Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles
Landscape profiles describing the pattern of the diversity of wetlands in a region can serve as a standard for characterizing the resource and quantifying the effects of management decisions. We used hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification to generate landscape profiles to evaluate the effects of mitig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 1999-09, Vol.19 (3), p.477-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 489 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Gwin, S.E Kentula, M.E Shaffer, P.W |
description | Landscape profiles describing the pattern of the diversity of wetlands in a region can serve as a standard for characterizing the resource and quantifying the effects of management decisions. We used hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification to generate landscape profiles to evaluate the effects of mitigation in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon, USA. The profiles were produced from information on the types, numbers, and relative abundances of wetlands by HGM class. Using field data, topographic maps, and National Wetland Inventory maps, we classified 45 naturally occurring wetlands (NOWs) into regional HGM classes (depression, riverine, slope, and lacustrine fringe) and developed the corresponding landscape profile (the NOW-Profile). We then classified 51 mitigation wetlands (MWs) and added them to the profile (the All Site-Profile) to examine changes in the regional wetland resource. The classification of MWs required development of new, atypical HGM classes to describe the unique combinations of site morphology and landscape setting found in these wetlands: depression-in-riverine-setting, in-stream-depression, and depression-in-slope-setting. Comparison of the landscape profiles showed that the structure and settings of NOWs and MWs are very different. Most NOWs fell into the regional HGM classes (91%), but most MWs fit the atypical classes (75%). Most NOWs were riverine wetlands (56%), whereas most MWs were depressions-in-riverine-setting and in-stream-depressions (33% for each class). The All Site-Profile showed an increase in the proportion of wetlands with depressional morphology, comprised mostly of MWs. Results also showed that the majority (71%) of MWs were constructed, at least partially, within existing NOWs through an exchange of wetland types and that most of these MWs (86%) belonged to the atypical classes. The approach used shows that the cumulative effects of wetland management decisions can be discerned effectively through HGM classification and development of landscape profiles. Although our results are important in documenting the landscape changes taking place in a specific region through mitigation, our approach is generally applicable for evaluating wetland management decisions and helping resource managers to make better-informed, broad-based decisions about the wetland resource. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03161687 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27199281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27199281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-28eb2af5d9eaf438cefe3c8cb3865849a3df4505694a4495b7b7df79650cb14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKw0AUBuBBFKyXjS9gQHAhROd-WapYFQou1PUwmZxJU9JOnUmUvr0pFQQ3rs7m-8-Fg9AZwdcEY3VzN8WMSCK12kMTYjgrJeVyH00wVaoUlNBDdJTzAmMiKSUTtHj4dN3g-nbVFP0cCggBfJ-LGIov6Du3qosEzdCNIq5GkeLQzIv5pk6xgbiMaT1vfeE7l3MbWr9j29Q2mr1bQ7FOMbQd5BN0EFyX4fSnHqP36cPb_VM5e3l8vr-dlZ4p05dUQ0VdELUBFzjTHgIwr33FtBSaG8fqwAUW0nDHuRGVqlQdlJEC-4pwx47R5a7vOPhjgNzbZZs9dONGEIdsqSLGUE3-hUQxrQzlI7z4AxdxSKvxCEsNxUJLw_SornbKp5hzgmDXqV26tLEE2-137O93Rny-w8FF65rUZvv-SjFhmBqOlVDsG3jTjHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920586938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gwin, S.E ; Kentula, M.E ; Shaffer, P.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Gwin, S.E ; Kentula, M.E ; Shaffer, P.W</creatorcontrib><description>Landscape profiles describing the pattern of the diversity of wetlands in a region can serve as a standard for characterizing the resource and quantifying the effects of management decisions. We used hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification to generate landscape profiles to evaluate the effects of mitigation in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon, USA. The profiles were produced from information on the types, numbers, and relative abundances of wetlands by HGM class. Using field data, topographic maps, and National Wetland Inventory maps, we classified 45 naturally occurring wetlands (NOWs) into regional HGM classes (depression, riverine, slope, and lacustrine fringe) and developed the corresponding landscape profile (the NOW-Profile). We then classified 51 mitigation wetlands (MWs) and added them to the profile (the All Site-Profile) to examine changes in the regional wetland resource. The classification of MWs required development of new, atypical HGM classes to describe the unique combinations of site morphology and landscape setting found in these wetlands: depression-in-riverine-setting, in-stream-depression, and