Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum

Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of adhesion and adhesives 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436
Hauptverfasser: Nesbitt, Stephanie L., A. Emerson, John, Bell, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 6
container_start_page 429
container_title International journal of adhesion and adhesives
container_volume 20
creator Nesbitt, Stephanie L.
A. Emerson, John
Bell, James P.
description Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27239190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0143749600000105</els_id><sourcerecordid>27239190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-glAQRBfVk6ZpGzcig5eBARfqOqTp6Uykk4xJqvj2di7M1tU5i-8_l4-Qcwo3FGhx-wY0Z2mZi-IK4BoAKKT8gIxoVYoUaFYektEeOSYnIXwOTAk5G5HpxPWrzth5ouZoYxJi3xgMd4lHpaNxNnFtEhfGdal2Nipj1yyGiD4kPyYuEtX1S2P75Sk5alUX8GxXx-Tj6fF98pLOXp-nk4dZqllRxLShvK0zVEIXJRM5LbDUvBV51WQ5q7HWTVbVFULNq4wrXQ8dVRxFK1SlkBVsTC63c1feffXDJXJpgsauUxZdH2RWZkxQAQPIt6D2LgSPrVx5s1T-V1KQa3FyI06urUgAuREn-ZC72C1QQauu9cpqE_bhimcg2EDdbykcfv026GXQBq3GxnjUUTbO_LPnD3YNgtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27239190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-7496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJAADK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesive bonding ; Applied sciences ; B.Aluminum ; Coupling agents ; Epoxy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects ; Mercaptoesters ; Metals. Metallurgy</subject><ispartof>International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=852093$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Emerson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><title>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</title><description>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</description><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>B.Aluminum</subject><subject>Coupling agents</subject><subject>Epoxy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</subject><subject>Mercaptoesters</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><issn>0143-7496</issn><issn>1879-0127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-glAQRBfVk6ZpGzcig5eBARfqOqTp6Uykk4xJqvj2di7M1tU5i-8_l4-Qcwo3FGhx-wY0Z2mZi-IK4BoAKKT8gIxoVYoUaFYektEeOSYnIXwOTAk5G5HpxPWrzth5ouZoYxJi3xgMd4lHpaNxNnFtEhfGdal2Nipj1yyGiD4kPyYuEtX1S2P75Sk5alUX8GxXx-Tj6fF98pLOXp-nk4dZqllRxLShvK0zVEIXJRM5LbDUvBV51WQ5q7HWTVbVFULNq4wrXQ8dVRxFK1SlkBVsTC63c1feffXDJXJpgsauUxZdH2RWZkxQAQPIt6D2LgSPrVx5s1T-V1KQa3FyI06urUgAuREn-ZC72C1QQauu9cpqE_bhimcg2EDdbykcfv026GXQBq3GxnjUUTbO_LPnD3YNgtY</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creator><creator>A. Emerson, John</creator><creator>Bell, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><author>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>B.Aluminum</topic><topic>Coupling agents</topic><topic>Epoxy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</topic><topic>Mercaptoesters</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Emerson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</au><au>A. Emerson, John</au><au>Bell, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</atitle><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>429-436</pages><issn>0143-7496</issn><eissn>1879-0127</eissn><coden>IJAADK</coden><abstract>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-7496
ispartof International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436
issn 0143-7496
1879-0127
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27239190
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adhesive bonding
Applied sciences
B.Aluminum
Coupling agents
Epoxy
Exact sciences and technology
Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects
Mercaptoesters
Metals. Metallurgy
title Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coupling%20agent%20studies:%20reaction%20of%20thiol-containing%20esters%20with%20aluminum&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20adhesion%20and%20adhesives&rft.au=Nesbitt,%20Stephanie%20L.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=429-436&rft.issn=0143-7496&rft.eissn=1879-0127&rft.coden=IJAADK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27239190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27239190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0143749600000105&rfr_iscdi=true