5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter

Soils harbor more than three times as much carbon (C) as the atmosphere, a large fraction of which (stable organic matter) serves as the most important global C reservoir due to its long residence time. Litter and root inputs bring fresh organic matter (FOM) into the soil and accelerate the turnover...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.260-275
Hauptverfasser: Su, Jiao, Zhang, Haiyang, Han, Xingguo, Lv, Ruofei, Liu, Li, Jiang, Yong, Li, Hui, Kuzyakov, Yakov, Wei, Cunzheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 1
container_start_page 260
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 29
creator Su, Jiao
Zhang, Haiyang
Han, Xingguo
Lv, Ruofei
Liu, Li
Jiang, Yong
Li, Hui
Kuzyakov, Yakov
Wei, Cunzheng
description Soils harbor more than three times as much carbon (C) as the atmosphere, a large fraction of which (stable organic matter) serves as the most important global C reservoir due to its long residence time. Litter and root inputs bring fresh organic matter (FOM) into the soil and accelerate the turnover of stable C pools, and this phenomenon is termed the “priming effect” (PE). Compared with knowledge about labile soil C pools, very little is known about the vulnerability of stable C to priming. Using two soils that substantially differed in age (500 and 5300 years before present) and in the degree of chemical recalcitrance and physical protection of soil organic matter (SOM), we showed that leaf litter amendment primed 264% more organic C from the young SOM than from the old soil with very stable C. Hierarchical partitioning analysis confirmed that SOM stability, reflected mainly by available C and aggregate protection of SOM, is the most important predictor of leaf litter‐induced PE. The addition of complex FOM (i.e., leaf litter) caused a higher bacterial oligotroph/copiotroph (K‐/r‐strategists) ratio, leading to a PE that was 583% and 126% greater than when simple FOM (i.e., glucose) was added to the young and old soils, respectively. This implies that the PE intensity depends on the chemical similarity between the primer (here FOM) and SOM. Nitrogen (N) mining existed when N and simple FOM were added (i.e., Glucose+N), and N addition raised the leaf litter‐induced PE in the old soil that had low N availability, which was well explained by the microbial stoichiometry. In conclusion, the PE induced by FOM inputs strongly decreases with increasing SOM stability. However, the contribution of stable SOM to CO2 efflux cannot be disregarded due to its huge pool size. We compared the vulnerability of stable and labile C to priming by using two soils that substantially differ in age (500 and 5300 years old) and physicochemical properties. We found that the old soil, characterized with more stable and less available C, was less primed than the young soil (a). Moreover, complex FOM addition could stimulate the growth of K‐strategists and induce greater PE compared to that with simple structure (b). N addition also raised PE in the old soils with low N availability (c). Thus, it is necessary to consider SOM stability, the FOM type, and N availability when predicting soil C dynamics under changing environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.16463
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720432928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720432928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-49aab0d8c2a77f49c59b27dfe2cbe2bf179e7df171c4bc2b54357d0d6b602fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgWgpDLwAssQCQ1r_xY5HqKAgkFhgYIpsxymp0rjYiVA3HoFn5ElwSWFAwsu1pU9HvgeAY4zGOJ7J3Ogx5ozTHTDElKcJYRnf3dxTlmCE6QAchLBACFGC-D4YUI5FxqgYgruUIvT5_vFslY_D1QUMrqqhUV67BlYB1jYEuPLV0hawfVENXLuumffK-blqKgOXqm2tPwR7paqDPdrOEXi6vnqc3iT3D7Pb6cV9YijmNGFSKY2KzBAlRMmkSaUmoigtMdoSXWIhbXxigQ3ThuiU0VQUqOCaI1IWmI7AWZ-78u61s6HNl1Uwtq5VY10XciIIYpRIkkV6-ocuXOeb-LuoGJcYSymjOu-V8S4Eb8t8s6_y6xyjfNNwHhvOvxuO9mSb2OlYya_8qTSCSQ_eqtqu_0_KZ9PLPvILVKeFNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2746911999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Su, Jiao ; Zhang, Haiyang ; Han, Xingguo ; Lv, Ruofei ; Liu, Li ; Jiang, Yong ; Li, Hui ; Kuzyakov, Yakov ; Wei, Cunzheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiao ; Zhang, Haiyang ; Han, Xingguo ; Lv, Ruofei ; Liu, Li ; Jiang, Yong ; Li, Hui ; Kuzyakov, Yakov ; Wei, Cunzheng</creatorcontrib><description>Soils harbor more than three times as much carbon (C) as the atmosphere, a large fraction of which (stable organic matter) serves as the most important global C reservoir due to its long residence time. Litter and root inputs bring fresh organic matter (FOM) into the soil and accelerate the turnover of stable C pools, and this phenomenon is termed the “priming effect” (PE). Compared with knowledge about labile soil C pools, very little is known about the vulnerability of stable C to priming. Using two soils that substantially differed in age (500 and 5300 years before present) and in the degree of chemical recalcitrance and physical protection of soil organic matter (SOM), we showed that leaf litter amendment primed 264% more organic C from the young SOM than from the old soil with very stable C. Hierarchical partitioning analysis confirmed that SOM stability, reflected mainly by available C and aggregate protection of SOM, is the most important predictor of leaf litter‐induced PE. The addition of complex FOM (i.e., leaf litter) caused a higher bacterial oligotroph/copiotroph (K‐/r‐strategists) ratio, leading to a PE that was 583% and 126% greater than when simple FOM (i.e., glucose) was added to the young and old soils, respectively. This implies that the PE intensity depends on the chemical similarity between the primer (here FOM) and SOM. Nitrogen (N) mining existed when N and simple FOM were added (i.e., Glucose+N), and N addition raised the leaf litter‐induced PE in the old soil that had low N availability, which was well explained by the microbial stoichiometry. In conclusion, the PE induced by FOM inputs strongly