Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has potential antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We compared the safety and efficacy of iNO administered in two concentrations in addition to standard supportive treatment (SST) compared with SST...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2023-02, Vol.20 (2), p.236-244
Hauptverfasser: Goldbart, Aviv, Lavie, Moran, Lubetzky, Ronit, Pillar, Giora, Landau, Daniel, Schlesinger, Yechiel, Spiegel, Ronen, Golan-Tripto, Inbal, Nahum, Amit, Greenberg, David, Tal, Asher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 2
container_start_page 236
container_title Annals of the American Thoracic Society
container_volume 20
creator Goldbart, Aviv
Lavie, Moran
Lubetzky, Ronit
Pillar, Giora
Landau, Daniel
Schlesinger, Yechiel
Spiegel, Ronen
Golan-Tripto, Inbal
Nahum, Amit
Greenberg, David
Tal, Asher
description Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has potential antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We compared the safety and efficacy of iNO administered in two concentrations in addition to standard supportive treatment (SST) compared with SST alone with the aim of improving clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study, 89 infants hospitalized with moderate to severe bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: 150 ppm NO plus SST (group 1), 85 ppm NO plus SST (group 2), and the control treatment (O /air plus SST) (group 3). Treatment was given for 40 minutes, four times each day, for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to reach "fit for discharge." This was a composite endpoint composed of both reaching a sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air and reaching a clinical score ⩽5. Secondary endpoints included time to reach sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air, time to clinical score ⩽5, and time to hospital discharge. Safety was assessed by the number of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs. Time-to-event efficacy outcomes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard ratios (HR) describe how many times more likely an individual is to experience an event, if such an individual receives NO rather than the control treatment during the observational period. Group 1 demonstrated significant efficacy for time to reach fit to discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.11;  = 0.041) and 3 (HR, 2.32;  = 0.049). Group 1 also demonstrated significant efficacy for time to hospital discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.01;  = 0.046) and 3 (HR, 2.28;  = 0.043). No significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 for either endpoint. There were no differences between treatment groups in time to reach a clinical score ⩽5. The iNO therapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Treatment with high-dose intermittent iNO at 150 ppm showed reduced time to clinical improvement compared with 85 ppm or control treatment of hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. The 150-ppm iNO dose is well tolerated, with significant benefit compared with both standard therapy and 85 ppm iNO, improving respiratory outcomes and reducing length of stay. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04060979).
doi_str_mv 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-348OC
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718963189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773339919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5d2f7eaf6bc7ec16d796d4d40283a05cd1ae9ecda2c5fb2745ed381dea6244c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KVBDwCshSL1wCsZ04cW8hpYAEXYnuPfLaE62RYy-2U0FfoS9dLwsc8GE8h28-2fMjdErKc1ITdtE5J23slr_PaUlJyQpWtYv-CzqkjNYF55Tsvfai4IKxA3QS42OZT1uTthFf0QHjhAvBm0P079atpQWNf5kUjMKLZ6MBjz7gtAa8DCDTBC5hP-JOzQnwZfBOrY23Jpn4HXf4frbJqMxAwA_SaT-Zv9nXe5eCt1t1b40zStqsM7kmj6_-SDvLbPvhI-AHiBvvIhyj_TH_C07e7iO0_Hm17G-Ku8X1bd_dFYoxkYpa07EBOfKVakARrhvBdaWrkrZMlrXSRIIApSVV9biiTVWDZi3RIDmtKsWO0NlOuwn-aYaYhslEBdZKB36OA21IKzjLJaPfPqGPfg7b5WeqYfk5gmwpvqNU8DEGGIdNMJMMLwMph21gw0dgwy6w4TWwPHj6pp9XE-iPsfd42H-1EZVy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773339919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Thoracic Society Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goldbart, Aviv ; Lavie, Moran ; Lubetzky, Ronit ; Pillar, Giora ; Landau, Daniel ; Schlesinger, Yechiel ; Spiegel, Ronen ; Golan-Tripto, Inbal ; Nahum, Amit ; Greenberg, David ; Tal, Asher</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldbart, Aviv ; Lavie, Moran ; Lubetzky, Ronit ; Pillar, Giora ; Landau, Daniel ; Schlesinger, Yechiel ; Spiegel, Ronen ; Golan-Tripto, Inbal ; Nahum, Amit ; Greenberg, David ; Tal, Asher</creatorcontrib><description>Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has potential antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We compared the safety and efficacy of iNO administered in two concentrations in addition to standard supportive treatment (SST) compared with SST alone with the aim of improving clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study, 89 infants hospitalized with moderate to severe bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: 150 ppm NO plus SST (group 1), 85 ppm NO plus SST (group 2), and the control treatment (O /air plus SST) (group 3). Treatment was given for 40 minutes, four times each day, for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to reach "fit for discharge." This was a composite endpoint composed of both reaching a sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air and reaching a clinical score ⩽5. Secondary endpoints included time to reach sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air, time to clinical score ⩽5, and time to hospital discharge. Safety was assessed by the number of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs. Time-to-event efficacy