The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes
Objective To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). Materials and Methods A three‐stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope‐ and user‐related parameters used to evaluate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2023-04, Vol.131 (4), p.494-502 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 502 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 494 |
| container_title | BJU international |
| container_volume | 131 |
| creator | Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. Hendriks, Nora Baard, Joyce Wiseman, Oliver J. Scotland, Kymora B. Somani, Bhaskar K. Şener, Tarik E. Emiliani, Esteban Dragos, Laurian B. Villa, Luca Talso, Michele Bin Hamri, Saeed Proietti, Silvia Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier Chew, Ben H. Eisner, Brian H. Monga, Manoj Hsi, Ryan S. Stern, Karen L. Leavitt, David A. Rivera, Marcelino Wollin, Daniel A. Borofsky, Michael Canvasser, Noah E. Ingimarsson, Johann P. El Tayeb, Marawan M. Bhojani, Naeem Gadzhiev, Nariman Tailly, Thomas Durutovic, Otas Nagele, Udo Skolarikos, Andreas Schout, Barbara M.A. Beerlage, Harrie P. Pelger, Rob C.M. Kamphuis, Guido M. |
| description | Objective
To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS).
Materials and Methods
A three‐stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope‐ and user‐related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two‐step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement.
Results
The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories.
Conclusion
This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS – The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bju.15916 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723155664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-30abadc60525d5a6702088eb097e346bb1febda4b06d2fd63b0446612ae7e2743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOwzAUhi0E4j7wAsgSCwwFO06chI07RZVgaCW2yI5PwJVrFzvhsvEI7LwdT4KhwADCy7F-ffrP5Udog5JdGt-eHHe7NCspn0PLNOVpL6Xkev77T0q-hFZCGBMSBZ4toiXGE1IQxpbR6_AW8MjqxvkJvvFCaXuDW-cGOCq4MfDYlwZw56EF7zxYF2p3BQFvD0eD_tXb80uEzc4-FvgYzPRW49rZADZ0AU-9G0PdYmdxaIVVwisdQGG4F6YTrY66az576L89phDW0EIjTID1r7qKRqcnw6Pz3uDyrH90MOjVrCh4jxEhhao5yZJMZYLnJC5XgCRlDizlUtIGpBKpJFwljeJMkjTegSYCckjylK2i7ZlvHPiug9BWEx1qMEZYcF2okjxhNMs4_0C3fqFj13kbp4tUUeRFmeVlpHZmVO1dCB6aaur1RPinipLqI7EqJlZ9JhbZzS_HTk5A_ZDfEUVgbwY8aANP_ztVhxejmeU7Z6SjNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788789579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. ; Hendriks, Nora ; Baard, Joyce ; Wiseman, Oliver J. ; Scotland, Kymora B. ; Somani, Bhaskar K. ; Şener, Tarik E. ; Emiliani, Esteban ; Dragos, Laurian B. ; Villa, Luca ; Talso, Michele ; Bin Hamri, Saeed ; Proietti, Silvia ; Doizi, Steeve ; Traxer, Olivier ; Chew, Ben H. ; Eisner, Brian H. ; Monga, Manoj ; Hsi, Ryan S. ; Stern, Karen L. ; Leavitt, David A. ; Rivera, Marcelino ; Wollin, Daniel A. ; Borofsky, Michael ; Canvasser, Noah E. ; Ingimarsson, Johann P. ; El Tayeb, Marawan M. ; Bhojani, Naeem ; Gadzhiev, Nariman ; Tailly, Thomas ; Durutovic, Otas ; Nagele, Udo ; Skolarikos, Andreas ; Schout, Barbara M.A. ; Beerlage, Harrie P. ; Pelger, Rob C.M. ; Kamphuis, Guido M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. ; Hendriks, Nora ; Baard, Joyce ; Wiseman, Oliver J. ; Scotland, Kymora B. ; Somani, Bhaskar K. ; Şener, Tarik E. ; Emiliani, Esteban ; Dragos, Laurian B. ; Villa, Luca ; Talso, Michele ; Bin Hamri, Saeed ; Proietti, Silvia ; Doizi, Steeve ; Traxer, Olivier ; Chew, Ben H. ; Eisner, Brian H. ; Monga, Manoj ; Hsi, Ryan S. ; Stern, Karen L. ; Leavitt, David A. ; Rivera, Marcelino ; Wollin, Daniel A. ; Borofsky, Michael ; Canvasser, Noah E. ; Ingimarsson, Johann P. ; El Tayeb, Marawan M. ; Bhojani, Naeem ; Gadzhiev, Nariman ; Tailly, Thomas ; Durutovic, Otas ; Nagele, Udo ; Skolarikos, Andreas ; Schout, Barbara M.A. ; Beerlage, Harrie P. ; Pelger, Rob C.M. ; Kamphuis, Guido M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS).