depression-in-slope-setting. Comparison of the landscape profiles showed that the structure and settings of NOWs and MWs are very different. Most NOWs fell into the regional HGM classes (91%), but most MWs fit the atypical classes (75%). Most NOWs were riverine wetlands (56%), whereas most MWs were depressions-in-riverine-setting and in-stream-depressions (33% for each class). The All Site-Profile showed an increase in the proportion of wetlands with depressional morphology, comprised mostly of MWs. Results also showed that the majority (71%) of MWs were constructed, at least partially, within existing NOWs through an exchange of wetland types and that most of these MWs (86%) belonged to the atypical classes. The approach used shows that the cumulative effects of wetland management decisions can be discerned effectively through HGM classification and development of landscape profiles. Although our results are important in documenting the landscape changes taking place in a specific region through mitigation, our approach is generally applicable for evaluating wetland management decisions and helping resource managers to make better-informed, broad-based decisions about the wetland resource.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03161687</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Brackish ; Classification ; Decisions ; Evaluation ; Freshwater ; Geologic depressions ; geomorphology ; landscape analysis ; laws and regulations ; Management decisions ; Marine ; Morphology ; Regional development ; Topographic mapping ; Topographic maps ; USA, Oregon, Portland ; Wetland management ; wetland mitigation ; wetland restoration ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 1999-09, Vol.19 (3), p.477-489</ispartof><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 1999.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-28eb2af5d9eaf438cefe3c8cb3865849a3df4505694a4495b7b7df79650cb14a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-28eb2af5d9eaf438cefe3c8cb3865849a3df4505694a4495b7b7df79650cb14a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920586938?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gwin, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentula, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, P.W</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>Landscape profiles describing the pattern of the diversity of wetlands in a region can serve as a standard for characterizing the resource and quantifying the effects of management decisions. We used hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification to generate landscape profiles to evaluate the effects of mitigation in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon, USA. The profiles were produced from information on the types, numbers, and relative abundances of wetlands by HGM class. Using field data, topographic maps, and National Wetland Inventory maps, we classified 45 naturally occurring wetlands (NOWs) into regional HGM classes (depression, riverine, slope, and lacustrine fringe) and developed the corresponding landscape profile (the NOW-Profile). We then classified 51 mitigation wetlands (MWs) and added them to the profile (the All Site-Profile) to examine changes in the regional wetland resource. The classification of MWs required development of new, atypical HGM classes to describe the unique combinations of site morphology and landscape setting found in these wetlands: depression-in-riverine-setting, in-stream-depression, and depression-in-slope-setting. Comparison of the landscape profiles showed that the structure and settings of NOWs and MWs are very different. Most NOWs fell into the regional HGM classes (91%), but most MWs fit the atypical classes (75%). Most NOWs were riverine wetlands (56%), whereas most MWs were depressions-in-riverine-setting and in-stream-depressions (33% for each class). The All Site-Profile showed an increase in the proportion of wetlands with depressional morphology, comprised mostly of MWs. Results also showed that the majority (71%) of MWs were constructed, at least partially, within existing NOWs through an exchange of wetland types and that most of these MWs (86%) belonged to the atypical classes. The approach used shows that the cumulative effects of wetland management decisions can be discerned effectively through HGM classification and development of landscape profiles. Although our results are important in documenting the landscape changes taking place in a specific region through mitigation, our approach is generally applicable for evaluating wetland management decisions and helping resource managers to make better-informed, broad-based decisions about the wetland resource.