Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study

Purpose Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approache...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2022-12, Vol.196 (3), p.613-622
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Qiufan, Luo, Hanjia, Xia, Wen, Lu, Qianyi, Jiang, Kuikui, Hong, Ruoxi, Xu, Fei, Wang, Shusen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 622
container_issue 3
container_start_page 613
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 196
creator Zheng, Qiufan
Luo, Hanjia
Xia, Wen
Lu, Qianyi
Jiang, Kuikui
Hong, Ruoxi
Xu, Fei
Wang, Shusen
description Purpose Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. Methods We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. Results We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. Conclusion We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A725053487</galeid><sourcerecordid>A725053487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-618f36e054f14af36123a8604b228e22050ae5813252941446cfb4bd506a60903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBThZQkJcUsZObCfcqgoK0goucLacZLLryrGDJ6m6D8E74-0itUUI-WCP_f2_PPZfFK85nHMA_Z44yLotQYgSlK5VqZ4UGy51VWrB9dNiA1zpUjWgnhcviK4BoNXQbopf2xh25YJpYrSmG3djPbNjrhlhWFxAz_xhmvcsxAFZ5-JMBxYTs7fOe5sOD08HR4T94mJgLrD5K7AuoaWF9Tb02XG2i8um9IFZNsd59fbIlp0lHBgt63B4WTwbrSd89Wc-K358-vj98nO5_Xb15fJiW_a1hKVUvBkrhbnlkdc2L7mobKOg7oRoUAiQYFE2vBJStDWva9WPXd0NEpRV0EJ1Vrw7-c4p_lyRFjM56jF3FDCuZIQWFZcSmiqjb_5Cr-OaQr5dpiqueJvJe2pnPRoXxrgk2x9NzYUWEmRVNzpT5_-g8hhwcn0MOLq8_0jw9oFgj9Yve4p-Pb4bPQbFCexTJEo4mjm5Kf-P4WCOCTGnhJicEHOXEKOyqDqJKMNhh-m-tf-ofgMOZbxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731619315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zheng, Qiufan ; Luo, Hanjia ; Xia, Wen ; Lu, Qianyi ; Jiang, Kuikui ; Hong, Ruoxi ; Xu, Fei ; Wang, Shusen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qiufan ; Luo, Hanjia ; Xia, Wen ; Lu, Qianyi ; Jiang, Kuikui ; Hong, Ruoxi ; Xu, Fei ; Wang, Shusen</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. Methods We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. Results We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. Conclusion We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer research ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Epidemiology ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022-12, Vol.196 (3), p.613-622</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-618f36e054f14af36123a8604b228e22050ae5813252941446cfb4bd506a60903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-618f36e054f14af36123a8604b228e22050ae5813252941446cfb4bd506a60903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0747-5909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qiufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Hanjia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Qianyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Kuikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Ruoxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shusen</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Purpose Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. Methods We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. Results We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. Conclusion We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEEkvhBThZQkJcUsZObCfcqgoK0goucLacZLLryrGDJ6m6D8E74-0itUUI-WCP_f2_PPZfFK85nHMA_Z44yLotQYgSlK5VqZ4UGy51VWrB9dNiA1zpUjWgnhcviK4BoNXQbopf2xh25YJpYrSmG3djPbNjrhlhWFxAz_xhmvcsxAFZ5-JMBxYTs7fOe5sOD08HR4T94mJgLrD5K7AuoaWF9Tb02XG2i8um9IFZNsd59fbIlp0lHBgt63B4WTwbrSd89Wc-K358-vj98nO5_Xb15fJiW_a1hKVUvBkrhbnlkdc2L7mobKOg7oRoUAiQYFE2vBJStDWva9WPXd0NEpRV0EJ1Vrw7-c4p_lyRFjM56jF3FDCuZIQWFZcSmiqjb_5Cr-OaQr5dpiqueJvJe2pnPRoXxrgk2x9NzYUWEmRVNzpT5_-g8hhwcn0MOLq8_0jw9oFgj9Yve4p-Pb4bPQbFCexTJEo4mjm5Kf-P4WCOCTGnhJicEHOXEKOyqDqJKMNhh-m-tf-ofgMOZbxI</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Zheng, Qiufan</creator><creator>Luo, Hanjia</creator><creator>Xia, Wen</creator><creator>Lu, Qianyi</creator><creator>Jiang, Kuikui</creator><creator>Hong, Ruoxi</creator><creator>Xu, Fei</creator><creator>Wang, Shusen</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-5909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study</title><author>Zheng, Qiufan ; Luo, Hanjia ; Xia, Wen ; Lu, Qianyi ; Jiang, Kuikui ; Hong, Ruoxi ; Xu, Fei ; Wang, Shusen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-618f36e054f14af36123a8604b228e22050ae5813252941446cfb4bd506a60903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qiufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Hanjia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Qianyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Kuikui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Ruoxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shusen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Qiufan</au><au>Luo, Hanjia</au><au>Xia, Wen</au><au>Lu, Qianyi</au><au>Jiang, Kuikui</au><au>Hong, Ruoxi</au><au>Xu, Fei</au><au>Wang, Shusen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>613-622</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Purpose Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. Methods We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. Results We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10–1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. Conclusion We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-5909</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022-12, Vol.196 (3), p.613-622
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2723155083
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Analysis
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer patients
Cancer research
Care and treatment
Clinical trials
Epidemiology
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Patient outcomes
Patients
Population studies
Population-based studies
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Survival
title Long-term survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in pN0 breast cancer patients: a population-based study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A40%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20survival%20after%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20biopsy%20or%20axillary%20lymph%20node%20dissection%20in%20pN0%20breast%20cancer%20patients:%20a%20population-based%20study&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Zheng,%20Qiufan&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=613-622&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-022-06746-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA725053487%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731619315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A725053487&rfr_iscdi=true