outcomes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard ratios (HR) describe how many times more likely an individual is to experience an event, if such an individual receives NO rather than the control treatment during the observational period. Group 1 demonstrated significant efficacy for time to reach fit to discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.11;  = 0.041) and 3 (HR, 2.32;  = 0.049). Group 1 also demonstrated significant efficacy for time to hospital discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.01;  = 0.046) and 3 (HR, 2.28;  = 0.043). No significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 for either endpoint. There were no differences between treatment groups in time to reach a clinical score ⩽5. The iNO therapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Treatment with high-dose intermittent iNO at 150 ppm showed reduced time to clinical improvement compared with 85 ppm or control treatment of hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. The 150-ppm iNO dose is well tolerated, with significant benefit compared with both standard therapy and 85 ppm iNO, improving respiratory outcomes and reducing length of stay. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04060979).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-6621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-348OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36169967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Babies ; Bronchiolitis - drug therapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Humans ; Infant ; Lung diseases ; Medical treatment ; Nitric Oxide ; Patient Discharge ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2023-02, Vol.20 (2), p.236-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Thoracic Society Feb 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5d2f7eaf6bc7ec16d796d4d40283a05cd1ae9ecda2c5fb2745ed381dea6244c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5d2f7eaf6bc7ec16d796d4d40283a05cd1ae9ecda2c5fb2745ed381dea6244c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5670-8804 ; 0000-0001-6259-405X ; 0000-0002-7063-4653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldbart, Aviv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavie, Moran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubetzky, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, Giora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, Yechiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Ronen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan-Tripto, Inbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahum, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Asher</creatorcontrib><title>Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response</title><title>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</title><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><description>Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has potential antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We compared the safety and efficacy of iNO administered in two concentrations in addition to standard supportive treatment (SST) compared with SST alone with the aim of improving clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study, 89 infants hospitalized with moderate to severe bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: 150 ppm NO plus SST (group 1), 85 ppm NO plus SST (group 2), and the control treatment (O /air plus SST) (group 3). Treatment was given for 40 minutes, four times each day, for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to reach "fit for discharge." This was a composite endpoint composed of both reaching a sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air and reaching a clinical score ⩽5. Secondary endpoints included time to reach sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air, time to clinical score ⩽5, and time to hospital discharge. Safety was assessed by the number of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs. Time-to-event efficacy outcomes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard ratios (HR) describe how many times more likely an individual is to experience an event, if such an individual receives NO rather than the control treatment during the observational period. Group 1 demonstrated significant efficacy for time to reach fit to discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.11;  = 0.041) and 3 (HR, 2.32;  = 0.049). Group 1 also demonstrated significant efficacy for time to hospital discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.01;  = 0.046) and 3 (HR, 2.28;  = 0.043). No significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 for either endpoint. There were no differences between treatment groups in time to reach a clinical score ⩽5. The iNO therapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Treatment with high-dose intermittent iNO at 150 ppm showed reduced time to clinical improvement compared with 85 ppm or control treatment of hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. The 150-ppm iNO dose is well tolerated, with significant benefit compared with both standard therapy and 85 ppm iNO, improving respiratory outcomes and reducing length of stay. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04060979).