decreases with increasing SOM stability. However, the contribution of stable SOM to CO2 efflux cannot be disregarded due to its huge pool size. We compared the vulnerability of stable and labile C to priming by using two soils that substantially differ in age (500 and 5300 years old) and physicochemical properties. We found that the old soil, characterized with more stable and less available C, was less primed than the young soil (a). Moreover, complex FOM addition could stimulate the growth of K‐strategists and induce greater PE compared to that with simple structure (b). N addition also raised PE in the old soils with low N availability (c). Thus, it is necessary to consider SOM stability, the FOM type, and N availability when predicting soil C dynamics under changing environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16463</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36178437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Availability ; Carbon ; Carbon - analysis ; Carbon dioxide ; chemical complexity ; Chemical fingerprinting ; Efflux ; Glucose ; Leaf litter ; Leaves ; microbial stoichiometry ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; nitrogen mining ; organic carbon stability ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; physical protection ; Pools ; Priming ; priming effect ; Protection ; Residence time ; Soil ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil organic matter ; Soil stability ; Soils ; Stability analysis ; Stoichiometry ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.260-275</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-49aab0d8c2a77f49c59b27dfe2cbe2bf179e7df171c4bc2b54357d0d6b602fd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-49aab0d8c2a77f49c59b27dfe2cbe2bf179e7df171c4bc2b54357d0d6b602fd13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7205-0838 ; 0000-0001-7951-0502 ; 0000-0002-1836-975X ; 0000-0002-9863-8461 ; 0000-0001-5877-1084 ; 0000-0001-9309-2722 ; 0000-0001-7518-5810 ; 0000-0001-5504-5773 ; 0000-0003-3090-2374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16463$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16463$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Ruofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzyakov, Yakov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cunzheng</creatorcontrib><title>5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Soils harbor more than three times as much carbon (C) as the atmosphere, a large fraction of which (stable organic matter) serves as the most important global C reservoir due to its long residence time. Litter and root inputs bring fresh organic matter (FOM) into the soil and accelerate the turnover of stable C pools, and this phenomenon is termed the “priming effect” (PE). Compared with knowledge about labile soil C pools, very little is known about the vulnerability of stable C to priming. Using two soils that substantially differed in age (500 and 5300 years before present) and in the degree of chemical recalcitrance and physical protection of soil organic matter (SOM), we showed that leaf litter amendment primed 264% more organic C from the young SOM than from the old soil with very stable C. Hierarchical partitioning analysis confirmed that SOM stability, reflected mainly by available C and aggregate protection of SOM, is the most important predictor of leaf litter‐induced PE. The addition of complex FOM (i.e., leaf litter) caused a higher bacterial oligotroph/copiotroph (K‐/r‐strategists) ratio, leading to a PE that was 583% and 126% greater than when simple FOM (i.e., glucose) was added to the young and old soils, respectively. This implies that the PE intensity depends on the chemical similarity between the primer (here FOM) and SOM. Nitrogen (N) mining existed when N and simple FOM were added (i.e., Glucose+N), and N addition raised the leaf litter‐induced PE in the old soil that had low N availability, which was well explained by the microbial stoichiometry. In conclusion, the PE induced by FOM inputs strongly decreases with increasing SOM stability. However, the contribution of stable SOM to CO2 efflux cannot be disregarded due to its huge pool size. We compared the vulnerability of stable and labile C to priming by using two soils that substantially differ in age (500 and 5300 years old) and physicochemical properties. We found that the old soil, characterized with more stable and less available C, was less primed than the young soil (a). Moreover, complex FOM addition could stimulate the growth of K‐strategists and induce greater PE compared to that with simple structure (b). N addition also raised PE in the old soils with low N availability (c). Thus, it is necessary to consider SOM stability, the FOM type, and N availability when predicting soil C dynamics under changing environment.</description><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>chemical complexity</subject><subject>Chemical fingerprinting</subject><subject>Efflux</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>microbial stoichiometry</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>nitrogen mining</subject><subject>organic carbon stability</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>physical protection</subject><subject>Pools</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>priming effect</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stoichiometry</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgWgpDLwAssQCQ1r_xY5HqKAgkFhgYIpsxymp0rjYiVA3HoFn5ElwSWFAwsu1pU9HvgeAY4zGOJ7J3Ogx5ozTHTDElKcJYRnf3dxTlmCE6QAchLBACFGC-D4YUI5FxqgYgruUIvT5_vFslY_D1QUMrqqhUV67BlYB1jYEuPLV0hawfVENXLuumffK-blqKgOXqm2tPwR7paqDPdrOEXi6vnqc3iT3D7Pb6cV9YijmNGFSKY2KzBAlRMmkSaUmoigtMdoSXWIhbXxigQ3ThuiU0VQUqOCaI1IWmI7AWZ-78u61s6HNl1Uwtq5VY10XciIIYpRIkkV6-ocuXOeb-LuoGJcYSymjOu-V8S4Eb8t8s6_y6xyjfNNwHhvOvxuO9mSb2OlYya_8qTSCSQ_eqtqu_0_KZ9PLPvILVKeFNA</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Su, Jiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Haiyang</creator><creator>Han, Xingguo</creator><creator>Lv, Ruofei</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><creator>Jiang, Yong</creator><creator>Li, Hui</creator><creator>Kuzyakov, Yakov</creator><creator>Wei, Cunzheng</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7205-0838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7951-0502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-2722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-5773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-2374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter</title><author>Su, Jiao ; Zhang, Haiyang ; Han, Xingguo ; Lv, Ruofei ; Liu, Li ; Jiang, Yong ; Li, Hui ; Kuzyakov, Yakov ; Wei, Cunzheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-49aab0d8c2a77f49c59b27dfe2cbe2bf179e7df171c4bc2b54357d0d6b602fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>chemical complexity</topic><topic>Chemical fingerprinting</topic><topic>Efflux</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>microbial stoichiometry</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>nitrogen mining</topic><topic>organic carbon stability</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>physical protection</topic><topic>Pools</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>priming effect</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stoichiometry</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su, Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Ruofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzyakov, Yakov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cunzheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su, Jiao</au><au>Zhang, Haiyang</au><au>Han, Xingguo</au><au>Lv, Ruofei</au><au>Liu, Li</au><au>Jiang, Yong</au><au>Li, Hui</au><au>Kuzyakov, Yakov</au><au>Wei, Cunzheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>260-275</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Soils harbor more than three times as much carbon (C) as the atmosphere, a large fraction of which (stable organic matter) serves as the most important global C reservoir due to its long residence time. Litter and root inputs bring fresh organic matter (FOM) into the soil and accelerate the turnover of stable C pools, and this phenomenon is termed the “priming effect” (PE). Compared with knowledge about labile soil C pools, very little is known about the vulnerability of stable C to priming. Using two soils that substantially differed in age (500 and 5300 years before present) and in the degree of chemical recalcitrance and physical protection of soil organic matter (SOM), we showed that leaf litter amendment primed 264% more organic C from the young SOM than from the old soil with very stable C. Hierarchical partitioning analysis confirmed that SOM stability, reflected mainly by available C and aggregate protection of SOM, is the most important predictor of leaf litter‐induced PE. The addition of complex FOM (i.e., leaf litter) caused a higher bacterial oligotroph/copiotroph (K‐/r‐strategists) ratio, leading to a PE that was 583% and 126% greater than when simple FOM (i.e., glucose) was added to the young and old soils, respectively. This implies that the PE intensity depends on the chemical similarity between the primer (here FOM) and SOM. Nitrogen (N) mining existed when N and simple FOM were added (i.e., Glucose+N), and N addition raised the leaf litter‐induced PE in the old soil that had low N availability, which was well explained by the microbial stoichiometry. In conclusion, the PE induced by FOM inputs strongly decreases with increasing SOM stability. However, the contribution of stable SOM to CO2 efflux cannot be disregarded due to its huge pool size. We compared the vulnerability of stable and labile C to priming by using two soils that substantially differ in age (500 and 5300 years old) and physicochemical properties. We found that the old soil, characterized with more stable and less available C, was less primed than the young soil (a). Moreover, complex FOM addition could stimulate the growth of K‐strategists and induce greater PE compared to that with simple structure (b). N addition also raised PE in the old soils with low N availability (c). Thus, it is necessary to consider SOM stability, the FOM type, and N availability when predicting soil C dynamics under changing environment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36178437</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16463</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7205-0838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7951-0502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-2722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-5773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-2374</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2023-01, Vol.29 (1), p.260-275
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720432928
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Availability
Carbon
Carbon - analysis
Carbon dioxide
chemical complexity
Chemical fingerprinting
Efflux
Glucose
Leaf litter
Leaves
microbial stoichiometry
Microorganisms
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - analysis
nitrogen mining
organic carbon stability
Organic matter
Organic soils
physical protection
Pools
Priming
priming effect
Protection
Residence time
Soil
Soil Microbiology
Soil organic matter
Soil stability
Soils
Stability analysis
Stoichiometry
Vulnerability
title 5300‐Year‐old soil carbon is less primed than young soil organic matter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T04%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=5300%E2%80%90Year%E2%80%90old%20soil%20carbon%20is%20less%20primed%20than%20young%20soil%20organic%20matter&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Su,%20Jiao&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=260-275&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16463&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720432928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2746911999&rft_id=info:pmid/36178437&rfr_iscdi=true