Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation
Cognitive fatigue (CF) can result from sustained mental effort, is characterized by subjective feelings of exhaustion and cognitive performance deficits, and is associated with slowed simple reaction time (RT). This study determined whether declines in motor preparation underlie this RT effect. Moto...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2022-11, Vol.240 (11), p.3033-3047 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3047 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 3033 |
| container_title | Experimental brain research |
| container_volume | 240 |
| creator | Peters, Kathleen J. Maslovat, Dana Carlsen, Anthony N. |
| description | Cognitive fatigue (CF) can result from sustained mental effort, is characterized by subjective feelings of exhaustion and cognitive performance deficits, and is associated with slowed simple reaction time (RT). This study determined whether declines in motor preparation underlie this RT effect. Motor preparation level was indexed using simple RT and the StartReact effect, wherein a prepared movement is involuntarily triggered at short latency by a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). It was predicted that if decreased motor preparation underlies CF-associated RT increases, then an attenuated StartReact effect would be observed following cognitive task completion. Subjective fatigue assessment and a simple RT task were performed before and after a cognitively fatiguing task or non-fatiguing control intervention. On 25% of RT trials, a SAS replaced the go-signal to assess the StartReact effect. CF inducement was verified by significant declines in cognitive performance (
p
= 0.003), along with increases in subjective CF (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2724582195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A723794459</galeid><sourcerecordid>A723794459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-b96329e172b041a7102946e61e77057027b09d7dad4ebc0ed1b5eb479e95f32c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9klFr1TAUx8NQ8Dr9Aj4FBkMfOpM0bW4ex5g6GAhOn2OannYZaXKXpJt-e9NV2O4QOXBCwu_3JxwOQu8oOaGEiI-JEMZoVVpFWs55RQ_QhvKaVZSS9gXaEEJ5xbdUvkKvU7pZrrUgG_TzyoV76HEEbbINHmc7QcLWYxNGb7O9AzzobMcZsI6AfchY5xxtN2fdOcA54B6Ms361ppBDxLsIOx31EvgGvRy0S_D273mIfnw6_372pbr8-vni7PSyMnzLc9XJtmYSqGAd4VQLSpjkLbQUhCCNIEx0RPai1z2HzhDoaddAx4UE2Qw1M_Uher_m7mK4nSFlNdlkwDntIcxJMcF4s2VUNgU9eobehDn68ruFKiVlIx-pUTtQ1g8hR22WUHUqWC0k5w_UyT-oUj1M1gQPgy3ve8KHPaEwGX7lUc8pqYurb_vs8RP2GrTL1ym4eZlr2gfZCpoYUoowqF20k46_FSVqWRC1LogqTT0siKJFqlcpFdiPEB_H8B_rD0WRuoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727279959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Peters, Kathleen J. ; Maslovat, Dana ; Carlsen, Anthony N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, Kathleen J. ; Maslovat, Dana ; Carlsen, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive fatigue (CF) can result from sustained mental effort, is characterized by subjective feelings of exhaustion and cognitive performance deficits, and is associated with slowed simple reaction time (RT). This study determined whether declines in motor preparation underlie this RT effect. Motor preparation level was indexed using simple RT and the StartReact effect, wherein a prepared movement is involuntarily triggered at short latency by a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). It was predicted that if decreased motor preparation underlies CF-associated RT increases, then an attenuated StartReact effect would be observed following cognitive task completion. Subjective fatigue assessment and a simple RT task were performed before and after a cognitively fatiguing task or non-fatiguing control intervention. On 25% of RT trials, a SAS replaced the go-signal to assess the StartReact effect. CF inducement was verified by significant declines in cognitive performance (
p
= 0.003), along with increases in subjective CF (
p
< 0.001) and control RT (
p
= 0.018) following the cognitive fatigue intervention, but not the control intervention. No significant pre-to-post-test changes in SAS RT were observed, indicating that RT increases resulting from CF are not substantially associated with declines in motor preparation, and instead may be attributable to other stages of processing during a simple RT task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Fatigue ; Latency ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Psychological aspects ; Reaction time task ; Research Article ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2022-11, Vol.240 (11), p.3033-3047</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-b96329e172b041a7102946e61e77057027b09d7dad4ebc0ed1b5eb479e95f32c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-b96329e172b041a7102946e61e77057027b09d7dad4ebc0ed1b5eb479e95f32c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6015-8991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, Kathleen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslovat, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><title>Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Cognitive fatigue (CF) can result from sustained mental effort, is characterized by subjective feelings of exhaustion and cognitive performance deficits, and is associated with slowed simple reaction time (RT). This study determined whether declines in motor preparation underlie this RT effect. Motor preparation level was indexed using simple RT and the StartReact effect, wherein a prepared movement is involuntarily triggered at short latency by a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). It was predicted that if decreased motor preparation underlies CF-associated RT increases, then an attenuated StartReact effect would be observed following cognitive task completion. Subjective fatigue assessment and a simple RT task were performed before and after a cognitively fatiguing task or non-fatiguing control intervention. On 25% of RT trials, a SAS replaced the go-signal to assess the StartReact effect. CF inducement was verified by significant declines in cognitive performance (