</description><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geologic depressions</subject><subject>geomorphology</subject><subject>landscape analysis</subject><subject>laws and regulations</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Topographic mapping</subject><subject>Topographic maps</subject><subject>USA, Oregon, Portland</subject><subject>Wetland management</subject><subject>wetland mitigation</subject><subject>wetland restoration</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKw0AUBuBBFKyXjS9gQHAhROd-WapYFQou1PUwmZxJU9JOnUmUvr0pFQQ3rs7m-8-Fg9AZwdcEY3VzN8WMSCK12kMTYjgrJeVyH00wVaoUlNBDdJTzAmMiKSUTtHj4dN3g-nbVFP0cCggBfJ-LGIov6Du3qosEzdCNIq5GkeLQzIv5pk6xgbiMaT1vfeE7l3MbWr9j29Q2mr1bQ7FOMbQd5BN0EFyX4fSnHqP36cPb_VM5e3l8vr-dlZ4p05dUQ0VdELUBFzjTHgIwr33FtBSaG8fqwAUW0nDHuRGVqlQdlJEC-4pwx47R5a7vOPhjgNzbZZs9dONGEIdsqSLGUE3-hUQxrQzlI7z4AxdxSKvxCEsNxUJLw_SornbKp5hzgmDXqV26tLEE2-137O93Rny-w8FF65rUZvv-SjFhmBqOlVDsG3jTjHQ</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Gwin, S.E</creator><creator>Kentula, M.E</creator><creator>Shaffer, P.W</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles</title><author>Gwin, S.E ; Kentula, M.E ; Shaffer, P.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-28eb2af5d9eaf438cefe3c8cb3865849a3df4505694a4495b7b7df79650cb14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geologic depressions</topic><topic>geomorphology</topic><topic>landscape analysis</topic><topic>laws and regulations</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Topographic mapping</topic><topic>Topographic maps</topic><topic>USA, Oregon, Portland</topic><topic>Wetland management</topic><topic>wetland mitigation</topic><topic>wetland restoration</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gwin, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentula, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, P.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gwin, S.E</au><au>Kentula, M.E</au><au>Shaffer, P.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>477-489</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Landscape profiles describing the pattern of the diversity of wetlands in a region can serve as a standard for characterizing the resource and quantifying the effects of management decisions. We used hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification to generate landscape profiles to evaluate the effects of mitigation in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon, USA. The profiles were produced from information on the types, numbers, and relative abundances of wetlands by HGM class. Using field data, topographic maps, and National Wetland Inventory maps, we classified 45 naturally occurring wetlands (NOWs) into regional HGM classes (depression, riverine, slope, and lacustrine fringe) and developed the corresponding landscape profile (the NOW-Profile). We then classified 51 mitigation wetlands (MWs) and added them to the profile (the All Site-Profile) to examine changes in the regional wetland resource. The classification of MWs required development of new, atypical HGM classes to describe the unique combinations of site morphology and landscape setting found in these wetlands: depression-in-riverine-setting, in-stream-depression, and depression-in-slope-setting. Comparison of the landscape profiles showed that the structure and settings of NOWs and MWs are very different. Most NOWs fell into the regional HGM classes (91%), but most MWs fit the atypical classes (75%). Most NOWs were riverine wetlands (56%), whereas most MWs were depressions-in-riverine-setting and in-stream-depressions (33% for each class). The All Site-Profile showed an increase in the proportion of wetlands with depressional morphology, comprised mostly of MWs. Results also showed that the majority (71%) of MWs were constructed, at least partially, within existing NOWs through an exchange of wetland types and that most of these MWs (86%) belonged to the atypical classes. The approach used shows that the cumulative effects of wetland management decisions can be discerned effectively through HGM classification and development of landscape profiles. Although our results are important in documenting the landscape changes taking place in a specific region through mitigation, our approach is generally applicable for evaluating wetland management decisions and helping resource managers to make better-informed, broad-based decisions about the wetland resource.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03161687</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-5212 |
ispartof | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 1999-09, Vol.19 (3), p.477-489 |
issn | 0277-5212 1943-6246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27199281 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Brackish Classification Decisions Evaluation Freshwater Geologic depressions geomorphology landscape analysis laws and regulations Management decisions Marine Morphology Regional development Topographic mapping Topographic maps USA, Oregon, Portland Wetland management wetland mitigation wetland restoration Wetlands |
title | Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effects%20of%20wetland%20regulation%20through%20hydrogeomorphic%20classification%20and%20landscape%20profiles&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Gwin,%20S.E&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=477-489&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03161687&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27199281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920586938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |