Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum
Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of adhesion and adhesives 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | International journal of adhesion and adhesives |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Nesbitt, Stephanie L. A. Emerson, John Bell, James P. |
description | Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27239190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0143749600000105</els_id><sourcerecordid>27239190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-glAQRBfVk6ZpGzcig5eBARfqOqTp6Uykk4xJqvj2di7M1tU5i-8_l4-Qcwo3FGhx-wY0Z2mZi-IK4BoAKKT8gIxoVYoUaFYektEeOSYnIXwOTAk5G5HpxPWrzth5ouZoYxJi3xgMd4lHpaNxNnFtEhfGdal2Nipj1yyGiD4kPyYuEtX1S2P75Sk5alUX8GxXx-Tj6fF98pLOXp-nk4dZqllRxLShvK0zVEIXJRM5LbDUvBV51WQ5q7HWTVbVFULNq4wrXQ8dVRxFK1SlkBVsTC63c1feffXDJXJpgsauUxZdH2RWZkxQAQPIt6D2LgSPrVx5s1T-V1KQa3FyI06urUgAuREn-ZC72C1QQauu9cpqE_bhimcg2EDdbykcfv026GXQBq3GxnjUUTbO_LPnD3YNgtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27239190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-7496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJAADK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesive bonding ; Applied sciences ; B.Aluminum ; Coupling agents ; Epoxy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects ; Mercaptoesters ; Metals. Metallurgy</subject><ispartof>International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=852093$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Emerson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><title>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</title><description>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</description><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>B.Aluminum</subject><subject>Coupling agents</subject><subject>Epoxy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</subject><subject>Mercaptoesters</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><issn>0143-7496</issn><issn>1879-0127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-glAQRBfVk6ZpGzcig5eBARfqOqTp6Uykk4xJqvj2di7M1tU5i-8_l4-Qcwo3FGhx-wY0Z2mZi-IK4BoAKKT8gIxoVYoUaFYektEeOSYnIXwOTAk5G5HpxPWrzth5ouZoYxJi3xgMd4lHpaNxNnFtEhfGdal2Nipj1yyGiD4kPyYuEtX1S2P75Sk5alUX8GxXx-Tj6fF98pLOXp-nk4dZqllRxLShvK0zVEIXJRM5LbDUvBV51WQ5q7HWTVbVFULNq4wrXQ8dVRxFK1SlkBVsTC63c1feffXDJXJpgsauUxZdH2RWZkxQAQPIt6D2LgSPrVx5s1T-V1KQa3FyI06urUgAuREn-ZC72C1QQauu9cpqE_bhimcg2EDdbykcfv026GXQBq3GxnjUUTbO_LPnD3YNgtY</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creator><creator>A. Emerson, John</creator><creator>Bell, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</title><author>Nesbitt, Stephanie L. ; A. Emerson, John ; Bell, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d15fb2ea9c6739416e7c5f948d243bebcd28b8e0b5825acbe0b1a5e9f9a8ae363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>B.Aluminum</topic><topic>Coupling agents</topic><topic>Epoxy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</topic><topic>Mercaptoesters</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Emerson, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nesbitt, Stephanie L.</au><au>A. Emerson, John</au><au>Bell, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum</atitle><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>429-436</pages><issn>0143-7496</issn><eissn>1879-0127</eissn><coden>IJAADK</coden><abstract>Double cantilever beam experiments performed by Joseph et al. showed increases in strain energy release rate and cohesive failure for mercaptoester-treated aluminum substrates as compared to untreated controls. This paper presents evaluation of the mercaptoester–aluminum reactivity as a first step toward assessing the effectiveness of incorporating the mercaptoester functionality into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy-aluminum bond system. Grazing-angle infrared spectroscopy and XPS of mercaptoester-treated solid aluminum substrates did not show evidence of a mercaptoester/aluminum reaction. The reaction was also attempted in solution where potential spatial limitations associated with the solid surface were eliminated. IR and NMR showed no evidence of reactivity between the mercaptoester and aluminum ions in solution. Theoretically, the Hard–Soft Acid–Base Theory, in conjunction with the Mison equation, does not support a mercaptoester–aluminum reaction. Thus incorporating a mercaptoester into a polymeric coupling agent for an epoxy–aluminum bond system would not result in chemical bonding. In addition, no significant reaction between thiols and aluminum in general, in the presence of water and moist air, is expected.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-7496 |
ispartof | International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2000, Vol.20 (6), p.429-436 |
issn | 0143-7496 1879-0127 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27239190 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adhesive bonding Applied sciences B.Aluminum Coupling agents Epoxy Exact sciences and technology Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects Mercaptoesters Metals. Metallurgy |
title | Coupling agent studies: reaction of thiol-containing esters with aluminum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coupling%20agent%20studies:%20reaction%20of%20thiol-containing%20esters%20with%20aluminum&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20adhesion%20and%20adhesives&rft.au=Nesbitt,%20Stephanie%20L.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=429-436&rft.issn=0143-7496&rft.eissn=1879-0127&rft.coden=IJAADK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00010-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27239190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27239190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0143749600000105&rfr_iscdi=true |