Janczyk, Markus
description A common explanation for processing limitations in dual-tasking is the existence of a bottleneck during response selection, meaning that the selection of responses can only occur serially for different tasks. However, a large body of data shows that features of a (secondary) Task 2 can already influence the processing of a (primary) Task 1. Such effects are referred to as backward crosstalk effects (BCEs). In the present study, two types of such BCEs were investigated: the compatibility-based BCE, which depends on the dimensional (often spatial) overlap between task features, and a BCE based on a go/no-go task in Task 2 (no-go BCE). Joining a line of research that suggests different mechanisms for these two types of BCEs, we investigated them using a mouse-tracking setup. Time continuous analyses revealed that the compatibility-based BCE triggered a spatial activation of the Task 2 response early during Task 1 processing, whereas the no-go BCE triggered an inhibitory effect in the case of a no-go Task 2, which spills over to Task 1 execution. This occurred, however, earlier in the time course than expected. The results are discussed with regard to recent models of dual-task processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17470218221135603
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725651279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17470218221135603</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2725651279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-189a3099bb9136af9146db8aba22cc020af7a1799d589a2fcbdadb5aa0e00db53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5etk-xHNt5K8QsEL_W8zGazZdvdzZpkKf33pq0oKF6SmfC8LzN5CblmMGNMiDsmEgGc5ZwzFqcZxCdksn-LgPPs9Ltm-Tm5cG4NkMQiExMyLHU3GIstRTdo5R01NfVbQ_1u0IemRLXZoq2ossY5j-2GNj2tRmwjj27j7um8p9hju3PNQaBM75t-NKOjXTh05G2waPoVrdDjJTmrsXX66uuekvfHh-XiOXp9e3pZzF8jFUvpI5ZLjEHKspQszrCWLMmqMscSOVcKOGAtkAkpqzSQvFZlhVWZIoIGCEU8JbdH38Gaj1E7X3SNU7ptsddhqoILnmYp40IG9OYXujajDRsFKk_zjEMCIlDsSB3-weq6GGzTod0VDIp9BsWfDIJmdtQ4XOkf1_8Fnykth5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858620407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Schonard, Carolin ; Ulrich, Rolf ; Janczyk, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Schonard, Carolin ; Ulrich, Rolf ; Janczyk, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>A common explanation for processing limitations in dual-tasking is the existence of a bottleneck during response selection, meaning that the selection of responses can only occur serially for different tasks. However, a large body of data shows that features of a (secondary) Task 2 can already influence the processing of a (primary) Task 1. Such effects are referred to as backward crosstalk effects (BCEs). In the present study, two types of such BCEs were investigated: the compatibility-based BCE, which depends on the dimensional (often spatial) overlap between task features, and a BCE based on a go/no-go task in Task 2 (no-go BCE). Joining a line of research that suggests different mechanisms for these two types of BCEs, we investigated them using a mouse-tracking setup. Time continuous analyses revealed that the compatibility-based BCE triggered a spatial activation of the Task 2 response early during Task 1 processing, whereas the no-go BCE triggered an inhibitory effect in the case of a no-go Task 2, which spills over to Task 1 execution. This occurred, however, earlier in the time course than expected. The results are discussed with regard to recent models of dual-task processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17470218221135603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2023-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2068-2083</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-189a3099bb9136af9146db8aba22cc020af7a1799d589a2fcbdadb5aa0e00db53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-189a3099bb9136af9146db8aba22cc020af7a1799d589a2fcbdadb5aa0e00db53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7604-7495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17470218221135603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17470218221135603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schonard, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janczyk, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><description>A common explanation for processing limitations in dual-tasking is the existence of a bottleneck during response selection, meaning that the selection of responses can only occur serially for different tasks. However, a large body of data shows that features of a (secondary) Task 2 can already influence the processing of a (primary) Task 1. Such effects are referred to as backward crosstalk effects (BCEs). In the present study, two types of such BCEs were investigated: the compatibility-based BCE, which depends on the dimensional (often spatial) overlap between task features, and a BCE based on a go/no-go task in Task 2 (no-go BCE). Joining a line of research that suggests different mechanisms for these two types of BCEs, we investigated them using a mouse-tracking setup. Time continuous analyses revealed that the compatibility-based BCE triggered a spatial activation of the Task 2 response early during Task 1 processing, whereas the no-go BCE triggered an inhibitory effect in the case of a no-go Task 2, which spills over to Task 1 execution. This occurred, however, earlier in the time course than expected. The results are discussed with regard to recent models of dual-task processing.</description><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5etk-xHNt5K8QsEL_W8zGazZdvdzZpkKf33pq0oKF6SmfC8LzN5CblmMGNMiDsmEgGc5ZwzFqcZxCdksn-LgPPs9Ltm-Tm5cG4NkMQiExMyLHU3GIstRTdo5R01NfVbQ_1u0IemRLXZoq2ossY5j-2GNj2tRmwjj27j7um8p9hju3PNQaBM75t-NKOjXTh05G2waPoVrdDjJTmrsXX66uuekvfHh-XiOXp9e3pZzF8jFUvpI5ZLjEHKspQszrCWLMmqMscSOVcKOGAtkAkpqzSQvFZlhVWZIoIGCEU8JbdH38Gaj1E7X3SNU7ptsddhqoILnmYp40IG9OYXujajDRsFKk_zjEMCIlDsSB3-weq6GGzTod0VDIp9BsWfDIJmdtQ4XOkf1_8Fnykth5c</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Schonard, Carolin</creator><creator>Ulrich, Rolf</creator><creator>Janczyk, Markus</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-7495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data</title><author>Schonard, Carolin ; Ulrich, Rolf ; Janczyk, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-189a3099bb9136af9146db8aba22cc020af7a1799d589a2fcbdadb5aa0e00db53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schonard, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janczyk, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schonard, Carolin</au><au>Ulrich, Rolf</au><au>Janczyk, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2068</spage><epage>2083</epage><pages>2068-2083</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>A common explanation for processing limitations in dual-tasking is the existence of a bottleneck during response selection, meaning that the selection of responses can only occur serially for different tasks. However, a large body of data shows that features of a (secondary) Task 2 can already influence the processing of a (primary) Task 1. Such effects are referred to as backward crosstalk effects (BCEs). In the present study, two types of such BCEs were investigated: the compatibility-based BCE, which depends on the dimensional (often spatial) overlap between task features, and a BCE based on a go/no-go task in Task 2 (no-go BCE). Joining a line of research that suggests different mechanisms for these two types of BCEs, we investigated them using a mouse-tracking setup. Time continuous analyses revealed that the compatibility-based BCE triggered a spatial activation of the Task 2 response early during Task 1 processing, whereas the no-go BCE triggered an inhibitory effect in the case of a no-go Task 2, which spills over to Task 1 execution. This occurred, however, earlier in the time course than expected. The results are discussed with regard to recent models of dual-task processing.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17470218221135603</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-7495</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2023-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2068-2083
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2725651279
source SAGE Complete
title Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20aspects%20of%20two%20types%20of%20backward%20crosstalk%20in%20dual-tasks:%20An%20analysis%20of%20continuous%20mouse-tracking%20data&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Schonard,%20Carolin&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2068&rft.epage=2083&rft.pages=2068-2083&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17470218221135603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725651279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858620407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17470218221135603&rfr_iscdi=true