Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Background: The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery. Purpose: To perform a systematic re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2023-09, Vol.51 (11), p.3053-3075 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3075 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3053 |
container_title | The American journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Zhao, Di Pan, Jian-ke Lin, Fang-zheng Luo, Ming-hui Liang, Gui-hong Zeng, Ling-feng Huang, He-tao Han, Yan-hong Xu, Nan-jun Yang, Wei-yi Liu, Jun |
description | Background:
The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.
Results:
A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Conclusion:
Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of re |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/03635465221119787 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720932140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03635465221119787</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2720932140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b13b674c17c974da07c289e596d7eb4b22bbfe135f7655c266fb2206735115223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5et-dgku95KsSpUhKrnJZvOltT9qElW6cH_btoKguJlZph53pdhBqFzSkaUKnVFuOQilYIxSmmuMnWABlQIlnAuxSEabOfJFjhGJ96vCCFUyWyAPufWv-KpNqFzHledw3N4t952Ld7Vrl-H3gEeVwEcHrcx2jiYuN5YHQDP7FI30IaImq71IfZDFF_jMX7a-ACNDtbsPOED63aBHyDoRLe63njrT9FRpWsPZ995iF6mN8-Tu2T2eHs_Gc8Sw1MRkpLyUqrUUGVylS40UYZlOYhcLhSUaclYWVZAuaiUFMIwKavYI1JxQWk8CR-iy73v2nVvPfhQNNYbqGvdQtf7gilGcs5oSiJ68Qtddb2L-0Yqk0QIJaPvENE9ZVznvYOqWDvbaLcpKCm2Dyn-PCRqRnuN10v4cf1f8AXi04ql</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860557667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Di ; Pan, Jian-ke ; Lin, Fang-zheng ; Luo, Ming-hui ; Liang, Gui-hong ; Zeng, Ling-feng ; Huang, He-tao ; Han, Yan-hong ; Xu, Nan-jun ; Yang, Wei-yi ; Liu, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Di ; Pan, Jian-ke ; Lin, Fang-zheng ; Luo, Ming-hui ; Liang, Gui-hong ; Zeng, Ling-feng ; Huang, He-tao ; Han, Yan-hong ; Xu, Nan-jun ; Yang, Wei-yi ; Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.
Results:
A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Conclusion:
Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03635465221119787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Ligaments ; Meta-analysis ; Risk factors ; Sports medicine ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2023-09, Vol.51 (11), p.3053-3075</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b13b674c17c974da07c289e596d7eb4b22bbfe135f7655c266fb2206735115223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b13b674c17c974da07c289e596d7eb4b22bbfe135f7655c266fb2206735115223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03635465221119787$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03635465221119787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jian-ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Fang-zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Ming-hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Gui-hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ling-feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, He-tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yan-hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Nan-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background:
The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.
Results:
A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Conclusion:
Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5et-dgku95KsSpUhKrnJZvOltT9qElW6cH_btoKguJlZph53pdhBqFzSkaUKnVFuOQilYIxSmmuMnWABlQIlnAuxSEabOfJFjhGJ96vCCFUyWyAPufWv-KpNqFzHledw3N4t952Ld7Vrl-H3gEeVwEcHrcx2jiYuN5YHQDP7FI30IaImq71IfZDFF_jMX7a-ACNDtbsPOED63aBHyDoRLe63njrT9FRpWsPZ995iF6mN8-Tu2T2eHs_Gc8Sw1MRkpLyUqrUUGVylS40UYZlOYhcLhSUaclYWVZAuaiUFMIwKavYI1JxQWk8CR-iy73v2nVvPfhQNNYbqGvdQtf7gilGcs5oSiJ68Qtddb2L-0Yqk0QIJaPvENE9ZVznvYOqWDvbaLcpKCm2Dyn-PCRqRnuN10v4cf1f8AXi04ql</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Zhao, Di</creator><creator>Pan, Jian-ke</creator><creator>Lin, Fang-zheng</creator><creator>Luo, Ming-hui</creator><creator>Liang, Gui-hong</creator><creator>Zeng, Ling-feng</creator><creator>Huang, He-tao</creator><creator>Han, Yan-hong</creator><creator>Xu, Nan-jun</creator><creator>Yang, Wei-yi</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Zhao, Di ; Pan, Jian-ke ; Lin, Fang-zheng ; Luo, Ming-hui ; Liang, Gui-hong ; Zeng, Ling-feng ; Huang, He-tao ; Han, Yan-hong ; Xu, Nan-jun ; Yang, Wei-yi ; Liu, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-b13b674c17c974da07c289e596d7eb4b22bbfe135f7655c266fb2206735115223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jian-ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Fang-zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Ming-hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Gui-hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Ling-feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, He-tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yan-hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Nan-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Di</au><au>Pan, Jian-ke</au><au>Lin, Fang-zheng</au><au>Luo, Ming-hui</au><au>Liang, Gui-hong</au><au>Zeng, Ling-feng</au><au>Huang, He-tao</au><au>Han, Yan-hong</au><au>Xu, Nan-jun</au><au>Yang, Wei-yi</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3053</spage><epage>3075</epage><pages>3053-3075</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background:
The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.
Results:
A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.
Conclusion:
Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03635465221119787</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5465 |
ispartof | The American journal of sports medicine, 2023-09, Vol.51 (11), p.3053-3075 |
issn | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720932140 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sage Journals |
subjects | Body mass index Ligaments Meta-analysis Risk factors Sports medicine Systematic review |
title | Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Factors%20for%20Revision%20or%20Rerupture%20After%20Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Zhao,%20Di&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3053&rft.epage=3075&rft.pages=3053-3075&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03635465221119787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720932140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860557667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03635465221119787&rfr_iscdi=true |