Materials and Methods
A three‐stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope‐ and user‐related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two‐step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement.
Results
The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories.
Conclusion
This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS – The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.15916</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36208033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Delphi consensus ; Delphi Technique ; endourology ; evaluation ; flexible ureterorenoscope ; Humans ; Kidney ; quality assessment ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tulipa ; Urology ; UroStone</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2023-04, Vol.131 (4), p.494-502</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-30abadc60525d5a6702088eb097e346bb1febda4b06d2fd63b0446612ae7e2743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-30abadc60525d5a6702088eb097e346bb1febda4b06d2fd63b0446612ae7e2743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4605-6283 ; 0000-0003-0085-7680 ; 0000-0003-0749-3859 ; 0000-0002-8277-0046 ; 0000-0002-6248-6478 ; 0000-0002-8891-4100 ; 0000-0002-5315-0710 ; 0000-0001-9925-2280 ; 0000-0003-2679-2635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.15916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.15916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baard, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Oliver J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scotland, Kymora B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somani, Bhaskar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şener, Tarik E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emiliani, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Laurian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talso, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hamri, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proietti, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doizi, Steeve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traxer, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Ben H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisner, Brian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monga, Manoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Ryan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavitt, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, Marcelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollin, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borofsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canvasser, Noah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingimarsson, Johann P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tayeb, Marawan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhojani, Naeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadzhiev, Nariman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutovic, Otas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagele, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skolarikos, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schout, Barbara M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beerlage, Harrie P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger, Rob C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphuis, Guido M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objective
To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS).
Materials and Methods
A three‐stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope‐ and user‐related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two‐step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement.
Results
The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories.
Conclusion
This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS – The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Delphi consensus</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>endourology</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>flexible ureterorenoscope</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>quality assessment</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tulipa</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>UroStone</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOwzAUhi0E4j7wAsgSCwwFO06chI07RZVgaCW2yI5PwJVrFzvhsvEI7LwdT4KhwADCy7F-ffrP5Udog5JdGt-eHHe7NCspn0PLNOVpL6Xkev77T0q-hFZCGBMSBZ4toiXGE1IQxpbR6_AW8MjqxvkJvvFCaXuDW-cGOCq4MfDYlwZw56EF7zxYF2p3BQFvD0eD_tXb80uEzc4-FvgYzPRW49rZADZ0AU-9G0PdYmdxaIVVwisdQGG4F6YTrY66az576L89phDW0EIjTID1r7qKRqcnw6Pz3uDyrH90MOjVrCh4jxEhhao5yZJMZYLnJC5XgCRlDizlUtIGpBKpJFwljeJMkjTegSYCckjylK2i7ZlvHPiug9BWEx1qMEZYcF2okjxhNMs4_0C3fqFj13kbp4tUUeRFmeVlpHZmVO1dCB6aaur1RPinipLqI7EqJlZ9JhbZzS_HTk5A_ZDfEUVgbwY8aANP_ztVhxejmeU7Z6SjNw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L.</creator><creator>Hendriks, Nora</creator><creator>Baard, Joyce</creator><creator>Wiseman, Oliver J.</creator><creator>Scotland, Kymora B.</creator><creator>Somani, Bhaskar K.</creator><creator>Şener, Tarik E.</creator><creator>Emiliani, Esteban</creator><creator>Dragos, Laurian B.</creator><creator>Villa, Luca</creator><creator>Talso, Michele</creator><creator>Bin Hamri, Saeed</creator><creator>Proietti, Silvia</creator><creator>Doizi, Steeve</creator><creator>Traxer, Olivier</creator><creator>Chew, Ben H.</creator><creator>Eisner, Brian H.</creator><creator>Monga, Manoj</creator><creator>Hsi, Ryan S.</creator><creator>Stern, Karen L.</creator><creator>Leavitt, David A.</creator><creator>Rivera, Marcelino</creator><creator>Wollin, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Borofsky, Michael</creator><creator>Canvasser, Noah E.</creator><creator>Ingimarsson, Johann P.</creator><creator>El Tayeb, Marawan M.</creator><creator>Bhojani, Naeem</creator><creator>Gadzhiev, Nariman</creator><creator>Tailly, Thomas</creator><creator>Durutovic, Otas</creator><creator>Nagele, Udo</creator><creator>Skolarikos, Andreas</creator><creator>Schout, Barbara M.A.</creator><creator>Beerlage, Harrie P.</creator><creator>Pelger, Rob C.M.