Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data

Recent developments in the neotectonic framework of Turkey introduced new tectonic elements necessitating the reconstruction of Turkey's seismic hazard map. In this regard, 14 seismic source zones were delineated. Maximum earthquake magnitudes for each seismic zones were determined using the fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering geology 2002-03, Vol.63 (3), p.221-232
1. Verfasser: Kayabali, Kamil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 3
container_start_page 221
container_title Engineering geology
container_volume 63
creator Kayabali, Kamil
description Recent developments in the neotectonic framework of Turkey introduced new tectonic elements necessitating the reconstruction of Turkey's seismic hazard map. In this regard, 14 seismic source zones were delineated. Maximum earthquake magnitudes for each seismic zones were determined using the fault rupture length approximation. Regression coefficients of the earthquake magnitude–frequency relationships for the seismic zones were compiled mostly from earlier works. Along with these data, a strong ground motion attenuation relationship developed by Joyner and Boore [Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M., 1988. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2. Recent Advances Ground Motion Evaluation, pp. 43–102.] was utilized to model the seismic hazard for Turkey using the probabilistic approach. For the modeling, the “earthquake location uncertainty” concept was employed. A grid of 5106 points with 0.2° intervals was constituted for the area encompassed by the 25–46°E longitudes and 35–43°N latitudes. For the return periods of 100 and 475 years, the peak horizontal ground acceleration (pga) in bedrock was computed for each grid point. Isoacceleration maps for the return periods of 100 and 475 years were constructed by contouring the pga values at each node.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00082-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27202588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013795201000825</els_id><sourcerecordid>27200972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-28ebf5163b23a89b860b4a997c3a0ad495840550eae0ce340840e4fc382b230e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gtCLoofqJGna9CSy6CqseHA9hzSdutFuuyatsD69qbvoUU_DD98_M3yEHFO4oEDTyycAyuMsF-wM6DkASBaLHTKiMmNxmtNsl4x-kH1y4P3rEAGyEZk-tCXWtnmJ2iryaP3SmmihP7Uro6p10bx3b7iOej8g3QIjhwabLmqw7dB0bRPwUnf6kOxVuvZ4tJ1j8nx7M5_cxbPH6f3kehZrzrMuZhKLStCUF4xrmRcyhSLReZ4ZrkGXSS5kAkIAagSDPIEQMakMlyw0APmYnG72rlz73qPv1NJ6g3Wtw0e9VyxjwISU_wIhz1gAxQY0rvXeYaVWzi61WysKavCrvv2qQZ4Cqr79KhF6J9sD2htdV043xvrfMhfD-3ngrjYcBi0fFp3yxmJjsLTBZafK1v5x6Qtv3o3N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27200972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kayabali, Kamil</creator><creatorcontrib>Kayabali, Kamil</creatorcontrib><description>Recent developments in the neotectonic framework of Turkey introduced new tectonic elements necessitating the reconstruction of Turkey's seismic hazard map. In this regard, 14 seismic source zones were delineated. Maximum earthquake magnitudes for each seismic zones were determined using the fault rupture length approximation. Regression coefficients of the earthquake magnitude–frequency relationships for the seismic zones were compiled mostly from earlier works. Along with these data, a strong ground motion attenuation relationship developed by Joyner and Boore [Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M., 1988. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2. Recent Advances Ground Motion Evaluation, pp. 43–102.] was utilized to model the seismic hazard for Turkey using the probabilistic approach. For the modeling, the “earthquake location uncertainty” concept was employed. A grid of 5106 points with 0.2° intervals was constituted for the area encompassed by the 25–46°E longitudes and 35–43°N latitudes. For the return periods of 100 and 475 years, the peak horizontal ground acceleration (pga) in bedrock was computed for each grid point. Isoacceleration maps for the return periods of 100 and 475 years were constructed by contouring the pga values at each node.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-7952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00082-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EGGOAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Internal geophysics ; Isoacceleration map ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Probabilistic approach ; Return period ; Seismic hazard ; Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics ; Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Engineering geology, 2002-03, Vol.63 (3), p.221-232</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-28ebf5163b23a89b860b4a997c3a0ad495840550eae0ce340840e4fc382b230e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-28ebf5163b23a89b860b4a997c3a0ad495840550eae0ce340840e4fc382b230e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795201000825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13534089$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kayabali, Kamil</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data</title><title>Engineering geology</title><description>Recent developments in the neotectonic framework of Turkey introduced new tectonic elements necessitating the reconstruction of Turkey's seismic hazard map. In this regard, 14 seismic source zones were delineated. Maximum earthquake magnitudes for each seismic zones were determined using the fault rupture length approximation. Regression coefficients of the earthquake magnitude–frequency relationships for the seismic zones were compiled mostly from earlier works. Along with these data, a strong ground motion attenuation relationship developed by Joyner and Boore [Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M., 1988. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2. Recent Advances Ground Motion Evaluation, pp. 43–102.] was utilized to model the seismic hazard for Turkey using the probabilistic approach. For the modeling, the “earthquake location uncertainty” concept was employed. A grid of 5106 points with 0.2° intervals was constituted for the area encompassed by the 25–46°E longitudes and 35–43°N latitudes. For the return periods of 100 and 475 years, the peak horizontal ground acceleration (pga) in bedrock was computed for each grid point. Isoacceleration maps for the return periods of 100 and 475 years were constructed by contouring the pga values at each node.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Isoacceleration map</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Probabilistic approach</subject><subject>Return period</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics</subject><subject>Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>0013-7952</issn><issn>1872-6917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gtCLoofqJGna9CSy6CqseHA9hzSdutFuuyatsD69qbvoUU_DD98_M3yEHFO4oEDTyycAyuMsF-wM6DkASBaLHTKiMmNxmtNsl4x-kH1y4P3rEAGyEZk-tCXWtnmJ2iryaP3SmmihP7Uro6p10bx3b7iOej8g3QIjhwabLmqw7dB0bRPwUnf6kOxVuvZ4tJ1j8nx7M5_cxbPH6f3kehZrzrMuZhKLStCUF4xrmRcyhSLReZ4ZrkGXSS5kAkIAagSDPIEQMakMlyw0APmYnG72rlz73qPv1NJ6g3Wtw0e9VyxjwISU_wIhz1gAxQY0rvXeYaVWzi61WysKavCrvv2qQZ4Cqr79KhF6J9sD2htdV043xvrfMhfD-3ngrjYcBi0fFp3yxmJjsLTBZafK1v5x6Qtv3o3N</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Kayabali, Kamil</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data</title><author>Kayabali, Kamil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-28ebf5163b23a89b860b4a997c3a0ad495840550eae0ce340840e4fc382b230e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Isoacceleration map</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Probabilistic approach</topic><topic>Return period</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics</topic><topic>Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kayabali, Kamil</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kayabali, Kamil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data</atitle><jtitle>Engineering geology</jtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>221-232</pages><issn>0013-7952</issn><eissn>1872-6917</eissn><coden>EGGOAO</coden><abstract>Recent developments in the neotectonic framework of Turkey introduced new tectonic elements necessitating the reconstruction of Turkey's seismic hazard map. In this regard, 14 seismic source zones were delineated. Maximum earthquake magnitudes for each seismic zones were determined using the fault rupture length approximation. Regression coefficients of the earthquake magnitude–frequency relationships for the seismic zones were compiled mostly from earlier works. Along with these data, a strong ground motion attenuation relationship developed by Joyner and Boore [Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M., 1988. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2. Recent Advances Ground Motion Evaluation, pp. 43–102.] was utilized to model the seismic hazard for Turkey using the probabilistic approach. For the modeling, the “earthquake location uncertainty” concept was employed. A grid of 5106 points with 0.2° intervals was constituted for the area encompassed by the 25–46°E longitudes and 35–43°N latitudes. For the return periods of 100 and 475 years, the peak horizontal ground acceleration (pga) in bedrock was computed for each grid point. Isoacceleration maps for the return periods of 100 and 475 years were constructed by contouring the pga values at each node.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00082-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-7952
ispartof Engineering geology, 2002-03, Vol.63 (3), p.221-232
issn 0013-7952
1872-6917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27202588
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquakes, seismology
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Geotechnics
Internal geophysics
Isoacceleration map
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Probabilistic approach
Return period
Seismic hazard
Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics
Tectonics. Structural geology. Plate tectonics
Turkey
title Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20of%20seismic%20hazard%20for%20Turkey%20using%20the%20recent%20neotectonic%20data&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20geology&rft.au=Kayabali,%20Kamil&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=221-232&rft.issn=0013-7952&rft.eissn=1872-6917&rft.coden=EGGOAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00082-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27200972%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27200972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0013795201000825&rfr_iscdi=true