Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance
Importance Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA health forum 2022-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e220326-e220326 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e220326 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | e220326 |
| container_title | JAMA health forum |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Bull, Claudia Teede, Helena Watson, Diane Callander, Emily J. |
| description | Importance Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. Observations The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. Conclusions and Relevance This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723814800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2665547045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c070fbc1a481c6a212285fcd87ab54cbff059f6948c51fab808efd2286e685693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhhdRsKjvEPHiZesku8lmj0XUCkqL1XPIphNt2WzWJAv27d1WD-JpfmY-hh--LLukMKUA9Garnf5A3aYP68PgpgwYm0LBxFE2YULWOVApjv_k0-wixi0AME6pqIpJ5lfYokmb7p3obk0eXd-iw-6wWOq0GWP-gr0PCddkMSTjHR7Iu68ew3g2SJ5RxyFgJMmTWYwYI5kfWpHVLiZ0ZIlhLOj0CJ9nJ1a3ES9-51n2dn_3ejvPnxYPj7ezp9wUVZFyAxXYxlBdSmqEZpQxya1Zy0o3vDSNtcBrK-pSGk6tbiRItOsREigkF3Vxll3__O2D_xwwJuU20WDb6g79EBWrWCFpKQFG9OofuvVD6MZ2ignBeVlByUeq_qFM8DEGtKoPG6fDTlFQexvqnw21t6H2NopvUV6D1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665547045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bull, Claudia ; Teede, Helena ; Watson, Diane ; Callander, Emily J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bull, Claudia ; Teede, Helena ; Watson, Diane ; Callander, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><description>Importance Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. Observations The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. Conclusions and Relevance This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Health care ; Patient satisfaction ; Quality improvement ; Quality of care ; Quantitative psychology ; Self report</subject><ispartof>JAMA health forum, 2022-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e220326-e220326</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c070fbc1a481c6a212285fcd87ab54cbff059f6948c51fab808efd2286e685693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c070fbc1a481c6a212285fcd87ab54cbff059f6948c51fab808efd2286e685693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bull, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teede, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callander, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance</title><title>JAMA health forum</title><description>Importance Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. Observations The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. Conclusions and Relevance This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Self report</subject><issn>2689-0186</issn><issn>2689-0186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhhdRsKjvEPHiZesku8lmj0XUCkqL1XPIphNt2WzWJAv27d1WD-JpfmY-hh--LLukMKUA9Garnf5A3aYP68PgpgwYm0LBxFE2YULWOVApjv_k0-wixi0AME6pqIpJ5lfYokmb7p3obk0eXd-iw-6wWOq0GWP-gr0PCddkMSTjHR7Iu68ew3g2SJ5RxyFgJMmTWYwYI5kfWpHVLiZ0ZIlhLOj0CJ9nJ1a3ES9-51n2dn_3ejvPnxYPj7ezp9wUVZFyAxXYxlBdSmqEZpQxya1Zy0o3vDSNtcBrK-pSGk6tbiRItOsREigkF3Vxll3__O2D_xwwJuU20WDb6g79EBWrWCFpKQFG9OofuvVD6MZ2ignBeVlByUeq_qFM8DEGtKoPG6fDTlFQexvqnw21t6H2NopvUV6D1Q</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Bull, Claudia</creator><creator>Teede, Helena</creator><creator>Watson, Diane</creator><creator>Callander, Emily J.</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance</title><author>Bull, Claudia ; Teede, Helena ; Watson, Diane ; Callander, Emily J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c070fbc1a481c6a212285fcd87ab54cbff059f6948c51fab808efd2286e685693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Self report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bull, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teede, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callander, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bull, Claudia</au><au>Teede, Helena</au><au>Watson, Diane</au><au>Callander, Emily J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance</atitle><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e220326</spage><epage>e220326</epage><pages>e220326-e220326</pages><issn>2689-0186</issn><eissn>2689-0186</eissn><abstract>Importance Psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating quality and performance across health services and systems. However, the adoption and implementation of PROMs and PREMs remain a challenge in many countries. The aim of this guide is to support instrument selection and implementation to measure health system performance. Observations The guide is split into 3 step-by-step sections. Step 1: Knowing What to Measure discusses what PROMs and PREMs capture and how they differ from related instruments. Step 2: Choosing the Right Instrument describes the critical psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, and provides resources to support instrument selection and evaluation. Step 3: Mitigating Potential PROM and PREM Implementation Barriers outlines key barriers and supports for instrument implementation at system, service, and individual levels. Conclusions and Relevance This guide aims to provide practical resources for the identification of psychometrically robust PROMs and PREMs, as well as support for their implementation to drive improvements across health systems globally.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><doi>10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2689-0186 |
| ispartof | JAMA health forum, 2022-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e220326-e220326 |
| issn | 2689-0186 2689-0186 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723814800 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Clinical outcomes Health care Patient satisfaction Quality improvement Quality of care Quantitative psychology Self report |
| title | Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20and%20Implementing%20Patient-Reported%20Outcome%20and%20Experience%20Measures%20to%20Assess%20Health%20System%20Performance&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20health%20forum&rft.au=Bull,%20Claudia&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e220326&rft.epage=e220326&rft.pages=e220326-e220326&rft.issn=2689-0186&rft.eissn=2689-0186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2665547045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665547045&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |