Commentary: collaborative systematic review may produce and share high-quality, comparative evidence more efficiently

Systematic reviews are necessary to synthesize available evidence and inform clinical practice and health policy decisions. There has been an explosion of evidence available in many fields; this makes it challenging to keep evidence syntheses up to date and useful. Comparative effectiveness systemat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of clinical epidemiology 2022-12, Vol.152, p.288-294
Hauptverfasser:	Hayden, Jill A, Hayden, Jill A., Ogilvie, Rachel, Singh, Sareen, Kashif, Shazia, Hartvigsen, Jan, Maher, Chris G., Furlan, Andrea D., Lasserson, Toby, Tugwell, Peter, van Tulder, Maurits, Qaseem, Amir, Ferreira, Manuela L., Buchbinder, Rachelle, Wieland, L. Susan, de Jesus-Moraleida, Fabianna Resende, Saragiotto, Bruno T., Yamato, Tie Parma, de Zoete, Annemarie, Bülow, Kasper, de Oliveira, Lisandra Almeida, Bejarano, Geronimo, Cancelliere, Carol
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Back pain Clinical medicine Clinical trials Cochrane review Collaboration Collaborative review model Data collection Decision making Effectiveness Evidence synthesis Exercise Health policy Humans Literature reviews Low Back Pain Network meta-analysis Quality control Reviews Synthesis Systematic review Teams
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!