</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Bronchiolitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>2329-6933</issn><issn>2325-6621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KVBDwCshSL1wCsZ04cW8hpYAEXYnuPfLaE62RYy-2U0FfoS9dLwsc8GE8h28-2fMjdErKc1ITdtE5J23slr_PaUlJyQpWtYv-CzqkjNYF55Tsvfai4IKxA3QS42OZT1uTthFf0QHjhAvBm0P079atpQWNf5kUjMKLZ6MBjz7gtAa8DCDTBC5hP-JOzQnwZfBOrY23Jpn4HXf4frbJqMxAwA_SaT-Zv9nXe5eCt1t1b40zStqsM7kmj6_-SDvLbPvhI-AHiBvvIhyj_TH_C07e7iO0_Hm17G-Ku8X1bd_dFYoxkYpa07EBOfKVakARrhvBdaWrkrZMlrXSRIIApSVV9biiTVWDZi3RIDmtKsWO0NlOuwn-aYaYhslEBdZKB36OA21IKzjLJaPfPqGPfg7b5WeqYfk5gmwpvqNU8DEGGIdNMJMMLwMph21gw0dgwy6w4TWwPHj6pp9XE-iPsfd42H-1EZVy</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Goldbart, Aviv</creator><creator>Lavie, Moran</creator><creator>Lubetzky, Ronit</creator><creator>Pillar, Giora</creator><creator>Landau, Daniel</creator><creator>Schlesinger, Yechiel</creator><creator>Spiegel, Ronen</creator><creator>Golan-Tripto, Inbal</creator><creator>Nahum, Amit</creator><creator>Greenberg, David</creator><creator>Tal, Asher</creator><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-405X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-4653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response</title><author>Goldbart, Aviv ; Lavie, Moran ; Lubetzky, Ronit ; Pillar, Giora ; Landau, Daniel ; Schlesinger, Yechiel ; Spiegel, Ronen ; Golan-Tripto, Inbal ; Nahum, Amit ; Greenberg, David ; Tal, Asher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5d2f7eaf6bc7ec16d796d4d40283a05cd1ae9ecda2c5fb2745ed381dea6244c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Bronchiolitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldbart, Aviv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavie, Moran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubetzky, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, Giora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, Yechiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Ronen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan-Tripto, Inbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahum, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Asher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldbart, Aviv</au><au>Lavie, Moran</au><au>Lubetzky, Ronit</au><au>Pillar, Giora</au><au>Landau, Daniel</au><au>Schlesinger, Yechiel</au><au>Spiegel, Ronen</au><au>Golan-Tripto, Inbal</au><au>Nahum, Amit</au><au>Greenberg, David</au><au>Tal, Asher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>236-244</pages><issn>2329-6933</issn><eissn>2325-6621</eissn><abstract>Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has potential antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral properties for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We compared the safety and efficacy of iNO administered in two concentrations in addition to standard supportive treatment (SST) compared with SST alone with the aim of improving clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study, 89 infants hospitalized with moderate to severe bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: 150 ppm NO plus SST (group 1), 85 ppm NO plus SST (group 2), and the control treatment (O /air plus SST) (group 3). Treatment was given for 40 minutes, four times each day, for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to reach "fit for discharge." This was a composite endpoint composed of both reaching a sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air and reaching a clinical score ⩽5. Secondary endpoints included time to reach sustained oxygen saturation ≥92% on room air, time to clinical score ⩽5, and time to hospital discharge. Safety was assessed by the number of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs. Time-to-event efficacy outcomes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard ratios (HR) describe how many times more likely an individual is to experience an event, if such an individual receives NO rather than the control treatment during the observational period. Group 1 demonstrated significant efficacy for time to reach fit to discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.11;  = 0.041) and 3 (HR, 2.32;  = 0.049). Group 1 also demonstrated significant efficacy for time to hospital discharge compared with groups 2 (HR, 2.01;  = 0.046) and 3 (HR, 2.28;  = 0.043). No significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 for either endpoint. There were no differences between treatment groups in time to reach a clinical score ⩽5. The iNO therapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Treatment with high-dose intermittent iNO at 150 ppm showed reduced time to clinical improvement compared with 85 ppm or control treatment of hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. The 150-ppm iNO dose is well tolerated, with significant benefit compared with both standard therapy and 85 ppm iNO, improving respiratory outcomes and reducing length of stay. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04060979).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>36169967</pmid><doi>10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-348OC</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-405X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-4653</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-6933
ispartof Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2023-02, Vol.20 (2), p.236-244
issn 2329-6933
2325-6621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718963189
source MEDLINE; American Thoracic Society Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Babies
Bronchiolitis - drug therapy
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Humans
Infant
Lung diseases
Medical treatment
Nitric Oxide
Patient Discharge
Prospective Studies
title Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dose Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhaled%20Nitric%20Oxide%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Acute%20Bronchiolitis:%20A%20Multicenter%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Clinical%20Trial%20to%20Evaluate%20Dose%20Response&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Thoracic%20Society&rft.au=Goldbart,%20Aviv&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=236-244&rft.issn=2329-6933&rft.eissn=2325-6621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-348OC&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773339919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773339919&rft_id=info:pmid/36169967&rfr_iscdi=true