p
= 0.003), along with increases in subjective CF (
p
< 0.001) and control RT (
p
= 0.018) following the cognitive fatigue intervention, but not the control intervention. No significant pre-to-post-test changes in SAS RT were observed, indicating that RT increases resulting from CF are not substantially associated with declines in motor preparation, and instead may be attributable to other stages of processing during a simple RT task.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Reaction time task</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9klFr1TAUx8NQ8Dr9Aj4FBkMfOpM0bW4ex5g6GAhOn2OannYZaXKXpJt-e9NV2O4QOXBCwu_3JxwOQu8oOaGEiI-JEMZoVVpFWs55RQ_QhvKaVZSS9gXaEEJ5xbdUvkKvU7pZrrUgG_TzyoV76HEEbbINHmc7QcLWYxNGb7O9AzzobMcZsI6AfchY5xxtN2fdOcA54B6Ms361ppBDxLsIOx31EvgGvRy0S_D273mIfnw6_372pbr8-vni7PSyMnzLc9XJtmYSqGAd4VQLSpjkLbQUhCCNIEx0RPai1z2HzhDoaddAx4UE2Qw1M_Uher_m7mK4nSFlNdlkwDntIcxJMcF4s2VUNgU9eobehDn68ruFKiVlIx-pUTtQ1g8hR22WUHUqWC0k5w_UyT-oUj1M1gQPgy3ve8KHPaEwGX7lUc8pqYurb_vs8RP2GrTL1ym4eZlr2gfZCpoYUoowqF20k46_FSVqWRC1LogqTT0siKJFqlcpFdiPEB_H8B_rD0WRuoA</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Peters, Kathleen J.</creator><creator>Maslovat, Dana</creator><creator>Carlsen, Anthony N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-8991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation</title><author>Peters, Kathleen J. ; Maslovat, Dana ; Carlsen, Anthony N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-b96329e172b041a7102946e61e77057027b09d7dad4ebc0ed1b5eb479e95f32c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Reaction time task</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, Kathleen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslovat, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, Kathleen J.</au><au>Maslovat, Dana</au><au>Carlsen, Anthony N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>240</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3033</spage><epage>3047</epage><pages>3033-3047</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Cognitive fatigue (CF) can result from sustained mental effort, is characterized by subjective feelings of exhaustion and cognitive performance deficits, and is associated with slowed simple reaction time (RT). This study determined whether declines in motor preparation underlie this RT effect. Motor preparation level was indexed using simple RT and the StartReact effect, wherein a prepared movement is involuntarily triggered at short latency by a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). It was predicted that if decreased motor preparation underlies CF-associated RT increases, then an attenuated StartReact effect would be observed following cognitive task completion. Subjective fatigue assessment and a simple RT task were performed before and after a cognitively fatiguing task or non-fatiguing control intervention. On 25% of RT trials, a SAS replaced the go-signal to assess the StartReact effect. CF inducement was verified by significant declines in cognitive performance (
p
= 0.003), along with increases in subjective CF (
p
< 0.001) and control RT (
p
= 0.018) following the cognitive fatigue intervention, but not the control intervention. No significant pre-to-post-test changes in SAS RT were observed, indicating that RT increases resulting from CF are not substantially associated with declines in motor preparation, and instead may be attributable to other stages of processing during a simple RT task.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-8991</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
| ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2022-11, Vol.240 (11), p.3033-3047 |
| issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2724582195 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cognition Cognitive ability Fatigue Latency Neurology Neurosciences Psychological aspects Reaction time task Research Article Risk factors |
| title | Slowed reaction times in cognitive fatigue are not attributable to declines in motor preparation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slowed%20reaction%20times%20in%20cognitive%20fatigue%20are%20not%20attributable%20to%20declines%20in%20motor%20preparation&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Peters,%20Kathleen%20J.&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=240&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3033&rft.epage=3047&rft.pages=3033-3047&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-022-06444-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA723794459%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727279959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A723794459&rfr_iscdi=true |