The Sequential Application of Baveno VII Criteria and VITRO Score Improves Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

Baveno VII proposed liver stiffness measurement (LSM)/platelet count (PLT)-based criteria (‘ruled out,’ LSM ≤15 kPa plus PLT ≥150 G/L; ‘ruled in’: LSM ≥25 kPa) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). However, a substantial proportion of patients remains ‘unclassified.’ Patients with evidence of cACLD (LSM ≥10 kPa) undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement at the Vienna General Hospital 2004 to 2021 (derivation [2004–2016], n = 221; validation [2017–2021], n = 81) were included. The performance of noninvasive tests (NITs) including von Willebrand factor antigen to PLT ratio (VITRO) for the detection of CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg) were evaluated. Overall, viral hepatitis was the predominant (50.7%) etiology, followed by alcoholic liver disease (15.2%) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (13.2%); CSPH prevalence was 62.3%. In the derivation cohort, 45.7% were ‘unclassified’ according to Baveno VII criteria; in this group, VITRO showed an excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of CSPH (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.909; 95% confidence interval, 0.823–0.965). VITRO ≤1.5 and ≥2.5 ruled out (sensitivity, 97.7%; negative predictive value, 97.5%) and ruled in (specificity, 94.7%; positive predictive value, 91.2%), respectively, CSPH in patients who were ‘unclassifiable’ by Baveno VII criteria. The application of a sequential Baveno VII-VITRO algorithm reallocated 73% and 70% of ‘unclassified’ patients to the ‘ruled in’ and ‘ruled out’ group, respectively, while maintaining high sensitivity and negative predictive value and specificity and positive predictive value in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. No patient allocated to the ‘CSPH ruled out’ group by the Baveno VII-VITRO algorithm developed decompensation within 5 years, whereas 5-year decompensation rates were negligible (4%) and substantial (23.9%) among ‘unclassified’ and ‘CSPH ruled in’ patients, respectively. The sequential application of VITRO in patients with cACLD who were ‘unclassifiable’ with regard to CSPH by Baveno VII criteria substantially decreased the number of ‘unclassifiable’ patients to