</creator><creator>Kamphuis, Guido M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-3859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-4100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-0710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-2280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-2635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes</title><author>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L. ; Hendriks, Nora ; Baard, Joyce ; Wiseman, Oliver J. ; Scotland, Kymora B. ; Somani, Bhaskar K. ; Şener, Tarik E. ; Emiliani, Esteban ; Dragos, Laurian B. ; Villa, Luca ; Talso, Michele ; Bin Hamri, Saeed ; Proietti, Silvia ; Doizi, Steeve ; Traxer, Olivier ; Chew, Ben H. ; Eisner, Brian H. ; Monga, Manoj ; Hsi, Ryan S. ; Stern, Karen L. ; Leavitt, David A. ; Rivera, Marcelino ; Wollin, Daniel A. ; Borofsky, Michael ; Canvasser, Noah E. ; Ingimarsson, Johann P. ; El Tayeb, Marawan M. ; Bhojani, Naeem ; Gadzhiev, Nariman ; Tailly, Thomas ; Durutovic, Otas ; Nagele, Udo ; Skolarikos, Andreas ; Schout, Barbara M.A. ; Beerlage, Harrie P. ; Pelger, Rob C.M. ; Kamphuis, Guido M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-30abadc60525d5a6702088eb097e346bb1febda4b06d2fd63b0446612ae7e2743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Delphi consensus</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>endourology</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>flexible ureterorenoscope</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>quality assessment</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tulipa</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>UroStone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baard, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Oliver J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scotland, Kymora B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somani, Bhaskar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şener, Tarik E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emiliani, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Laurian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talso, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Hamri, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proietti, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doizi, Steeve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traxer, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Ben H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisner, Brian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monga, Manoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Ryan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavitt, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, Marcelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollin, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borofsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canvasser, Noah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingimarsson, Johann P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tayeb, Marawan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhojani, Naeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadzhiev, Nariman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutovic, Otas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagele, Udo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skolarikos, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schout, Barbara M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beerlage, Harrie P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelger, Rob C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphuis, Guido M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderickx, Michaël M.E.L.</au><au>Hendriks, Nora</au><au>Baard, Joyce</au><au>Wiseman, Oliver J.</au><au>Scotland, Kymora B.</au><au>Somani, Bhaskar K.</au><au>Şener, Tarik E.</au><au>Emiliani, Esteban</au><au>Dragos, Laurian B.</au><au>Villa, Luca</au><au>Talso, Michele</au><au>Bin Hamri, Saeed</au><au>Proietti, Silvia</au><au>Doizi, Steeve</au><au>Traxer, Olivier</au><au>Chew, Ben H.</au><au>Eisner, Brian H.</au><au>Monga, Manoj</au><au>Hsi, Ryan S.</au><au>Stern, Karen L.</au><au>Leavitt, David A.</au><au>Rivera, Marcelino</au><au>Wollin, Daniel A.</au><au>Borofsky, Michael</au><au>Canvasser, Noah E.</au><au>Ingimarsson, Johann P.</au><au>El Tayeb, Marawan M.</au><au>Bhojani, Naeem</au><au>Gadzhiev, Nariman</au><au>Tailly, Thomas</au><au>Durutovic, Otas</au><au>Nagele, Udo</au><au>Skolarikos, Andreas</au><au>Schout, Barbara M.A.</au><au>Beerlage, Harrie P.</au><au>Pelger, Rob C.M.</au><au>Kamphuis, Guido M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>494-502</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS).
Materials and Methods
A three‐stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope‐ and user‐related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two‐step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement.
Results
The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories.
Conclusion
This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS – The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36208033</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.15916</doi><tpages>502</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-3859</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-4100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-0710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-2280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-2635</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
| ispartof | BJU international, 2023-04, Vol.131 (4), p.494-502 |
| issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155664 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Consensus Delphi consensus Delphi Technique endourology evaluation flexible ureterorenoscope Humans Kidney quality assessment Questionnaires Response rates Surveys and Questionnaires Tulipa Urology UroStone |
| title | The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP‐tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A07%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Uniform%20grading%20tooL%20for%20flexIble%20ureterorenoscoPes%20(TULIP%E2%80%90tool):%20a%20Delphi%20consensus%20project%20on%20standardised%20evaluation%20of%20flexible%20ureterorenoscopes&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Henderickx,%20Micha%C3%ABl%20M.E.L.&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=494-502&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.15916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2723155664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788789579&rft_id=info:pmid/36208033&rfr_iscdi=true |